-
Epidemiology and Infection Feb 2022This review aimed to compare the clinical features and CT imaging features between patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and lung cancer and patients with PTB... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of clinical and imaging features between pulmonary tuberculosis complicated with lung cancer and simple pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
This review aimed to compare the clinical features and CT imaging features between patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and lung cancer and patients with PTB alone. That would help to analyse the differences between the two and consequently providing a theoretical basis for the clinical diagnosis and treatment for the patients. Relevant case-control studies focusing on the clinical and CT imaging characteristics between PTB with lung cancer and PTB alone were systematically searched from five electronic databases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for comparison. As of 2021-07-06, a total of 1735 articles were retrieved. But only 15 articles were finally included for meta-analysis. The results showed a higher proportion of irritable cough, haemorrhagic pleural effusion and lower proportion of night sweating in PTB patients with lung cancer than in PTB patients, and the differences were statistically significant (irritable cough: OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.43-4.11; haemorrhagic pleural effusion: OR 5.73, 95% CI 1.63-20.12; night sweating: OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.87). In addition, there are many differences in the imaging characteristics of the two types of patients. In conclusion, this review summarises the similarities and differences in clinical symptoms and imaging features between patients with PTB and lung cancer and patients with PTB alone, suggesting that we should be alert to the occurrence of lung cancer in patients with obsolete PTB relapse.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Cough; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Pleural Effusion; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 35105410
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268822000176 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2018Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an almost always fatal tumour, for which palliative platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the standard treatment. Multimodal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an almost always fatal tumour, for which palliative platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the standard treatment. Multimodal therapeutic strategies incorporating surgery, radiation therapy or photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy have been recommended for selected patients but there is no consensus about their effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of radical multimodal treatment options (including radical surgery ± radical radiotherapy ± photodynamic therapy ± systemic therapy) compared to each other or to palliative treatments, for people with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
SEARCH METHODS
We reviewed data from the Cochrane Lung Cancer group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. We also checked reference lists of primary original studies, review articles and relevant conference proceedings manually for further related articles up to 21 March 2017.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials of multimodal therapy for people with malignant pleural mesothelioma (stages I, II or III) that measured at least one of the following endpoints: overall survival, health-related health-related quality of life, adverse events or progression-free survival. We considered studies regardless of language or publication status.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted relevant information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes for this review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the studies. Two review authors assessed the risk of bias in the included trials using pre-defined 'Risk of bias' domains. We assessed the methodological quality using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We conducted this review in accordance with the published Cochrane protocol. Two randomised clinical trials with 104 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Both trials were at high risk of bias (for outcomes other than overall survival), and we rated the evidence as moderate quality for overall survival and low quality for all other outcomes. One trial compared combined extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) plus neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy plus postoperative high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy with combined EPP plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The other trial compared EPP plus postoperative hemithoracic radiotherapy with standard (non-radical) therapy alone following platinum-based chemotherapy (patients in the standard therapy arm received continued oncological management according to local policy, which could include further chemotherapy or palliative radiotherapy).For the first trial, median overall survival calculated from registration was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.4 to 27.8) in the no-radiotherapy group and 19.3 months (95% CI 11.5 to 21.8) in the radiotherapy group. For the second trial, median overall survival was 14.4 months (95% CI 5.3 to 18.7) for patients allocated to EPP and 19.5 months (95% CI 13.4 to time not yet reached) for patients randomised to standard non-radical therapy. In the second trial, 12 serious adverse events were reported during the study period: ten in the EPP group and two in the non-radical therapy group. Overall health-related quality of life scores were not different between the two arms in either study. We could not perform a meta-analysis of the two included trials due to clinical heterogeneity. We also identified three ongoing trials evaluating the topic of our review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The overall strength of the evidence gathered in this review is low and there is a lack of available evidence to support the use of radical multimodality therapy in routine clinical practice (particularly as one trial suggests greater harm). Given the added cost of multimodality treatment and the possible increase in risk of adverse effects, the lack of evidence of their effectiveness probably means that these interventions should currently be limited to clinical trials alone.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Platinum Compounds; Pneumonectomy; Radiotherapy Dosage; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29309720
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012605.pub2 -
Abdominal Radiology (New York) May 2022Imaging of the peritoneum and related pathology is a challenge. Among peritoneal diseases, malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is an uncommon tumor with poor... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Imaging of the peritoneum and related pathology is a challenge. Among peritoneal diseases, malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is an uncommon tumor with poor prognosis. To date, there are no specific guidelines or imaging protocols dedicated for the peritoneum and MPeM. The objective of this study was to analyze the literature describing imaging modalities used for MPeM to determine their relative clinical efficacy and review commonly reported imaging features of MPeM to promote standardized reporting.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of original research articles discussing imaging modalities in MPeM from 1999 to 2020. Effectiveness measures and common findings were compared across imaging modalities.
