-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017Staphylococcus aureus causes pulmonary infection in young children with cystic fibrosis. Prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed hoping to prevent such infection and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Staphylococcus aureus causes pulmonary infection in young children with cystic fibrosis. Prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed hoping to prevent such infection and lung damage. Antibiotics have adverse effects and long-term use might lead to infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This is an update of a previously published review.
OBJECTIVES
To assess continuous oral antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of Staphylococcus aureus versus no prophylaxis in people with cystic fibrosis, we tested these hypotheses. Prophylaxis:1. improves clinical status, lung function and survival;2. causes adverse effects (e.g. diarrhoea, skin rash, candidiasis);3. leads to fewer isolates of common pathogens from respiratory secretions;4. leads to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and colonisation of the respiratory tract with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Companies manufacturing anti-staphylococcal antibiotics were contacted.Most recent search of the Group's Register: 29 September 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of continuous oral prophylactic antibiotics (given for at least one year) compared to intermittent antibiotics given 'as required', in people with cystic fibrosis of any disease severity.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The authors assessed studies for eligibility and methodological quality and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four studies, with a total of 401 randomised participants aged zero to seven years on enrolment; one study is ongoing. The two older included studies generally had a higher risk of bias across all domains, but in particular due to a lack of blinding and incomplete outcome data, than the two more recent studies. We only regarded the most recent study as being generally free of bias, although even here we were not certain of the effect of the per protocol analysis on the study results. Evidence was downgraded based on GRADE assessments and outcome results ranged from moderate to low quality. Downgrading decisions were due to limitations in study design (all outcomes); for imprecision (number of people needing additional antibiotics); and for inconsistency (weight z score).Fewer children receiving anti-staphylococcal antibiotic prophylaxis had one or more isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (low quality evidence). There was no significant difference between groups in infant or conventional lung function (moderate quality evidence). We found no significant effect on nutrition (low quality evidence), hospital admissions, additional courses of antibiotics (low quality evidence) or adverse effects (moderate quality evidence). There was no significant difference in the number of isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa between groups (low quality evidence), though there was a trend towards a lower cumulative isolation rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the prophylaxis group at two and three years and towards a higher rate from four to six years. As the studies reviewed lasted six years or less, conclusions cannot be drawn about the long-term effects of prophylaxis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Anti-staphylococcal antibiotic prophylaxis leads to fewer children having isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, when commenced early in infancy and continued up to six years of age. The clinical importance of this finding is uncertain. Further research may establish whether the trend towards more children with CF with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, after four to six years of prophylaxis, is a chance finding and whether choice of antibiotic or duration of treatment might influence this.
Topics: Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Child; Child, Preschool; Cystic Fibrosis; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Tract Infections; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 28417451
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001912.pub4 -
Viruses Jan 2024Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is a major cause of lower respiratory tract infection, especially in infants, and increases the risk of recurrent wheezing... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is a major cause of lower respiratory tract infection, especially in infants, and increases the risk of recurrent wheezing and asthma. Recently, researchers have proposed a possible association between respiratory diseases and microbiome alterations. However, this connection has not been fully established. Herein, we conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the reported evidence of microbiome alterations in patients with RSV infection.
METHODS
The systematic literature review on the association between RSV and microbiome in humans was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL from 2012 until February 2022. The results were analyzed qualitatively, focusing on the relationship between microbiome and RSV infection with available key microbiome-related parameters.
RESULTS
In the 405 articles identified by searching databases, 12 (Respiratory tract: 9, Gut: 2, Both: 1) articles in line with the research aims were eligible for this qualitative review. The types of samples for the respiratory tract microbiome and the sequencing methods utilized varied from study to study. This review revealed that the overall microbial composition in both the respiratory tract and gut in RSV-infected patients was different from that in healthy controls. Our generated results demonstrated an increase in the abundance of and , which could contribute to the distinctive separation based on the beta diversity in the respiratory tract.
CONCLUSIONS
The respiratory tract and gut microbiome changed in patients with RSV infection. Further research with a well-organized longitudinal design is warranted to clarify the impact of microbiome alterations on disease pathogenesis.
