-
Expert Review of Gastroenterology &... Mar 2023There is no conclusive evidence comparing the efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists to the other guidelines recommended pharmacotherapy for... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, pioglitazone and vitamin E for liver histology among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: systematic review and pilot network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
INTRODUCTION
There is no conclusive evidence comparing the efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists to the other guidelines recommended pharmacotherapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Therefore, we aim to compare the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists, pioglitazone and vitamin E in patients with NAFLD.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to 11 April 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing GLP-1 receptor agonists, pioglitazone and vitamin E against placebo or other active controls in patients with NAFLD were included.
RESULTS
Nine RCTs including 1482 patients proved eligible. GLP-1 receptor agonists ranked first in steatosis, ballooning necrosis, γ-glutamyl transferase, body weight, body mass index, and triglycerides. Administration of GLP-1 receptor agonists, as compared with placebo, was associated with improvement in liver histology [steatosis (OR = 4.11, 95% CI: 2.83, 5.96), ballooning necrosis (OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 2.14, 4.41), lobular inflammation (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.29, 2.68), fibrosis (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.20)].
CONCLUSIONS
GLP-1 receptor agonists were as effective as pioglitazone and vitamin E for liver histology among patients with NAFLD. GLP-1 receptor agonists might be considered as an alternative or complementary treatment in the future clinical practice. [Figure: see text].
Topics: Humans; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hypoglycemic Agents; Necrosis; Network Meta-Analysis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Pioglitazone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vitamin E; Pilot Projects
PubMed: 36689199
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2172397 -
Diabetology International Jan 2019Studies investigating bladder cancer risk in pioglitazone-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients report conflicting results. Previous meta-analyses on this topic...
BACKGROUND
Studies investigating bladder cancer risk in pioglitazone-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients report conflicting results. Previous meta-analyses on this topic utilized publications prior to 2013. More long-term observational studies have been published since then. We reviewed the accumulated evidence and updated findings from previous meta-analyses.
METHODS
This meta-analysis was based on a systematic review of peer-reviewed observational studies published prior to September 30, 2016. Eligible studies were identified using a specified MEDLINE search. References from included studies and from previous meta-analyses were screened for additional records. Meta-analysis hazards ratios were derived using a random-effects model. Several sensitivity analyses including hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis with country-specific effects were conducted.
RESULTS
Of 363 identified records, 23 studies were included in this review and 18 in the actual meta-analyses. For bladder cancer outcome, the estimated effect size for ever vs. never use of pioglitazone was 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.28]. In the cumulative dose and duration analyses, highest effect was observed in the highest/longest exposure group, but substantial heterogeneity was present. In the sensitivity analysis, only studies adjusted for lifestyle-related factors were included and the frequentist effect size was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.00-1.40, = 0.054). However, the risk was not verified in the Bayesian framework with an effect size of 1.17 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.94-1.54].
CONCLUSIONS
In line with previous meta-analyses, we observed a small but statistically significant association between ever (vs. never) use of pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk; however, causality is not established and alternative explanations cannot be ruled out.
PubMed: 30800561
DOI: 10.1007/s13340-018-0360-4 -
Diabetes & Metabolism Feb 2017Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and an unfavourable outcome following stroke. Apart from pioglitazone, glucose-lowering... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and an unfavourable outcome following stroke. Apart from pioglitazone, glucose-lowering modalities have not been shown to protect against stroke. Nevertheless, there is evidence from experimental studies of potential neuroprotective effects with dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, especially if treatment starts before stroke.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a meta-analysis of available evidence regarding the risk of stroke in individuals taking DPP-4 inhibitors.
METHODS
All available data from prospective randomized placebo-controlled trials involving DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM patients published up to December 2015 were considered. The included trials reported data on the incidence of stroke with a recruitment rate of at least 100 diabetes patients and a follow-up of at least 12 weeks.
RESULTS
A total of 19 small randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of gliptins (n=9278), along with three multicentre prospective double-blind placebo-controlled RCTs assessing cardiovascular outcomes as the primary endpoint and involving 36,395 T2DM patients, were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis of the small RCTs showed a non-significant trend towards benefit with DPP-4 inhibitors against stroke [odds ratio (OR): 0.639, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.336-1.212; P=0.170]. In contrast, in the analysis of RCTs reporting on cardiovascular safety, there was no difference in the risk of stroke with gliptin treatment compared with a placebo (OR: 0.996, 95% CI: 0.850-1.166; P=0.958).
