-
VASA. Zeitschrift Fur Gefasskrankheiten Jul 2022Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects more than 202 million people worldwide. Several studies have shown that patients with PAD are often undertreated, and that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects more than 202 million people worldwide. Several studies have shown that patients with PAD are often undertreated, and that statin utilization is suboptimal. European and American guidelines highlight statins as the first-line lipid-lowering therapy to treat patients with PAD. Our objective with this meta-analysis was to further explore the impact of statins on lower extremities PAD endpoints and examine whether statin dose (high vs. low intensity) impacts outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. Any study that presented a comparison of use of statins vs. no statins for PAD patients or studies comparing high vs. low intensity statins were considered to be potentially eligible. We excluded studies with only critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients. The Medline (PubMed) database was searched up to January 31, 2021. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. In total, 39 studies and 275,670 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In total, 136,025 (49.34%) patients were on statins vs. 139,645 (50.66%) who were not on statins. Statin use was associated with a reduction in all cause-mortality by 42% (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49-0.67, p<0.01) and cardiovascular death by 43% (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, p<0.01). Statin use was associated with an increase in amputation-free survival by 56% (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.58, p<0.01). The risk of amputation and loss of patency were reduced by 35% (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p<0.01) and 46% (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.74, p<0.01), respectively. Statin use was also associated with a reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 35% (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.80, p<0.01) and myocardial infarction rates by 41% (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.33-0.86, p<0.01). Among patients treated with statins, the high-intensity treatment group was associated with a reduction in all cause-mortality by 36% (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.54-0.74, p<0.01) compared to patients treated with low intensity statins. Statin treatment among patients with PAD was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MACE, risk for amputation, or loss of patency. Higher statin dose seems to be associated with improved outcomes.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lower Extremity; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35673949
DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001012 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Dec 2020To evaluate the clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To evaluate the clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD).
DATA SOURCES
EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception to March 2020 for clinical studies reporting on the association between of aPL [IgG/IgM anticardiolipin (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA)] and PAD.
METHODS
We determined the pooled prevalence (PP) of patients positive for aPL in PAD or the PP of PAD in patients positive for aPL; we employed Peto's odds ratio with random effect for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies comprising 6,057 patients were evaluated: in patients with PAD, the PP of IgG aCL was 12% vs 4.1% in those without, IgM aCL was 13.2% vs 2.1%, and LA 13.3% vs 3.3%, respectively. The PP of patients with LA was greater in critical limb ischemia than in the control group (19.3% vs 4.2%). Also, the PP of patients with LA was greater in the failed than in the successful revascularisation group (35.8% vs 15.8%). The PP of post-procedural revascularisation failures was similar in the groups given or not given oral anticoagulation (59.2% vs 61.9%).
CONCLUSION
All the aPL related to PAD regardless of diagnostic definition used, whereas LA related also to critical limb ischaemia and failed revascularisation. Data expressed as percentage of participants positive for aPL limit the interpretation of these relationships.
Topics: Antibodies, Anticardiolipin; Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Humans; Lower Extremity; Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor; Peripheral Arterial Disease
PubMed: 33065424
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.08.012 -
Clinical and Applied... 2024Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a standard therapy in patients with ischemic vascular diseases (IVD) including coronary artery,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a standard therapy in patients with ischemic vascular diseases (IVD) including coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial diseases, although the optimal duration of this treatment is still debated. Previous meta-analyses reported conflicting results about the effects of long-term and short-term as well as non-DAPT use in various clinical settings. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of different durations of DAPT.
METHODS
We reviewed relevant articles and references from database, which were published prior to April 2023. Data from prospective studies were processed using RevMan5.0 software, provided by Cochrane Collaboration and transformed using relevant formulas. The inclusion criteria involved randomization to long-term versus short-term or no DAPT; the endpoints included at least one of total or cardiovascular (CV) mortalities, IVD recurrence, and bleeding.
RESULTS
A total of 34 randomized studies involving 141 455 patients were finally included. In comparison with no or short-term DAPT, long-term DAPT reduced MI and stroke, but did not reduce the total and CV mortalities. Meanwhile, bleeding events were increased, even though intracranial and fatal bleedings were not affected. Besides, the reduction of MI and stroke recurrence showed no statistical significance between long-term and short-term DAPT groups.
CONCLUSION
Long-term DAPT may not reduce the mortality of IVD besides increasing bleeding events, although reduced the incidences of MI and stroke early recurrence to a certain extent and did not increase the risk of fatal intracranial bleeding.
