-
Journal of the American Academy of... Jan 2015To evaluate the effect of antipsychotics on the corrected QT (QTc) interval in youth. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of antipsychotics on the corrected QT (QTc) interval in youth.
METHOD
We searched PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) for randomized or open clinical trials of antipsychotics in youth <18 years with QTc data, meta-analyzing the results. Meta-regression analyses evaluated the effect of age, sex, dose, and study duration on QTc. Incidences of study-defined QTc prolongation (>440-470 milliseconds), QTc >500 milliseconds, and QTc change >60 milliseconds were also evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 55 studies were meta-analyzed, evaluating 108 treatment arms covering 9 antipsychotics and including 5,423 patients with QTc data (mean age = 12.8 ± 3.6 years, female = 32.1%). Treatments included aripiprazole: studies = 14; n = 814; haloperidol: studies = 1; n = 15; molindone: studies = 3; n = 125; olanzapine: studies = 5; n = 212; paliperidone: studies = 3; n = 177; pimozide: studies = 1; n = 25; quetiapine: studies = 5; n = 336; risperidone: studies = 23; n = 2,234; ziprasidone: studies = 10, n = 523; and placebo: studies = 19, n = 962. Within group, from baseline to endpoint, aripiprazole significantly decreased the QTc interval (-1.44 milliseconds, CI = -2.63 to -0.26, p = .017), whereas risperidone (+1.68, CI = +0.67 to +2.70, p = .001) and especially ziprasidone (+8.74, CI = +5.19 to +12.30, p < .001) significantly increased QTc. Compared to pooled placebo arms, aripiprazole decreased QTc (p = .007), whereas ziprasidone increased QTc (p < .001). Compared to placebo, none of the investigated antipsychotics caused a significant increase in the incidence of the 3 studied QTc prolongation measures, but there was significant reporting bias.
CONCLUSION
Based on these data, the risk of pathological QTc prolongation seems low during treatment with the 9 studied antipsychotics in otherwise healthy youth. Nevertheless, because individual risk factors interact with medication-related QTc effects, both medication and patient factors need to be considered when choosing antipsychotic treatment.
Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Electrocardiography; Humans; Long QT Syndrome
PubMed: 25524787
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.10.002 -
Pharmacopsychiatry Jan 2019The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic drugs for tic disorders (TDs) in a network meta-analysis. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic drugs for tic disorders (TDs) in a network meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and 4 Chinese databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs for TDs were included.
RESULTS
Sixty RCTs were included. In terms of tic symptom score, compared with placebo, haloperidol, risperidone, aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, and ziprasidone can significantly improve tic symptom score (standardized mean differences [SMD] ranged from -12.32 to -3.20). Quetiapine was superior to haloperidol, pimozide, risperidone, tiapride, aripiprazole, and penfluridol for improving tic symptom score (SMD ranged from -28.24 to -7.59). Compared with tiapride, aripiprazole could significantly improve tic symptom score (SMD=-4.27). Compared with all other drugs, penfluridol was not effective. Atypical antipsychotics were generally well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS
Atypical antipsychotics (risperidone and aripiprazole) appear to be the most robust evidence-based options for the treatment of TDs. Quetiapine may be a promising therapy. Ziprasidone and olanzapine are also effective, but the evidence is lacking. Further high-quality directly comparing different pharmacological treatment studies are justified.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Bayes Theorem; Humans; Tic Disorders
PubMed: 29506305
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124872 -
Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford,... Sep 2021Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by involuntary muscle movements manifesting as motor and vocal tics. In the majority, tics are... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by involuntary muscle movements manifesting as motor and vocal tics. In the majority, tics are manageable without medication. Where tics cause discomfort or impair function, behavioural or pharmaceutical treatments may be considered.
AIMS
To provide a meticulous examination of the quality of evidence for the current pharmacological treatments for TS.
METHODS
PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of aripiprazole, risperidone, clonidine, guanfacine, haloperidol, pimozide, tiapride and sulpiride for the treatment of tics in children and adults with TS. Quality of reporting and risk of bias were assessed against the CONSORT checklist and Cochrane risk of bias criteria, respectively.
RESULTS
Seventeen RCTs were identified. Response rates reached 88.6% for aripiprazole, 68.9% for clonidine, 62.5% for risperidone and 19% for guanfacine. Statistically significant improvements were reported for all medications compared to placebo in at least one study and for at least one measure of tic severity. Most studies predated the CONSORT and Cochrane criteria and did not score highly when assessed on these measures.
CONCLUSIONS
There are relatively few placebo-controlled trials of commonly prescribed medications. Studies are often of poor quality and short duration. There is evidence for the efficacy of each medication, but no drug is clearly superior. Clonidine and guanfacine are better tolerated than antipsychotics, but less effective. There is too little evidence to determine whether adults respond differently from children.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Child; Humans; Patient Acuity; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Tourette Syndrome; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34286606
DOI: 10.1177/02698811211032445 -
International Clinical... May 2020To collect the best available evidence and to compare the first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) vs. the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the treatment of...
To collect the best available evidence and to compare the first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) vs. the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the treatment of delusional disorder (DD). Systematic review including studies evaluating treatment response in DD using clinician-rated scales appearing in PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception till September 2019. Those studies meeting inclusion criteria were selected. Outcomes were summarized into two response categories: (1) response to treatment equal to or greater than 50% and (2) response less than 50%. Biases and quality of the studies were evaluated, and relevant data were extracted. Finally, both narrative review and quantitative synthesis were performed. The final sample included six studies (437 patients, 318 on treatment with SGAs). Antipsychotics achieved a good response in 32.3% of patients. Effectiveness differences between FGA and SGA were only marginal favouring the former. Among the most used antipsychotics, risperidone and olanzapine showed, respectively, 34.3 and 33.7% good response. Pimozide (n = 35) demonstrated a higher response rates compared with other antipsychotics. Inpatients showed the best treatment outcomes. Antipsychotics appeared to be an effective treatment in patients with DD. FGA were slightly superior to SGA. Pimozide does not seem to provide any advantage in most DD subtypes.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32097136
DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000306