-
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Jun 2017Intraosseous schwannomas of the mandible are rare tumors that usually arise from peripheral nerve sheaths of the main trunk or branches of the inferior alveolar nerve... (Review)
Review
Intraosseous schwannomas of the mandible are rare tumors that usually arise from peripheral nerve sheaths of the main trunk or branches of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN).A systematic review of the English literature through PubMed was conducted from 1945 to 2016. Forty-nine patients of mandibular intraosseous schwannomas were identified. The most common location of the tumor was the posterior mandible (61.2%). There were 28 patients in whom the tumor involved the IAN (57.1%). The most commonly performed procedures included enucleation through a mucoperiosteal flap and a bone window (73%), curettage (10%), segmental mandibulectomy (10%), and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (6%). The recurrence rate was 6%: all 3 recurrent patients occurred in the posterior area. The authors report a 72-year-old female with a schwannoma of the IAN which was removed through a sagittal split of the mandible, although there was a bony defect of the external cortex after biopsy of the lesion. The nerve was reconstructed with a sural nerve graft.Due to the slow growing nature and encapsulation of schwannomas, surgical resection seems the best treatment with optimal functional outcomes and low recurrence rate even with a minimally invasive approach. Sagittal split ramus osteotomy and segmental mandibulectomy are reserved to large or posterior lesions to aid with radical resection or improve exposure and reconstruction.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Mandible; Mandibular Neoplasms; Mandibular Nerve; Mandibular Osteotomy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neurilemmoma; Neurosurgical Procedures; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus; Sural Nerve
PubMed: 28212127
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003557 -
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2018Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been investigated because of its intimate relationship with tissue recovery processes, such as on peripheral nerve damage. Based on... (Review)
Review
Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been investigated because of its intimate relationship with tissue recovery processes, such as on peripheral nerve damage. Based on the wide range of benefits that the PBMT has shown and its clinical relevance, the aim of this research was to carry out a systematic review of the last 10 years, ascertaining the influence of the PBMT in the regeneration of injured peripheral nerves. The search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE database with the combination of the keywords: low-level laser therapy AND nerve regeneration. Initially, 54 articles were obtained, 26 articles of which were chosen for the study according to the inclusion criteria. In the qualitative aspect, it was observed that PBMT was able to accelerate the process of nerve regeneration, presenting an increase in the number of myelinated fibers and a better lamellar organization of myelin sheath, besides improvement of electrophysiological function, immunoreactivity, high functionality rate, decrease of inflammation, pain, and the facilitation of neural regeneration, release of growth factors, increase of vascular network and collagen. It was concluded that PBMT has beneficial effects on the recovery of nerve lesions, especially when related to a faster regeneration and functional improvement, despite the variety of parameters.
PubMed: 29890728
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering5020044 -
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2022Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a worldwide problem which hugely affects the quality of patients' life. Nerve conduits are now the alternative for treatment of PNI to... (Review)
Review
Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a worldwide problem which hugely affects the quality of patients' life. Nerve conduits are now the alternative for treatment of PNI to mimic the gold standard, autologous nerve graft. In that case, with the advantages of electrospun micro- or nano-fibers nerve conduit, the peripheral nerve growth can be escalated, in a better way. In this systematic review, we focused on 39 preclinical studies of electrospun nerve conduit, which include the in vitro and in vivo evaluation from animal peripheral nerve defect models, to provide an update on the progress of the development of electrospun nerve conduit over the last 5 years (2016-2021). The physical characteristics, biocompatibility, functional and morphological outcomes of nerve conduits from different studies would be compared, to give a better strategy for treatment of PNI.
Topics: Animals; Peripheral Nerves; Prostheses and Implants; Nerve Regeneration; Sciatic Nerve; Tissue Scaffolds
PubMed: 36600878
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S362144 -
Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England) Jul 2017Ultrasound is an established method of viewing the median nerve in the carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There is some evidence to suggest that immediate changes may occur... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ultrasound is an established method of viewing the median nerve in the carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There is some evidence to suggest that immediate changes may occur in the median nerve before and after hand activity. The evidence for the validity and reliability of ultrasound for testing acute changes in the median nerve has not been systematically reviewed to date.
AIMS
To evaluate the evidence for visible change in ultrasound appearance of the median nerve after hand activity.
METHODS
A literature search was designed, and three reviewers independently selected published research for inclusion. Two reviewers independently appraised papers using the Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) appraisal checklist, while the third reviewer resolved discrepancies between appraisals.
RESULTS
Ten studies were appraised and the results showed an increase in median nerve cross-sectional area following activity, with a return to normal size within 1 h following activity. Both healthy individuals and those diagnosed with CTS participated, all were small convenience samples. Ultrasonographic measurements of the median nerve were reliable in the four studies reporting this, and the studies demonstrated high quality.
