-
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology :... 2023Vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has recently been proposed to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with controversial results. We, therefore, conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has recently been proposed to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with controversial results. We, therefore, conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of this therapy for H. pylori eradication.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database from inception until November 2022, collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VA dual therapy with other regimens for H. pylori eradication. Pooled relative risks (RRs) were calculated using random effects model.
RESULTS
Five RCTs were ultimately included. Compared with the vonoprazan-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (VAC) triple therapy, the eradication rate of VA dual therapy was lower in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (n = 3 RCTs, RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99, P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference between them in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01, P = 0.11). For clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains, the eradication rate of VA dual therapy was significantly higher than that of the VAC triple therapy (n = 2 RCTs, RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.39, P = 0.02). Compared with the PPI-based triple therapy (PAC), VA dual therapy had a superior eradication rate (n = 2 RCTs, ITT analysis: RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23, P = 0.003; PP analysis: pooled RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.22, P = 0.0004). Compared with VAC or PAC triple therapy, VA dual therapy has a similar incidence of total adverse events and compliance.
CONCLUSIONS
VA dual therapy had a similar effect compared to VAC triple therapy and was superior to PAC triple therapy. Future RCTs are needed to ascertain the optimal dosage and duration of vonoprazan and amoxicillin, and the effect of VA dual therapy compared with the mainstream regimens recommended by current guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Amoxicillin; Clarithromycin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Helicobacter pylori; Helicobacter Infections; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37602635
DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_153_23 -
Neurosurgical Review Dec 2022The management of base of skull (BS) chordomas is a neurosurgical conundrum owing to their close proximity to the critical neurovascular structures. Surgical resection... (Review)
Review
The management of base of skull (BS) chordomas is a neurosurgical conundrum owing to their close proximity to the critical neurovascular structures. Surgical resection is the gold standard treatment followed by adjuvant radiotherapy which includes photon therapy, proton beam therapy (PBT), gamma knife radiosurgery, etc. PBT has become an unparalleled therapeutic modality in the management of BS chordomas. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the outcomes in BS chordoma patients who received PBT as a primary or adjuvant therapy. PubMed and Cochrane databases were screened till May 2022. Following the PRISMA guidelines, studies were reviewed thoroughly, and the data of the included study was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS 9.4 with P value < .05 considered as significant. Sixteen studies with 752 patients were included. The majority of the patients were adults (> 18 years) with a male:female ratio of 1.2. The most common clinical features were cranial nerve (3rd, 6th, or 12th) palsy and hearing impairment. Ninety-five percent of the patients underwent surgical resection before PBT. The mean PBT dose received was 74.02 cGe (cobalt gray equivalent). Eighty percent of the patients showed a positive response to the therapy defined in terms of tumor regression. Five-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated as 76.6%, 79.6%, and 89%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed none of the factors had any significant association with 5-year LC. PBT is a growing therapeutic technique that has revolutionized the treatment of BS chordomas.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Female; Chordoma; Proton Therapy; Survival Rate; Skull Base Neoplasms; Skull Base; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 36181614
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01880-7 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Oct 2017Reirradiation (reRT) for locoregional recurrences poses unique challenges and risks; re-treatment using proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) could prove advantageous.... (Review)
Review
Reirradiation (reRT) for locoregional recurrences poses unique challenges and risks; re-treatment using proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) could prove advantageous. Assessing clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles, this systematic review comprehensively evaluated available evidence regarding PBT reRT. Fourteen original investigations across central nervous system (CNS) (n=6), head/neck (H&N) (n=4), lung (n=2), and gastrointestinal (n=2) malignancies were analyzed. PBT for recurrent uveal melanoma achieved 5-year eye retention of 55%; for chordomas, reRT afforded a 2-year local control and overall survival (OS) of 85% and 80%, respectively. Multiple PBT reRT studies for adult gliomas illustrate no grade ≥3 toxicities. Two pediatric CNS tumor studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of reRT, with one total grade 3 toxicity and achievement of longer-term OS. PBT for H&N malignancies shows appropriate local/locoregional control and favorable toxicity profiles versus historical photon-based methods, including low (9-10%) rates of feeding tube placement. PBT for recurrent lung cancer can achieve favorable survival with expected toxicities/complications of reRT, especially with concurrent chemotherapy and centrally located recurrences. Lastly, PBT reRT in gastrointestinal malignancies induced very few high-grade complications. Hence, based on the limited existing data, PBT is a notably safe reRT modality for effective salvage of recurrent disease. Institutional experiences must continue to be reported: dosimetric correlations, late toxicities, and advanced PBT techniques.
Topics: Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Proton Therapy; Re-Irradiation
PubMed: 28941560
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.005 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Apr 2018As costs of cancer care rise, the importance of documenting value in oncology increases. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) has the potential to reduce toxicities in cancer... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
As costs of cancer care rise, the importance of documenting value in oncology increases. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) has the potential to reduce toxicities in cancer patients, but is relatively expensive and unproven. Evaluating quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential to establishing PBT's "value" in oncologic therapy. The goal of this systematic review was to assess QOL and PROs in patients treated with PBT.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic searches were conducted. The PubMed search engine was the primary data source, along with publications found from references of selected articles, and articles known to the authors published through 2017. Seventeen original investigations were found to have sufficient focus and relevance to be incorporated into the systematic review.
