-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after acute limb ischemia in patients with cancer.Journal of Vascular Surgery Sep 2021Cancer results in a hypercoagulable state that is associated with both venous and arterial thromboses. However, little is known about the effects of acute limb ischemia... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cancer results in a hypercoagulable state that is associated with both venous and arterial thromboses. However, little is known about the effects of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in this cohort of patients. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed the available clinical data on cancer and its association with ALI and evaluated the outcomes in these patients after a diagnosis of ALI.
METHODS
Three databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were queried. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were included regardless of the publication year, language, sample size, or follow-up length. All the steps of the meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) and MOOSE (meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines.
RESULTS
Seven studies from 6222 references with a total of 2899 patients were included. Of the 2899 patients, 1195 (41%) had had a diagnosis of ALI before their cancer diagnosis, and 1704 (59%) had presented with ALI after a cancer diagnosis. Nearly three quarters of ALI events were among patients with cancer of the skin and soft tissue (19%), genitourinary (18%), lung (17%), and gastrointestinal (16%) systems. ALI recurrence was similar between the two groups, and major amputation was more likely in patients with a diagnosis of ALI after a cancer diagnosis (7.4% vs 4.6%; P < .01). The incidence of mortality at 1 year was significantly greater for patients with established cancer who had presented with ALI compared with the patients who had presented with ALI before a cancer diagnosis (50.6% vs 29.9%; P < .01). After adjusting for study variability using the random effects model, the mortality at 1 year for all patients was 52.3% (95% confidence interval, 37.7%-66.5%). No significant heterogeneity (P = .73) was found between the two groups of patients, which varied by the timing of the ALI diagnosis in relation to the cancer diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS
The 1-year mortality after the development of ALI in patients with cancer was >50%. For patients presenting with ALI of unclear etiology, the presence of an underlying cancer should be considered.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Female; Humans; Ischemia; Limb Salvage; Male; Neoplasms; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33905869
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.058 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Jul 2016Drug-induced Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) has long been associated with the use of different drugs, including cancer chemotherapy or β-adrenoceptor blockers. However,... (Review)
Review
AIM
Drug-induced Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) has long been associated with the use of different drugs, including cancer chemotherapy or β-adrenoceptor blockers. However, sources report extremely variable prevalence and the level of evidence for each class is heterogeneous. Moreover, new signals are emerging from case reports and small series. Our objective was therefore to review available evidence about this adverse drug effect and to propose a mechanistic approach of drug-induced RP.
METHODS
A systematic review of English and French language articles was performed through Medline (1946-2015) and Embase (1974-2015). Further relevant papers were identified from the reference lists of retrieved articles.
RESULTS
We identified 12 classes of drugs responsible for RP, with a variety of underlying mechanisms such as increased sympathetic activation, endothelial dysfunction, neurotoxicity or decreased red blood cell deformability. Cisplatin and bleomycin were associated with the highest risk, followed by β-adrenoceptor blockers. Recent data suggest a possible involvement of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), through an unknown mechanism.
CONCLUSION
Drug-induced RP is a probably underestimated adverse drug event, with limited available evidence regarding its prevalence. Although rare, serious complications like critical digital ischaemia have been reported. When these treatments are started in patients with a history of RP, careful monitoring must be made and, if possible, alternative therapies that do not alter peripheral blood flow should be considered.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Animals; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Prevalence; Raynaud Disease
PubMed: 26949933
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12912 -
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ :... Jul 2021Arterial catheterization is frequently performed in neonatal intensive care units with an inherent risk of peripheral ischemic injury, especially in preterm infants. The... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arterial catheterization is frequently performed in neonatal intensive care units with an inherent risk of peripheral ischemic injury, especially in preterm infants. The treatment options following vascular damage involve invasive and non-invasive modalities. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence of the use of topical nitroglycerine (TNG) either alone or as adjunctive therapy. The secondary aim was to develop an approach to the treatment of catheter induced ischemia in infants based on the available evidence.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted of available databases for relevant articles that involved the treatment of peripheral tissue ischemia in neonates with the use of TNG. Citations were restricted to human subjects.
