-
Journal of Endodontics Nov 2015Signaling molecules and responding dental pulp stem cells are the 2 main control keys of dentin regeneration/dentinogenesis. The aim of this study was to present a... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Signaling molecules and responding dental pulp stem cells are the 2 main control keys of dentin regeneration/dentinogenesis. The aim of this study was to present a systematic review investigating the gene expression of various dental pulp cells in response to different variants of tricalcium silicate cements.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was performed by 2 independent reviewers followed by article selection and data extraction. Studies analyzing all sorts of dental pulp cells (DPCs) and any variant of tricalcium silicate cement either as the experimental or as the control group were included.
RESULTS
A total of 39 articles were included in the review. Among the included studies, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply, Tulsa Dental, OK) was the most commonly used tricalcium silicate cement variant. The extracellular signal regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway was the most commonly activated pathway to be identified, and similarly, dentin sialophosphoprotein osteocalcin dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1, alkaline phosphatase, bone sialoprotein, osteopontin, type I collagen, and Runx2 were the most commonly expressed genes in that order of frequency.
CONCLUSIONS
Biodentine (Septodont Ltd, Saint Maur des Faussés, France), Bioaggregate (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, BC, Canada), and mineral trioxide aggregate stimulate the osteogenic/odontogenic capacity of DPCs by proliferation, angiogenesis, and biomineralization through the activation of the extracellular signal regulated kinase ½, nuclear factor E2 related factor 2, p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase, p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor kappa B, and fibroblast growth factor receptor pathways. When DPCs are placed into direct contact with tricalcium silicate cements, they show higher levels of gene activation, which in turn could translate into more effective pulpal repair and faster and more predictable formation of reparative dentin.
Topics: Calcium Compounds; Cell Proliferation; Cytokines; Dental Materials; Dental Pulp; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Osteogenesis; Silicates
PubMed: 26381895
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.015 -
Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 2019The clinical management of OLP represents a considerable challenge for the oral physician. The aim of this review is to assess the main intervention used in the...
AIM
The clinical management of OLP represents a considerable challenge for the oral physician. The aim of this review is to assess the main intervention used in the management of OLP and the efficacy of every type of treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched and analyzed PubMed database for articles on OLP management. Only randomized controlled trials, comparing an active treatment with placebo, or between different active treatments, were considered in this systematic review. Only patients with symptomatic OLP were included and interventions of all types were considered (topical treatment, systemic drugs, non pharmacological intervention).
RESULTS
A total of 25 randomized controlled trials were examined and included in this review. Steroids are the most frequently employed drug in the treatment of OLP and their efficacy and safety are demonstrated. Also calcineurin inhibitors and photo-dynamic therapy are used in different studies for OLP management, with positive results.
CONCLUSION
Topical steroids remain the first-line treatment for symptomatic OLP, however, many different pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies would represent a valid alternative for its management, but, nowadays they require further investigations.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Calcineurin; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Humans; Lichen Planus, Oral; Photochemotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Steroids
PubMed: 30836913
DOI: 10.2174/1389557519666190301144157 -
The Journal of Contemporary Dental... May 2018Biomarkers are detected during bone formation and resorption associated with the dynamics of bone metabolism and are gaining importance as preferential indicators of...
BACKGROUND
Biomarkers are detected during bone formation and resorption associated with the dynamics of bone metabolism and are gaining importance as preferential indicators of bone healing in comparison with conventional methodologies. Current literature suggests that the usage of bone turnover markers for monitoring bone regeneration in association with biomaterials is limited.
AIM
To systematically review literature and evaluate whether bone-biomarkers can independently predict bone regeneration following implantation of various bone biomaterials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE) database from 1980 to January 2017. The articles for systematic review were selected based on formulated inclusion and exclusion criteria Results: Upon database searching, 443 articles were retrieved and thoroughly reviewed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In all, 41 studies were finally included for evaluation out of which 4 were clinical studies and the remaining 37 studies utilized animal models. On further evaluation, 12 studies reported the presence of biomarkers in association with cellular response during bone regeneration around bio-materials. Moreover, biomarkers related to enzyme activity and matrix protein derivatives were enhanced during bone-matrix deposition as reported in 14 studies. Inorganic skeletal matrix biomarkers indicative of bone mineralization showed positive expression in eight studies.
CONCLUSION
Several biomarkers appear to be useful for the assessment of bone regeneration around biomaterials. Although biomarkers are capable of independently predicting bone regeneration, lack of substantial evidence in the literature limits their true clinical utility.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Noninvasive and inexpensive methods of isolating and characterization of biomarkers from cellular and extracellular skeletal matrix during bone regeneration have proven value in evaluating success of bone biomaterials.
Topics: Alkaline Phosphatase; Biocompatible Materials; Biomarkers; Bone Regeneration; Calcification, Physiologic; Cathepsin K; Collagen Type I; Dental Implants; Humans; Osteocalcin; Osteopontin; PubMed; Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase
PubMed: 29807974
DOI: No ID Found -
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research Nov 2019To evaluate whether changes in the concentration of different biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) can be used to detect the root resorption process in...
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate whether changes in the concentration of different biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) can be used to detect the root resorption process in adult or adolescent patients undergoing treatment with a fixed appliance, in comparison with untreated subjects or treated patients not showing signs of root resorption.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The following databases were analysed in the period between June 2017 and March 2018, without any language and initial date restrictions: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. A quality assessment instrument (QAI) was developed to establish the risk of bias.
RESULTS
A total of 1127 articles were analysed. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven studies qualified for the final review. The QAI tool revealed that five articles were at a moderate risk of bias and two articles were at a low risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Dentine phosphoprotein (DPP) may be considered a relatively useful marker for root resorption. Dentinal sialoprotein (DSP) could be a potential biomarker but is not highly helpful at detecting root shortening. Inflammatory cytokines (pro- and anti-resorption), osteopontin (OPN), osteoprotegerin (OPG), RANKL and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) are useful biomarkers to explain the biological mechanisms that occur during orthodontic movement but are not specific enough. Further studies are required to clarify the role of GM-CSF as a potential biomarker to distinguish subjects at a risk of severe root resorption in the early phase.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Biomarkers; Cytokines; Gingival Crevicular Fluid; Humans; Root Resorption; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 31207100
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12329