-
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Aug 2017Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial. This systematic review sought to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial. This systematic review sought to examine the role of TACE in the treatment of HCC with PVT in either the main portal vein (MPV) or portal vein branches (PVB).
METHODS
PubMed was searched for "hepatocellular carcinoma" and "transarterial chemoembolization" from January 1, 2006 to August 31, 2016. Cohorts treated with TACE for HCC with PVT were included. Meta-analysis of overall survival (OS), mRECIST response, and complication incidence was performed. MPV and PVB subgroups were compared.
RESULTS
Of 136 search results, 13 studies with 1933 TACE patients were included. Median OS (95% CI) was eight (5-15) months. Survival rates after one, three, and five years were 29% (20%-40%), 4% (1%-11%), and 1% (0%-5%), respectively. Only 1% experienced liver failure and 18% had post-treatment complications. Patients with MPV thrombosis had worse survival than PVB patients (p < 0.001), but similar mRECIST response rates (14% vs. 16%, p = 0.238).
CONCLUSION
TACE is a safe treatment for a highly selected population of HCC patients with PVT. Despite worse survival rates compared to PVB thrombosis, PVT in the MPV should not be considered an absolute contraindication to TACE.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Humans; Liver Failure; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplastic Cells, Circulating; Portal Vein; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 28552299
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.04.016 -
The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology... Jul 2022Portal vein thrombosis is considered to be an indicator of worse outcomes in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. More and more evidence shows that metabolic disorders are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Portal vein thrombosis is considered to be an indicator of worse outcomes in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. More and more evidence shows that metabolic disorders are noticeable pro-thrombotic factors. However, whether or not metabolic disorders increase the risk of cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis is controversial. We aim to quantify the magnitude of the association between metabolic disorders and the risk of cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Databases were searched for papers to identify studies in which metabolic disorders were compared in liver cirrhosis with or without portal vein thrombosis. Based on data from the eligible studies, metabolic disorders related to portal vein thrombosis included diabetes mellitus, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hypercholesterolemia, and body mass index. Pooled adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs were calculated. Data for 22 studies with a total of 57 371 portal vein thrombosis cases and 3 979 015 participants were included. Statistically significant pooled odds ratios for portal vein thrombosis were obtained for diabetes mel- litus (odds ratio 1.80, 95% CI 1.42-2.28), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (odds ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.34-1.95), and hypercholesterolemia (odds ratio 3.59, 95% CI 1.83-7.03). Body mass index was likely irrelevant with cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.87-1.17), both in overall and subgroup meta-analyses. Significant heterogeneities among studies were observed, except for the hypercholesterolemia group. Metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and hypercholesterolemia, increased the risk of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients by 1.80-fold, 1.61-fold, and 3.59-fold, respectively. Body mass index did not appear to be a risk predictor of cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Further, well-designed clinical and mechanistic studies are required to strengthen the arguments, especially in obese patients.
Topics: Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Liver Cirrhosis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Portal Vein; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 35879911
DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2022.211022 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2022In this paper, we aimed to evaluate clinical and imagistic features, and also to provide a diagnostic algorithm for patients presenting with gastrointestinal involvement... (Review)
Review
In this paper, we aimed to evaluate clinical and imagistic features, and also to provide a diagnostic algorithm for patients presenting with gastrointestinal involvement from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a systematic search on the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify and collect papers oncases of HCC with gastrointestinal involvement. This search was last updated on 29 April 2022. One hundred and twenty-three articles were included, corresponding to 197 patients. The majority of the patients were male (87.30%), with a mean age of 61.21 years old. The analysis showed large HCCs located mainly in the right hepatic lobe, and highly elevated alfa-fetoprotein (mean = 15,366.18 ng/mL). The most frequent etiological factor was hepatitis B virus (38.57%). Portal vein thrombosis was present in 27.91% of cases. HCC was previously treated in most cases by transarterial chemoembolization (32.99%) and surgical resection (28.93%). Gastrointestinal lesions, developed mainly through direct invasion and hematogenous routes, were predominantly detected in the stomach and duodenum in equal measure-27.91%. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common presentation (49.74%). The main diagnostic tools were esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and computed tomography. The mean survival time was 7.30 months. Gastrointestinal involvement in HCC should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with underlying HCC and gastrointestinal manifestations or pathological findings in EGD.
