-
Progress in Lipid Research Oct 2016Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, might be involved in the regulation of blood lipid concentration variability and may thereby... (Review)
Review
Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, might be involved in the regulation of blood lipid concentration variability and may thereby affect cardiovascular health. We aimed to systematically review studies investigating the association between epigenetic marks and plasma concentrations of triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Six medical databases were searched until September 3rd 2015, reference lists were screened, and experts in the field were contacted. Of the 757 identified references, 31 articles reporting on 23 unique studies met all inclusion criteria. These studies included data on 8027 unique participants. Overall, no consistent associations were observed between global DNA methylation and blood lipids. Candidate gene and epigenome-wide association studies reported epigenetic regulation of several genes to be related with blood lipids, of which results for ABCG1, CPT1A, TNNT1, MIR33B, SREBF1, and TNIP were replicated. To date, no studies have been performed on histone modification in relation to blood lipids. To conclude, promising results have been reported in the field of epigenetics and dyslipidaemia, however, further rigorous studies are needed to expand our understanding on the role of epigenetics in regulating human's blood lipid levels and its effects on health and disease.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1; Carrier Proteins; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; DNA Methylation; Dyslipidemias; Epigenomics; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Membrane Glycoproteins; Niemann-Pick C1 Protein; Triglycerides
PubMed: 27746199
DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.10.002 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) May 2022We aim to evaluate the impacts of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2), glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist (GLP-1RAs), and dipeptidyl peptidase-four (DPP4)... (Review)
Review
AIM
We aim to evaluate the impacts of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2), glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist (GLP-1RAs), and dipeptidyl peptidase-four (DPP4) inhibitors on the levels of high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglyceride and total cholesterol.
METHODS
The MEDLINE database was searched from inception till October 2021, for randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter two inhibitors (SGLT-2), glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist (GLP-1RAs), and dipeptidyl peptidase-four (DPP4) inhibitors on lipid levels.
RESULTS
A total of 57 trials were included in the analysis. Our pooled analysis demonstrates that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly increase the levels of HDL (WMD = 0.07 mg/dL [0.06 to 0.08], P < 0.00001). SGLT-2 inhibitors were also found to be significantly associated with an increase in the levels of LDL (WMD = 0.11 mg/dL, [0.09-0.13 mg/dL, P < 0.00001). Pooled analysis also demonstrates that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduce the levels of triglyceride (WMD = -0.10 mg/dL, [-0.13 to -0.06], P < 0.00001). Our pooled analysis demonstrates that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly increased the levels of total cholesterol (WMD = 0.10 mg/dL, [0.06 to 0.15], P < 0.0001), whereas, GLP-1RAs significantly reduced the levels of total cholestrol (WMD = -0.18 mg/dL, [-0.34 to -0.02], P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION
This is the first head-to-head study comparing the effects of 3-novel glucose-lowering agents to lipid parameters. However, more trials are crucial to better understand the impact of glucose-lowering drugs on lipid parameters.
PubMed: 35637990
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103633 -
Cardiovascular Diabetology Feb 2024The 2022 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) cardiorenal guideline provided clinical recommendations on sodium-glucose co-transport 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The 2022 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) cardiorenal guideline provided clinical recommendations on sodium-glucose co-transport 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) use. Since then, additional trials of relevance for SGLT2i have been published. This update re-evaluates the clinical recommendations for using SGLTi and their indirect comparison with existing evidence on GLP-1RA as compared to the standard of care to reduce cardiorenal morbidity and mortality.
METHODS
We updated our existing search and screening of the literature from September 2021 to April 2023 for randomized controlled trials of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA with placebo control. We conducted risk of bias assessment, data extraction and updated our meta-analysis of studies with similar interventions and components. The certainty of the evidence was determined using GRADE.
RESULTS
Evidence from three new trials and additional results from an updated existing trial on SGLT2i met our inclusion criteria after an updated search. Across all the included studies, the total sample size was 151,023 adults, with 90,943 in SGLT2i trials and 60,080 in GLP-1 RA trials. The mean age ranged from 59.9 to 68.4 years. Compared with standard care, the use of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA showed significant reductions in the outcomes of cardiovascular (CV) mortality (14% & 13%), any-cause mortality (12% & 12%), major adverse CV events (MACE) (11% & 14%), heart failure (HF) hospitalization (30% & 9%), CV death or HF hospitalization (23% & 11%), and kidney composite outcome (32% & 22%). In participants with T2D, both classes demonstrated significant cardiorenal protection. But, only GLP-1RA showed a reduction in non-fatal stroke (16%) and only SGLT2i showed a reduction in HF hospitalization (30%) in this population of people living with T2D.
