-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2018Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2010 and subsequently updated in 2012, and twice in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications. We also assessed the side effects of vaginal cleansing solutions to determine adverse events associated with the intervention.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (10 July 2017), and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized trials and one quasi-randomized trial assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Cluster-randomized trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. We excluded trials that utilized vaginal preparation during labor or that did not use antibiotic surgical prophylaxis. We also excluded any trials using a cross-over design.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
At least three of the review authors independently assessed eligibility of the studies. Two review authors were assigned to extract study characteristics, quality assessments, and data from eligible studies.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 11 trials reporting results for 3403 women evaluating the effects of vaginal cleansing (eight using povidone-iodine, two chlorhexidine, one benzalkonium chloride) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Additionally, some trials used vaginal preparations using sponge sticks, douches, or soaked gauze wipes. The control groups were typically no vaginal preparation (eight trials) or the use of a saline vaginal preparation (three trials). The risk of bias in the studies reduced our confidence in the results for endometritis outcomes.Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 8.7% in control groups to 3.8% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.63, 10 trials, 3283 women, moderate quality of evidence). Subgroup analysis could not rule out larger reductions in endometritis with antiseptics in women who were in labor or in women whose membranes had ruptured when antiseptics were used. Risks of postoperative fever and postoperative wound infection may be slightly lowered by antiseptic preparation, but the confidence intervals around the effects for both outcomes are consistent with a large reduction in risk and no difference between groups (fever: RR 0.87 (0.72 to 1.05; wound infection: RR 0.74 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.11), both moderate-quality evidence). Two trials reported a lower risk of a composite outcome of wound complication or endometritis in women receiving preoperative vaginal preparation (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.82, two trials, 499 women, moderate-quality evidence). No adverse effects were reported with either the povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine vaginal cleansing.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine solution compared to saline or not cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis. Subgroup analysis could not rule out larger reductions in endometritis with antiseptics in women who were in labor or in women whose membranes had ruptured when antiseptics were used.The quality of the evidence using GRADE was moderate for all reported outcomes. We downgraded the outcome of post-cesarean endometritis and composite of wound complications or endometritis for risk of bias and postoperative fever and postoperative wound infections for wide CIs.As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers may consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before performing cesarean deliveries.
Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Benzalkonium Compounds; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Fever; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina
PubMed: 30016540
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.pub6 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Sep 2019Direct comparison metaanalyses have reported benefits with presurgical vaginal preparation before cesarean delivery for the reduction of endometritis. These reports did... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Direct comparison metaanalyses have reported benefits with presurgical vaginal preparation before cesarean delivery for the reduction of endometritis. These reports did not perform a multitreatment comparison of the various antiseptic solutions assessed in previous studies.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to review the literature systematically and quantitate and summarize indirectly the comparative efficacy of antiseptic formulations and their concentrations that are used for the preparation of the vagina before cesarean delivery in the prevention of endometritis and other infectious complications.
STUDY DESIGN
We used MEDLINE, EMBASE (from their inception to November 2018) and Cochrane databases, biographies, and conference proceedings. We used randomized clinical trials of patients who underwent surgical preparation of the vagina with antiseptic formulations before cesarean delivery with the aim of reducing the risk of infectious morbidity. Our systematic review was registered and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Extension for network meta-analysis guidelines. Network meta-analysis was performed with computerized software and used user-written programs to assess consistency, inconsistency, ranking probabilities, and graphing results. Direct and indirect pairwise comparisons of the various formulations and their concentrations were performed with the use of multivariate random-effects models and metaregression. A frequentist inference method was employed for the fitted model to estimate the ranking probabilities. Subgroup analyses for patients in labor, not in labor, and with ruptured membranes were conducted.
RESULTS
For the prevention of endometritis, we identified 23 studies that comprised 7097 women who were allocated to the following treatments: povidone-iodine (1%, 5%, 10%), chlorhexidine (0.2%, 0.4%), metronidazole gel, cetrimide, or normal saline solution/no treatment. Direct and indirect pairwise comparisons indicated that, when compared with saline solution or no treatment, all antiseptic formulations decreased rates of endometritis (5.2% vs 9.1%; odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.65; 22 studies/6994 women). Individually, povidone-iodine (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.64; 16 studies/5968 women), cetrimide (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.90; 1 study/200 women), and metronidazole (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.90; 1 study/224 women) significantly reduced the risk of endometritis. Rankings of vaginal preparations indicated that povidone-iodine 1% had the highest probability (72.7%) of being the most effective treatment for the prevention of endometritis. For the secondary outcomes of postoperative wound infection and fever, a significant reduction was found only with povidone-iodine (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.78; 16 studies/5968 women; and odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.83; 12 studies/4667 women). Subgroup analyses also found that povidone-iodine significantly reduced risk of endometritis for women in labor (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.88; 5 studies/1211 women), with ruptured membranes(odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.44; 4 studies/476 women), and undergoing planned cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.57; 8 studies/1825 women).