RESULTS
Six hundred and eighty-nine articles were identified, and twenty-seven case reports and case series were compatible with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sixty-eight infants out of the 76 published cases (89%) experienced a favorable outcome and 79% (n = 60) demonstrated complete recovery with the topical application of TNG to the ischemic site.
CONCLUSION
The available evidence demonstrates that TNG is effective for the treatment of peripheral ischemia in neonates after standard conservative measures have failed. However, due to the absence of robust evidence for this therapeutic modality, there are no uniform guidelines regarding the frequency, duration, and safety of TNG use. Planning the management of peripheral ischemia in neonates with TNG should be a multidisciplinary decision that includes close surveillance of blood pressure, methemoglobin levels, and follow up cranial ultrasound.
PubMed: 34400871
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.05.008 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Feb 2023Frailty represents a state of multisystem impairment that may adversely impact people presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and diabetes-related foot... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Frailty represents a state of multisystem impairment that may adversely impact people presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs). The aim of this systematic review was to explore the association between frailty and outcomes from CLTI and DFUs.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases to find studies using a validated measure of frailty in individuals with CLTI and/or DFUs. The primary outcomes were the impact of frailty on the severity of initial clinical presentation and unfavorable follow-up outcomes including readmissions, major limb amputation, cardiovascular events, revascularization, and wound healing.
RESULTS
Ten cohort studies were included. Two studies had a low risk of bias, 1 was unable to be assessed, 5 had moderate risk of bias, and 2 high risk of bias. The prevalence of frailty in people presenting with CLTI ranged from 27% to 88% and was 71% in people with DFUs. The presence of frailty in both people with CLTI and DFUs was associated with substantially increased severity at presentation (severity of ischemia and tissue loss) and poorer outcomes at follow-up (risk of readmission, limb amputation, and all-cause mortality).
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of frailty in both people with CLTI and DFUs is likely associated with substantially higher complexity at presentation followed by a greater risk for readmission, amputation, and death during follow-up. Heterogeneity in the tools used to screen for frailty, poor definition of frailty, and unclear evaluation of exposure and outcomes limit further interpretation of findings.
Topics: Humans; Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; Diabetic Foot; Frailty; Treatment Outcome; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Factors; Chronic Disease; Ischemia; Limb Salvage; Retrospective Studies; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 36332876
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.057 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Oct 2023Sacubitril-valsartan is an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) associated with a decreased risk of death and hospitalization for selected patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Sacubitril-valsartan is an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) associated with a decreased risk of death and hospitalization for selected patients with heart failure (HF). However, its association with improved atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association of ARNI with ASCVD events in patients with HF. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies comparing ARNIs with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in terms of myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, peripheral artery disease, and the composite end point in patients with HF. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included, with 17,541 patients assigned to either the ARNI (8,764 patients) or ACEi/ARB (8,777 patients) groups. The incidence of composite end point (risk ratio [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 1.13, p = 0.63), myocardial infarction (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.30, p = 0.85), angina pectoris (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.17, p = 0.70), and stroke (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.16, p = 0.93) were not statistically different between the ARNI and ACEi/ARB groups. However, ARNI was associated with a higher incidence of peripheral artery disease (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.52, p = 0.03). In conclusion, this meta-analysis found no association between ARNI therapy and improved ASCVD events in patients with HF.
Topics: Humans; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Neprilysin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Atherosclerosis; Antihypertensive Agents; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Angina Pectoris; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Heart Failure; Antiviral Agents
PubMed: 37619492
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.154 -
Annals of Surgery Aug 2023The aim was to analyze the risk of progression to chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), amputation and subsequent interventions after revascularization versus...
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to analyze the risk of progression to chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), amputation and subsequent interventions after revascularization versus noninvasive therapy in patients with intermittent claudication (IC).