RESULTS
Among 582 studies analyzed, the most-used imaging modality was CT (54.3%). In the differentiation of MPeM from peritoneal carcinomatosis, one study found CT had a diagnostic sensitivity of 53%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 68%. Two studies found fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) had sensitivity of 86-92%, specificity of 83-89%, and accuracy of 87-89%. Another study found magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the best predictor of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index. Characteristics shown to best differentiate MPeM from other diseases included ascites, peritoneal thickening, mesenteric thickening, pleural plaques, maximum tumor dimension, and number of masses.
CONCLUSION
Most published MPeM imaging studies utilized CT. PET/CT or MRI appear promising, and future studies should compare effectiveness of these modalities. MPeM imaging reports should highlight ascites, number of and maximum tumor dimension, peritoneal/mesenteric thickening, and associated pleural plaques, allowing for better aggregation of MPeM imaging data across studies.
Topics: Ascites; Humans; Mesothelioma; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 35257201
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03464-x -
Histopathology Mar 2023Tumour budding is an established prognostic factor in various solid tumours, including colorectal cancers and oral squamous cell carcinomas. However, its role is unclear... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Tumour budding is an established prognostic factor in various solid tumours, including colorectal cancers and oral squamous cell carcinomas. However, its role is unclear and needs to be defined for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LSCC). Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the prognostic role of tumour budding in LSCC. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed literature investigating the association between tumour budding and survival outcomes or clinicopathological variables in LSCC. The primary outcomes were pooled estimates for overall and recurrence-free survival with hazard ratio (HR) as the effect measure. The association between tumour budding and clinicopathological parameters was also investigated. Of 243 studies, nine were included, comprising 2546 patients. An increased risk of death [HR = 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.50-2.05, P < 0.00001] and recurrence (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.12-1.68, P = 0.003) was evident in patients with high-grade tumour budding. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses revealed consistent results. Pathological stage II, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular and pleural invasion were associated with high-grade tumour budding. Tumour budding is a new and promising prognostic factor in patients with LSCC. However, pervasive heterogeneity and publication bias reduces the credibility of these findings and the applicability of tumour budding in clinical practice. Future studies are required to standardise reporting on tumour budding in LSCC.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Proportional Hazards Models; Mouth Neoplasms; Lung
PubMed: 36217904
DOI: 10.1111/his.14822 -
Cancers Jun 2019Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm related to asbestos exposure and with high mortality rate. The management of patients with MPM is complex and... (Review)
Review
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm related to asbestos exposure and with high mortality rate. The management of patients with MPM is complex and controversial, particularly with regard to early diagnosis. In the last few years, breath analysis has been greatly implemented with this aim. In this review the strengths of breath analysis and preliminary results in searching breath biomarkers of MPM are highlighted and discussed, respectively. Through a systematic electronic literature search, collecting papers published from 2000 until December 2018, fifteen relevant scientific papers were selected. All papers considered were prospective, comparative, observational case-control studies although every single one pilot and based on a relatively small number of samples. The identification of diagnostic VOCs pattern, through breath sample characterization and the statistical data treatment, allows to obtain a strategic information for clinical diagnostics. To date the collected data provide just preliminary information and, despite the promising results and diagnostic accuracy, conclusions cannot be generalized due to the limited number of individuals included in each cohort study. Furthermore none of studies was externally validated, although validation process is a necessary step towards clinical implementation. Breathomics-based biomarker approach should be further explored to confirm and validate preliminary findings and to evaluate its potential role in monitoring the therapeutic response.