PubMed: 35626424
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051270 -
Surgery Aug 2021Portal venous system thrombosis can develop after bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the incidence of portal venous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Portal venous system thrombosis can develop after bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery and clarify the role of anticoagulation for the prevention of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was pooled by a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the incidence of portal venous system thrombosis according to the average duration of prophylactic anticoagulation (extended versus short-term). Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Among 2,714 papers initially screened, 68 studies were included. Among 100,964 patients undergoing bariatric surgery, 300 developed portal venous system thrombosis. The pooled overall incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was 0.419% (95% confidence interval: 0.341%-0.505%). The pooled incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was numerically lower in patients who received extended prophylactic anticoagulation protocol after bariatric surgery than those who received short-term prophylactic anticoagulation protocol (0.184% vs 0.459%). Meta-regression analyses demonstrated that sample size (P = .006), type of surgery (P < .001), and average duration of prophylactic anticoagulation (P = .024) might be sources of heterogeneity, but not region, publication year, history of bariatric surgery, follow-up duration, or use of prophylactic anticoagulation. Sensitivity analyses could not identify any source of heterogeneity. The estimated mortality of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was 1.33%.
CONCLUSION
Portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery is rare, but potentially lethal. Extended prophylactic anticoagulation protocol may be considered in patients at a high risk of developing portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Bariatric Surgery; Humans; Incidence; Obesity; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 33875250
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.005 -
Surgery For Obesity and Related... Aug 2017Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) is considered an uncommon complication in general surgery; nevertheless, with the growing popularity of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) is considered an uncommon complication in general surgery; nevertheless, with the growing popularity of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as a bariatric procedure we have seen an increase in the occurrence of this complication.
OBJECTIVES
To elucidate the question if it is a procedure-related complication and explore the modalities of prevention and treatment of this complication, a systematic review of available literature regarding PMVT events after SG was conducted.
METHODS
Our systematic review yielded 28 studies enclosing 89 patients. Perioperative data was collected from each study and analyzed.
RESULTS
The incidence of PMVT after SG ranged from .37% to 1%, 65% of the patients were female, and the mean body mass index was 41.63 kg/m. Perioperative co-morbidities including hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were recorded in 39.7%, 41.63%, and 38.23% of cases respectively. Tachycardia and fever were reported only in 23.9% and 20.89%, respectively, and hereditary thrombophilia studies were positive in 30.43% of cases. The rate of acute major complications after PMVT was 14.6% (13 cases), and mortality was reported in 3 cases (average 3.37%).
CONCLUSION
PMVT seems to be an uncommon multifactorial disease, with unpredictable symptoms and varieties of the treatments options, but additional studies are required to further define optimal management and prevention algorithms.
Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Gastrectomy; Humans; Mesenteric Ischemia; Mesenteric Veins; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Thrombophilia; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 28526434
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.015 -
Surgery Apr 2016Our aim was to review variations from the originally described associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure and relevant... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Our aim was to review variations from the originally described associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure and relevant clinical outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (ie, PRISMA) guidelines. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted until March 2015. Inclusion criteria were any publications reporting technical variations and descriptions of ALPPS. Exclusion criteria were insufficient technical description, data repeated elsewhere, or data that could not be accessed in English.