Topics: Infant; Humans; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Respiratory Tract Infections; Microbiota; Asthma
PubMed: 38399997
DOI: 10.3390/v16020220 -
Viruses Mar 2023Τhe COVID-19 pandemic highly impacted the circulation, seasonality, and morbidity burden of several respiratory viruses. We reviewed published cases of SARS-CoV-2 and... (Review)
Review
Τhe COVID-19 pandemic highly impacted the circulation, seasonality, and morbidity burden of several respiratory viruses. We reviewed published cases of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory virus co-infections as of 12 April 2022. SARS-CoV-2 and influenza co-infections were reported almost exclusively during the first pandemic wave. It is possible that the overall incidence of SARS-CoV-2 co-infections is higher because of the paucity of co-testing for respiratory viruses during the first pandemic waves when mild cases might have been missed. Animal models indicate severe lung pathology and high fatality; nevertheless, the available literature is largely inconclusive regarding the clinical course and prognosis of co-infected patients. Animal models also indicate the importance of considering the sequence timing of each respiratory virus infection; however, there is no such information in reported human cases. Given the differences between 2020 and 2023 in terms of epidemiology and availability of vaccines and specific treatment against COVID-19, it is rational not to extrapolate these early findings to present times. It is expected that the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory virus co-infections will evolve in the upcoming seasons. Multiplex real-time PCR-based assays have been developed in the past two years and should be used to increase diagnostic and infection control capacity, and also for surveillance purposes. Given that COVID-19 and influenza share the same high-risk groups, it is essential that the latter get vaccinated against both viruses. Further studies are needed to elucidate how SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory virus co-infections will be shaped in the upcoming years, in terms of impact and prognosis.
Topics: Animals; Humans; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Coinfection; Influenza, Human; Pandemics; Influenza Vaccines
PubMed: 37112844
DOI: 10.3390/v15040865 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2014Staphylococcus aureus causes pulmonary infection in young children with cystic fibrosis. Prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed hoping to prevent such infection and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Staphylococcus aureus causes pulmonary infection in young children with cystic fibrosis. Prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed hoping to prevent such infection and lung damage. Antibiotics have adverse effects and long-term use might lead to infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
OBJECTIVES
To assess continuous oral antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of Staphylococcus aureus versus no prophylaxis in people with cystic fibrosis, we tested these hypotheses. Prophylaxis:1. improves clinical status, lung function and survival;2. causes adverse effects (e.g. diarrhoea, skin rash, candidiasis);3. leads to fewer isolates of common pathogens from respiratory secretions;4. leads to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and colonisation of the respiratory tract with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Companies manufacturing anti-staphylococcal antibiotics were contacted.Most recent search of Register: 04 September 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of continuous oral prophylactic antibiotics (given for at least one year) compared to intermittent antibiotics given 'as required', in people with cystic fibrosis of any disease severity.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The authors assessed studies for eligibility and methodological quality and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four studies, totaling 401 randomised participants aged zero to seven years on enrolment. The two older studies generally had a higher risk of bias across all domains, but in particular due to a lack of blinding and incomplete outcome data, than the two more recent studies. We only regarded the most recent study as being generally free of bias, although even here we were not certain of the effect of the per protocol analysis on the study results.Fewer children receiving anti-staphylococcal antibiotic prophylaxis had one or more isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. There was no significant difference between groups in infant or conventional lung function. We found no significant effect on nutrition, hospital admissions, additional courses of antibiotics or adverse effects. There was no significant difference in the number of isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa between groups, though there was a trend towards a lower cumulative isolation rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the prophylaxis group at two and three years and towards a higher rate from four to six years. As the studies reviewed lasted six years or less, conclusions cannot be drawn about the long-term effects of prophylaxis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Anti-staphylococcal antibiotic prophylaxis leads to fewer children having isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, when commenced early in infancy and continued up to six years of age. The clinical importance of this finding is uncertain. Further research may establish whether the trend towards more children with CF with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, after four to six years of prophylaxis, is a chance finding and whether choice of antibiotic or duration of treatment might influence this.
Topics: Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Child; Child, Preschool; Cystic Fibrosis; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Tract Infections; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 25419599
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001912.pub3 -
Radiology Jul 2023Background Radiological lung may explain the persistence of respiratory complaints in post-COVID-19 condition (long-COVID). Purpose To perform a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Background Radiological lung may explain the persistence of respiratory complaints in post-COVID-19 condition (long-COVID). Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and type of COVID-19 residual lung abnormalities at 1-year chest CT. Materials and Methods A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline databases was performed from January 2020 to January 2023. Full-text reports of CT lung in adults (≥18 years) with confirmed COVID-19 at 1-year follow-up were included. The prevalence of any residual lung abnormality and type (fibrotic or not) was analyzed according to the Fleischner Glossary. The meta-analysis included studies with chest CT data assessable in no less than 80% of individuals. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence. Multiple sub-group (country, journal category, methodological quality, study setting, outcomes) and meta-regression analyses were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. I statistics estimated low (25%), moderate (26-50%) and high (>50%) heterogeneity. 95% Prediction Intervals (95% PIs) were computed to describe the expected estimates range. Results Of 22 709 records, 21 studies were reviewed (20 prospective, 9 from China, and 7 in radiology journals). The meta-analysis included 14 studies with chest CT data in 1854 of 2043 individuals (M/F: 1109/934). Estimates of lung were highly heterogeneous (7.1-96.7%), with a pooled frequency of 43.5% (I=94%; 95% PI: 5.9%, 90.4%). This also applied to single non-fibrotic changes, including ground glass opacity, consolidations, nodules/masses, parenchymal bands, and reticulations. The prevalence range of fibrotic traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis was 1.6-25.7% (I=93%; 95% PI: 0.0%, 98.6%;); honeycombing was unremarkable (0-1.1%; I=58%; 95% PI: 0%, 60%). Lung were unrelated to any characteristics of interest. Conclusion The prevalence of COVID-19 lung at 1-year chest CT is highly heterogeneous among studies. Heterogeneity determinants remain unknown suggesting caution in data interpretation with no convincing evidence. PROSPERO (CRD42022341258) COVID-19 pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, chest CT, long-COVID, systematic review, metaanalysis See also the editorial by Parraga and Svenningsen in this issue.