CONCLUSIONS
This updated and comprehensive meta-analysis substantiates and strengthens the clinical recommendations of the CCS cardiorenal guidelines.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Humans; Middle Aged; Canada; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Hypoglycemic Agents; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 38360604
DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02154-w -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Jul 2024To evaluate the efficacy and cardiovascular outcomes of combination pioglitazone with either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or a sodium-glucose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effect of combination pioglitazone with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and real-world study from an international federated database.
AIMS
To evaluate the efficacy and cardiovascular outcomes of combination pioglitazone with either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by conducting a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of a large international real-world database.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science to identify relevant articles for inclusion (PROSPERO [CRD: 42023483126]). Nineteen studies assessing pioglitazone + SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs versus controls were identified, 16 of which were randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane-endorsed tools and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. We additionally performed a retrospective cohort study of all individuals aged 18 years or over with T2D, using the TriNetX platform. We included propensity-score-matched individuals who were treated for at least 1 year with pioglitazone and a GLP-1RA or pioglitazone and an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared against GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and composite stroke and transient ischaemic attack.
RESULTS
The average follow-up in the included studies ranged from 24 to 52 weeks. Combination of pioglitazone with a GLP-1RA reduced glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight greater than in controls: mean differences -1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.27, -0.74) and -1.19 kg (95% CI -1.80, -0.58), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mortality between groups: mean difference - 1.56 mmHg (95% CI -4.48, 1.35; p = 0.30) and relative risk (RR) 0.29 (95% CI 0.07-1.15; p = 0.08), respectively. Combination of pioglitazone with SGLT2 inhibitors reduced HbA1c, weight and SBP to a greater extent than control treatment: mean differences -0.48% (95% CI -0.67, -0.28), -2.3 kg (95% CI -2.72, -1.88) and -2.4 mmHg (95% CI -4.1, -0.7; p = 0.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.81, 95% CI 0.30-10.97; p = 0.52). The included trials demonstrated a reduction in risk of heart failure with combination treatment. Similarly, from the real-world database (n = 25 230 identified), pioglitazone and SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy was associated with reduced risk of heart failure compared to monotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.65; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Both our systematic review/meta-analysis and the real-world dataset show that combination of pioglitazone with either GLP-1RAs or SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with increased weight loss and reduced risk of heart failure compared with monotherapy.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Pioglitazone; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Hypoglycemic Agents; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Drug Therapy, Combination; Treatment Outcome; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Databases, Factual; Glycated Hemoglobin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
PubMed: 38558280
DOI: 10.1111/dom.15576 -
American Journal of Therapeutics 2020Since the discovery of insulin, it was the only drug available for the treatment of diabetes until the development of sulfonylureas and biguanides 50 years later. But...
BACKGROUND
Since the discovery of insulin, it was the only drug available for the treatment of diabetes until the development of sulfonylureas and biguanides 50 years later. But even with the availability of oral glucose-lowering drugs, insulin supplementation was often needed to achieve good glucose control in type 2 diabetes. Insulin NPH became the basal insulin therapy of choice and adding NPH to metformin and/or sulfonylureas became the standard of care until basal insulin analogs were developed and new glucose-lowering drugs became available.
AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY
The advantages in cost-benefit of insulin analogs and their combination with new glucose-lowering drugs are still a matter of debate. There is no general agreement on how to avoid inertia by prescribing insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes when really needed, as reflected by the diversity of recommendations in the current clinical practice guidelines.
DATA SOURCES
When necessary for this review, a systematic search of the evidence was done in PubMed and Cochrane databases.
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES
Adding new oral glucose-lowering drugs to insulin such as DPP-4 inhibitors lead to a modest HbA1c reduction without weight gain and no increase in hypoglycemia. When SGLT-2 inhibitors are added instead, there is a slightly higher HbA1c reduction, but with body weight and blood pressure reduction. The downside is the increase in genital tract infections. GLP-1 receptor agonists have become the best alternative when basal insulin fails, particularly using fixed ratio combinations. Rapid-acting insulins via the inhaled route may also become an alternative for insulin supplementation and/or intensification. "Smart insulins" are under investigation and may become available for clinical use in the near future.
