-
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Jun 2024Despite therapeutic advances for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with the emergence of all-trans retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab-ozogamycin,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Despite therapeutic advances for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with the emergence of all-trans retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab-ozogamycin, approximately 10% of patients still experience disease relapse, typically occurring within 24 to 36 months following completion of front-line treatment. Traditionally, both allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have been considered reasonable treatment options for relapsed APL; however, no randomized controlled studies have been conducted comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT in patients with relapsed APL. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess the totality of evidence pertaining to allo-HCT or auto-HCT in relapsed APL. Our search identified 1158 references, of which 23 met our inclusion criteria. While acknowledging the limitations of comparing these 2 treatment modalities indirectly, based on results from separate meta-analyses, it appears that pooled rates of event-free survival (71% versus 54%), progression-free survival (63% versus 43%), and overall survival (82% versus 58%) are higher after auto-HCT. This difference can be explained in part by the higher risk of pooled nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing allo-HCT (29% versus 5%), owing to inherent risks associated with this modality. In the absence of a randomized prospective clinical trial comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT, our results show that both modalities are acceptable in patients with relapsed APL. The higher pooled NRM rate with allo-HCT is an important consideration when choosing this option. Additionally, the comparable pooled relapse rate for auto-HCT and allo-HCT (24% versus 23%) provides a rationale for evaluating post-HCT consolidative strategies to mitigate this risk.
Topics: Humans; Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Transplantation, Autologous; Transplantation, Homologous; Adult; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38554737
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.03.024 -
Annals of Hematology Apr 2023Severe bleeding is the leading cause of early death in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, there are no means for hemorrhagic risk...
Severe bleeding is the leading cause of early death in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, there are no means for hemorrhagic risk stratification in APL. This study aimed to identify optimized predictors of severe bleeding events related to APL. A total of 109 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed APL from January 2015 to April 2022 were retrospectively investigated. A systematic review of computer-based patient medical records was conducted to obtain clinical date, including baseline characteristics, routine blood examination findings, coagulation and fibrinolysis indexes, and bleeding events. Among the 109 patients, 89 were classified into the no-severe bleeding group, while 20 had severe bleeding. Compared with the patients with no severe bleeding, the patients with severe bleeding had significantly higher circulating leukemic cell percentages, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scores, D-dimer (D-D) levels, and fibrin degradation product (FDP) levels. They also had lower fibrinogen (FIB) levels and a longer prothrombin time. Multivariate analysis revealed that the circulating leukemic cell percentage (OR = 1.040, CI = 1.008-1.072, P = 0.012), FIB level (OR = 0.101, CI = 0.011-0.896, P = 0.040), and FDP level (OR = 1.012, CI = 1.000-1.024, P = 0.047) were independent risk factors for severe bleeding. FDP/FIB, D-D/FIB, and seven meaningful indicators in the single-factor analysis were included in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results showed that FDP/FIB was the best indicator for predicting severe bleeding related to newly diagnosed APL. The area under the ROC curve of FDP/FIB was 0.915, and the best cutoff value was 61.77, with 100% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity. Statistical analysis showed a higher incidence of severe bleeding and higher DIC scores when FDP/FIB was >61.77 in APL patients. FDP/FIB has obvious advantages in predicting the degree of bleeding associated with primary promyelocytic leukemia; the greater the FDP/FIB value, the more severe the bleeding. The risk of severe bleeding was the highest when FDP/FIB > 61.77.
Topics: Humans; Blood Coagulation; Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation; Hemorrhage; Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36750485
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05122-8 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Oct 2020Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3, internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation, is a known predictor for worse outcome in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Prognostic Significance of Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation in Non-Transplant Adult Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3, internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation, is a known predictor for worse outcome in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML). However, the prognostic significance of FLT3-ITD mutation in adult, non-transplant patients is still unclear therefore we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explain this issue. The main outcome was overall survival (OS), while additional outcomes included event-free survival (EFS).
METHODS
Seven Databases (ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, SpringerLink, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost) were searched up to August 2020. Studies investigating the prognostic value of AML in adults with FLT3-ITD mutational status were selected. Studies which patients had received transplantation, diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) or secondary AML were excluded. The selected studies were divided into subgroups based on their cytogenetic profile. Summary hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity tests were conducted and presented in I2 value. Forest plot was presented to facilitate understanding of the results. Publication bias was analyzed by Funnel Plot test.
RESULTS
A total of ten studies describing research conducted from 1999 to 2020, met the inclusion criteria for this study. Nine studies reported OS and four studies reported EFS in HR. The highest HR for OS is 6.33 (95% CI, 2.61-15.33; p < 0.001), for EFS is 3.58 (95% CI, 1.59 - 8.05); p = 0.002)., while the lowest for OS is 1.33 (95% CI, 0.88-2.01; P = 0.174) and for EFS is 1.29 (95% CI, 0.75-2.23; p = 0.34). Nine studies were included in meta-analysis with HR for OS 1.91 (95% CI, 1.59-2.30, p < 0.00001), whereas 4 studies were included in meta-analysis for EFS with HR 1.64 (95% CI, 1.25-2.14; p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSION
FLT3-ITD mutation is associated with worse prognosis in adult, non-transplant patients with AML, both for OS and EFS.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Mutation; Prognosis; Survival Rate; Tandem Repeat Sequences; fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3
PubMed: 33112537
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.2827 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2018Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the most common acute leukaemia affecting adults. Most patients diagnosed with AML are at advanced age and present with co-morbidities,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the most common acute leukaemia affecting adults. Most patients diagnosed with AML are at advanced age and present with co-morbidities, so that intensive therapy such as stem cell transplantation (SCT) is impossible to provide or is accompanied by high risks for serious adverse events and treatment-related mortality. Especially for these patients, it is necessary to find out whether all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), an intermediate of vitamin A inducing terminal differentiation of leukaemic cell lines, added to chemotherapy confers increased benefit or harm when compared with the same chemotherapy alone.
OBJECTIVES
This review aims to determine benefits and harms of ATRA in addition to chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for adults with AML (not those with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (non-APL)).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, study registries and relevant conference proceedings up to July 2018 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also contacted experts for unpublished data.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs comparing chemotherapy alone with chemotherapy plus ATRA in patients with all stages of AML. We excluded trials if less than 80% of participants were adults or participants with AML, and if no subgroup data were available. Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were included, if they had a refractory anaemia and more than 20% of blasts.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of trials. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information. We used hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS; instead of the pre-planned event-free survival, as this outcome was not reported), and we calculated risk ratios (RR) for the other outcomes quality of life, on-study mortality and adverse events. We presented all measures with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE methods.
MAIN RESULTS
Our search resulted in 2192 potentially relevant references, of which we included eight trials with 28 publications assessing 3998 patients. Overall, we judged the potential risk of bias of the eight included trials as moderate. Two of eight trials were published as abstracts only. All the included trials used different chemotherapy schedules and one trial only evaluated the effect of the hypomethylating agent decitabine, a drug know to affect epigenetics, in combination with ATRA.The addition of ATRA to chemotherapy resulted in probably little or no difference in OS compared to chemotherapy only (2985 participants; HR 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.02); moderate-certainty evidence). Based on a mortality rate at 24 months of 70% with chemotherapy alone, the mortality rate with chemotherapy plus ATRA was 68% (95% CI 65% to 71%).For DFS, complete response rate (CRR) and on-study mortality there was probably little or no difference between treatment groups (DFS: 1258 participants, HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12; CRR: 3081 participants, RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.09; on-study mortality: 2839 participants, RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.30, all moderate-certainty evidence).Three trials with 1428 participants reported the adverse events 'infection' and 'cardiac toxicity': There was probably no, or little difference in terms of infection rate between participants receiving ATRA or not (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.15; moderate-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether ATRA decreases cardiac toxicity (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.90; P = 0.02, very low certainty-evidence, however, cardiac toxicity was low).Rates and severity of diarrhoea and nausea/vomiting were assessed in two trials with 337 patients and we are uncertain whether there is a difference between treatment arms (diarrhoea: RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.47; nausea/vomiting: RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.85; both very low-certainty evidence).Quality of life was not reported by any of the included trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found no evidence for a difference between participants receiving ATRA in addition to chemotherapy or chemotherapy only for the outcome OS. Regarding DFS, CRR and on-study mortality, there is probably no evidence for a difference between treatment groups. Currently, it seems the risk of adverse events are comparable to chemotherapy only.As quality of life has not been evaluated in any of the included trials, further research is needed to clarify the effect of ATRA on quality of life.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Decitabine; Diarrhea; Disease Progression; Heart; Humans; Infections; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Nausea; Recurrence; Tretinoin; Vomiting
PubMed: 30080246
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011960.pub2