Topics: Adult; Humans; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; Prospective Studies; Lung; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Bronchiectasis; Pulmonary Fibrosis; Disease Progression
PubMed: 37404150
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230535 -
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science Feb 2023We conducted this systematic review to clarify the clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of surgical and non-surgical patients with fragility fracture of... (Review)
Review
We conducted this systematic review to clarify the clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of surgical and non-surgical patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP). We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and MEDLINE for English language articles on FFP. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) of surgical patients in comparison to non-surgical patients for clinical characteristics (Rommens FFP classification, age, sex, dementia, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy), complications (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, cardiac event, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pressure ulcer, multiple organ failure, anemia caused by surgical bleeding, and surgical site infection), and outcomes (hospital mortality and one-year mortality). Five studies involving 1,090 patients with FFP (surgical patients, 432; non-surgical patients, 658) were included. FFP type III and IV (OR = 8.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.99 to 11.88; <0.00001), a younger age (MD = -3.29; 95% CI -3.83 to -2.75; 0.00001), the absence of dementia (OR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.57; <0.0001), and the presence of osteoporosis (OR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.35; = 0.0003) were significantly associated with the surgical patients. Urinary tract infection (OR = 2.06; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.10; = 0.0005), anemia caused by surgical bleeding (OR = 4.55; 95% CI 1.95 to 10.62; = 0.0005), and surgical site infection (OR = 16.74; 95% CI 3.05 to 91.87; = 0.001) were significantly associated with the surgical patients. There were no significant differences in the outcomes between the surgical and non-surgical patients. Our findings may help to further understand the treatment strategy for FFP and improve clinical outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Fractures, Bone; Blood Loss, Surgical; Urinary Tract Infections; Osteoporosis; Dementia; Pelvis
PubMed: 36923634
DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.85.1.35 -
American Journal of Therapeutics 2020Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly reported in seriously ill patients with COVID-19 infection. Incidence of VTE has been reported before and results varied... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly reported in seriously ill patients with COVID-19 infection. Incidence of VTE has been reported before and results varied widely in study cohorts.
AREA OF UNCERTAINTY
Incidence of major VTE (segmental pulmonary embolism and above and proximal deep vein thrombosis) which is a contributor to mortality and morbidity is not known. Also, data is unclear on the optimal anticoagulation regimen to prevent VTE.
DATA SOURCES
Multiple databases including PubMed were searched until May 12, 2020, to include studies reporting VTE in hospitalized COVID-19 adult patients. MOOSE guidelines were followed in selection, and 11 studies were included. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the VTE burden in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and potential benefits of therapeutic dosing of anticoagulation compared with prophylaxis dosing for VTE prevention.
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES
Many societies and experts recommend routine prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin for VTE prevention in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In this meta-analysis, the pooled rate of major VTE was 12.5% in hospitalized patients and 17.2% in intensive care unit patients. When therapeutic anticoagulation dosing was compared with prophylactic anticoagulation, the pooled odds ratio of VTE was 0.33 (95% confidence interval 0.14-0.75; P = 0.008, I = 0%) suggesting statistical significance with therapeutic dosing of anticoagulation for primary prevention of VTE in all hospitalized patients. However, this should be interpreted with caution as the bleeding events and safety profile could not be ascertained because of lack of adequate information. We recommend applying this finding to hospitalized COVID 19 patients only after carefully weighing individual bleeding risks and benefits.
