-
Muscle & Nerve Jan 2022Previous studies have shown inconsistent data on the relationship between statin use and polyneuropathy (PN). The current systematic review and meta-analyses were...
INTRODUCTION/AIMS
Previous studies have shown inconsistent data on the relationship between statin use and polyneuropathy (PN). The current systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to comprehensively investigate the risk of incident PN among statin-users compared with non-users by identifying all available studies and summarizing their results.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to October 31, 2020. We included cohort and case-control studies that compared the risk of incident PN between statin-users and non-users. Point estimates and standard errors from eligible studies were pooled together using the generic inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Of 4968 retrieved articles, 6 studies in non-diabetic populations and 2 studies in diabetic populations fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two meta-analyses were performed. The pooled analyses did not find a statistically significant association between the use of statins and risk of incident PN with the pooled odds ratio of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.76; I 74%) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.56-1.21; I 80%) in non-diabetic and diabetic groups respectively.
DISCUSSION
No significant association between the use of statins and the risk of PN was observed in this systematic review and these two meta-analyses. However, there was a high degree of heterogeneity of the meta-analyses.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Odds Ratio; Polyneuropathies
PubMed: 34693541
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27447 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2022Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, probably immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, probably immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. Treatment options for MMN are few. People with MMN do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange. Uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005, with an amendment in 2007. We updated the review to incorporate new evidence.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulin in people with MMN.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases on 20 April 2021: the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, and checked the reference lists of included studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered RCTs and quasi-RCTs examining the effects of any dose of IVIg and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in people with definite or probable MMN for inclusion in the review. Eligible studies had to have measured at least one of the following outcomes: disability, muscle strength, or electrophysiological conduction block. We used studies that reported the frequency of adverse effects to assess safety.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently reviewed the literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We followed standard Cochrane methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
Six cross-over RCTs including a total of 90 participants were suitable for inclusion in the review. Five RCTs compared IVIg to placebo, and one compared IVIg to SCIg. Four of the trials comparing IVIg versus placebo involved IVIg-naive participants (induction treatment). In the other two trials, participants were known IVIg responders receiving maintencance IVIg at baseline and were then randomised to maintenance treatment with IVIg or placebo in one trial, and IVIg or SCIg in the other. Risk of bias was variable in the included studies, with three studies at high risk of bias in at least one risk of bias domain. IVIg versus placebo (induction treatment): three RCTs including IVIg-naive participants reported a disability measure. Disability improved in seven out of 18 (39%) participants after IVIg treatment and in two out of 18 (11%) participants after placebo (risk ratio (RR) 3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 10.12; 3 RCTs, 18 participants; low-certainty evidence). The proportion of participants with an improvement in disability at 12 months was not reported. Strength improved in 21 out of 27 (78%) IVIg-naive participants treated with IVIg and one out of 27 (4%) participants who received placebo (RR 11.00, 95% CI 2.86 to 42.25; 3 RCTs, 27 participants; low-certainty evidence). IVIg treatment may increase the proportion of people with resolution of at least one conduction block; however, the results were also consistent with no effect (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 51.70; 4 RCTs, 28 participants; low-certainty evidence). IVIg versus placebo (maintenance treatment): a trial that included participants on maintenance IVIg treatment reported an increase in disability in 17 out of 42 (40%) people switching to placebo and seven out of 42 (17%) remaining on IVIg (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.24; 1 RCT, 42 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and a decrease in grip strength in 20 out of 42 (48%) participants after a switch to placebo treatment compared to four out of 42 (10%) remaining on IVIg (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.54; 1 RCT, 42 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, IVIg versus placebo (induction or maintenance): four trials comparing IVIg and placebo reported adverse events, of which data from two studies could be meta-analysed. Transient side effects were reported in 71% of IVIg-treated participants versus 4.8% of placebo-treated participants in these studies. The pooled RR for the development of side effects was 10.33 (95% CI 2.15 to 49.77; 2 RCTs, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was only one serious side effect (pulmonary embolism) during IVIg treatment. IVIg versus SCIg (maintenance treatment): the trial that compared continuation of IVIg maintenance versus SCIg maintenance did not measure disability. The evidence was very uncertain for muscle strength (standardised mean difference 0.08, 95% CI -0.84 to 1.00; 1 RCT, 9 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence was very uncertain for the number of people with side effects attributable to treatment (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.40; 1 RCT, 9 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Low-certainty evidence from three small RCTs shows that IVIg may improve muscle strength in people with MMN, and low-certainty evidence indicates that it may improve disability; the estimate of the magnitude of improvement of disability has wide CIs and needs further studies to secure its significance. Based on moderate-certainty evidence, it is probable that most IVIg responders deteriorate in disability and muscle strength after IVIg withdrawal. SCIg might be an alternative treatment to IVIg, but the evidence is very uncertain. More research is needed to identify people in whom IVIg withdrawal is possible and to confirm efficacy of SCIg as an alternative maintenance treatment.