RESULTS
Studies of skull base (n = 1), brain (n = 1), head/neck (n = 1), lung (n = 1), breast (n = 2), prostate (n = 8), and pediatric (n = 3) malignancies treated with PBT that met eligibility criteria were included. QOL did not deteriorate during PBT for skull base and after PBT for brain tumors, respectively. PROs were higher for PBT than photon-based radiotherapy for both head/neck and lung cancer. Patient-reported breast cosmesis was appropriate after PBT and comparable to photon modalities. PBT in various settings of prostate cancer displayed an expected post-therapy decline; one study showed improved PROs (rectal urgency, bowel frequency) for PBT, and two others showed PROs/QOL comparable with other modalities. Pediatric studies demonstrated improvements in QOL during therapy, with additional increases thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on limited data, PBT provides favorable QOL/PRO profiles for select brain, head/neck, lung, and pediatric cancers; measures for prostate and breast cancers were more modest. These results have implications for cost-effective cancer care and prudently designed QOL evaluation in ongoing trials, which are discussed. Future data could substantially change the conclusions of this review.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasms; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Prostatic Neoplasms; Proton Therapy; Quality of Life; Skull Base Neoplasms
PubMed: 29028221
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx208 -
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Jul 2022This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the relative efficacy of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on early heartburn symptom... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
GOALS
This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the relative efficacy of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on early heartburn symptom resolution in patients with erosive esophagitis.
BACKGROUND
Limited available data directly compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a first-in-class potassium-competitive acid blocker, with PPIs in erosive esophagitis.
STUDY
We conducted a systematic literature review (in MEDLINE and CENTRAL) and subsequent network meta-analysis according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials in adults with erosive esophagitis treated with vonoprazan or a PPI were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes were heartburn symptom resolution rate on Day 1 and Day 7. The study was performed with all available data, using a random effects model within a Bayesian framework.
RESULTS
Overall, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis. For heartburn resolution rate on Day 1 (9 of 10 trials), vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (QD) was superior to placebo (median odds ratio=16.75, 95% credible interval: 2.16-207.80). Point estimates numerically favored vonoprazan 20 mg QD over other comparators. For heartburn resolution rate on Day 7 (10 of 10 trials), vonoprazan 20 mg QD was superior to placebo and other comparators except rabeprazole 20 mg QD. Point estimates numerically favored vonoprazan 20 mg QD over rabeprazole 20 mg QD.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, vonoprazan 20 mg QD was equally effective in heartburn resolution on Day 1, and equally or more effective on Day 7 versus PPIs in adults with erosive esophagitis.
Topics: Adult; Bayes Theorem; Esophagitis; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Heartburn; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyrroles; Rabeprazole; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35470298
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001707 -
Radiation Oncology (London, England) May 2023Particle therapy, mainly including carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT), has dose distribution advantages compared to photon radiotherapy. It has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Particle therapy, mainly including carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT), has dose distribution advantages compared to photon radiotherapy. It has been widely reported as a promising treatment method for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its application in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is relatively rare, and its efficacy and safety are inconclusive. This study aimed to provide systematic evidence for evaluating the efficacy and safety of particle therapy for inoperable LA-NSCLC.
METHODS
To retrieve published literature, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library until September 4, 2022. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 2 and 5 years. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity. The pooled clinical outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using STATA 15.1.
RESULTS
Nineteen eligible studies with a total sample size of 851 patients were included. The pooled data demonstrated that the OS, PFS, and LC rates at 2 years of LA-NSCLC treated by particle therapy were 61.3% (95% CI = 54.7-68.7%), 37.9% (95% CI = 33.8-42.6%) and 82.2% (95% CI = 78.7-85.9%), respectively. The pooled 5-year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 41.3% (95% CI = 27.1-63.1%), 25.3% (95% CI = 16.3-39.4%), and 61.5% (95% CI = 50.7-74.6%), respectively. Subgroup analysis stratified by treatment type showed that the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT, PBT combined with concurrent chemotherapy) group had better survival benefits than the PBT and CIRT groups. The incidence rates of grade 3/4 esophagitis, dermatitis, and pneumonia in LA-NSCLC patients after particle therapy were 2.6% (95% CI = 0.4-6.0%), 2.6% (95% CI = 0.5-5.7%) and 3.4% (95% CI = 1.4-6.0%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Particle therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in LA-NSCLC patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Proton Therapy; Chemoradiotherapy
PubMed: 37217970
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02264-x -
Cancers Apr 2023Complex anatomy surrounding the oropharynx makes proton therapy (PT), especially intensity-modulated PT (IMPT), a potentially attractive option due to its ability to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Complex anatomy surrounding the oropharynx makes proton therapy (PT), especially intensity-modulated PT (IMPT), a potentially attractive option due to its ability to reduce the volume of irradiated healthy tissues. Dosimetric improvement may not translate to clinically relevant benefits. As outcome data are emerging, we aimed to evaluate the evidence of the quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following PT for oropharyngeal carcinoma (OC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched PubMed and Scopus electronic databases (date: 15 February 2023) to identify original studies on QOL and PROs following PT for OC. We employed a fluid strategy in the search strategy by tracking citations of the initially selected studies. Reports were extracted for information on demographics, main results, and clinical and dose factor correlates. Quality assessment was performed using the NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. The PRISMA guidelines were followed in the preparation of this report.