CONCLUSION
Among patients who underwent cesarean delivery, presurgical vaginal irrigation with povidone-iodine had the highest probability of reducing the risk of endometritis, postoperative wound infections, and fever.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Cetrimonium; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Metronidazole; Network Meta-Analysis; Povidone-Iodine
PubMed: 30954518
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.002 -
Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) Nov 2023Exomphalos is a congenital anomaly found in 1/4500 newborns. Choice of non-operative management of exomphalos major unamenable to primary repair is controversial. This... (Review)
Review
AIM
Exomphalos is a congenital anomaly found in 1/4500 newborns. Choice of non-operative management of exomphalos major unamenable to primary repair is controversial. This study aims at reviewing conservative management modalities and compare outcomes and complications.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines of all English publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Search words were exomphalos OR omphalocoele AND conservative OR non-operative AND management. Studies were scrutinised for patient demographics, co-morbidities, mode of treatment, time to full feeds, time to full epithelialisation, length of stay, complications and mortality. Studies not specifically describing mode of management and/or describing primary or staged surgical repairs were excluded.
RESULTS
Initial search resulted in 1243 studies. Forty-two studies were deemed suitable offering 822 patients for analysis after excluding duplicates and non-eligible studies. Management methods varied including painting with Alcohol, Mercurochrome, silver products, Povidone Iodine, honey and other materials. Mortality was mostly due to associated anomalies. There was mixed reporting of alcohol, silver, Povidone Iodine and mercury toxicity as well as infection during the course of treatment.
CONCLUSION
This report has recognised the variations in topical substances employed for conservative management with no clear consensus. Reports on safety of different methods remain unclear.
PubMed: 37674328
DOI: 10.1111/apa.16961 -
The Journal of Surgical Research Nov 2023The use of optimal skin antiseptic agents for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) is of critical importance, especially during abdominal surgical procedures.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The use of optimal skin antiseptic agents for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) is of critical importance, especially during abdominal surgical procedures. Alcohol-based chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and aqueous-based povidone-iodine (PVI) are the two most common skin antiseptics used nowadays. The objective of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness of alcohol-based CHG versus aqueous-based PVI used for skin preparation before abdominal surgery to reduce SSIs.
METHODS
Standard medical databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library were searched to find randomized, controlled trials comparing alcohol-based CHG skin preparation versus aqueous-based PVI in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The combined outcomes of SSIs were calculated using odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. All data were analyzed using Review Manager Software 5.4, and the meta-analysis was performed with a random effect model analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies, all randomized, controlled trials, were included (n = 12,072 participants), recruiting adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery. In the random effect model analysis, the use of alcohol-based CHG in patients undergoing abdominal surgery was associated with a reduced risk of SSI compared to aqueous-based PVI (odds ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [0.74, 0.96], z = 2.61, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
Alcohol-based CHG may be more effective for preventing the risk of SSI compared to aqueous-based PVI agents in abdominal surgery. The conclusion of this meta-analysis may add a guiding value to reinforce current clinical practice guidelines.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Preoperative Care; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Povidone-Iodine; Ethanol; Chlorhexidine; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 37573638
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.011 -
The Journal of Arthroplasty Aug 2020Dilute povidone-iodine (PI) lavage, a simple disinfection method, could reduce postoperative infection risk. However, there is no clinical consensus regarding its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dilute povidone-iodine (PI) lavage, a simple disinfection method, could reduce postoperative infection risk. However, there is no clinical consensus regarding its efficacy in total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated PI lavage's efficacy in preventing infection after TJA.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before November 22, 2019, that compared postoperative infection rates in patients who underwent TJA with or without PI lavage before wound closure. Subgroup analyses were designed to identify the differences in infection site (overall or deep), type of surgery (total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty), time until diagnosis of infection (3 or 12 months postoperatively), and primary/aseptic revision arthroplasties.