Topics: Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Plasma Exchange; Polyneuropathies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35015296
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004429.pub3 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Jan 2022Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most common dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin. It often persists and can adversely affect quality of life... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most common dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin. It often persists and can adversely affect quality of life of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. This systematic review explored the proportions of patients with persistent CIPN and the reporting methods used.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched up to March 2021 for publications reporting CIPN outcomes following adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy at prespecified timepoints in participants with CRC. Secondary outcomes assessed the tools used to measure CIPN. Two authors reviewed full text publications for eligibility, data extraction and appraisal. Meta-analysis was performed where Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (any grade) was reported at the most frequent timepoints.
RESULTS
From 7895 citations identified, 27 studies met the eligibility criteria: six were randomised control trials, and 21 were non-randomised studies. Pooled prevalence of CIPN at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after chemotherapy were 58%, 45%, 32% and 24% respectively. The average prevalence of CIPN decreased by 26% per year after chemotherapy (pooled RR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.72-0.75). Across all studies, ten separate tools were used as the primary measure of CIPN. Quality appraisal identified open-label design and inadequate reporting of participants lost to follow-up as the main methodological limitations.
CONCLUSION
Our summary of reported rates of persistent CIPN indicates substantial long-term toxicity affecting CRC survivors, and will help clinicians estimate CIPN risk and its change over time. The heterogeneity of CIPN measures identified in the review highlights the need for a standardised CIPN assessment.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Oxaliplatin; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Quality of Life
PubMed: 34410459
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06502-4 -
BioMed Research International 2016Purpose. The aim of this paper is to review the published studies on the characteristics of impairments in the postural control and gait performance in diabetic... (Review)
Review
Purpose. The aim of this paper is to review the published studies on the characteristics of impairments in the postural control and gait performance in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods. A review was performed by obtaining publication of all papers reporting on the postural control and gait performance in DPN from Google Scholar, Ovid, SAGE, Springerlink, Science Direct (SD), EBSCO Discovery Service, and Web of Science databases. The keywords used for searching were "postural control," "balance," "gait performance," "diabetes mellitus," and "diabetic peripheral neuropathy." Results. Total of 4,337 studies were hit in the search. 1,524 studies were screened on their titles and citations. Then, 79 studies were screened on their abstract. Only 38 studies were eligible to be selected: 17 studies on postural control and 21 studies on the gait performance. Most previous researches were found to have strong evidence of postural control impairments and noticeable gait deficits in DPN. Deterioration of somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems with the pathologic condition of diabetes on cognitive impairment causes further instability of postural and gait performance in DPN. Conclusions. Postural instability and gait imbalance in DPN may contribute to high risk of fall incidence, especially in the geriatric population. Thus, further works are crucial to highlight this fact in the hospital based and community adults.
Topics: Diabetic Neuropathies; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gait; Gait Disorders, Neurologic; Humans; Postural Balance; Vestibular Diseases
PubMed: 27525281
DOI: 10.1155/2016/9305025 -
BMC Endocrine Disorders Nov 2022Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), due to its potential for causing morbidity and disability from foot ulcers and amputations, is increasingly becoming a source of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), due to its potential for causing morbidity and disability from foot ulcers and amputations, is increasingly becoming a source of concern in Saudi Arabia and worldwide. However, wide variability exists in the prevalence of DPN reported in previous studies in Saudi Arabia, limiting the utility of existing data in national public health policy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the magnitude of DPN in patients living with DM in Saudi Arabia in order to inform policymakers during the implementation of appropriate preventive and treatment strategies for DPN.