RESULTS
Initial search results returned 790 results; 46 studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. There were several alternatives described to the first stage of complete parenchymal split. Variations included partial ALPPS (partial split; hypertrophy of future liver remnant [FLR] 80-90%), radiofrequency-assisted liver partition and portal vein ligation (mean FLR hypertrophy 62%), laparoscopic microwave ablation and portal vein ligation (FLR hypertrophy 78-90%), associating liver tourniquet and portal ligation for staged hepatectomy (median FLR hypertrophy 61%), and sequential associating liver tourniquet and portal ligation for staged hepatectomy (FLR hypertrophy 77%) with a potential decrease in morbidity particularly after stage I. We analyzed several other variations, including considerations for segment IV, operative maneuvers, use of laparoscopy, identification of biliary complications, and liver containment.
CONCLUSION
The current literature demonstrates a large variability in techniques of ALPPS that limits meaningful statistical comparisons of outcomes. Not physically splitting the liver at the first stage may decrease morbidity; however, randomized controlled trials are needed to determine benefits in technical variations.
Topics: Hepatectomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Ligation; Liver Regeneration; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Portal Vein
PubMed: 26747229
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.013 -
Surgical shunts for extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in pediatric patients: a systematic review.HPB : the Official Journal of the... May 2021Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) causes portal hypertension in noncirrhotic children. Among surgical treatments, it is unclear whether the meso-Rex shunt... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) causes portal hypertension in noncirrhotic children. Among surgical treatments, it is unclear whether the meso-Rex shunt (MRS) or portosystemic shunt (PSS) offers lower post-operative morbidity and superior patency over time. Our objective was to evaluate long-term outcomes comparing MRS and PSS for pediatric patients with EHPVO.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted of articles reporting children undergoing surgical shunts for EHPVO from 1/2000-2/2020. Of 87 articles screened, 22 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was shunt thrombosis and secondary outcomes included non-operative complications, stenosis, and re-operation.
RESULTS
Eighteen of 22 studies were of good quality and four had fair quality. Of 461 patients included, 340 underwent MRS and 121 underwent PSS. MRS were associated with a higher rate of post-operative thrombosis when compared to PSS (14.1% vs 5.8%, p = 0.021). There were 40/340 MRS patients (11.8%) that required at least one re-operation for either shunt thrombosis or stenosis, versus 5/121 PSS patients (4.1%), p = 0.019.
CONCLUSION
Both MRS and PSS result in acceptable long-term patency rates, but the more technically demanding MRS is associated with higher post-shunt thrombosis, often requiring further operative intervention. This study suggests that PSS may offer advantages for pediatric patients with EHPVO.
Topics: Child; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Portal Vein; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical; Reoperation; Thrombosis
PubMed: 33388243
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.11.1149 -
Thrombosis Research Sep 2023Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon manifestation of venous thromboembolism in the splanchnic venous system, with scarce evidence surrounding its management....
BACKGROUND
Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon manifestation of venous thromboembolism in the splanchnic venous system, with scarce evidence surrounding its management. We assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), vitamin-k antagonists (VKAs), or no anticoagulation.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the primary efficacy outcome being complete recanalization of affected vessels and primary safety outcome being major bleeding. Meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model, with dichotomous outcomes being synthesized with odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % CIs.
RESULTS
Seven non-randomized and one randomized study involving 883 participants were included for analysis. DOACs were more effective than VKAs (OR = 4.33; 95 % CI: 2.4, 7.83; n = 1 study) in non-cirrhotic patients and no anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients (OR = 3.86; 95 % CI: 1.49, 10.03; n = 3 studies). DOACs had a statistically significant reduction in major bleeding compared to observation [OR = 0.09; 95 % CI: 0.03, 0.29; n = 3 studies], LMWHs [OR = 0.13; 95 % CI: 0.03, 0.29; n = 1 study] and VKAs [OR = 0.12; 95 % CI: 0.02, 0.69; n = 2 studies] in non-cirrhotic patients. No difference in major bleeding was found between DOACs and observation, LMWH, or VKAs in cirrhotic patients.
CONCLUSION
DOACs appear to be a favorable alternative to VKAs and LMWHs in non-cirrhotic patients. This avenue of research would benefit from larger studies that adjust for SVT etiologies, patient risk factors, and overall bleeding risk.