RESULTS
We included 7 studies with 31,213 TJA cases, comprising 8861 patients who received PI lavage and 22,352 who did not. Pooled odds ratio for overall infection rate for the PI and non-PI lavage groups was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.19, P = .17) and for the deep infection rate was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.98, P = .86). Subgroup analyses revealed no differences in postoperative infection rates between the PI and non-PI lavage groups in terms of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty, diagnosis of infection at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, or primary and aseptic revision arthroplasties.
CONCLUSION
We detected no differences in the overall postoperative infection rates between the PI and non-PI lavage groups before wound closure in TJA including all studies in the subgroup analyses.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Therapeutic Irrigation
PubMed: 32229147
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.004 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Feb 2021To perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the rate of contamination of autologous bone fragments inadvertently dropped on the operating room floor,...
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the rate of contamination of autologous bone fragments inadvertently dropped on the operating room floor, the microbial profile (contaminating organism), and the outcome of intraoperative decontamination techniques in terms of effectiveness and cellular toxicity.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Medline, and Embase were searched for English literature published from 1990 through 2020 using terms such as "bone graft contamination," "dropped osteoarticular fragments," "autogenous bone decontamination," and similar interchangeable words.
STUDY SELECTION
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Inclusion criteria consisted of all studies on contamination of host bone fragments, means and/or rate of autologous bone contamination in operating rooms, microbial analysis of contaminated bone autograft, outcome of decontamination, and cellular viability after decontamination.
DATA EXTRACTION
All potentially eligible studies underwent a full-text review and cross-referencing after title and abstract screening. Data on authors, publication year, study type, means and rate of contamination, microbial profile, decontamination technique, and effectiveness and cellular toxicity outcomes were extracted.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Analysis and synthesis of data were performed on Microsoft Excel 2016.
CONCLUSION
The rate of contamination for dropped osteoarticular or osteochondral host fragment approached 40%. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common organism contaminating the bone graft when dropped on the operating room floor. A 5-minute bath in 10% povidone-iodine solution followed by 1-minute bulb syringe lavage with normal saline has proved successful in decontamination and maintenance of cellular viability.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Bone Transplantation; Bone and Bones; Decontamination; Humans; Operating Rooms; Povidone-Iodine
PubMed: 33109957
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001908 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Aug 2018Infection is a concern after all orthopedic procedures, including shoulder surgery. This systematic review of literature aimed to determine risk factors for infection as... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Infection is a concern after all orthopedic procedures, including shoulder surgery. This systematic review of literature aimed to determine risk factors for infection as well as the availability and effectiveness of measures utilized to prevent infection after elective shoulder surgery.
METHODS
An electronic database search was performed using MEDLINE (1950-October 2017), EMBASE (1980-October 2017), CINAHL (1982-October 2017), and the Cochrane database to identify studies reporting a risk factor or preventive measure for infection after shoulder surgery.
RESULTS
Fifty-one studies were eligible for inclusion. Risk factors identified for infection were male sex, the presence of hair, receiving an intra-articular cortisone injection within the 3 months prior to surgery, smoking, obesity, and several comorbidities. The only preventive measure with level I evidence was for the use of chlorhexidine wipes for cleansing the skin in the days prior to surgery and for the use of ChloraPrep or DuraPrep over povodine and iodine to prep the skin at the time of surgery. Level II-IV evidence was found for other infection prevention methods such as intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis.
CONCLUSION
There are many risk factors associated with developing an infection after elective shoulder surgery. Many preventive measures have been described which may decrease the risk of infection; however, most lack a high level evidence to support them. The findings of this systematic review are clinically relevant as it has been shown that infection after shoulder surgery results in poor patient-reported outcomes and pose a significant financial burden. As surgeons the goal should be to prevent infections to avoid the morbidity for patients and the increased cost for society.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV systematic review of literature.