CONCLUSIONS
Good-quality evidence as identified by the EBLIP appraisal checklist suggests that following hand activity, the median nerve changes in size in the carpal tunnel. The results may not be generalizable to all people and activities due to the use of small convenience sampling and narrow range of activities studied, in all of the studies appraised.
Topics: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Female; Hand; Humans; Male; Median Nerve; Movement; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 28582584
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqx059 -
Annals of Emergency Medicine Jun 2024We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY OBJECTIVE
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures.
METHODS
We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).
RESULTS
We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: -1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: -1.7 to -0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: -1.8; 95% CrI: -3.0 to -0.55, [low]; SMD: -1.4; 95% CrI: -2.0 to -0.72, [low]; SMD: -2.3; 95% CrI: -3.2 to -1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: -1.21; 95% CrI: -2.18 to -0.23, [very low]: SMD: -0.92; 95% CrI: -1.70 to -0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
Topics: Humans; Hip Fractures; Nerve Block; Pain Management; Preoperative Care; Network Meta-Analysis; Pain Measurement; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Femoral Nerve; Length of Stay
PubMed: 38385910
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024 -
Journal of Sports Science & Medicine Jun 2021Stretching is commonly used to increase range of motion and flexibility. Therefore, investigations are usually oriented towards the muscle-tendon unit. Limited evidence...
Stretching is commonly used to increase range of motion and flexibility. Therefore, investigations are usually oriented towards the muscle-tendon unit. Limited evidence exists regarding potential effects of stretching on peripheral nerves which lie within muscles. The objective of this investigation will be to elucidate the responses of peripheral nerves to stretching. A literature search was performed using the following databases: Scopus, NLM Pubmed and ScienceDirect. Studies regarding the effects of stretching protocols on responses of peripheral nerves were retrieved for investigation. The NHLBI tool was used for quality assessment. Outcomes included nerve stiffness, nerve displacement, pain pressure thresholds and resistive torque. A total of 10 studies were considered eligible and were included in this investigation. The quality assessment of the studies revealed an overall "fair to good" methodological quality across the included studies. All studies except for one involved healthy participants. High heterogeneity of stretching protocols was retrieved. As a consequence of stretching, nerve stiffness (-15.6%) and pain pressure thresholds (-1.9kg) increased. Nerve displacements on each movement plane for all the considered nerves and nerve deformation were also frequently observed. Peripheral nerve responses to muscle stretching include decreased nerve stiffness and increased pain pressure thresholds. Nerve displacement also frequently occurs. It is still unclear if reduced nerve displacement may lead to clinical outcomes. There is a lack of longitudinal studies regarding peripheral nerve adaptations to stretching.
Topics: Humans; Muscle Stretching Exercises; Muscle, Skeletal; Neuralgia; Peripheral Nerves; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 34211318
DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2021.258 -
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Aug 2014The risk of nerve injuries in aesthetic breast surgery has not been well explored. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The risk of nerve injuries in aesthetic breast surgery has not been well explored.
OBJECTIVES
The authors conducted a systematic review to provide evidence-based information on the incidence and treatment of nerve injuries resulting from aesthetic breast surgery.
METHODS
A broad literature search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was undertaken to identify studies in which nerve injury occurred after breast augmentation or mastopexy. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were established before the search was performed.
RESULTS
The initial 4806 citations were narrowed by topic, title, and abstract to 53 articles. After full-text review, 36 studies were included. The risk of any nerve injury after breast augmentation ranged from 13.57% to 15.44%. Specific nerve injury rates were calculated for the intercostal cutaneous nerves, branches to the nipple-areola complex, intercostobrachial nerve, long thoracic nerve, and brachial plexus. Also calculated were the total estimated risks of chronic pain, hyperesthesia, hypoesthesia, and numbness. The meta-analysis showed no associations between the rates of breast nerve injury or sensation change and implant size, incision type, or implant position in patients who underwent breast augmentation. The data were insufficient to determine rates of nerve injury in mastopexy.
CONCLUSIONS
The possibility of nerve injury, sensation change, or chronic pain with breast augmentation is real, and estimating the incidences of these conditions is useful to both patients and surgeons. Optimizing patient outcomes requires timely treatment by a multidisciplinary team and may include peripheral nerve surgery.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
3.
Topics: Adult; Breast Implantation; Chronic Pain; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Neurologic Examination; Pain, Postoperative; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sensory Thresholds; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 24951626
DOI: 10.1177/1090820X14536726 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Aug 2022Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a leading cause of morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of lower extremity nerve...
BACKGROUND
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a leading cause of morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of lower extremity nerve decompression in reducing DPN symptoms and complications.