PubMed: 31207975
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11060831 -
BMC Cancer Nov 2023Whether a transthoracic (TT) procedure by a thoracic surgeon or a transabdominal (TA) by a gastrointestinal surgeon is best for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Whether a transthoracic (TT) procedure by a thoracic surgeon or a transabdominal (TA) by a gastrointestinal surgeon is best for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) remains unknown. Survival and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups in this meta-analysis to clarify this argument.
METHODS
We searched 7 databases for eligible studies comparing TT and TA procedures for Siewert type II EGJA. The final analyzed endpoints included intraoperative and hospitalization outcomes, recurrence, complication, and survival.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies involving 10,756 patients met the inclusion criteria. The TA group had higher rates of overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.31 [1.20 ~ 1.44], p < 0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.49 [1.24 ~ 1.79], p < 0.0001). The survival advantage of OSR and DFSR increased with time. Subgroup analysis of OS and DFS suggested that TA remained the preferred approach among all subgroups. More total/positive lymph nodes were retrieved, and fewer lymph node recurrences were found in the TA group. The analysis of perioperative outcomes revealed that the TA procedure was longer, had more intraoperative blood loss, and prolonged hospital stay. Similar R0 resection rates, as well as total recurrence, local recurrence, liver recurrence, peritoneal recurrence, lung recurrence, anastomosis recurrence and multiple recurrence rates, were found between the two groups. The safety analysis showed that the TT procedure led to more total complications, anastomotic leakages, cases of pneumonia, and cases of pleural effusion.
CONCLUSIONS
The TA procedure appeared to be a suitable choice for patients with Siewert type II EGJA because of its association with longer survival, fewer recurrences, and better safety.
Topics: Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Blood Loss, Surgical; Adenocarcinoma; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Gastrectomy
PubMed: 37990193
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11640-5 -
Cancer Cytopathology Feb 2022Cytology effusions are often the only material available for diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, the cytomorphological features alone are not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Cytology effusions are often the only material available for diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, the cytomorphological features alone are not always diagnostic, and cytology samples preclude an assessment for pleural tissue invasion. Accordingly, immunohistochemical, soluble, and molecular biomarkers have been developed. The aim of this study is to provide quantitative evidence regarding the diagnostic performance of novel biomarkers. To that end, a systematic literature review was performed of articles dealing with a loss of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1), methylthioadenosine (MTAP), 5-hydroxymethylcitosine (5-hmC), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), insulin like-growth factor II messenger RNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3), enhanced zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) staining, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) homozygous deletion (HD) testing, soluble mesothelin, and microRNA quantification in cytological samples for the diagnosis of MPM versus reactive atypical mesothelial cells. Sensitivity and specificity were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed. The quality of the studies was assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Seventy-one studies were included. BAP1 loss showed a sensitivity of 0.65 (confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.71) and a specificity of 0.99 (CI, 0.93-1.00). MTAP loss and p16 HD showed 100% specificity with sensitivities of 0.47 (CI, 0.38-0.57) and 0.62 (CI, 0.53-0.71), respectively. BAP1 loss and CDKN2A HD combined showed maximal specificity and a sensitivity of 0.83 (CI, 0.78-0.89). GLUT1 and IMP3 showed sensitivities of 0.82 (CI, 0.70-0.90) and 0.65 (CI, 0.41-0.90), respectively, with comparable specificity. Mesothelin showed a sensitivity of 0.73 (CI, 0.68-0.77) and a specificity of 0.90 (CI, 0.84-0.93). In conclusion, some of the recently emerging biomarkers are close to 1.00 specificity. Their moderate sensitivity on their own, however, can be significantly improved by the use of 2 biomarkers, such as a combination of BAP1 and CDKN2A with fluorescence in situ hybridization or a combination of BAP1 and MTAP immunohistochemistry.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Glucose Transporter Type 1; Homozygote; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Pleural Neoplasms; Sequence Deletion
PubMed: 34478240
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22509 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2022Advanced stage malignant mesothelioma (asMM) patients have poor prognosis. Several trials investigated the role of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Advanced stage malignant mesothelioma (asMM) patients have poor prognosis. Several trials investigated the role of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pre-treated asMM.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature of clinical trials testing single-agent anti PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs in pre-treated asMM was performed. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data were extracted. The predictive role of PD-L1 was assessed.