Topics: Humans; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38571479
DOI: 10.1177/10760296241244772 -
Molecular Neurobiology Oct 2022Neural regeneration has troubled investigators worldwide in the past decades. Currently, cell transplantation emerged as a breakthrough targeted therapy for spinal cord... (Review)
Review
Neural regeneration has troubled investigators worldwide in the past decades. Currently, cell transplantation emerged as a breakthrough targeted therapy for spinal cord injury (SCI) in the neurotrauma field, which provides a promising strategy in neural regeneration. Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), a specialized type of glial cells, is considered as the excellent candidate due to its unique variable and intrinsic regeneration-supportive properties. In fact, OECs could support olfactory receptor neuron turnover and axonal extension, which is essential to maintain the function of olfactory nervous system. Hitherto, an increasing number of literatures demonstrate that transplantation of OECs exerts vital roles in neural regeneration and functional recovery after neural injury, including central and peripheral nervous system. It is common knowledge that the deteriorating microenvironment (ischemia, hypoxia, scar, acute and chronic inflammation, etc.) resulting from injured nervous system is adverse for neural regeneration. Interestingly, recent studies indicated that OECs could promote neural repair through improvement of the disastrous microenvironments, especially to the overwhelmed inflammatory responses. Although OECs possess unusual advantages over other cells for neural repair, particularly in SCI, the mechanisms of OEC-mediated neural repair are still controversial with regard to anti-inflammation. Therefore, it is significant to summarize the anti-inflammation property of OECs, which is helpful to understand the biological characteristics of OECs and drive future studies. Here, we mainly focus on the anti-inflammatory role of OECs to make systematic review and discuss OEC-based therapy for CNS injury.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cell Transplantation; Humans; Nerve Regeneration; Neuroglia; Olfactory Bulb; Spinal Cord; Spinal Cord Injuries
PubMed: 35962300
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02983-4 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery May 2023No consensus has yet been reached regarding the optimal treatment of patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TO) and chronic limb ischemia. In the present study, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
No consensus has yet been reached regarding the optimal treatment of patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TO) and chronic limb ischemia. In the present study, we aimed to summarize the results on endovascular treatment of such patients.
METHODS
We performed a meta-analysis using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The eligible studies had been reported up to December 2021 and had evaluated endovascular angioplasty to treat patients with TO and chronic limb ischemia. The early (mortality and technical success) and late (primary/secondary patency and limb salvage) outcomes were evaluated. StatsDirect (StatsDirect Ltd, Merseyside, UK) was used for the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, 15 eligible studies were included (only endovascular in 11 studies and both endovascular and open repair in 4 studies). Among 601 patients, 402 endovascular procedures (416 limbs) were recorded (angioplasty plus stenting for 7.2% and angioplasty plus thrombolysis for 3.7%). The clinical presentation was intermittent claudication (stage II-III) for 7.9% of the patients and critical ischemia (stage IV-VI) for 92.1% of the patients. Most of the patients had had lesions below the knee, and five had had upper extremity lesions. The pooled technical success rate was 86% (range, 81.1%-90.3%), with no in-hospital mortality. The other complications included perforations (1.9%), wound complications (2.2%), and distal embolism (0.2%). Primary patency was 65.7% (range, 52.7%-77.6%) at 12 months and 50.7% (range, 23.3%-77.9%) at 36 months. Secondary patency was 76.2% (range, 57.5%-90.8%) at 12 months and 64.5% (range, 32.3%-90.6%) at 36 months. The limb salvage rate was 94.1% (range, 90.7%-96.7%) at 12 months and 89.1% (range, 80.6%-95.4%) at 36 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Endovascular angioplasty for patients with TO and chronic limb ischemia was associated with optimal safety and low complication rates. The technical success and late outcomes were acceptable.
