-
NeuroImage. Clinical 2015Mechanisms underlying the development of phantom limb pain and neuropathic pain after limb amputation and spinal cord injury, respectively, are poorly understood. The... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Mechanisms underlying the development of phantom limb pain and neuropathic pain after limb amputation and spinal cord injury, respectively, are poorly understood. The goal of this systematic review was to assess the robustness of evidence in support of "maladaptive plasticity" emerging from applications of advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS
Using MeSH heading search terms in PubMed and SCOPUS, a systematic review was performed querying published manuscripts.
RESULTS
From 146 candidate publications, 10 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Results from fMRI investigations provided some level of support for maladaptive cortical plasticity, including longitudinal studies that demonstrated a change in functional organization related to decreases in pain. However, a number of studies have reported no relationship between reorganization, pain and deafferentation, and emerging evidence has also suggested the opposite - that is, chronic pain is associated with preserved cortical function.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on advanced functional neuroimaging results, there is only limited evidence for a relationship between chronic pain intensity and reorganization after deafferentation. The review demonstrates the need for additional neuroimaging studies to clarify the relationship between chronic pain and reorganization.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Brain; Brain Mapping; Chronic Pain; Extremities; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neuralgia; Neuronal Plasticity; Pain Measurement; Phantom Limb; Spinal Cord Injuries
PubMed: 26740913
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.018 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2015This is the first update of a Cochrane review published in Issue 5, 2010 on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for phantom pain and stump pain following... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This is the first update of a Cochrane review published in Issue 5, 2010 on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for phantom pain and stump pain following amputation in adults. Pain may present in a body part that has been amputated (phantom pain) or at the site of amputation (stump pain), or both. Phantom pain and stump pain are complex and multidimensional and the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear. The condition remains a severe burden for those who are affected by it. The mainstay treatments are predominately pharmacological, with increasing acknowledgement of the need for non-drug interventions. TENS has been recommended as a treatment option but there has been no systematic review of available evidence. Hence, the effectiveness of TENS for phantom pain and stump pain is currently unknown.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the analgesic effectiveness of TENS for the treatment of phantom pain and stump pain following amputation in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
For the original version of the review we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, PEDRO and SPORTDiscus (February 2010). For this update, we searched the same databases for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 2010 to 25 March 2015.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We only included RCTs investigating the use of TENS for the management of phantom pain and stump pain following an amputation in adults.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We planned that where available and appropriate, data from outcome measures were to be pooled and presented as an overall estimate of the effectiveness of TENS.
MAIN RESULTS
In the original review there were no RCTs that examined the effectiveness of TENS for the treatment of phantom pain and stump pain in adults. For this update, we did not identify any additional RCTs for inclusion.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There were no RCTs to judge the effectiveness of TENS for the management of phantom pain and stump pain. The published literature on TENS for phantom pain and stump pain lacks the methodological rigour and robust reporting needed to confidently assess its effectiveness. Further RCT evidence is required before an assessment can be made. Since publication of the original version of this review, we have found no new studies and our conclusions remain unchanged.
Topics: Adult; Amputation Stumps; Humans; Pain Management; Phantom Limb; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
PubMed: 26284511
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007264.pub3 -
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Mar 2017The aim of this manuscript was to investigate the effectiveness of conservative therapy for phantom limb pain (PLP). In this systematic review, CINAHL, AMED, the... (Review)
Review
The aim of this manuscript was to investigate the effectiveness of conservative therapy for phantom limb pain (PLP). In this systematic review, CINAHL, AMED, the Cochrane database of systematic reviews, PEDro, psychology and behavioral sciences collection, and MEDLINE were systematically searched for appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Selected papers were assessed for risk of bias, and evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. Twelve RCTs met initial inclusion/exclusion criteria, of which five were of sufficient quality for final inclusion. There is conflicting evidence from two RCTs for the effectiveness of electromagnetic shielding limb liners on pain in the short term. There is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of both hypnosis in the short term and graded motor imagery (GMI) in the short-to-medium term. Additionally, there is limited evidence that a single session of mirror therapy has no immediate effect on PLP. Limb liner discomfort was the only adverse effect identified. This review identifies a range of conservative therapies, many of which demonstrate preliminary evidence of potential with respect to clinically worthwhile effects above control interventions and few, if any, adverse effects. However, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence upon which to make any firm clinical conclusions.
