-
Neurology May 2017To systematically assess the effect of pharmacologic treatments of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) on pain and quality of life. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically assess the effect of pharmacologic treatments of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) on pain and quality of life.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews from 2011 to October 12, 2015, and PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for primary studies from January 1, 2013, to May 24, 2016. We searched Clinicaltrials.gov on March 9, 2016. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for eligibility, serially abstracted data, and independently evaluated risk of bias and graded strength of evidence (SOE).
RESULTS
We updated a recently completed systematic review of 57 eligible studies with 24 additional published studies and 25 unpublished studies. For reducing neuropathy-related pain, the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors duloxetine and venlafaxine (moderate SOE), the anticonvulsants pregabalin and oxcarbazepine (low SOE), the drug classes tricyclic antidepressants (low SOE) and atypical opioids (low SOE), and botulinum toxin (low SOE) were more effective than placebo. We could not draw conclusions about quality of life due to incomplete reporting. All studies were short-term (less than 6 months), and all effective drugs had more than 9% dropouts from adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS
For reducing pain, duloxetine and venlafaxine, pregabalin and oxcarbazepine, tricyclic antidepressants, atypical opioids, and botulinum toxin were more effective than placebo. However, quality of life was poorly reported, studies were short-term, drugs had substantial dropout rates, and opioids have significant risks. Future studies should evaluate longer-term outcomes, use methods and measures recommended by pain organizations, and assess patients' quality of life.
Topics: Analgesics; Diabetic Neuropathies; Humans; Neuralgia; Pain; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Quality of Life
PubMed: 28341643
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003882 -
Cancer Treatment and Research... 2021This systematic review provides a high-quality synthesis of the empirical evidence regarding chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) characteristics and...
This systematic review provides a high-quality synthesis of the empirical evidence regarding chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) characteristics and patterns described in studies of children who received neurotoxic chemotherapy to treat cancer. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched for articles published 2009 - 2019, yielding 861. Forty-two papers met the eligibility criteria, including 31 that described characteristics and patterns of vincristine-induced CIPN. Fifty-seven percent of articles were of low to moderate quality; measurement flaws were the most common limitations. The reported CIPN incidence varies widely (2.8%-100%) depending on risk factors (e.g., race) and the measurement approach. Incidence rates of sensory, motor, autonomic CIPN, and pain were 12-28%, 50-72%, 0.8-83% and 5.7-44%, respectively. The evidence suggests that sensory and motor neuropathy, pain, and functional deficits are common and can persist into adulthood. Caucasian race is a risk factor and, contrary to prior thinking, cumulative chemotherapy dosage alone does not predict CIPN severity. The influence of other risk factors is less clear, and studies to date have not explored potential interactions among race, genetics, age, sex, drug metabolism, and nutritional status, among other factors.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Humans; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
PubMed: 34225104
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100420 -
Prosthetics and Orthotics International Feb 2015Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy impairs quality of life and can be difficult to treat. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy impairs quality of life and can be difficult to treat.
OBJECTIVE
To discuss current treatment recommendations for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
STUDY DESIGN
Literature review.
METHODS
Systematic review of the literature discussing treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Existing treatment guidelines were studied and compared.
RESULTS
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy occurs in about one in six people with diabetes. This condition impairs quality of life and increases healthcare costs. Treatment recommendations exist, but individual patient therapy can require a trial-and-error approach. Many treatment options have adjuvant benefits or side effects which should be considered prior to initiating therapy. Often, a combination of treatment modalities with various mechanisms of action is required for adequate pain control. Adequate medication titration and a reasonable trial period should be allowed.
CONCLUSION
The treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy can be challenging, but effective management can improve patient's quality of life.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy impairs quality of life and can be difficult to treat. Many treatment options have adjuvant benefits or side effects which should be considered prior to initiating therapy. Often, a combination of treatment modalities with various mechanisms of action is required for adequate pain control.
Topics: Analgesics; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Diabetic Neuropathies; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Pain Management; Quality of Life
PubMed: 25614498
DOI: 10.1177/0309364614542266 -
Clinical Autonomic Research : Official... Aug 2019Diabetic neuropathy is a common and disabling disorder, and there are currently no proven effective disease-modifying treatments. Physical activity and dietary... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Diabetic neuropathy is a common and disabling disorder, and there are currently no proven effective disease-modifying treatments. Physical activity and dietary interventions in patients with diabetes and diabetic neuropathy have multiple beneficial effects and are generally low risk, which makes lifestyle interventions an attractive treatment option. We reviewed the literature on the effects of physical activity and dietary interventions on length-dependent peripheral neuropathy and cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes.
METHODS
The electronic database PubMed was systematically searched for original human and mouse model studies examining the effect of either dietary or physical activity interventions in subjects with diabetes, prediabetes, or metabolic syndrome.