CONCLUSION
The promising data from experimental studies regarding cardioprotective gliptin-associated effects against stroke were not supported by available data from trials specifically looking at cardiovascular safety.
Topics: Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Stroke
PubMed: 27916514
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2016.10.006 -
Neurology India 2023Disease-modifying agents like Pioglitazone have shown promising effects on neuroinflammation and homeostasis of amyloid plaques, but there is a lack of research papers... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Drug Repositioning of Pioglitazone in Management and Improving the Cognitive Function among the Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Disease-modifying agents like Pioglitazone have shown promising effects on neuroinflammation and homeostasis of amyloid plaques, but there is a lack of research papers providing conclusive evidence.
OBJECTIVES
This study is aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of Pioglitazone in improving cognitive function in patients with mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Trials published in the last 12 years were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and other trial registries. Five hundred twenty-five records were obtained, from which five studies were included for quantitative analysis. Studies comparing Pioglitazone with a suitable placebo or other oral hypoglycemic agent were considered for review. Data was extracted using a pretested form, which was followed by a risk of bias assessment (ROB) with Cochrane's ROB assessment tool.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included studies where Pioglitazone (15-30 mg) was compared to other oral hypoglycemic agents, placebo, or diabetic diet for a minimum duration of 6 months. Pioglitazone did not show a statistically significant improvement in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores [mean difference (MD): -1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.14-1.81]. By conducting sensitivity analysis with the removal of one study, significant efficacy was obtained [MD: -2.75; 95% CI: -4.84--0.66]. The Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory I (WMS-R) scores had a significant improvement in the Pioglitazone group [MD: 2.02; 95% CI: 0.09-3.95].
CONCLUSION
Pioglitazone is a safe medication that has a promising effect in slowing the advancement of AD.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Pioglitazone; Drug Repositioning; Cognition
PubMed: 38174446
DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.391397 -
The Indian Journal of Medical Research Nov 2016With pioglitazone ban and subsequent revoking in India along with varying regulatory decisions in other countries, it was decided to carry out a systematic review on its... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES
With pioglitazone ban and subsequent revoking in India along with varying regulatory decisions in other countries, it was decided to carry out a systematic review on its safety, efficacy and drug utilization in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India and compare with the data from the European Medicines Agency Assessment Report (EMA-AR).
METHODS
Systematic review was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct databases using 'pioglitazone AND India AND human' and 'pioglitazone AND India AND human AND patient' and compared with EMA-AR. Spontaneous reports in World Health Organization VigiBase from India were compared with VigiBase data from other countries.
RESULTS
Sixty six publications, 26 (efficacy), 32 (drug utilization) and eight (safety), were retrieved. In India, pioglitazone was used at 15-30 mg/day mostly with metformin and sulphonylurea, being prescribed to 26.7 and 8.4 per cent patients in north and south, respectively. The efficacy in clinical trials (CTs) was similar to those in EMA-AR. Incidence of bladder cancer in pioglitazone exposed and non-exposed patients was not significantly different in an Indian retrospective cohort study. There were two cases and a series of eight cases of bladder cancer published but none reported in VigiBase.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS
In India, probably due to lower dose, lower background incidence of bladder cancer and smaller sample size in epidemiological studies, association of bladder cancer with pioglitazone was not found to be significant. Reporting of CTs and adverse drug reactions to Clinical Trials Registry of India and Pharmacovigilance Programme of India, respectively, along with compliance studies with warning given in package insert and epidemiological studies with larger sample size are needed.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; India; Metformin; Pioglitazone; Thiazolidinediones
PubMed: 28361819
DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_650_15 -
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology Oct 2017Vildagliptin and pioglitazone/rosiglitazone are emerging Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (OHAs) which are used to treat patients suffering from Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Adverse drug effects observed with vildagliptin versus pioglitazone or rosiglitazone in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Vildagliptin and pioglitazone/rosiglitazone are emerging Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (OHAs) which are used to treat patients suffering from Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the adverse drug events which were observed with the use of vildagliptin versus pioglitazone or rosiglitazone respectively.