BACKGROUND
Conflicting evidence exists regarding adverse limb outcomes after each treatment strategy.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched aided by a health sciences librarian through August 16, 2022. Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing invasive (endovascular or surgical revascularization) and noninvasive treatment (exercise and/or medical treatment) were included. PROSPERO registration was completed (CRD42022352831).
RESULTS
A total of 9 RCTs comprising 1477 patients (invasive, 765 patients; noninvasive, 712 patients) were eligible. During a mean of 3.6-year follow-up, progression to CLTI after invasive [5 (2-8) per 1000 person-years] and noninvasive treatment [6 (3-10) per 1000 person-years] were not statistically different [rate ratio (RR): 0.77; 95% CI, 0.35-1.69; P =0.51, I2 =0%]. Incidence of amputation (RR: 1.69; 95% CI, 0.54-5.26; P =0.36, I2 =0%) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% CI, 0.91-1.74; P =0.16, I2 =0%) also did not differ between the groups. However, the invasive treatment group underwent significantly more revascularizations (RR: 4.15; 95% CI, 2.80-6.16; P <0.00001, I2 =83%). The results were not changed by fixed effect or random-effects models, nor by sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Although there is equivalent risk of progression to CLTI, major amputation and all-cause mortality compared with noninvasive treatment, invasive treatment for patients with IC led to significantly more revascularization procedures and should be used selectively in patients with major lifestyle limitation. Guideline recommendation of noninvasive treatment for first-line IC therapy is supported.
Topics: Humans; Endovascular Procedures; Exercise Therapy; Intermittent Claudication; Ischemia; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36728522
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005793 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Nov 2023Both bypass surgery and endovascular treatment are well-recognized interventions for the treatment of peripheral artery disease; however, the effect of failed... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Both bypass surgery and endovascular treatment are well-recognized interventions for the treatment of peripheral artery disease; however, the effect of failed endovascular treatment on subsequent surgeries remains controversial. A systematic review was conducted to compare the outcomes of primary bypass and bypass surgery after endovascular treatment.
METHODS
Three academic databases (Embase, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched from their inception to August 2022. Two independent investigators searched for studies that reported the outcomes of primary bypass surgery and bypass surgery after endovascular treatment in patients with peripheral artery disease. Abstracts and full-text studies were screened independently using duplicate data abstraction. Dichotomous outcome measures were reported using a random-effects model to generate a summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
Seventeen retrospective observational studies were selected from 3911 articles and included 8064 patients, 6252 of whom underwent primary bypass surgery and 1812 underwent bypass surgery after endovascular treatment. The mean age was 69.0 years and 61.2% (n = 4938) were male. For perioperative outcomes, the 30-day results showed no difference in mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53-1.10), or amputation (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67-1.20). For short- to mid-term outcomes, primary patency did not differ at 6 months (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.19), 1 year (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97-1.30), or 2 years (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.85-1.61) follow-up. Amputation-free survival did not differ at 6 months (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82-1.30), 1 year (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.89-1.32), 2 years (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.93-1.50), or 3 years (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.84-1.40) of follow-up. No significant difference was found in overall survival or second patency.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis of retrospective, nonrandomized, observational studies suggests that prior endovascular treatment of lower extremity arterial disease does not result in worse perioperative, short-term, or mid-term clinical outcomes of subsequent infrainguinal bypass surgery compared with patients without prior endovascular treatment.