RESULTS
Twenty studies are included in this review. Fourteen studies were human studies and six were in mice. Studies were generally small with few controlled trials, and there are no widely agreed upon outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS
Recent research indicates that dietary interventions are effective in modifying diabetic neuropathy in animal models, and there are promising data that they may also ameliorate diabetic neuropathy in humans. It has been known for some time that lifestyle interventions can prevent the development of diabetic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects. However, there is emerging evidence that lifestyle interventions are effective in individuals with established diabetic neuropathy. In addition to the observed clinical value of lifestyle interventions, there is emerging evidence of effects on biochemical pathways that improve muscle function and affect other organ systems, including the peripheral nerve. However, data from randomized controlled trials are needed.
Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diet, Healthy; Exercise; Humans; Overweight; Risk Reduction Behavior
PubMed: 31076938
DOI: 10.1007/s10286-019-00607-x -
European Journal of Neurology Jul 2021The coexistence of peripheral neuropathy (PN) and restless legs syndrome (RLS) or Willis-Ekbom disease is relatively frequent, but its prevalence has shown a high... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The coexistence of peripheral neuropathy (PN) and restless legs syndrome (RLS) or Willis-Ekbom disease is relatively frequent, but its prevalence has shown a high variability across studies. In addition, several reports have shown data suggesting the presence of PN in patients with idiopathic RLS.
METHODS
A search was undertaken using the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science Databases, from 1966 to 6 December 2020, crossing the search term 'restless legs syndrome' with 'neuropathy', 'polyneuropathy' (PNP) and 'peripheral neuropathy', and the references of interest for this topic were identified; a meta-analysis was performed, according to PRISMA guidelines, and a calculation of pooled prevalences, where appropriate, was made using standard methods.
RESULTS
Restless legs syndrome has been reported in 5.2%-53.7% of patients with PN (average 21.5%; 95% confidence interval 18.6%-24.5%), and PN has been reported in 0%-87.5% of patients with RLS (average 41.8%; 95% confidence interval 39.9%-43.6%), both being significantly more frequent than in controls. The heterogeneity across studies could be due to differences in the diagnostic criteria used for both RLS and PN. RLS is a frequent clinical complaint in patients with PN of different aetiologies, mainly diabetic PN, uraemic PNP, familial amyloid PNP, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and chronic dysimmune inflammatory PNP. Recent neurophysiological findings suggest the presence of small sensory fibre loss in patients diagnosed with idiopathic RLS, but it remains to be determined whether RLS associated with small sensory fibre loss and idiopathic RLS are different clinical entities.
CONCLUSIONS
Future studies including clinical and neurophysiological assessment and skin biopsy involving a large series of patients with PN and RLS are needed for a better understanding of the association between these two entities.
Topics: Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial; Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; Diabetic Neuropathies; Humans; Polyneuropathies; Restless Legs Syndrome
PubMed: 33772991
DOI: 10.1111/ene.14840 -
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2021The epidemiology and treatment of peripheral neuropathy in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is poorly understood. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The epidemiology and treatment of peripheral neuropathy in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is poorly understood. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence, prevalence, risk factors, and treatments of peripheral neuropathy in SSc.
METHODS
A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases for literature reporting peripheral neuropathy in SSc was performed. Studies evaluating incidence, prevalence, risk factors, and treatments were synthesized. A metaanalysis using a random effects model was used to evaluate the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy.
RESULTS
This systematic review identified 113 studies that reported 949 of 2143 subjects with at least 1 type of peripheral neuropathy. The mean age was 48.5 years. The mean time between SSc onset and detection of peripheral neuropathy was 8.85 years. The pooled prevalence of neuropathy was 27.37% (95% CI 22.35-32.70). Risk factors for peripheral neuropathy in SSc included advanced diffuse disease, anticentromere antibodies, calcinosis cutis, ischemia of the vasa nervorum, iron deficiency anemia, metoclopramide, pembrolizumab, silicosis, and uremia. There were 73 subjects with successful treatments (n = 36 restoring sensation, n = 37 restoring motor or sensorimotor function). Treatments included decompression surgery, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, carbamazepine, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, tricyclic antidepressants, and intravenous Ig.
CONCLUSION
All-cause peripheral neuropathy is not uncommon in SSc. Compression neuropathies can be treated with decompression surgery. Observational data reporting immunosuppressives and anticonvulsants to treat peripheral neuropathy in SSc are limited and conflicting. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions.
Topics: Humans; Incidence; Iron Deficiencies; Middle Aged; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Risk Factors; Scleroderma, Systemic
PubMed: 34210833
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.201299 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Nov 2016The dramatic increase in the number of childhood cancer survivors over the last 60years has made monitoring and minimising long term side effects of cancer treatment... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The dramatic increase in the number of childhood cancer survivors over the last 60years has made monitoring and minimising long term side effects of cancer treatment increasingly important. Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has been described with many commonly used chemotherapy agents. This article provides a critical overview of pediatric CIPN, its incidence, clinical manifestations, late effects, and recent advances in understanding of risk factors and pharmacogenomics as well as evaluating current assessment strategies and treatment approaches.
METHODS
Neurotoxicity data was systematically collated from Medline, Embase and Pubmed and analysed for quality, relevance and originality in three stages prior to inclusion. Quality scoring was done using the QUALSYST assessment tool.