PubMed: 37544136
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.06.003 -
Surgical Oncology Sep 2017An important risk of major hepatic resection is postoperative liver failure, which is directly related to insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Portal vein... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
An important risk of major hepatic resection is postoperative liver failure, which is directly related to insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Portal vein embolization (PVE) and portal vein ligation (PVL) can minimize this risk by inducing hypertrophy of the FLR. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of PVE and PVL for FLR hypertrophy. A systematic search was conducted on the17 of January 2017. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Oxford Critical Appraisal Skills Program for cohort studies. The primary endpoint was the relative rate of hypertrophy of the FLR. Number of cancelled hepatic resection and postoperative morbidity and mortality were secondary endpoints. For meta-analysis, the pooled hypertrophy rate was calculated for each intervention. The literature search identified 21 eligible studies with 1953 PVE and 123 PVL patients. All studies were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found regarding the rate of FLR hypertrophy (PVE 43.2%, PVL 38.5%, p = 0.39). The number of cancelled hepatic resections due to inadequate hypertrophy was significantly lower after PVL (p = 0.002). No differences were found in post-intervention mortality and morbidity. This meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in safety and rate of FLR hypertrophy between PVE and PVL. PVE should be considered as the preferred strategy, since it is a minimally invasive procedure. However, during a two-stage procedure, PVL can be performed with expected comparable outcome as PVE.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Hepatomegaly; Humans; Ligation; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Portal Vein
PubMed: 28807245
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.05.001 -
Clinical and Applied... 2023Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is not rare in patients with acute pancreatitis. It remains unclear about whether anticoagulation should be given for acute... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is not rare in patients with acute pancreatitis. It remains unclear about whether anticoagulation should be given for acute pancreatitis-associated SVT. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Rates of SVT recanalization, any bleeding, death, intestinal ischemia, portal cavernoma, and gastroesophageal varices were pooled and compared between patients with acute pancreatitis-associated SVT who received and did not receive therapeutic anticoagulation. Pooled rates and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated. Overall, 16 studies including 698 patients with acute pancreatitis-associated SVT were eligible. After therapeutic anticoagulation, the pooled rates of SVT recanalization, any bleeding, death, intestinal ischemia, portal cavernoma, and gastroesophageal varices were 44.3% (95%CI = 32.3%-56.6%), 10.7% (95%CI = 4.9%-18.5%), 13.3% (95%CI = 6.9%-21.4%), 16.8% (95%CI = 6.9%-29.9%), 21.2% (95%CI = 7.5%-39.5%), and 29.1% (95%CI = 16.1%-44.1%), respectively. Anticoagulation therapy significantly increased the rate of SVT recanalization (RR = 1.69; 95%CI = 1.29-2.19; < .01), and marginally increased the risk of bleeding (RR = 1.98; 95%CI = 0.93-4.22; = .07). The rates of death (RR = 1.42; 95%CI = 0.62-3.25; = .40), intestinal ischemia (RR = 2.55; 95%CI = 0.23-28.16; = .45), portal cavernoma (RR = 0.51; 95%CI = 0.21-1.22; = .13), and gastroesophageal varices (RR = 0.71; 95%CI = 0.38-1.32; = .28) were not significantly different between patients who received and did not receive anticoagulation therapy. Heterogeneity was statistically significant in the meta-analysis of intestinal ischemia, but not in those of SVT recanalization, any bleeding, death, portal cavernoma, or gastroesophageal varices. Anticoagulation may be effective for recanalization of acute pancreatitis-associated SVT, but cannot improve the survival. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to further investigate the clinical significance of anticoagulation therapy in such patients.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatitis; Acute Disease; Venous Thrombosis; Hemorrhage; Anticoagulants; Ischemia; Varicose Veins; Portal Vein; Splanchnic Circulation
PubMed: 37461391
DOI: 10.1177/10760296231188718