CONCLUSIONS
Aggressive weight loss strategies together with the new glucose-lowering drugs which do not cause hypoglycemia nor weight gain should limit the number of patients with type 2 diabetes needing insulin. Nevertheless, because of therapeutic inertia and the progressive nature of the disease, many need at least a basal insulin supplementation and insulin analogs are the best choice as they become more affordable. Fixed ratio combinations with GLP1 receptor agonists are a good choice for intensification of insulin therapy.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 31567175
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001088 -
International Urology and Nephrology Nov 2016Lithium is an essential treatment in bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant depression; however, its use has been limited by concerns regarding its renal adverse... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Lithium is an essential treatment in bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant depression; however, its use has been limited by concerns regarding its renal adverse effects. An improved understanding of potential molecular mechanisms can help develop prevention and treatment strategies for lithium-associated renal disease.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and PsychINFO including English-language original research articles published prior to November 2015 that specifically investigated lithium's effects on nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), using molecular markers.
RESULTS
From a total of 3510 records, 71 pre-clinical studies and two relevant clinical studies were identified. Molecular alterations were reported in calcium signaling, inositol monophosphate, extracellular-regulated, prostaglandin, sodium/solute transport, G-protein-coupled receptors, nitric oxide, vasopressin/aquaporin, and inflammation-related pathways in lithium-associated renal disease. The majority of studies found that these mechanisms were implicated in NDI, while few studies had examined CKD.
DISCUSSION
Future studies will have to focus on (1) validating the present findings in human subjects and (2) examining CKD, which is the most clinically relevant lithium-associated renal effect. This will improve our understanding of lithium's biological effects, as well as inform a personalized medicine approach, which could lead to safer lithium prescribing and less renal adverse events.
Topics: Animals; Aquaporins; Calcium; Diabetes Insipidus, Nephrogenic; Humans; Lithium; Prostaglandins; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Signal Transduction; Sodium; Symporters; Vasopressins
PubMed: 27357223
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1352-6 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022This study aimed to assess the impact of different antidiabetic agents on individuals with diabetes and COVID-19. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
This study aimed to assess the impact of different antidiabetic agents on individuals with diabetes and COVID-19.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to October 31, 2021 and included seven antidiabetic agents. The data were pooled traditional pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The pairwise meta-analysis included 35 studies. Metformin (odds ratio (OR), 0.74; P=0.001), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) (OR, 0.88; P=0.04), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) (OR, 0.82; P=0.001), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) (OR, 0.91; P=0.02) treatment were associated with lower COVID-19 mortality in individuals with diabetes compared to respective non-users. However, insulin treatment resulted in higher mortality (OR, 1.8; P=0.001). Mortality did not significantly differ in sulfonylurea (OR, 0.97; P=0.56) and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) (OR, 1.00; P=0.96) users. Furthermore, due to limited data, we analyzed five antidiabetic agents (metformin, DPP4i, sulfonylurea, insulin, and SGLT2i) and found no association between them and severe disease risk (all P>0.05). The Bayesian network meta-analysis included 18 studies. GLP1RA and SGLT2i had the highest first and second rank probability (67.3% and 62.5%, respectively). Insulin showed the maximum probability of ranking seventh (97.0%). Metformin had the third and fourth highest rank probability of 44.8% and 38.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, DPP4i had the fifth-highest rank probability of 42.4%, followed by sulfonylurea at 45.1%.
CONCLUSION
Metformin, DPP4i, SGLT2i, and GLP1RA treatments were highly possible to reduced COVID-19 mortality risk in individuals with diabetes, while insulin might be related to increased mortality risk. Sulfonylurea and TZDs treatments were not associated with mortality. None of the antidiabetic agents studied were associated with the risk of severe disease. Additionally, GLP1RA probably had the most significant protective effect against death, followed by SGLT2i and metformin.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42021288200).
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Metformin; Network Meta-Analysis; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 35692410
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.895458 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024The benefit of first-line use of sodium-dependent glucose transport 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in type 2 diabetes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
First-line treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetic population at low risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The benefit of first-line use of sodium-dependent glucose transport 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with low risk of cardiovascular diseases are not clear.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. We used the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the dichotomous and continuous variable, respectively.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies involving 2,885 T2DM at low risk of cardiovascular diseases were included. Compared to placebo, first line use of SGLT2i significantly reduced glycosylated hemoglobin type A1C (HbA1c) (MD: -0.72), weight (MD: -1.32) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (MD: -27.05) levels. Compared with metformin, SGLT2i reduced body weight (MD: -1.50) and FPG (MD: -10.13) more effectively, with similar reduction for HbA1c (MD: -0.05). No significant increased safety adverse was found for SGLT2i, including nasopharyngitis (OR: 1.07), urinary tract infection (OR: 2.31), diarrhea (OR: 1.18) and hypoglycemia (OR: 1.06). GLP-1RAs significantly reduced HbA1c (MD: -1.13), weight (MD: -2.12) and FPG (MD: -31.44) levels as first-line therapy compared to placebo. GLP-1RAs significantly increased occurrence of diarrhea (OR: 2.18), hypoglycemia (OR: 3.10), vomiting (OR: 8.22), and nausea (OR: 4.41).
CONCLUSION
First line use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RAs is effective in reducing HbA1c, weight, and FPG levels in T2DM patients at low risk for cardiovascular disease. SGLT2i may be superior to metformin in controlling body weight and FPG. GLP-1RAs may increase the occurrence of diarrhea, hypoglycemia, vomiting, and nausea.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. https://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd, CRD42022347233).
Topics: Humans; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Nausea; Sodium; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Vomiting
PubMed: 38348420
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1289643 -
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice Feb 2021We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the use of incretin-based therapies including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the use of incretin-based therapies including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists as well as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitorsin persons with posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) so as to assess both their efficacy and safety.
METHODS
We searched for publications on Kidney/Renal Transplantation and DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1-receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors and included every study using these antidiabetics. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistical significant.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies and 310 individuals with a mean age of 55.98 ± 8.81 years were included in the analysis. Participants received DPP-4 inhibitors in 8 studies, SGLT-2 inhibitors in 6 studies and GLP-1 receptor agonists in 2 studies, with a mean follow-up of 22.03 ± 14.95 weeks. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction was demonstrated in 10 studies (mean +/- standard deviation (MD) = - 0.38%, I = 45%). MD of HbA1c was -0.3741 and -0.4596 mg/dl for DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors respectively. Nine studies demonstrated differences in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (MD = - 25,76) and 5 studies in post-prandial glucose (PPG) (MD = - 6.61) before and following treatment. Most studies did not show adverse effects on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and hepatic function.
CONCLUSIONS
DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors appear both efficacious and safe in renal transplant recipients. More high-quality studies are required to guide therapeutic choices for PTDM.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Incretins; Kidney Function Tests; Kidney Transplantation; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 33338553
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108604 -
Medicine May 2017We aimed to assess the safety and efficiency of the novel sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in combinations with insulin for type 1 and type 2 diabetes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
We aimed to assess the safety and efficiency of the novel sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in combinations with insulin for type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM).
METHODS
We searched Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from January 2010 to December 2016 without restriction of language. FDA data and Clinical Trials (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) were also searched. Study selection, data extraction, and evaluation of risk of bias were performed by 2 persons independently. The risk of bias was assessed by Cochrance System Evaluate Method and Q test was used to evaluate the heterogeneity between studies. We used random effect model to analyze the results by Revman 5.3. This meta-analysis has been registered at online public registry PROSPERO (registration number is: CRD42017054718).
RESULTS
Nine trials including 3069 patients were analyzed. Compared with control group, SGLT2 inhibitor produced absolute reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (MD -1.35%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.36 to -0.34], P = .009), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (MD -1.01 mmol/L, 95%CI [-1.98 to 0.04], P = .04), insulin dosage (MD -4.85 U/24 hours, 95%CI [-7.42 to -2.29], P = .002), and body weight (MD -2.30 kg, 95%CI [-3.09 to -1.50], P < .00001). But the risk of hypoglycemia (OR 1.18, 95%CI [0.86, 1.61], P = . 30) and urinary tract infection (UTI) (OR 1.34, 95%CI [0.79, 2.27], P = .28) were proved as no difference and genital tract infection (GTI) with SGLT2 inhibitors was higher than control group (OR 2.96, 95%CI [1.05, 8.37], P = .04), in which cases were mild and responded to the therapy. According to the subgroup analysis, SGLT2 inhibitors had a similar effect in effective factors of both T1DM and T2DM, but the risk of GTI mainly increased in T2DM versus T1DM (T1DM OR 0.27 [0.01, 7.19], P = .43 vs T2DM OR 4.28 [2.00, 9.16], P = .0002).
CONCLUSION
SGLT2 inhibitors have improved the HbA1c, FPG, and body weight when combined with insulin and decreased the dose of insulin without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. However, SGLT2 inhibitor was proved to be related to the events of GTI, despite SGLT2 inhibitors appeared to be well tolerated. We suggest that more monitoring should be done to prevent the events of GTI, and more randomized controlled trials should be planned next step.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 28538386
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006944