CONCLUSION
Major VTE events, especially pulmonary embolism, seem to be high in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Therapeutic anticoagulation dosing seems to significantly benefit the odds of preventing any VTE when compared with prophylactic dosing in all hospitalized patients.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Coronavirus Infections; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Incidence; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Pulmonary Embolism; SARS-CoV-2; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 33156016
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001295 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2016Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is one of the most common emerging multi-drug resistant organisms found in the lungs of people with cystic fibrosis and its prevalence is... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is one of the most common emerging multi-drug resistant organisms found in the lungs of people with cystic fibrosis and its prevalence is increasing. Chronic infection with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has recently been shown to be an independent predictor of pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization and antibiotics. However, the role of antibiotic treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in people with cystic fibrosis is still unclear. This is an update of a previously published review.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of our review is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. The primary objective is to assess this in relation to lung function and pulmonary exacerbations in the setting of acute pulmonary exacerbations. The secondary objective is to assess this in relation to the eradication of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched a registry of ongoing trials and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews.Date of latest search: 27 May 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Any randomized controlled trial of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia mono-infection or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia co-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in either the setting of an acute pulmonary exacerbation or a chronic infection treated with suppressive antibiotic therapy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Both authors independently assessed the trials identified by the search for potential inclusion in the review.
MAIN RESULTS
The initial search strategy identified only one trial of antibiotic treatment of pulmonary exacerbations that included people with cystic fibrosis with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. However, this trial had to be excluded because data was not available per pathogen.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review did not identify any evidence regarding the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. Until such evidence becomes available, clinicians need to use their clinical judgement as to whether or not to treat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Randomized clinical trials are needed to address these unanswered clinical questions.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cystic Fibrosis; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Respiratory Tract Infections; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
PubMed: 27415821
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009249.pub4 -
Mycoses Jul 2016Fungi in the order Mucorales cause acute, invasive and frequently fatal infections in susceptible patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of all... (Review)
Review
Fungi in the order Mucorales cause acute, invasive and frequently fatal infections in susceptible patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of all reported mucormycosis cases during the last 25 years in Iran. After a comprehensive literature search, we identified 98 cases in Iran from 1990-2015. The mean patient age was 39.8 ± 19.2 years. Diabetes was the most common underlying condition (47.9%), and 22.4% of the patients underwent solid organ or bone marrow transplantation. The most common clinical forms of mucormycosis were rhinocerebral (48.9%), pulmonary (9.2%) and cutaneous (9.2%). Eight cases of disseminated disease were identified. Overall mortality in the identified cases was 40.8%, with the highest mortality rate in patients diagnosed with disseminated infection (75%). The mortality rate in rhinocerebral infection patients was significantly lower (45.8%). Rhinocerebral infection was the most common clinical manifestation in diabetes patients (72.9%). Patients were diagnosed using various methods including histopathology (85.7%), microscopy (12.3%) and culture (2.0%). Rhizopus species were the most prevalent (51.7%), followed by Mucor species (17.2%). Sixty-nine patients were treated with a combination of surgery and antifungal therapy (resulting survival rate, 66.7%). Owing to the high mortality rate of advanced mucormycosis, early diagnosis and treatment may significantly improve survival rates. Therefore, increased monitoring and awareness of this life-threatening disease is critical.
Topics: Adult; Antifungal Agents; Dermatomycoses; Diabetes Complications; Female; Humans; Invasive Fungal Infections; Iran; Lung Diseases, Fungal; Male; Middle Aged; Mucorales; Mucormycosis; Rhizopus; Survival Rate; Young Adult
PubMed: 26906121
DOI: 10.1111/myc.12474 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Sep 2015Nitrofurantoin's use has increased exponentially since recent guidelines repositioned it as first-line therapy for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI). We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Nitrofurantoin's use has increased exponentially since recent guidelines repositioned it as first-line therapy for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess nitrofurantoin's efficacy and toxicity in the treatment of lower UTI.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of all human controlled clinical trials published from 1946 to 2014 and assessing short-term (≤14 days) nitrofurantoin for lower UTI. Meta-analyses assessing efficacy and adverse events were conducted on randomized trials.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven controlled trials including 4807 patients fulfilled entry criteria; most were conducted between the 1970s and 1990s and were at increased risk for various biases. Nitrofurantoin appears to have good clinical and microbiological efficacy for UTI caused by common uropathogens, with clinical cure rates varying between 79% and 92%. The most methodologically robust studies surveyed indicate overall equivalence between nitrofurantoin when given for 5 or 7 days and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials confirmed equivalence in clinical cure, but indicated a slight advantage to comparator drugs in microbiological efficacy (risk ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97). If given for only 3 days, nitrofurantoin's clinical efficacy was diminished (61%-70%). Toxicity was infrequent (5%-16% in the 17 reporting studies), mild, reversible and predominantly gastrointestinal; meta-analyses confirmed no difference between nitrofurantoin and comparators. Hypersensitivity reactions such as pulmonary fibrosis and hepatotoxicity were not observed. Acquisition of resistance to nitrofurantoin is still relatively rare.
CONCLUSIONS
When given short term for lower UTI, nitrofurantoin has good clinical and microbiological efficacy; toxicity is mild and predominantly gastrointestinal.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Nitrofurantoin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Tract Infections
PubMed: 26066581
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv147