-
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Aug 2022There is an established relationship between the degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) and prognosis. Quantitation of MR severity guides therapeutic approaches.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is an established relationship between the degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) and prognosis. Quantitation of MR severity guides therapeutic approaches. Inconsistent definitions and categorization of MR severity in clinical studies limit meaningful comparisons among trials and compromise development of an effective evidence base. The purpose of this study was to quantify heterogeneity in grading systems for MR severity in the contemporary literature.
METHODS
This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-adjusted clinical studies of mitral valve interventions (surgical or percutaneous). A total of 35 articles from 2015 to 2020 were included (15 randomized controlled trials and 20 propensity score-adjusted clinical studies).
RESULTS
There were 22 studies that reported MR severity in numeric categories, either values from the historical "plus" system or numeric MR grades, whereas 9 studies reported MR severity using text-only descriptive categories. Among the studies that used numeric categories, 2+ MR was defined as moderate in 64% of studies, mild in 27%, and mild-moderate in 9%, and 3+ MR was defined as moderate in 14%, moderate-severe in 52%, and severe in 14%.
CONCLUSIONS
There was substantial variability in MR severity definition and reporting in contemporary clinical studies of mitral valve interventions. We recommend that the historical plus numeric grading system be abandoned and that inclusion and outcome criteria in MR clinical trials be based on US and European guideline-recommended categories as none or trace, mild, moderate, and severe. Adoption of these simple recommendations will improve the consistency and quality of MR clinical trial design and reporting.
Topics: Humans; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Prognosis; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33838121
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.073 -
PeerJ 2023The receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1) expression is associated with clinicopathological characteristics and the prognosis of various cancers; however, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1) expression is associated with clinicopathological characteristics and the prognosis of various cancers; however, the conclusions are controversial. As a result, this study aimed to explore the clinicopathological and prognostic values of RACK1 expression in patients with cancer.
METHODOLOGY
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were comprehensively explored from their inception to April 20, 2023, for selecting studies on the clinicopathological and prognostic role of RACK1 in patients with cancer that met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the prognosis-predictive value of RACK1 expression, while pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to evaluate the correlation between RACK1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancer. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies (13 on prognosis and 20 on clinicopathological characteristics) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The findings indicated that high RACK1 expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13-2.33; = 0.009; I = 89%) and reversely correlated with disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.22-2.88; = 0.004; I = 0%). Furthermore, increased RACK1 expression was significantly associated with lymphatic invasion/N+ stage (OR = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04-2.90; = 0.04; I = 79%) of tumors.
CONCLUSIONS
RACK1 may be a global predictive marker of poor prognosis in patients with cancer and unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics. However, further clinical studies are required to validate these findings.
Topics: Humans; Disease-Free Survival; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Receptors for Activated C Kinase
PubMed: 37601269
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15873 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2020Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke. The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncology patients). Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of their location, or number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by a possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants. Patients with isolated SSPE, or incidental PE, may have a more benign clinical presentation compared to those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients, and their prognosis, needs to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required. This is the second update of the Cochrane systematic review published in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 26 November 2019. We also undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors inspected all citations identified to ensure reliable assessment. If relevant studies were identified, we planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials to assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Dyspnea; Humans; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 32030721
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010222.pub4 -