Topics: Amputation Stumps; Amputees; Conservative Treatment; Humans; Hypnosis; Imagery, Psychotherapy; Magnetic Field Therapy; Magnets; Motor Activity; Pain Measurement; Pain Perception; Pain Threshold; Phantom Limb; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28339333
DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1288283 -
Neuromodulation : Journal of the... Jun 2016Traditional tonic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been approved by FDA for chronic pain of intractable back and limb pain. However, it induces paresthesia and relieves... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Traditional tonic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been approved by FDA for chronic pain of intractable back and limb pain. However, it induces paresthesia and relieves pain poorly to some extent. Recently, burst SCS has been developed for pain reduction without the mandatory paresthesia.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review of burst SCS for chronic back and limb pain.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review is to determine the effects of burst SCS on pain relief without paresthesia for various conditions including failed back surgery syndrome, painful diabetic neuropathy, and radiculopathy.
METHODS
The available literature on burst SCS in managing chronic pain without paresthesia was reviewed. The 2011 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence Guidelines Process Manual was used to grade the evidence and risk of bias. Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, SCOPUS, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles.
OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome measure was pain relief and paresthesia status. Secondary outcome measures were improvement in pain quality, functional status, and complications.
RESULTS
For this review, five studies including a total of 117 patients met the eligibility criteria. All studies were graded a Class IV study.
LIMITATIONS
The limitations of this systematic review include an overall paucity of high quality studies.
CONCLUSION
Burst SCS is a new approach that possibly causes more pain reduction for short-term duration than tonic SCS without eliciting paresthesia. The evidence based on this systematic review for burst SCS in treating chronic intractable pain is considered fair and limited. This is an AAN recommendation level U. Further research is needed with a larger sample size and a standardized study design.
Topics: Back Pain; Chronic Pain; Humans; Pain Measurement; Phantom Limb; Spinal Cord Stimulation
PubMed: 27139915
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12440 -
Acta Ophthalmologica Nov 2018To investigate causes, diagnostics and treatment modalities for persistent socket pain (PSP) after enucleation and evisceration.
PURPOSE
To investigate causes, diagnostics and treatment modalities for persistent socket pain (PSP) after enucleation and evisceration.
METHODS
A systematic search was undertaken in accordance with the PRISMA Statement, in PubMed, Embase.com and Thomson Reuters/Web of Science. We searched for relevant papers until the 28th of July 2016. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with a history of enucleation or evisceration, (2) PSP, (3) report of the cause and/or used diagnostics and/or treatment modality, (4) full text in English, Dutch or Spanish language. Excluded were (1) review articles, (2) comments, and publications concerning, (3) nonhumans, (4) exenterated patients, (5) acute postoperative pain, or (6) periorbital pain without pain in the socket. Given the lack of high quality evidence from randomized controlled trials, we examined all available evidence from primary observational studies and assessed quality within this lower level of evidence.
RESULTS
A total of 32 studies were included. Causes of PSP found were prosthesis-related (n = 5), dry socket (n = 2), trochleitis (n = 3), compression of the trigeminal nerve (n = 2), implant-related (n = unknown), inflammation (n = 5), surgery-related (n = 4), neuromas (n = 8), malignant tumours (n = 3), psychiatric/psychosocial (n = 2), phantom pain (n = 149), rarer entities (n = 3) or unknown (n = 14). Nonsurgical treatments suffice for conditions as trochleitis, prosthesis-related pain, dry socket and for phantom pain. Other causes of pain may require more invasive treatments such as implant removal.