RESULTS
Seven reports were selected, including one from a recently published paper captured from citation tracking. Five compared PT and photon-based therapy, although none were randomized controlled trials. Most endpoints with significant differences favored PT, including xerostomia, cough, need for nutritional supplements, dysgeusia, food taste, appetite, and general symptoms. However, some endpoints favored photon-based therapy (sexual symptoms) or showed no significant difference (e.g., fatigue, pain, sleep, mouth sores). The PROs and QOL improve following PT but do not appear to return to baseline.
CONCLUSION
Evidence suggests that PT causes less QOL and PRO deterioration than photon-based therapy. Biases due to the non-randomized study design remain obstacles to a firm conclusion. Whether or not PT is cost-effective should be the subject of further investigation.
PubMed: 37190180
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082252 -
Physical and Engineering Sciences in... Jun 2023Particle therapies are becoming increasingly available clinically due to their beneficial energy deposition profile, sparing healthy tissues. This may be further...
Particle therapies are becoming increasingly available clinically due to their beneficial energy deposition profile, sparing healthy tissues. This may be further promoted with ultra-high dose rates, termed FLASH. This review comprehensively summarises current knowledge based on studies relevant to proton- and carbon-FLASH therapy. As electron-FLASH literature presents important radiobiological findings that form the basis of proton and carbon-based FLASH studies, a summary of key electron-FLASH papers is also included. Preclinical data suggest three key mechanisms by which proton and carbon-FLASH are able to reduce normal tissue toxicities compared to conventional dose rates, with equipotent, or enhanced, tumour kill efficacy. However, a degree of caution is needed in clinically translating these findings as: most studies use transmission and do not conform the Bragg peak to tumour volume; mechanistic understanding is still in its infancy; stringent verification of dosimetry is rarely provided; biological assays are prone to limitations which need greater acknowledgement.
Topics: Protons; Biological Assay; Carbon; Electrons; Health Status
PubMed: 37160539
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01266-z -
Proton beams in cancer treatments: Clinical outcomes and dosimetric comparisons with photon therapy.Cancer Treatment Reviews Feb 2016To review current evidence of the role of proton therapy (PT) in other tumors than skull base, sinusal/parasinusal, spinal and pediatric tumors; to determine... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To review current evidence of the role of proton therapy (PT) in other tumors than skull base, sinusal/parasinusal, spinal and pediatric tumors; to determine medico-economic aspects raised by PT.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review on Medline was performed with the following keywords: proton therapy, proton beam, protontherapy, cancer; publications with comparison between PT and photon-therapy were also selected.
RESULTS
In silico studies have shown superiority (better dose delivery to the target and/or to organs at risk) of PT toward photon-therapy in most of thoracic and abdominal malignant tumors. Potential benefits of PT could be: reduction of toxicities (including radiation-induced cancer), increase of tumor control through a dose-escalation approach, hypofractionation. Cost of treatment is always cited as an issue which actually can be managed by a precise patient selection making PT a cost-effective procedure. Comparison plan with photon therapy may be useful to determine the dosimetric and clinical advantages of PT (Normal Tissue Complications Probability).
CONCLUSION
PT may be associated with a great advantage compared to the best photon-therapies in various types of cancers. Accumulation of clinical data is on-going and will challenge the in silico data analysis. Some indications are associated with strong superiority of PT and may be discussed as a new standard within prospective observational studies.
Topics: Abdominal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Patient Selection; Proton Therapy; Radiation Dose Hypofractionation; Radiation Monitoring; Radiometry; Thoracic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26827698
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.12.007 -
Oncology Research and Treatment 2021This study aimed to systematically present application situation and therapeutic effect of proton therapy (PT), heavy ion therapy, and helical tomotherapy (TOMO) for...
PURPOSE
This study aimed to systematically present application situation and therapeutic effect of proton therapy (PT), heavy ion therapy, and helical tomotherapy (TOMO) for gastric cancer (GC), and to find gaps of existing studies.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese Biological Medical Database were searched. Tables, bubble plot, and heat map were conducted to display results.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included. About PT, 7 single-arm studies showed median overall survival (OS) within 2-66 months and 1 study reported 40% of patients happened moderate degree of radiation gastritis. About TOMO, 1 study reported longer median OS and progression-free survival, lower occurrence of Grade III toxicity, and late toxicity compared to 3D-CRT, while another study remained neutral. About heavy ion therapy, there was no clinical study was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Existing studies presented good clinic treatment effect about PT and TOMO for GC, and furthermore clinical studies are needed.
Topics: Heavy Ion Radiotherapy; Humans; Proton Therapy; Protons; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 34695829
DOI: 10.1159/000518997