-
BMC Urology May 2016To evaluate the efficacy and safety of silodosin as a medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of silodosin as a medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of silodosin in the treatment of ureteral stones. The reference lists of retrieved studies were also investigated.
RESULTS
Six RCTs, including 916 participants and comparing silodosin with controls, were used in the meta-analysis. Silodosin was superior to controls in terms of stone expulsion rate, the primary efficacy end point in all six RCTs (odds ratio [OR] for expulsion 2.16, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.62 to 2.86, p <0.00001). Silodosin was also more effective for secondary efficacy end points; the stone expulsion time (standardized mean difference [SMD] -3.66, 95 % CI -6.61 to -0.71; p =0.01) and analgesic requirements (SMD -0.89, 95 % CI -1.19 to -0.60; p < 0.00001) were significantly reduced compared with those of controls. Other than the incidence of abnormal ejaculation, which was higher in the silodosin groups (OR 2.84, 95 % CI 1.56 to 5.16, p =0.0006), few adverse effects were observed.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis indicates silodosin is an effective and safe treatment option for ureteral stones with a low occurrence of side effects.
Topics: Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Premature Ejaculation; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ureterolithiasis; Urological Agents
PubMed: 27233621
DOI: 10.1186/s12894-016-0141-y -
The Journal of Sexual Medicine Jan 2021The field of study addressing the relationship between FSD and male sexual dysfunction (MSD) represents a pivotal worldwide health issue as interrelationship between FSD... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The field of study addressing the relationship between FSD and male sexual dysfunction (MSD) represents a pivotal worldwide health issue as interrelationship between FSD and MSD studies are still inconclusive.
AIM
To review the interrelationship between FSD and MSD and to conclude whether there is a definitive risk of men developing sexual dysfunction when his partner is suffering from FSD.
METHODS
The investigation was conducted following the standard practice for conducting and reporting the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comprising of 4 electronic databases, that is, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library and Ovid (Medline) from inception to December 2019. Search strategies were developed based on relevant keywords with appropriate truncation and Boolean operators' approach. The quality of studies was employed using the McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies and were assessed by independent reviewers. The levels of evidence of the included studies were also determined.
OUTCOMES
MSD who had been exposed to FSD.
RESULTS
From more than 8,000 studies searched, 26 studies were finally included, and most included studies have reasonable quality. Meta-analysis found a significant sexual dysfunction in men who are partnered with women with FSD. It found a consistent correlation between FDS and sexual dysfunction in men with a significant 3-fold increase in MSD who are partnered with women with FSD (odds ratio = 3.011, 95% confidence interval: 1.856-4.885, P = <.001, I² = 42.26%). Among subtypes of MSD, likelihood increased 4-fold for erectile dysfunction and that of premature ejaculation doubled. The data for several other domains on their components were mixed.
CLINICAL TRANSLATION
These findings support the notion that clinicians should evaluate sexual function pertaining to both partners and encompassing several dimensions and needing an interdisciplinary approach.
STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS
This review exhaustively examines data search from vast electronic databases and as the comparison of studies is extracted from English journal publications, not all regions worldwide are represented.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis and systematic review found an association between sexual dysfunction in men partnered with women with FSD, especially in the domains of erectile and ejaculatory function. Chew PY, Choy CL, Sidi Hb,et al. The Association Between Female Sexual Dysfunction and Sexual Dysfunction intheMale Partner: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2021;18:99-112.
Topics: Ejaculation; Erectile Dysfunction; Female; Humans; Male; Premature Ejaculation; Sexual Partners
PubMed: 33303390
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.10.001 -
Indian Journal of Psychiatry 2021Sexual dysfunction is often associated with substance use disorders. This study aimed to synthesize Indian literature on sexual dysfunction among patients with substance... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Sexual dysfunction is often associated with substance use disorders. This study aimed to synthesize Indian literature on sexual dysfunction among patients with substance use disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electronic search engines were used to identify studies of the last 20 years that reported sexual dysfunction with different substance use disorders. Information was extracted using a predefined template. Quality appraisal of the included studies was carried out using Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven relevant papers were identified that pertained to 24 distinct studies. Most of them were in patients with alcohol dependence, and fewer were in patients with opioid dependence. The study designs were primarily single-group cross-sectional, though many case-control, cross-sectional studies were also identified. The proportion of participants with sexual dysfunction ranged from 22.2% to 76% for studies related to alcohol dependence and 40% to 90% for studies pertaining to opioid dependence. Varied types of sexual dysfunctions were identified, including poor satisfaction, lack of desire, premature ejaculation, and erectile dysfunction. Efforts to address bias and confounders were not reported in most studies.
CONCLUSION
Sexual dysfunction affects a substantial proportion of patients with substance use disorders. Clinicians can make an effort to ascertain and address sexual dysfunction in their routine clinical practice while dealing with patients with substance use disorders.
PubMed: 34456345
DOI: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_716_20 -
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs Jul 2018The prevalence of sexual dysfunctions has increased over the last decades; despite a number of available treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of sexual dysfunctions has increased over the last decades; despite a number of available treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation (PE), and Peyronie's disease (PD), still several unmet therapeutic needs deserve to be fulfilled. The aim of this review is to detail on phase I and II clinical trials investigating novel medical treatments for ED, PE, and PD.
AREAS COVERED
We conducted a systematic review of the literature including both published and ongoing phase I and II registered trials focused on medical treatment of ED, PE, and PD during the last 5 years. A total of 35 trials have been identified. Most studies (63%) investigated ED treatments and 26% were still ongoing. Stem cells (SCs) therapy was assessed in 28% of trials.
EXPERT OPINION
SCs therapy represent a promising treatment for ED although only few patients have been treated to date. Likewise, the oral selective oxytocin receptor antagonists for treating PE showed excellent safety profile and deserve further investigations in phase III trials. Preliminary results of novel topical treatments for PD with fibrinolytic and antiinflammatory drugs are encouraging, but urgently need to be confirmed in large placebo-controlled trials.
Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Drug Design; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Induration; Premature Ejaculation; Prevalence; Stem Cell Transplantation
PubMed: 29969332
DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1495707 -
Danish Medical Journal Jul 2016The debate on non-medical male circumcision has gaining momentum during the past few years. The objective of this systematic review was to determine if circumcision,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The debate on non-medical male circumcision has gaining momentum during the past few years. The objective of this systematic review was to determine if circumcision, medical indication or age at circumcision had an impact on perceived sexual function in males.
METHODS
Systematic searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase. The included studies compared long-term sexual function in circumcised and non-circumcised males, before and after circumcision, or compared different ages at circumcision. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the level of evidence (Grade A-D).
RESULTS
Database and hand searches yielded 3,677 records. Inclusion criteria were fulfilled in 38 studies including two randomised trials. Overall, the only identified differences in sexual function in circumcised males were decreased premature ejaculation and increased penile sensitivity (Grade A-B). Following non-medical circumcision, no inferior sexual function was reported (A-B). Following medical circumcision, most outcomes were comparable (B); however, problems in obtaining an orgasm were increased (C) and erectile dysfunction was reported with inconsistency (D). A younger age at circumcision seemed to cause less sexual dysfunction than circumcision later in life.
CONCLUSIONS
The hypothesis of inferior male sexual function following circumcision could not be supported by the findings of this systematic review. However, further studies on medical circumcision and age at circumcision are required.
Topics: Circumcision, Male; Humans; Male; Perception; Sexual Behavior
PubMed: 27399981
DOI: No ID Found -
Andrologia Dec 2020To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of drug treatments for premature ejaculation. A systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were executed on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of drug treatments for premature ejaculation. A systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were executed on randomised controlled trials of drug interventions for premature ejaculation. Intravaginal ejaculation latency time and related adverse effects were outcome measures. A total of 44 RCTs with 11,008 patients were included in our NMA. In therapy <8 weeks, the ranking of drug efficacy was topical creams >selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)+ phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) > PDE5i > sertraline > clomipramine > paroxetine > dapoxetine 60 milligram (mg) > dapoxetine 30 mg > fluoxetine>citalopram > duloxetine>placebo. In therapy ≥ 8 weeks, the ranking of drug efficacy was SSRI + PDE5i > topical creams > paroxetine > tramadol > PDE5i > fluoxetine > dapoxetine 60 mg > dapoxetine 30 mg > clomipramine>citalopram > placebo. For total adverse events, clomipramine, dapoxetine 30 mg, dapoxetine 60 mg, paroxetine, PDE5i, SSRI + PDE5i and tramadol had a higher risk than placebo. In conclusion, in ≥8 weeks of therapy, the drug combination of SSRI + PDE5i was the most effective PE therapy. In <8 weeks of therapy, the efficacy of local anaesthetics was best. All drug treatments were ranked better than placebo. In general, drugs with better effects had more obvious side effects.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Ejaculation; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Premature Ejaculation; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32892379
DOI: 10.1111/and.13806 -
Medicine Dec 2018We performed the network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review involved all evidence from relevant trials to compare the efficiency and safety of various types of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in men with premature ejaculation: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
We performed the network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review involved all evidence from relevant trials to compare the efficiency and safety of various types of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in patients with premature ejaculation (PE).