PubMed: 37453586
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.07.003 -
Journal of Cellular Physiology Jun 2019Aberrant blood vessel functioning and systemic circulation are key causes for vascular disorders; cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal artery stenosis, and peripheral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Aberrant blood vessel functioning and systemic circulation are key causes for vascular disorders; cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal artery stenosis, and peripheral artery diseases. Epidemiological and basic science evidence supported genetic reasons, compounded by obesity, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking as risk factors. This is an umbrella review of risk factors and therapies in vascular disorders, exploring systematic reviews and meta-analyses studies in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Central published in January 2000-May 2018. We made qualitative eligibility gradation of the articles based on inclusion criteria, and independently extracted descriptive and methodologic data to compile their outcomes. We considered 95% confidence interval and the between-study heterogeneity, designated by I . Overall, we extracted 217 studies of impressive quality and at low risk of bias, including 124, 30, 23, 32, and 8, respectively, for the search terms "cardiovascular," "renal," "cerebral," and "limb ischemia" each in combination with "risk factors" and "therapeutics." Our search on genome-wide analyses revealed genes associated with HDL-cholesterol, matrix metalloproteases, angiogenesis, notch3, renin-angiotensin, apolipoprotein E, insulin, and cytokine levels as critical participants in the pathogenesis of vascular diseases. Hypertension and endothelial growth factor-linked polymorphisms were found to contribute to vascular damage. The studies reinforced that lifestyle and dietary patterns influenced susceptibility of circulatory system diseases. Additionally, endovascular medicines, surgical vascularization, angioplasty, and renal artery stenting appeared as major therapeutic approaches in vascular patients. Altogether, our review offers up-to-date information on pathophysiology of vascular diseases and provides insight into existing research, clinical management and clinical gaps in the field.
Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Complications; Endothelial Growth Factors; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertension; Life Style; Obesity; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30317627
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27633 -
Nutrition, Metabolism, and... Aug 2023The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition (undernutrition) that can be calculated from albumin concentration,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition (undernutrition) that can be calculated from albumin concentration, total peripheral lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol concentration. CONUT score has been proposed as a promising prognostic marker in several clinical settings; however, a consensus on its prognostic value in patients with stroke is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between CONUT score and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke based on all current available studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Systematic research on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to February 2023 was performed on the association between CONUT score and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were followed. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool. Pooled effect estimation was calculated by a random-effect model. Through the initial literature search, 15 studies (all high-quality) including 16 929 patients were found to be eligible and analysed in the meta-analysis. A significant risk of malnutrition (in most studies defined by a CONUT score ≥5) was directly associated with mortality, higher risk of poor functional outcome according to the modified Rankin Scale and total infection development. Evidence was consistent for acute ischaemic stroke and preliminary for acute haemorrhagic stroke.
CONCLUSION
CONUT score is an independent prognostic indicator, and it is associated with major disability and infection development during hospitalisation.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42022306560.
Topics: Humans; Nutritional Status; Brain Ischemia; Stroke; Malnutrition; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Nutrition Assessment
PubMed: 37336716
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.05.012 -
Atherosclerosis Jan 2020It is unclear whether improvements in the detection/treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) affect overall survival and morbidity. We undertook a systematic review...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
It is unclear whether improvements in the detection/treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) affect overall survival and morbidity. We undertook a systematic review to describe survival and morbidity in contemporary PAD cohorts.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched for randomised and observational studies reporting mortality/morbidity events between 1 May 2003 and 31 December, 2017 in patients with PAD, diagnosed by intermittent claudication (IC), critical limb ischaemia (CLI), or an ankle brachial index (ABI) < 0.9. Pooled event rates for all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, major CV events (MACE; non-fatal MI/stroke, CV death), and major amputation were calculated per 1000 person-years.
RESULTS
124 eligible studies were identified (570,856 patients; 855,894 person-years of follow-up). Statin use was reported in 67% of the overall cohort and antiplatelet use in 79%. Pooled event rates for all-cause and CV mortality, MI, stroke, MACE, and major amputation were 113, 39, 20, 12, 71, and 70 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Compared with patients with an ABI <0.9, the presence of CLI was associated with increased rates of all-cause and CV mortality, MI, MACE, and major amputation. Event rates for stroke were similar between patients with an ABI <0.9 and CLI.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data show PAD patients have a high risk of all-cause and CV mortality, and imply the risk of stroke or MI is at least equivalent to the risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Moreover, our data underline the need for improved treatments to attenuate CV risk in PAD patients.
Topics: Ankle Brachial Index; Atherosclerosis; Global Health; Humans; Lower Extremity; Morbidity; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Survival Rate
PubMed: 31606132
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.09.012