CONCLUSION
Careful history and examination can give some direction in the diagnostic procedure; however, PSP is probably multifactorial and the specific origin(s) may remain uncertain. Implant replacement can be an effective treatment. Studies to identifiy less invasive procedures are required.
Topics: Eye Diseases; Eye Enucleation; Eye Evisceration; Eye Pain; Humans; Orbital Diseases; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 29633581
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13688 -
Archives of Rehabilitation Research and... Jun 2019This systematic review aims to evaluate current literature for the prevalence, causes, and effect of low back pain (LBP) in traumatic lower limb amputees, specifically... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aims to evaluate current literature for the prevalence, causes, and effect of low back pain (LBP) in traumatic lower limb amputees, specifically its association with the kinematics and kinetics of the lumbar spine and lower extremities.
DATA SOURCES
Databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched systematically for eligible studies from inception to January 2018.
STUDY SELECTION
The inclusion terms were synonyms of , , and , whereas studies involving nontraumatic amputee populations, single cases, or reviews were excluded. 1822 studies were initially identified, of which 44 progressed to full-text reading, and 11 studies were included in the review.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two independent reviewers reviewed the included studies, which were evaluated using a quality assessment tool and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system for risk of bias, prior to analyzing results and conclusions.
DATA SYNTHESIS
There was an LBP prevalence of 52%-64% in traumatic amputees, compared to 48%-77% in the general amputee population (predominantly vascular, tumor, trauma), attributed to a mixture of biomechanical, psychosocial, and personal factors. These factors determined the presence, frequency, and severity of the pain in the amputees, significantly affecting their quality of life. However, little evidence was available on causality.
CONCLUSION
The high prevalence of LBP in traumatic amputees highlights the necessity to advance research into the underlying mechanics behind LBP, specifically the spinal kinematics and kinetics. This may facilitate improvements in rehabilitation, with the potential to improve quality of life in traumatic amputees.
PubMed: 33543047
DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100007 -
BMC Neurology Feb 2024We previously performed a systematic review and meta-analysis which revealed a Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) prevalence estimate of 64% [95% CI: 60.01-68.1]. The prevalence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
We previously performed a systematic review and meta-analysis which revealed a Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) prevalence estimate of 64% [95% CI: 60.01-68.1]. The prevalence estimates varied significantly between developed and developing countries. Remarkably, there is limited evidence on the prevalence of PLP and associated risk factors in African populations.
METHODS
Adults who had undergone limb amputations between January 2018 and October 2022 were recruited from healthcare facilities in the Western and Eastern Cape Provinces. We excluded individuals with auditory or speech impairments that hindered clear communication via telephone. Data on the prevalence and risk factors for PLP were collected telephonically from consenting and eligible participants. The prevalence of PLP was expressed as a percentage with a 95% confidence interval. The associations between PLP and risk factors for PLP were tested using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The strength of association was calculated using the Odds Ratio where association was confirmed.
RESULTS
The overall PLP prevalence was 71.73% [95% CI: 65.45-77.46]. Persistent pre-operative pain, residual limb pain, and non-painful phantom limb sensations were identified as risk factors for PLP.
CONCLUSION
This study revealed a high prevalence of PLP. The use of effective treatments targeting pre-amputation pain may yield more effective and targeted pre-amputation care, leading to improved quality of life after amputation.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Phantom Limb; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38321380
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03547-w -
Biomedicines Oct 2022Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been utilized for over 50 years with accumulating evidence of efficacy in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The level and... (Review)
Review
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been utilized for over 50 years with accumulating evidence of efficacy in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The level and strength of evidence supporting the use of PNS for peripheral neuropathic pain remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to synthesize data from prospective studies on the efficacy of PNS for neuropathic pain as it pertains to pain intensity, neurological deficits/neuropathy (e.g., weakness, sensory deficits, gait/balance), and other secondary outcomes (quality of life, satisfaction, emotional functioning, and adverse events). In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identified articles from MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Overall, per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, pooled results demonstrate very low quality or low quality of evidence supporting modest to substantial improvement in pain and neurological function after PNS implantation for treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. PNS for phantom limb pain was the only indication that had moderate level evidence. Future prospective and well-powered studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of PNS for peripheral neuropathic pain.