METHODS
We conducted comprehensive searches of peer-reviewed and grey literature. PubMed, the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials published up to June 1, 2017. The primary outcome was intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IVELT) and adverse effects (AEs). We performed pairwise meta-analyses by random effects model and network meta-analysis by Bayesian model. We used the GRADE framework to assess the quality of evidence contributing to each network estimate.
RESULTS
Of 3046 titles and abstracts initially identified, 17 trials reporting 5739 participants were included. Considering IVELT in the NMA, paroxetine plus sildenafil and sildenafil alone are both superior to placebo (MD: 1.75, 95% CrI: 0.05 to 3.78; MD 1.43, 95% CrI 0.003 to 2.81). Sildenafil is superior to sertraline (MD: 1.63, 95% CrI: 0.10 to 2.79). Considering AEs, placebo demonstrated obviously lower risk comparing to paroxetine, sildenafil and paroxetine plus sildenafil (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.52; OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.80; OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.92). Compared with tadalafil plus paroxetine, dapoxetine showed significantly less AEs (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.96).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study concluded that although paroxetine plus sildenafil and sildenafil alone both demonstrated significant IVELT benefit compared with placebo, significant increase of AEs risk was also observed. Furthermore, sildenafil alone was superior to sertraline in efficacy with comparable tolerability.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Humans; Male; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Premature Ejaculation; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 30544399
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013342 -
The Journal of Sexual Medicine Apr 2018Sexual dysfunction is a common problem among men and women and is associated with negative individual functioning, relationship difficulties, and lower quality of life. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Sexual dysfunction is a common problem among men and women and is associated with negative individual functioning, relationship difficulties, and lower quality of life.
AIM
To determine the magnitude of associations between 6 health-related lifestyle factors (cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, diet, caffeine, and cannabis use) and 3 common sexual dysfunctions (erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, and female sexual dysfunction).
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of 10 electronic databases identified 89 studies that met the inclusion criteria (452 effect sizes; N = 348,865). Pooled mean effects (for univariate, age-adjusted, and multivariable-adjusted estimates) were computed using inverse-variance weighted random-effects meta-analysis and moderation by study and population characteristics were tested using random-effects meta-regression.
RESULTS
Mean effect sizes from 92 separate meta-analyses provided evidence that health-related lifestyle factors are important for sexual dysfunction. Cigarette smoking (past and current), alcohol intake, and physical activity had dose-dependent associations with erectile dysfunction. Risk of erectile dysfunction increased with greater cigarette smoking and decreased with greater physical activity. Alcohol had a curvilinear association such that moderate intake was associated with a lower risk of erectile dysfunction. Participation in physical activity was associated with a lower risk of female sexual dysfunction. There was some evidence that a healthy diet was related to a lower risk of erectile dysfunction and female sexual dysfunction, and caffeine intake was unrelated to erectile dysfunction. Publication bias appeared minimal and findings were similar for clinical and non-clinical samples.
CLINICAL TRANSLATION
Modification of lifestyle factors would appear to be a useful low-risk approach to decreasing the risk of erectile dysfunction and female sexual dysfunction.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS
Strengths include the testing of age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted models and tests of potential moderators using meta-regression. Limitations include low statistical power in models testing diet, caffeine, and cannabis use as risk factors.