Acta Neuropathologica Communications Jul 2023Trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3) loss has been implicated in worse prognoses for patients with meningiomas. However, there have been challenges in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3) loss has been implicated in worse prognoses for patients with meningiomas. However, there have been challenges in measuring H3K27me3 loss, quantifying its impact, and interpreting its clinical utility. We conducted a systematic review across Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies examining H3K27me3 loss in meningioma. Clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) characteristics were aggregated. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to assess prevalence of H3K27me3 loss and meningioma recurrence risk. Study bias was characterized using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool and funnel plots. Nine publications met inclusion criteria with a total of 2376 meningioma cases. The prevalence of H3K27me3 loss was 16% (95% CI 0.09-0.27), with higher grade tumors associated with a significantly greater proportion of loss. H3K27me3 loss was more common in patients who were male, had recurrent meningiomas, or required adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients were 1.70 times more likely to have tumor recurrence with H3K27me3 loss (95% CI 1.35-2.15). The prevalence of H3K27me3 loss in WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas was found to be significantly greater in tissue samples less than five years old versus tissue of all ages and when a broader definition of IHC staining loss was applied. This analysis demonstrates that H3K27me3 loss significantly associates with more aggressive meningiomas. While differences in IHC and tumor tissue age have led to heterogeneity in studying H3K27me3 loss, a robust prognostic signal is present. Our findings suggest an opportunity to improve study design and standardize tissue processing to optimize clinical viability of this epigenetic marker.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Biomarkers, Tumor; Histones; Meningeal Neoplasms; Meningioma; Prognosis
PubMed: 37491289
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-023-01615-9 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Aug 2022Gliosarcomas are extremely rare malignant brain tumors, which can be classified as primary gliosarcoma (PGS) if the tumors arise de novo or secondary gliosarcoma (SGS)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Gliosarcomas are extremely rare malignant brain tumors, which can be classified as primary gliosarcoma (PGS) if the tumors arise de novo or secondary gliosarcoma (SGS) in patients who had previously been treated for glioblastoma. Given their rarity, it is unclear if PGS is clinically and genetically different from SGS. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features, prognostic survivals, and molecular profiles of these rare tumors.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Web of Science for relevant studies. Odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the random-effect model.
RESULTS
We included eight studies with 239 PGS and 79 SGS for meta-analyses. Compared to PGS, SGS occurred at a younger age and had lower rates of gross total resection and radiation therapy. Bevacizumab was more commonly administered in SGS. SGS patients had a significantly worse PFS (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40-0.89) and OS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.31-0.68) in comparison to PGS. The incidences of EGFR mutation, IDH mutation, and MGMT methylation were not statistically different between PGS and SGS.
CONCLUSION
Our results demonstrated that PGS and SGS had distinct clinicopathological profiles and prognoses but shared similar genetic profiles. This study facilitates our understanding of how these two malignant brain tumors behave clinically, but future studies will be required to elucidate the genetic pathways of PGS and SGS.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Gliosarcoma; Humans; Mutation; Prognosis
PubMed: 35768633
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04057-w -
PloS One 2021GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A.
METHODS
We first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I2>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
In total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20-2.38 I2 = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02-1.95 I2 = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33-2.86, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15-2.92, I2 = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION
GPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Publication Bias; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
PubMed: 33788883
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249040 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Mar 2016Right-sided colon cancers (RCC) and left-sided colon cancers (LCC) are of different embryological origins, and various differences exist between them. However, the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Right-sided colon cancers (RCC) and left-sided colon cancers (LCC) are of different embryological origins, and various differences exist between them. However, the survival difference has not been assessed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the prognostic differences between RCC and LCC.
METHODS
Fifteen studies that compared the prognosis of colon cancer according to tumor location were identified. The effects of tumor location on survival outcome were assessed.
RESULTS
Patients with RCC had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with LCC in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.14, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.22, p < 0.01). Our subgroup analyses demonstrated significant prognostic differences in Western countries (HR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.08-1.23, p < 0.01), a nationwide database (HR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.05-1.27, p = 0.01), and a stage-adjusted analysis (HR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.05-1.24, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
These findings demonstrate that tumor location is associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer patients, and those with RCC have a significantly worse prognosis than those with LCC in terms of OS. RCC should be treated distinctively from LCC, and the establishment of standardized management for colon cancer by tumor location is needed.
Topics: Colonic Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models
PubMed: 26573851
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-3026-6 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Jun 2022The 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging of Gallbladder cancer subdivided T2 stage into T2a and T2b based on tumour location. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging of Gallbladder cancer subdivided T2 stage into T2a and T2b based on tumour location. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes in T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers.