Topics: Humans; Thromboangiitis Obliterans; Angioplasty, Balloon; Angioplasty; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Ischemia; Limb Salvage; Vascular Patency; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36174815
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.017 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2018Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), caused by narrowing of the arteries in the limbs, is increasing in incidence and prevalence as our population is ageing and as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), caused by narrowing of the arteries in the limbs, is increasing in incidence and prevalence as our population is ageing and as diabetes is becoming more prevalent. PAD can cause pain in the limbs while walking, known as intermittent claudication, or can be more severe and cause pain while at rest, ulceration, and ultimately gangrene and limb loss. This more severe stage of PAD is known as 'critical limb ischaemia'. Treatments for PAD include medications that help to reduce the increased risk of cardiovascular events and help improve blood flow, as well as endovascular or surgical repair or bypass of the blocked arteries. However, many people are unresponsive to medications and are not suited to surgical or endovascular treatment, leaving amputation as the last option. Gene therapy is a novel approach in which genetic material encoding for proteins that may help increase revascularisation is injected into the affected limbs of patients. This type of treatment has been shown to be safe, but its efficacy, especially regarding ulcer healing, effects on quality of life, and other symptomatic outcomes remain unknown.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of gene therapy for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched Cochrane CENTRAL, the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and AMED, along with trials registries (all searched 27 November 2017). We also checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews for further studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised studies that evaluated gene therapy versus no gene therapy in people with PAD. We excluded studies that evaluated direct growth hormone treatment or cell-based treatments.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected studies, performed quality assessment, and extracted data from the included studies. We collected pertinent information on each study, as well as data for the outcomes of amputation-free survival, ulcer healing, quality of life, amputation, all-cause mortality, ankle brachial index, symptom scores, and claudication distance.
MAIN RESULTS
We included in this review a total of 17 studies with 1988 participants (evidence current until November 2017). Three studies limited their inclusion to people with intermittent claudication, 12 limited inclusion to people with varying levels of critical limb ischaemia, and two included people with either condition. Study investigators evaluated many different types of gene therapies, using different protocols. Most studies evaluated growth factor-encoding gene therapy, with six studies using vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-encoding genes, four using hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-encoding genes, and three using fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-encoded genes. Two studies evaluated hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) gene therapy, one study used a developmental endothelial locus-1 gene therapy, and the final study evaluated a stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) gene therapy. Most studies reported outcomes after 12 months of follow-up, but follow-up ranged from three months to two years.Overall risk of bias varied between studies, with many studies not providing sufficient detail for adequate determination of low risk of bias for many domains. Two studies did not utilise a placebo control, leading to risk of performance bias. Several studies reported in previous protocols or in their Methods sections that they would report on certain outcomes for which no data were then reported, increasing risk of reporting bias. All included studies reported sponsorships from corporate entities that led to unclear risk of other bias. The overall quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low, generally as the result of heterogeneity and imprecision, with few or no studies reporting on outcomes.Evidence suggests no clear differences for the outcomes of amputation-free survival, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between those treated with gene therapy and those not receiving this treatment (all moderate-quality evidence). Low-quality evidence suggests improvement in complete ulcer healing with gene therapy (odds ratio (OR) 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 4.59; P = 0.04). We could not combine data on quality of life and can draw no conclusions at this time regarding this outcome (very low-quality evidence). We included one study in the meta-analysis for ankle brachial index, which showed no clear differences between treatments, but we can draw no overall association (low-quality evidence). We combined in a meta-analysis pain symptom scores as assessed by visual analogue scales from two studies and found no clear differences between treatment groups (very low-quality evidence). We carried out extensive subgroup analyses by PAD classification, dosage schedule, vector type, and gene used but identified no substantial differences.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Moderate-quality evidence shows no clear differences in amputation-free survival, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between those treated with gene therapy and those not receiving gene therapy. Some evidence suggests that gene therapy may lead to improved complete ulcer healing, but this outcome needs to be explored with improved reporting of the measure, such as decreased ulcer area in cm², and better description of ulcer types and healing. Further standardised data that are amenable to meta-analysis are needed to evaluate other outcomes such as quality of life, ankle brachial index, symptom scores, and claudication distance.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Chemokine CXCL12; Extremities; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Genetic Therapy; Hepatocyte Growth Factor; Humans; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit; Intermittent Claudication; Ischemia; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 30380135
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012058.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2021Acute limb ischaemia usually is caused by a blood clot blocking an artery or a bypass graft. Severe acute ischaemia will lead to irreversible damage to muscles and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute limb ischaemia usually is caused by a blood clot blocking an artery or a bypass graft. Severe acute ischaemia will lead to irreversible damage to muscles and nerves if blood flow is not restored in a few hours. Once irreversible damage occurs, amputation will be necessary and the condition can be life-threatening. Infusion of clot-busting drugs (thrombolysis) is a useful tool in the management of acute limb ischaemia. Fibrinolytic drugs are used to disperse blood clots (thrombi) to clear arterial occlusion and restore blood flow. Thrombolysis is less invasive than surgery. A variety of techniques are used to deliver fibrinolytic agents. This is an update of a review first published in 2004.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the effects of infusion techniques during peripheral arterial thrombolysis for treatment of patients with acute limb ischaemia.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registries to 20 October 2020. We undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing infusion techniques for fibrinolytic agents in the treatment of acute limb ischaemia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures as recommended by Cochrane. We assessed the risk of bias in included trials using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We evaluated certainty of evidence using GRADE. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We were not able to carry out meta-analyses due to clinical heterogeneity, so we have reported the results and performed the comparisons narratively. The main outcomes of interest were amputation-free survival or limb salvage, amputation, mortality, vessel patency, duration of thrombolysis, and complications such as cerebrovascular accident and major and minor bleeding.