METHODS
Online databases were searched for studies comparing vildagliptin with pioglitazone/rosiglitazone. Adverse drug events were considered as the clinical endpoints in this analysis. We calculated Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) using the RevMan 5.3 software. All the authors had full access to the data which were used and approved the final version of the manuscript.
RESULTS
A total number of 2396 patients were analyzed (1486 and 910 patients were treated with vildagliptin and pioglitazone/rosiglitazone respectively). Vildagliptin and pioglitazone/rosiglitazone were both associated with similar overall adverse drug events (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.81-1.24; P = 1.00). Headache (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.60-1.27; P = 0.49) and upper respiratory tract infection (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.71-1.27; P = 0.75) were similarly observed. However, dizziness was significantly lower with pioglitazone/rosiglitazone (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.92; P = 0.02). Back pain, diarrhea and nausea were insignificantly lower with pioglitazone/rosiglitazone (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.49-1.33; P = 0.40), (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.48-1.44; P = 0.52) and (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.25-1.05; P = 0.07) respectively, whereas peripheral edema and weight gain were insignificantly higher (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.56-2.62; P = 0.63) and (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 0.51-10.34; P = 0.28) respectively. Nevertheless, when pioglitazone and rosiglitazone were separately compared with vildagliptin, peripheral edema and weight gain were significantly higher with rosiglitazone (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.40-3.99; P = 0.001) and (OR: 5.20, 95% CI: 2.47-10.92; P = 0.0001) respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both vildagliptin and pioglitazone/rosiglitazone are acceptable for the treatment of patients with T2DM on the basis that they are not significantly different in terms of overall adverse drug events. However, weight gain and peripheral edema would have to be re-assessed in further larger randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Nitriles; Pioglitazone; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rosiglitazone; Thiazolidinediones; Vildagliptin
PubMed: 29058622
DOI: 10.1186/s40360-017-0175-0 -
Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental Sep 2016Thiazolidinediones (TZDs; pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) have provided promising results in clinical trials for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The main purpose of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Thiazolidinediones (TZDs; pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) have provided promising results in clinical trials for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The main purpose of this systematic review was to summarize evidence on circulating adiponectin levels in relation to histological changes following TZD treatment in patients with histologically confirmed NASH. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library. We included four studies, published between 2006 and 2012, providing data for 187 histologically confirmed NASH adult patients (105 on TZD and 82 controls) treated for 6-12months. Significant increase in adiponectin (80-178%) after TZD treatment was observed in all included studies. Improvement in steatosis following treatment was observed in all studies. A trend towards improvement in lobular inflammation was observed in all studies after pioglitazone, but not after rosiglitazone. Trends toward improvement in ballooning and fibrosis were observed in the two studies after pioglitazone using either the highest doses or the longest duration of therapy. Overall disease activity score was improved in all studies after pioglitazone, but not after rosiglitazone. Insulin resistance and liver function tests were also improved after treatment. Despite weight gain, circulating leptin was not increased after treatment. In conclusion, parallel increases in circulating adiponectin levels and histological improvement were observed in this systematic review. These results warrant further consideration of TZDs, but even more importantly point to a key role for novel potential treatments for NASH patients such as the newer selective peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ modulators, which increase adiponectin without significant weight gain.
Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Animals; Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Thiazolidinediones
PubMed: 27506737
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.05.013 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aug 2014To determine whether thiazolidinedione use is associated with a risk of bladder cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
To determine whether thiazolidinedione use is associated with a risk of bladder cancer.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE in June 2012 (with PubMed update to July 2013) and conducted meta-analysis on the overall risks of bladder cancer with pioglitazone or rosiglitazone and the risk with different categories of cumulative dose or duration of drug use.
RESULTS
We screened 230 citations and included 18 studies, comprising five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 observational studies. Meta-analysis showed a significantly higher overall risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone in RCTs [7878 participants; odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-5.80] and observational studies (>2.6 million patients; OR for 'ever' users vs. non-users 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.35). Subgroup analysis of observational studies by cumulative dose showed the risk of bladder cancer to be greatest with >28.0 g of pioglitazone (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.28-2.12). A significantly increased risk was found with both 12-24 months (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.71) and >24 months (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.26-1.81) cumulative durations of pioglitazone exposure. No significant risk was seen with rosiglitazone in RCTs (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.35-2.04) or 'ever' users vs. non-users in observational studies (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.12); the evidence for any relationship between bladder cancer risk and rosiglitazone cumulative duration is limited and inconsistent. Direct comparison of pioglitazone to rosiglitazone 'ever' users yielded an OR of 1.25 (95% CI 0.91-1.72).