CONCLUSION
Results provide compelling evidence that cigarette smoking, alcohol, and physical activity are important for sexual dysfunction. Insufficient research was available to draw conclusions regarding risk factors for premature ejaculation or for cannabis use as a risk factor. These findings should be of interest to clinicians treating men and women with complaints relating to symptoms of sexual dysfunction. Allen MS, Walter EE. Health-Related Lifestyle Factors and Sexual Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Research. J Sex Med 2018;15:458-475.
Topics: Female; Health Behavior; Humans; Life Style; Male; Risk Factors; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
PubMed: 29523476
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.008 -
International Journal of Sexual Health... 2023Male sexual dysfunction is a common disorder with consequential implications. Hitherto, treatment was based on pharmacological approach which has yielded little success...
BACKGROUND
Male sexual dysfunction is a common disorder with consequential implications. Hitherto, treatment was based on pharmacological approach which has yielded little success in sustainability and produced attendant complications including overweight/obesity, and cardiovascular problems. Hence, the paradigm is toward non-pharmacological approach, but their efficacy is yet to be summarized for clinical practice. This study summarized efficacy of physiotherapy for male sexual dysfunction to inform clinical decision-making and practice.
METHODOLOGY
Electronic search of clinical trials on PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted covering from inception till July 2021 using words, such as male sexual dysfunction and physiotherapy and further refined to erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, exercises, electrical stimulation, biofeedback. Search strategy included expansion via medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncation of keywords. Boolean operators "AND" and "OR" were utilized.
RESULTS
Out of 239 studies, 13 eligible ones were included in this study. Outcome measures used were full/abridged versions of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF/IIEF-5), Manometric, or digital anal pressure measurement. Eleven studies were on erectile dysfunction/erectile dysfunction with climacturia and two on premature ejaculation. Physiotherapy was for 6-12 weeks covering 9-20 sessions. Physiotherapy used was standalone/combinations of pelvic floor muscle exercises, electrical stimulation, or biofeedback. PEDro scores of the studies were 4-9/10. Studies involved 912 participants (472/440 intervention/control) between 19 and 83 years with erectile dysfunction lasting 6-360 months. There was significant (0.0001 ≤ ≤ .05) improvement in sexual function (interventions > controls). Nothing determines the efficacy of physiotherapy or choice of approach.
CONCLUSION
Physiotherapy is an effective non-pharmacological treatment approach for male sexual dysfunction.
PubMed: 38596771
DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2022.2155288 -
American Journal of Men's Health 2020Male sexual dysfunctions (MSDs) often remain undiagnosed and untreated in Asia compared to Europe due to conservative cultural and religious beliefs, socioeconomic...
Male sexual dysfunctions (MSDs) often remain undiagnosed and untreated in Asia compared to Europe due to conservative cultural and religious beliefs, socioeconomic conditions, and lack of awareness. There is a tendency for the use of traditional medicines and noncompliance with and reduced access to modern healthcare. The present systematic review compared the incidence and factors of MSD in European and Asian populations. English language population/community-based original articles on MSDs published in MEDLINE from 2008 to 2018 were retrieved. A total of 5392 studies were retrieved, of which 50 (25 Asian and 25 European) were finally included in this review. The prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) (0%-95.0% vs. 0.9%-88.8%), low satisfaction (3.2%-37.6% vs. 4.1%-28.3%), and hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) (0.7%-81.4 vs. 0%-65.5%) was higher in Asian than in European men, whereas the prevalence of anorgasmia (0.4% vs. 3%-65%) was lower in Asian than in European men. Age was an independent positive factor of MSD. In European men over 60 years old, the prevalence of premature ejaculation (PE) decreased. The prevalence of MSD was higher in questionnaires than in interviews. The significant factors were age, single status, low socioeconomic status, poor general health, less physical activity, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, obesity, lower urinary tract symptoms, prostatitis, anxiety, depression and alcohol, tobacco, and drug use. The prevalence of MSD differed slightly in Asian and European men. There is a need to conduct large studies on the various Asian populations for the effective management of MSD.
Topics: Adult; Age Distribution; Anxiety; Asian People; Depression; Erectile Dysfunction; Europe; Humans; Male; Men's Health; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sexual Behavior; Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological; Socioeconomic Factors; White People
PubMed: 32623948
DOI: 10.1177/1557988320937200