RESULTS
We selected 13 studies including 888 patients. ORR and DCR were 18.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.9-22.8%) and 55.4% (95% CI: 48.1-62.5%), respectively. Median PFS and OS ranged from 2.1 to 5.9 and from 6.7 to 20.9 months, respectively. ORR according to PD-L1 was 27.0% (95% CI: 18.7-36.2%).
CONCLUSIONS
Anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs might be considered a treatment option for chemotherapy-resistant asMM, even if reliable predictive factors are still lacking.
Topics: B7-H1 Antigen; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 35192932
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103639 -
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Aug 2017Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasia. Multidisciplinary treatments, including the association of induction and/or adjuvant therapeutic... (Review)
Review
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasia. Multidisciplinary treatments, including the association of induction and/or adjuvant therapeutic regimens with surgery, have been reported to give encouraging results. Current therapeutic options are not well standardized yet, especially regarding the best association between surgery and medical treatments. The present review aims to assess safety, efficacy and outcomes of different therapies for MPM. Areas covered: This article focuses on the multimodality treatment of mesothelioma. A systematic review was performed by using electronic databases to identify studies that considered induction and adjuvant approaches in MPM therapy in a multidisciplinary setting, including surgery. Endpoints included overall survival, disease free survival, disease recurrence, and complications. Expert commentary: This systematic review offers a comprehensive view of current multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies for MPM, suggesting that multimodality therapy offers acceptable outcomes with better results reported for trimodality approaches. Individualization of care for each patient is fundamental in choosing the most appropriate treatment. The growing complexity of treatment protocols mandates that MPM patients be referred to specialized Centers, in which every component of the interdisciplinary team can provide the necessary expertise and quality of care.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Patient Safety; Pleural Neoplasms; Pneumonectomy; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28580813
DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1338951 -
Practical Radiation Oncology 2020This review explores the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after lung-sparing surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Because severe... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This review explores the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after lung-sparing surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Because severe toxicities have been documented after radiation therapy for MPM, its use remains controversial, especially as modern surgical management has shifted toward lung-sparing pleurectomy/decortication. IMRT is an advanced technique that may allow for safer radiation therapy delivery, but there remains limited data (including no summative data) to support this notion.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
We performed a systematic review evaluating the safety and efficacy of post-pleurectomy IMRT (P-IMRT). A systematic review of PubMed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted for publications of all dates that specifically reported clinical outcomes and/or toxicities of P-IMRT in patients with MPM. Ten original studies were included in this review.
RESULTS
The incidence of grade 3 pneumonitis ranged from 0% to 16%, with all but 2 studies reporting rates below 9%. Grade 4 and 5 pneumonitis were observed in less than 1.5% of cases, except in one publication that used hypofractionated radiation therapy to doses >60 Gy. Crude local failure rates ranged from 19% to 60%, median progression free survival ranged from 12 to 16 months, and median overall survival ranged from 19 to 28 months.
CONCLUSIONS
P-IMRT produces relatively few higher-grade toxicities and has reasonable disease-related outcomes, especially when delivered using conventionally fractionated regimens to doses of 45 to 54 Gy and exercising careful attention to dose constraints during treatment planning. IMRT can thus be considered in well-selected patients in whom adequate survival after pleurectomy is expected. These data also support the initiation of the phase III NRG-LU006 trial of extended pleurectomy/decortication and chemotherapy with or without IMRT.
Topics: Humans; Lung; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Pleural Neoplasms; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
PubMed: 32088429
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.02.007