MAIN RESULTS
Nine studies with a total of 671 participants are included in this update. Trials covered a variety of infusion techniques, dosage regimens, and adjunctive agents. We grouped trials according to types of techniques assessed (e.g. intravenous and intra-arterial delivery of the agent, 'high-' and 'low-dose' regimens of the agent, continuous infusion and 'forced infusion' of the agent, use of adjunctive antiplatelet agents). We assessed the certainty of evidence as very low to low due to the limited power of individual studies to deliver clinically relevant results, small and heterogeneous study populations, use of different inclusion criteria by each study in terms of severity and duration of ischaemia, considerably different outcome measures between trials, and use of different fibrinolytic agents. This heterogeneity prevented pooling of data in meta-analyses. No regimen has been shown to confer benefit in terms of amputation-free survival (at 30 days), amputation, or death. For vessel patency, complete success was more likely with intra-arterial (IA) than with intravenous (IV) infusion (odds ratio (OR) 13.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.79 to 62.67; 1 study, 40 participants; low-certainty evidence); radiological failure may be more likely with IV infusion (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.38; 1 study, 40 participants; low-certainty evidence). Due to the small numbers involved in each arm and design differences between arms, it is not possible to conclude whether any technique offered any advantage over another. None of the treatment strategies clearly affected complications such as cerebrovascular accident or major bleeding requiring surgery or blood transfusion. Minor bleeding complications were more frequent in systemic (intravenous) therapy compared to intra-arterial infusion (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.56; 1 study, 40 participants), and in high-dose compared to low-dose therapy (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.96; 1 study, 63 participants). Limited evidence from individual trials appears to indicate that high-dose and forced-infusion regimens reduce the duration of thrombolysis. In one trial, the median duration of infusion was 4 hours (range 0.25 to 46) for the high-dose group and 20 hours (range 2 to 46) for the low-dose group. In a second trial, treatment using pulse spray was continued for a median of 120 minutes (range 40 to 310) compared with low-dose infusion for a median of 25 hours (range 2 to 60). In a third trial, the median duration of therapy was reduced with pulse spray at 195 minutes (range 90 to 1260 minutes) compared to continuous infusion at 1390 minutes (range 300 to 2400 minutes). However, none of the studies individually showed improvement in limb salvage at 30 days nor benefit for the amputation rate related to the technique of drug delivery. Similarly, no studies reported a clear difference in occurrence of cerebrovascular accident or major bleeding. Although 'high-dose' and 'forced-infusion' techniques achieved vessel patency in less time than 'low-dose' infusion, more minor bleeding complications may be associated (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.96; 1 study, 72 participants; and OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.32; 1 study, 121 participants, respectively). Use of adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists did not improve outcomes, and results were limited by inclusion of participants with non-limb-threatening ischaemia.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence to show that any thrombolytic regimen provides a benefit over any other in terms of amputation-free survival, amputation, or 30-day mortality. The rate of CVA or major bleeding requiring surgery or blood transfusion did not clearly differ between regimens but may occur more frequently in high dose and IV regimens. This evidence was limited and of very low certainty. Minor bleeding may be more common with high-dose and IV regimens. In this context, thrombolysis may be an acceptable therapy for patients with marginally threatened limbs (Rutherford grade IIa) compared with surgery. Caution is advised for patients who do not have limb-threatening ischaemia (Rutherford grade I) because of risks of major haemorrhage, cerebrovascular accident, and death from thrombolysis.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Arteries; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Ischemia; Thrombolytic Therapy
PubMed: 34786692
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000985.pub3 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Jul 2019The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin (BIV) was shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in percutaneous coronary interventions for reducing procedural... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin (BIV) was shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in percutaneous coronary interventions for reducing procedural blood loss. The aim of this study was to compare outcome profiles of BIV and UFH in peripheral endovascular procedures (PEPs) by synthesizing the currently available data.
METHODS
Following the PRISMA statement, we conducted a comprehensive literature search using Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Google scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov. We recruited randomized, controlled trials and well-conducted observational studies that compared UFH and BIV in PEPs requiring anticoagulation, excluding endovascular cardiac procedures and coronary interventions. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to compare the outcome profiles of these two agents.