METHODS
PubMed, Google Scholar, African Journals Online, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Wiley Online Library were searched systematically to acquire relevant articles based on preset criteria. We evaluated heterogeneity and publication bias and employed a random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence of DPN from the included studies. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in conducting the meta-analysis. Analysis was performed using the STATA Version 12 software.
RESULTS
Twelve studies with a total of 4,556 participants living with DM, of whom 2,081 were identified as having DPN were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of DPN was 39% (95% CI [30%, 49%]). Subgroup analysis based on diagnostic method showed that prevalence estimates for DPN using screening questionnaires and clinical examination were 48% (95% CI [46%, 50%]) and 40% (95% CI: [38%, 42%]), respectively, while the estimated prevalence using nerve conduction studies was 26% (95% CI [15%, 36%]).
CONCLUSION
This study showed a high magnitude of DPN in Saudi Arabia (39%), thus highlighting the need for sustained efforts to reduce the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and DPN in the kingdom.
Topics: Humans; Amputation, Surgical; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Neuropathies; Prevalence; Saudi Arabia
PubMed: 36319996
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-01167-4 -
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Jan 2022Immunomodulatory therapies, including the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have made a profound impact on treatment of advanced cancers in recent decades.... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Immunomodulatory therapies, including the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have made a profound impact on treatment of advanced cancers in recent decades. Neurologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) related to use of these agents are rare but potentially fatal sequelae. This systematic reviewed aimed to describe onset, clinical features, treatment, and outcome of neurological irAEs following ICI usage.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all case reports (n = 168) and case series (n = 29) describing neurological irAEs (n = 255 patients). Patient demographics, clinical features, and clinical courses were extracted and used to assess statistical relationships between reported variables.
RESULTS
Of reports describing neurological irAEs related to ICI use, the majority of cases were in men (66%) and patients above the age of fifty (85%). Disorders of the peripheral nervous system (PNS, 83%) were more common than central nervous system involvement. Neuromuscular disorders were the most common type of neurological irAE (e.g. myasthenia gravis, 36%), followed by peripheral neuropathies (16%), followed by all CNS disorders combined (15%). Most cases presented within the first 5 doses of ICI treatment. Most patients improved clinically, but 24% of cases were fatal. Mortality was highest in patients with neuromuscular irAEs, such as myasthenia gravis and myositis.
CONCLUSION
This systematic literature review describes the largest collection of neurological irAEs to date including both CNS and PNS manifestations of ICIs. The information described herein can be used to better inform monitoring and treatment of patients undergoing treatment with ICIs.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Male; Myositis; Neoplasms; Peripheral Nervous System; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
PubMed: 34942546
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120089 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Feb 2016Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a serious dose-limiting side-effect without any FDA-approved treatment option. Prior reviews focus mostly on... (Review)
Review
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a serious dose-limiting side-effect without any FDA-approved treatment option. Prior reviews focus mostly on pharmacological interventions, but nonpharmaceutical interventions have also been evaluated. A Web of Science and PubMed database search to identify relevant RCTs from January 2005 to May 2015 included the terms: CIPN, cancer; and supplements, vitamin E, goshajinkigan, kampo, acetyl-L-carnitine, carnitine, alpha-lipoic acid, omega-3, glutamine, or glutamate; or massage, acupuncture, mind-body practice, yoga, meditation, Tai-Chi, physical activity, or exercise. Of 1465 publications screened, 12 RCTs evaluated natural products and one evaluated electroacupuncture. Vitamin E may help prevent CIPN. L-Glutamine, goshajinkigan, and omega-3 are also promising. Acetyl-L-carnitine may worsen CIPN and alpha-lipoic acid activity is unknown. Electroacupuncture was not superior to placebo. No RCTs were published regarding other complementary therapies, although some studies mention positive incidental findings. Natural products and complementary therapies deserve further investigation, given the lack of effective CIPN interventions.
Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Antineoplastic Agents; Biological Products; Complementary Therapies; Dietary Supplements; Exercise; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Glutamine; Humans; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Vitamin E
PubMed: 26652982
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.11.014 -
BMC Endocrine Disorders Apr 2020Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global health care problem that can impose a substantial economic burden. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common microvascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global health care problem that can impose a substantial economic burden. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common microvascular complication of DM that increases the potential for morbidity and disability due to ulceration and amputation. Though there is a significant amount of variation in the primary studies on DM regarding the prevalence of DPN in Africa. Hence, this study was aimed to estimate the overall prevalence of DPN in DM patients in Africa.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, African Journals OnLine, WHO African Library, and the Cochrane Review were systematically searched online to retrieve related articles. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was followed. Heterogeneity across the included studies was evaluated by the inconsistency index (I). Publication bias was examined by funnel plot and Egger's regression test. The random-effect model was fitted to estimate the pooled prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy among patients in Africa. The meta-analysis was performed using the STATA™ Version 14 software.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies which includes 269,691 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 46% (95% CI:36.21-55.78%). Based on the subgroup analysis, the highest prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in DM patients was reported in West Africa at 49.4% (95% CI: 32.74, 66.06).
CONCLUSION
This study revealed that the overall prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy is relatively high in Africa. Hence, DPN needs situation-based interventions and preventive strategies, which are specific to the country. Further meta-analysis is needed to identify associated factors for the occurrence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Topics: Africa; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Neuropathies; Humans; Prevalence; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32293400
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-020-0534-5 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Dec 2017Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can adversely affect completion of systemic anti-cancer treatment and cause long-term morbidity. Increasingly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can adversely affect completion of systemic anti-cancer treatment and cause long-term morbidity. Increasingly pharmacogenetic studies have been performed to explore susceptibility to this important adverse effect. A systematic review was conducted to identify pharmacogenetic studies, assess their quality and findings and undertake meta-analysis where possible. 93 studies were included. Notable methodological issues included lack of standardisation and detail in phenotype definition and acknowledgement of potential confounding factors. Insufficient data was presented in many studies meaning only a minority could be included in meta-analysis showing mainly non-significant effects. Nonetheless, SNPs in CYP2C8, CYP3A4, ARHGEF10, EPHA and TUBB2A genes (taxanes), FARS2, ACYP2 and TAC1 (oxaliplatin), and CEP75 and CYP3A5 (vincristine) are of potential interest. These require exploration in large cohort studies with robust methodology and well-defined phenotypes. Seeking standardisation of phenotype, collaboration and subsequently, individual-patient-data meta-analysis may facilitate identifying contributory SNPs which could be combined in a polygenic risk score to predict those most at risk of CIPN.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cohort Studies; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Neoplasms; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 29198326
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.09.009 -
Reumatologia Clinica 2019To review the efficacy and safety of rituximab in vasculitic neuropathy (VN) METHODS: A literature search was performed on Medline and Embase up until 2017. It included... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review the efficacy and safety of rituximab in vasculitic neuropathy (VN) METHODS: A literature search was performed on Medline and Embase up until 2017. It included terms related to "vasculitis","vasculitic neuropathy" and "Rituximab". Research was carried out by two reviewers. The main outcome was rituximab efficacy.
RESULTS
Of an initial selection of 702 articles, 5 remained with a level of evidence between 1+ and 3 and variable recommendation degree. In the only clinical trial included, rituximab was superior to conventional therapy for cryoglobulinemic vasculitis with VN showing an increase in drug retention rate (64.3% vs. 3.5%; P<.001)and with a lower rate of serious adverse effects (.12 vs. .48). Cohort studies of patients with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis showed improvement and complete/partial remission of VN. In a series of 5 cases of refractory EGPA suffering from VN, 60% and 20% of patients achieved complete and partial remission respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Rituximab seems an effective and safe treatment for VN in the context of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. Evidence for specific efficacy in VN in the context of other types of vasculitis is lacking.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Cryoglobulinemia; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Rituximab; Vasculitis
PubMed: 30691946
DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2018.10.007