PubMed: 36289867
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102606 -
Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und... Nov 2023Up to 80% of patients after amputation are affected by phantom limb pain. This may be due to various mechanisms of cortical reorganisation. Non-surgical treatment of the...
Up to 80% of patients after amputation are affected by phantom limb pain. This may be due to various mechanisms of cortical reorganisation. Non-surgical treatment of the neuropathic phantom limb pain involves mirror therapy. Thereby, the use of a mirror should induce the illusion that the extremity has been preserved. This illusion should initiate processes to restore the original organisation of the somatosensory and motor cortex and thus to reduce pain. Evidence of mirror therapy to treat lower extremity phantom limb pain is rare. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to qualitatively analyse the efficacy of mirror therapy for treatment of phantom limb pain in adult patients after unilateral amputations of the lower extremity.The databases Medline (PubMed), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Library (Central), and OPENGREY were systematically searched until 26th November 2020, followed by continued searches in these databases to provide a review of updated literature. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation (Risk of Bias Tool [RoB]) of included studies were conducted by two reviewers independently. The primary outcome was pain intensity, and secondary outcomes were pain frequency, pain duration, activities of daily life (ADL), and quality of life. The methodology of this review follows the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.The search revealed 234 articles. Four articles were included in the analysis. A reduction in pain intensity due to mirror therapy was reported in all studies, however, in only 2 studies there were significant differences between mirror therapy and the comparison after 4 weeks of treatment (p < 0.001; p < 0.05). This significant difference was maintained after 3 and 6 months follow-up in one of those studies (p < 0.001). The outcomes pain frequency, pain duration, and ADL were decreased after 4 and 10 weeks of mirror therapy compared to comparison, but with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). After 6 months, there was a significant improvement in the duration of pain and in ADL after mirror therapy compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Differences in the results quality of life between the intervention group and comparison were observed in 2 studies.Mirror therapy of high frequency and duration is an effective intervention to reduce phantom limb pain in patients after unilateral lower extremity amputation. The superiority of mirror therapy to other interventions cannot be concluded, as the evidence was of low quality.
PubMed: 37967831
DOI: 10.1055/a-2188-3565 -
British Journal of Pain Feb 2024To evaluate the efficacy of conventional and novel non-pharmacologic, non-invasive therapeutic interventions in physiotherapy for the treatment of phantom limb pain...
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of conventional and novel non-pharmacologic, non-invasive therapeutic interventions in physiotherapy for the treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) in post-amputee patients.
METHODS
A systematic search for the articles was conducted in multiple electronic databases such as PUBMED, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), following the PRISMA method and only published articles from the last 12 years (2010-2022) evaluating the efficacy of different physiotherapy interventions for the treatment of PLP in post-amputee patients were included. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the articles were assessed and evaluated by two independent reviewers using the PEDro scale, Methodological index for non-randomized studies scale (MINORS), and Cochrane collaboration's assessment tool.
RESULT
A total of 1840 articles were identified, out of which 17 articles (11 RCTs and 6 pilot studies) were ultimately chosen after the full-text screening. After reviewing the articles, evidence identified in RCTs and pilot studies indicates towards significant improvement in reducing the severity of PLP in post-amputee patients by using different physiotherapy interventions.
CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION
Physiotherapy interventions with advance modalities and exercises can be used to increase the overall effectiveness of the treatment and to reduce the severity of phantom limb pain in post-amputee patients. However, due to the lack of consistent evidence for a given intervention, it becomes even more difficult to reach a majority consensus as to which intervention better assess all the mechanism of PLP thereby alleviating the problem of PLP in post-amputee patients. Therefore, more rigorous randomized controlled trials will be required in the future to reach a conclusion.
PubMed: 38344263
DOI: 10.1177/20494637231197002