METHODS
A database search was performed using Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Articles addressing surgical decompression of lower limb peripheral nerves in patients with diabetes were screened for inclusion. Two independent reviewers undertook the assessment. Methodological quality measures were the Cochrane risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
RESULTS
The pooled sample size from 21 studies was 2169 patients. Meta-analysis of 16 observational studies showed significant improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) ( < 0.00001) and two-point discrimination ( = 0.003), with strong reliability. Decompression of the tarsal tunnel region had the highest improvement in VAS [MD, 6.50 (95% CI, 3.56-9.44)]. A significant low-risk ratio (RR) of ulcer development and lower limb amputation was detected ( < 0.00001). Lowest RR of ulcer development was detected with tarsal tunnel release [RR, 0.04 (95% CI, 0.00-0.48)]. Improvements in VAS, two-point discrimination, and nerve conduction velocity were nonsignificant in the meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RCT analysis was limited to only two studies for each outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Meta-analysis of observational studies highlights the efficacy of lower extremity nerve decompression in reducing DPN symptoms, ulcerations, and amputations. Releasing the tibial nerve in the tarsal tunnel region was the most effective observed procedure. Nevertheless, high-quality RCTs are required to support the utility of this intervention in DPN.
PubMed: 35999882
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004478 -
Biology May 2022In the last two decades, artificial scaffolds for nerve regeneration have been produced using a variety of polymers. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a natural polyester... (Review)
Review
In the last two decades, artificial scaffolds for nerve regeneration have been produced using a variety of polymers. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a natural polyester that can be easily processed and offer several advantages; hence, the purpose of this review is to provide a better understanding of the efficacy of therapeutic approaches involving PHB scaffolds in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration following nerve dissection in animal models. A systematic literature review was performed following the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) criteria. The revised databases were: Pub-Med/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Sixteen studies were included in this review. Different animal models and nerves were studied. Extension of nerve gaps reconnected by PHB scaffolds and the time periods of analysis were varied. The additives included in the scaffolds, if any, were growth factors, neurotrophins, other biopolymers, and neural progenitor cells. The analysis of the quality of the studies revealed good quality in general, with some aspects that could be improved. The analysis of the risk of bias revealed several weaknesses in all studies. The use of PHB as a biomaterial to prepare tubular scaffolds for nerve regeneration was shown to be promising. The incorporation of additives appears to be a trend that improves nerve regeneration. One of the main weaknesses of the reviewed articles was the lack of standardized experimentation on animals. It is recommended to follow the currently available guidelines to improve the design, avoid the risk of bias, maximize the quality of studies, and enhance translationality.
PubMed: 35625434
DOI: 10.3390/biology11050706 -
JBJS Reviews Jan 2022The common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the most commonly injured peripheral nerve of the lower extremity in patients with trauma. Traumatic CPN injuries have historically...
BACKGROUND
The common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the most commonly injured peripheral nerve of the lower extremity in patients with trauma. Traumatic CPN injuries have historically been associated with relatively poor outcomes and patient satisfaction, although improved surgical technique and novel procedures appear to improve outcomes. Given the variety of underlying injury modalities, treatment options, and prognostic variables, we sought to evaluate and summarize the current literature on traumatic CPN injuries and to provide recommendations from an analysis of the included studies for treatment and future research.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search terms consisted of variations of "peroneal nerve" or "fibular nerve" combined with "injury," "laceration," "entrapment," "repair," or "neurolysis." Information with regard to treatment modality, outcomes, and patient demographic characteristics was recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS
The initial search yielded 2,301 articles; 42 met eligibility criteria. Factors associated with better outcomes included a shorter preoperative interval, shorter graft length when an interposed graft was used, nerve continuity, and younger patient age. Gender or sex was not mentioned as a factor affecting outcomes in any study. Motor grades of ≥M3 on the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale are typically considered successful outcomes. This was achieved in 81.4% of patients who underwent neurolysis, 78.8% of patients who underwent end-to-end suturing, 49.0% of patients who underwent nerve grafting, 62.9% of patients who underwent nerve transfer, 81.5% of patients who underwent isolated posterior tibial tendon transfer (PTTT), and 84.2% of patients who underwent a surgical procedure with concurrent PTTT.
CONCLUSIONS
Studies included in this review were heterogenous, complicating our ability to perform further analysis. It is not possible to uniformly advocate for the best treatment option, given diverse injury modalities and patient presentations and a variety of prognostic factors. Many studies do not show outcomes with respect to injury modality. Future studies should show preoperative muscle strengths and should clearly define outcomes based on the injury modality and surgical treatment option. This would allow for greater analysis of the most appropriate treatment option for a given mechanism of injury. Newer surgical techniques are promising and should be further explored.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Transfer; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Peroneal Nerve; Peroneal Neuropathies; Tendon Transfer
PubMed: 35020680
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00256