RESULTS
A total of 61 studies met inclusion criteria. Peripheral neuropathy is common and may be long lasting with characteristics specific to each chemotherapy agent. There is significant variability in reported incidence and natural history, related to challenges in clinical assessment and diagnosis. Emerging risk factors for CIPN include treatment factors such as dose, duration and concurrent medication and patient factors such as age and inherited susceptibilities. Recent identification of individual genetic variations has advanced understanding of pathomechanisms and may direct future treatment approaches.
CONCLUSION
While these studies guide suggestions for current clinical practice, further systematic research with development of strategies for amelioration and prevention of CIPN is necessary. Standardised assessment protocols and objective outcomes measures of CIPN applicable to patients of different ages are critical to enabling the development of novel treatments and facilitation of future clinical trials and treatment individualisation.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Disease Progression; Humans; Incidence; Neoplasms; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27664395
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.09.005 -
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Jul 2017Parkinson's disease (PD) has been associated with peripheral neuropathy (PN). PN has been demonstrated in some rare genetic forms of PD (e.g. PARK2 mutations) but has... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Parkinson's disease (PD) has been associated with peripheral neuropathy (PN). PN has been demonstrated in some rare genetic forms of PD (e.g. PARK2 mutations) but has also been linked to levodopa exposure.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review is to clarify any evidence of peripheral nervous system involvement in idiopathic PD.
METHODS
A systematic computer-based literature search was conducted on PubMed database.
FINDINGS
The pooled estimate of the prevalence of large fiber PN in PD was 16.3% (based on 1376 patients). The pooled estimate of the prevalence of biopsy-proven small fiber neuropathy was 56.9% (based on 72 patients). Large fiber PN in PD is in the majority of cases distal, symmetrical, axonal and predominantly sensory. There are, however, few reports of chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy and very occasional cases of acute neuropathies. Although nerve conduction studies have been performed in the majority of the studies, they included only a limited number of nerves, mainly in the lower limbs. There is little evidence to support a direct link between levodopa treatment and the development of PN in idiopathic PD. In the majority of the cases PN has been linked to abnormalities in vitamin B12, methylmalonic acid or fasting homocysteine levels. Additional aetiological risk factors for PN may be responsible for any apparent link between PD and PN.
CONCLUSIONS
Large-scale prospective studies with long-term follow-up with detailed baseline assessments are needed in order to understand the natural history of PN in PD, both on clinical and neurophysiological parameters.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
PubMed: 28566165
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.05.023 -
Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD Aug 2022Chronic immune mediated neuropathy is a heterogenous group of peripheral nerve diseases, encompassing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP),...
Chronic immune mediated neuropathy is a heterogenous group of peripheral nerve diseases, encompassing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), autoimmune nodopathy, multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy. Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 antigen, which has been used in the treatment of autoimmune neuropathies, although the efficacy of RTX remains unclear. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane Register for studies between 2000 and 2021 using the search terms "Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy" OR "Multifocal motor neuropathy" OR "Myelin associated glycoprotein" OR "Distal acquired demyelinating neuropathy" OR "Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy" OR "demyelinating neuropathy" AND "Rituximab". Twenty-three studies were included, of which two were randomised controlled trials, 6 prospective studies and 15 retrospective studies. RTX was effective in 63% of CIDP patients, 48% of anti-MAG neuropathy, and 96% of patients with autoimmune nodopathy. Neurophysiological improvement was evident in 58% of CIDP and 40% of anti-MAG neuropathy patients. Low rates of serious adverse events (2.6%) were observed. These results indicate that RTX has potential as a treatment in immune mediated polyneuropathy, although the quality of evidence supporting its use it poor. Randomized controlled trials are required to reliably establish the efficacy and safety of RTX. Trial registration number: CRD42020179666.
Topics: Humans; Polyneuropathies; Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rituximab
PubMed: 35672205
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2022.05.013 -
Muscle & Nerve Jan 2022Previous studies have shown inconsistent data on the relationship between statin use and polyneuropathy (PN). The current systematic review and meta-analyses were...
INTRODUCTION/AIMS
Previous studies have shown inconsistent data on the relationship between statin use and polyneuropathy (PN). The current systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to comprehensively investigate the risk of incident PN among statin-users compared with non-users by identifying all available studies and summarizing their results.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to October 31, 2020. We included cohort and case-control studies that compared the risk of incident PN between statin-users and non-users. Point estimates and standard errors from eligible studies were pooled together using the generic inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Of 4968 retrieved articles, 6 studies in non-diabetic populations and 2 studies in diabetic populations fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two meta-analyses were performed. The pooled analyses did not find a statistically significant association between the use of statins and risk of incident PN with the pooled odds ratio of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.76; I 74%) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.56-1.21; I 80%) in non-diabetic and diabetic groups respectively.
DISCUSSION
No significant association between the use of statins and the risk of PN was observed in this systematic review and these two meta-analyses. However, there was a high degree of heterogeneity of the meta-analyses.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Odds Ratio; Polyneuropathies
PubMed: 34693541
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27447