METHODS
Literature search of Medline, Web of science, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed. Study characteristics, survival and recurrence data were extracted for meta-analysis of effect estimates and of individual patient data.
RESULTS
Fifteen retrospective studies (2531 patients, T2a = 1332, T2b = 199) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in patients with T2b compared to T2a tumours (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.67-2.86, p < 0.0001). Meta-analysis of individual patient data (n = 629) showed similar results (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.43-2.58, p < 0.00001). Patients with T2b tumours had higher risk of recurrence compared to T2a (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.40-7.28, p = 0.006) and were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.12-2.84, p = 0.014). Liver resection improved OS in T2b tumours (HR 2.99, CI 1.73-5.16, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
T2b gallbladder tumours have worse overall survival and increase risk of recurrence compared to T2a. Liver resection appears to improve OS in patients with T2b tumours. However, high quality multicenter data is required to confirm these results.
Topics: Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Gallbladder Neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35042673
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.019 -
Gene Aug 2018An increasing number of studies have shown that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in the development of glioma. However, a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
An increasing number of studies have shown that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in the development of glioma. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical value of lncRNA expression in glioma patients is lacking. We performed this study to assess the relationship between the expression of various lncRNAs and the clinicopathological features, diagnosis and prognosis of glioma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search. We conducted a subgroup analysis to assess the clinicopathological value of urothelial carcinoma associated 1 (UCA1). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of lncRNAs for survival were calculated to analyze the prognostic performance of lncRNAs.
RESULTS
In total, 40 studies, including 30 investigating clinicopathological features, 3 investigating diagnoses and 32 investigating prognoses, were analyzed in this study. UCA1 expression was positively associated with tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-4.15; P < 0.001) and World Health Organization (WHO) grade (OR, 3.84, [95% CI 1.84-8.01], P < 0.001). In the prognostic meta-analysis, high metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) expression could predict poor overall survival (OS) in patients with glioma, with a pooled HR of 2.32 (95% CI: 1.64-3.27, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that lncRNAs are associated with tumor size, WHO grade, and prognosis in glioma patients. lncRNAs could function as potential molecular biomarkers of the clinicopathology and prognosis of glioma.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Humans; Prognosis; RNA, Long Noncoding
PubMed: 29777909
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.05.054 -
European Journal of Medical Research Mar 2023Glaucoma is a chronic neurodegenerative process of the optic nerve that is the leading cause of blindness worldwide, and early diagnosis of the disease could greatly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Glaucoma is a chronic neurodegenerative process of the optic nerve that is the leading cause of blindness worldwide, and early diagnosis of the disease could greatly affect patients' prognoses. The pathophysiology of glaucoma is complicated by a combination of genetic and epigenetic factors. Deciphering the early diagnostic biomarkers in glaucoma could attenuate the disease's global burden and help us understand the exact mechanisms involved in glaucoma. The microRNAs are members of a larger family of non-coding RNAs that play an essential role in the epigenetic basis of glaucoma. A systematic study and meta-analysis of diagnostic microRNAs in glaucoma, jointly with network analysis of target genes, were carried out on published papers assessing differentially expressed microRNAs in human subjects. In total, 321 articles were found, and, after screening, six studies were eligible for further analysis. 52 differentially expressed microRNAs were found, of which 28 and 24 were up-regulated and down-regulated, respectively. Only 12 microRNAs were qualified for meta-analysis, with overall sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 74%, respectively. Then, using network analysis, it became apparent that the VEGF-A, AKT1, CXCL12, and HRAS genes were the most important targets for the microRNAs. Perturbations in WNT signaling, protein transport, and extracellular matrix organization pathways were discovered to be important in the etiology of glaucoma using the community detection approach. This study tries to uncover the promising microRNAs and their target genes that govern the epigenetics of glaucoma.
Topics: Humans; MicroRNAs; Glaucoma; Prognosis; Early Diagnosis
PubMed: 36973823
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01093-8