Topics: 2-Propanol; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Chlorhexidine; Comorbidity; Elective Surgical Procedures; Humans; Infection Control; Iodine; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Shoulder
PubMed: 29340748
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4832-7 -
International Journal of Dental Hygiene Feb 2022A wide variety of mouth rinses are available to combat micro-organisms in the oral cavity. At the present global pandemic, the need of the hour is to control the viral... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
A wide variety of mouth rinses are available to combat micro-organisms in the oral cavity. At the present global pandemic, the need of the hour is to control the viral infection due to the novel corona virus SARS-COV-2, as its port of entry is through the receptors located in the oral and pharyngeal mucosa. This systematic literature review focuses on the in vivo studies [randomized control trials (RCTs)] done on the efficacy of existing mouth rinses which have been used in reducing the viral loads.
METHODS
The electronic database which includes PubMed-MEDLINE, Google scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, ProQuest and CINAHL was searched from December 2019 to June 2021 with appropriate Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and Boolean operators. Two reviewers independently reviewed the abstracts.
RESULTS
Of the 2438 retrieved titles, 905 remained after removing duplicates. Twelve articles were eligible to be included in this review of which seven were randomized with adequate sample size.
CONCLUSIONS
Mouth washes containing povidone iodine and chlorhexidine decrease the viral load transiently. Large amount of in vivo studies are of paramount importance, especially RCTs, to prove the efficacy of these mouth rinses.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Mouth; Mouthwashes; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34628705
DOI: 10.1111/idh.12555 -
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Jun 2018Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a significant source of morbidity in spine surgery, with reported rates varying from 0.7 to 16%. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a significant source of morbidity in spine surgery, with reported rates varying from 0.7 to 16%.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and evaluate the evidence for strategies for prophylaxis of SSI in adult spine surgery in the last twenty years.
METHODS
Two independent systematic searches were conducted, at two international spine centers, encompassing PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Database, EBSCO Medline, ScienceDirect, Ovid Medline, EMBASE (Ovid), and MEDLINE. References were combined and screened, then distilled to 69 independent studies for final review.
RESULTS
11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 51 case-controlled studies (CCS), and 7 case series were identified. Wide variation exists in surgical indications, approaches, procedures, and even definitions of SSI. Intra-wound vancomycin powder was the most widely studied intervention (19 studies, 1 RCT). Multiple studies examined perioperative antibiotic protocols, closed-suction drainage, povidone-iodine solution irrigation, and 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate skin closure. 18 interventions were examined by a single study only. There is limited evidence for the efficacy of intra-wound vancomycin. There is strong evidence that closed-suction drainage does not affect SSI rates, while there is moderate evidence for the efficacy of povidone-iodine irrigation and that single-dose preoperative antibiotics is as effective as multiple doses. Few conclusions can be drawn about other interventions given the paucity and poor quality of studies.
CONCLUSIONS
While a small body of evidence underscores a select few interventions for SSI prophylaxis in adult spine surgery, most proposed measures have not been investigated beyond a single study. Further high level evidence is required to justify SSI preventative treatments.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Spine; Suction; Surgical Wound Infection; Vancomycin
PubMed: 29609860
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.03.023 -
Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii Feb 2022The development of the field related to the treatment of wounds has resulted in the appearance of new antimicrobial active ingredients.
INTRODUCTION
The development of the field related to the treatment of wounds has resulted in the appearance of new antimicrobial active ingredients.
AIM
To analyse, evaluate and systematize the available scientific evidence of the effectiveness and safety of antiseptic preparations intended for the treatment of chronic wounds.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We conducted a literature review using the advanced search engine in the PubMed database. We used a combination of two English keywords, i.e.: "antiseptic" and "chronic wound". We have selected only clinical, randomized controlled trials.
RESULTS
We obtained a total of 825 items (674 full-text works). We included 29 studies in the review. The most frequently evaluated preparation was octenidine dihydrochloride and povidone iodine (pharmacological drugs). Preparations containing polyhexanide, products based on hypochlorite, reactive oxygen species, 1% acetic acid, and specialized antibacterial dressings were also assessed. The new generation of antimicrobial preparations were highly effective, both in the prevention and treatment of infections, and were well tolerated by the tissues and do not interfere with the healing process. The best tolerated and most effective antiseptic was OCT/PE. For cleaning, we recommend OCT-based irrigation fluids, PHMB, or hypochlorite. The maintenance of the antimicrobial effect during the therapy was ensured by a compatible dressing.
CONCLUSIONS
An antiseptic alone is not effective enough and the therapeutic effect depends to the greatest extent on properly selected causal therapy, preceded by thorough diagnostics.
PubMed: 35369629
DOI: 10.5114/ada.2022.113807