RESULTS
Thirteen articles containing 14 studies involving a total of 21,057 patients were enrolled. Of these, 2 were randomized controlled trials, 2 were prospective cohort studies, and 10 were retrospective studies. There were no significant differences between BIV and UFH in terms of procedural success rates, major and minor perioperative bleeding, transfusion, perioperative transient ischemic attack, or hemorrhagic strokes. However, compared with UFH, BIV had significantly lower odds ratios (OR) of perioperative mortality (OR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.86), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.83), net adverse clinical events (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88), perioperative myocardial infarction (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98), major vascular complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91), and minor vascular complications (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with UFH, PEPs using BIV had comparable procedural success rates and odds of perioperative transient ischemic attack and hemorrhagic stroke. However, procedures with BIV had a lower but nonsignificant odds of perioperative bleeding and transfusion. Depending on the procedures conducted, the patients who received BIV will have reduced or comparable odds of perioperative mortality, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, net adverse clinical events, and major and minor vascular complications. Therefore, BIV may be chosen solely as an alternative procedural anticoagulant to UFH for PEPs.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Endovascular Procedures; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Observational Studies as Topic; Patient Safety; Peptide Fragments; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31230646
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.037 -
Vascular Dec 2021The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with peripheral arterial disease are not completely understood. Therefore, we conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with peripheral arterial disease are not completely understood. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the effects of DOACs in this population.
METHODS
We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science till April 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies, with no linguistic restrictions. The efficacy outcomes were cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infraction, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), acute limb ischemia, amputation, and target lesion revascularization. The safety outcome was major bleeding events. Random effects risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS
A total four randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Among peripheral arterial disease patients, DOACs did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular death (RR = 1.02 95%CI 0.75-1.37, = 0.92), stroke (RR = 0.73 95%CI 0.46-1.14, = 0.16), myocardial infraction (RR = 0.85 95%CI 0.70-1.03, = 0.10), MACE (RR = 0.73 95%CI 0.46-1.14, = 0.16), or amputation (RR = 0.73 95%CI 0.46-1.14, = 0.16) compared with control. However, DOACs were associated with reduction in acute limb ischemia (RR = 0.67 95%CI 0.55-0.80, < 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (RR = 0.89 95%CI 0.81-0.99, = 0.02) at the expense of major bleeding events (RR = 1.43 95%CI 1.16-1.77, < 0.01) compared with control.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on current evidence, no significant difference in cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infraction, MACE, and amputation was found when DOACs were compared to antiplatelet monotherapy. The benefits of preventing target lesion revascularization and acute limb ischemia were balanced by amplified risk of major bleeding. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to figure out the uncertainty around efficacy and safety of medications for peripheral arterial disease.
Topics: Aged; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33504278
DOI: 10.1177/1708538120987935 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Jul 2022Depression is a significant risk factor for death in coronary artery disease. Conversely, the research surrounding depression and peripheral arterial disease is limited.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Depression is a significant risk factor for death in coronary artery disease. Conversely, the research surrounding depression and peripheral arterial disease is limited. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the available literature on the impact of comorbid depression on adverse outcomes in peripheral arterial disease.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the following databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from inception until July 2021.
REVIEW METHODS
Included studies compared depressed and non-depressed patients with peripheral arterial disease. The outcomes included death, major adverse cardiovascular events, and major adverse limb events.
RESULTS
A total of 9 297 articles were searched. Of these, seven studies were identified. Depressed patients were more likely to be women, diabetic, have a history of smoking, and have chronic limb threatening ischaemia, despite being younger than non-depressed patients. There was a 20% increase in major adverse limb events in depressed patients (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11 - 1.31, z = 3.9, p < .001, GRADE strength: very low) but no increased risk of death (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.72 - 1.40, z = 0.06, p = .95, GRADE strength: very low) or major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.67 - 2.01, z = 0.54, p = .59, GRADE strength: very low). A follow up meta-regression of various comorbidities and demographic variables did not demonstrate a significant contribution to the observed risk ratio for major adverse limb events.
CONCLUSION
Depression was reported in 13% of patients with peripheral arterial disease, associated with more medical comorbidity, and a 20% increased risk of major adverse limb events. Although the strength of this evidence is very low, the current state of the literature remains limited. Future studies should prospectively assess the impact of depression and its relationship to medical comorbidities and high risk health behaviours.
Topics: Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Depression; Extremities; Female; Humans; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease
PubMed: 35483579
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.020