CONCLUSIONS
A modest but clinically significant increase in the risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone was found, which appears to be related to cumulative dose and duration of exposure. We recommend that prescribers limit pioglitazone use to shorter durations.
Topics: Data Interpretation, Statistical; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Risk; Thiazolidinediones; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 24325197
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12306 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2021To systematically evaluate the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with prediabetes or T2DM combined with NAFLD. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with prediabetes or T2DM combined with NAFLD.
METHODS
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases were searched until August 2020 for publications written in English. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, continuous data extraction, independent assessment of bias risk, and graded the strength of evidence. Our primary outcomes were the individual number of patients with improvement of at least 1 point in each of the histological parameters. Baseline characteristic data, such as BMI, weight, total body fat, fasting plasma glucose and fasting plasma insulin, and liver biological indicators, such as triglyceride level, HDL cholesterol level, plasma AST, and plasma ALT, were used as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 4 studies were included. Compared with placebo, pioglitazone significantly improved steatosis grade, inflammation grade and ballooning grade, while in the fibrosis stage, there was no significant improvement in pioglitazone compared with placebo. In addition, pioglitazone can also improve blood glucose and liver function.
CONCLUSION
Pioglitazone can significantly improve the histological performance of the liver and insulin sensitivity. Additionally, it can significantly reduce fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, plasma AST, ALT and other liver biological indicators. Due to the lack of relevant randomized controlled trials and short intervention times, long-term studies are still needed to verify its efficacy and safety.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020212025].
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Pioglitazone; Prediabetic State; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33995271
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.615409 -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Jul 2024To evaluate the efficacy and cardiovascular outcomes of combination pioglitazone with either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or a sodium-glucose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effect of combination pioglitazone with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and real-world study from an international federated database.
AIMS
To evaluate the efficacy and cardiovascular outcomes of combination pioglitazone with either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by conducting a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of a large international real-world database.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science to identify relevant articles for inclusion (PROSPERO [CRD: 42023483126]). Nineteen studies assessing pioglitazone + SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs versus controls were identified, 16 of which were randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane-endorsed tools and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. We additionally performed a retrospective cohort study of all individuals aged 18 years or over with T2D, using the TriNetX platform. We included propensity-score-matched individuals who were treated for at least 1 year with pioglitazone and a GLP-1RA or pioglitazone and an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared against GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and composite stroke and transient ischaemic attack.
RESULTS
The average follow-up in the included studies ranged from 24 to 52 weeks. Combination of pioglitazone with a GLP-1RA reduced glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight greater than in controls: mean differences -1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.27, -0.74) and -1.19 kg (95% CI -1.80, -0.58), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mortality between groups: mean difference - 1.56 mmHg (95% CI -4.48, 1.35; p = 0.30) and relative risk (RR) 0.29 (95% CI 0.07-1.15; p = 0.08), respectively. Combination of pioglitazone with SGLT2 inhibitors reduced HbA1c, weight and SBP to a greater extent than control treatment: mean differences -0.48% (95% CI -0.67, -0.28), -2.3 kg (95% CI -2.72, -1.88) and -2.4 mmHg (95% CI -4.1, -0.7; p = 0.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.81, 95% CI 0.30-10.97; p = 0.52). The included trials demonstrated a reduction in risk of heart failure with combination treatment. Similarly, from the real-world database (n = 25 230 identified), pioglitazone and SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy was associated with reduced risk of heart failure compared to monotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.65; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Both our systematic review/meta-analysis and the real-world dataset show that combination of pioglitazone with either GLP-1RAs or SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with increased weight loss and reduced risk of heart failure compared with monotherapy.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Pioglitazone; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Hypoglycemic Agents; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Drug Therapy, Combination; Treatment Outcome; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Databases, Factual; Glycated Hemoglobin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
PubMed: 38558280
DOI: 10.1111/dom.15576