-
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Aug 2023Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture in terms of fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome.
METHODS
Databases of Embase, Medline ALL, Web-of-Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical and functional outcomes of humeral shaft fractures after non-operative treatment with a functional brace or operative treatment by intramedullary nailing (IMN; antegrade or retrograde) or plate osteosynthesis (open plating or minimally invasive). A pooled analysis of the results was performed using MedCalc.
RESULTS
A total of 173 studies, describing 11,868 patients, were included. The fracture healing rate for the non-operative group was 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-92%), 94% (95% CI 92-95%) for the IMN group and 96% (95% CI 95-97%) for the plating group. The rate of secondary radial nerve palsies was 1% in patients treated non-operatively, 3% in the IMN, and 6% in the plating group. Intraoperative complications and implant failures occurred more frequently in the IMN group than in the plating group. The DASH score was the lowest (7/100; 95% CI 1-13) in the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis group. The Constant-Murley and UCLA shoulder score were the highest [93/100 (95% CI 92-95) and 33/35 (95% CI 32-33), respectively] in the plating group.
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that even though all treatment modalities result in satisfactory outcomes, operative treatment is associated with the most favorable results. Disregarding secondary radial nerve palsy, specifically plate osteosynthesis seems to result in the highest fracture healing rates, least complications, and best functional outcomes compared with the other treatment modalities.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Humeral Fractures; Fracture Healing; Bone Plates; Radial Neuropathy; Humerus; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37093269
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04836-8 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2020Shock wave therapy has seen widespread use since the 1990s to treat various musculoskeletal disorders including rotator cuff disease, but evidence of its efficacy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Shock wave therapy has seen widespread use since the 1990s to treat various musculoskeletal disorders including rotator cuff disease, but evidence of its efficacy remains equivocal.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the benefits and harms of shock wave therapy for rotator cuff disease, with or without calcification, and to establish its usefulness in the context of other available treatment options.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP up to November 2019, with no restrictions on language. We reviewed the reference lists of retrieved trials to identify potentially relevant trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that used quasi-randomised methods to allocate participants, investigating participants with rotator cuff disease with or without calcific deposits. We included trials of comparisons of extracorporeal or radial shock wave therapy versus any other intervention. Major outcomes were pain relief greater than 30%, mean pain score, function, patient-reported global assessment of treatment success, quality of life, number of participants experiencing adverse events and number of withdrawals due to adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary comparison was shock wave therapy compared to placebo.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirty-two trials (2281 participants) met our inclusion criteria. Most trials (25) included participants with rotator cuff disease and calcific deposits, five trials included participants with rotator cuff disease and no calcific deposits, and two trials included a mixed population of participants with and without calcific deposits. Twelve trials compared shock wave therapy to placebo, 11 trials compared high-dose shock wave therapy (0.2 mJ/mm² to 0.4 mJ/mm² and above) to low-dose shock wave therapy. Single trials compared shock wave therapy to ultrasound-guided glucocorticoid needling, ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injection, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), no treatment or exercise; dual session shock wave therapy to single session therapy; and different delivery methods of shock wave therapy. Our main comparison was shock wave therapy versus placebo and results are reported for the 3 month follow up. All trials were susceptible to bias; including selection (74%), performance (62%), detection (62%), and selective reporting (45%) biases. No trial measured participant-reported pain relief of 30%. However, in one trial (74 participants), at 3 months follow up, 14/34 participants reported pain relief of 50% or greater with shock wave therapy compared with 15/40 with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 1.94); low-quality evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision). Mean pain (0 to 10 scale, higher scores indicate more pain) was 3.02 points in the placebo group and 0.78 points better (0.17 better to 1.4 better; clinically important change was 1.5 points) with shock wave therapy (9 trials, 608 participants), moderate-quality evidence (downgraded for bias). Mean function (scale 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better function) was 66 points with placebo and 7.9 points better (1.6 better to 14 better, clinically important difference 10 points) with shock wave therapy (9 trials, 612 participants), moderate-quality evidence (downgraded for bias). Participant-reported success was reported by 58/150 people in shock wave therapy group compared with 35/137 people in placebo group (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.91; 6 trials, 287 participants), low-quality evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision). None of the trials measured quality of life. Withdrawal rate or adverse event rates may not differ between extracorporeal shock wave therapy and placebo, but we are uncertain due to the small number of events. There were 11/34 withdrawals in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy group compared with 13/40 withdrawals in the placebo group (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.31; 7 trials, 581 participants) low-quality evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision); and 41/156 adverse events with extracorporeal shock wave therapy compared with 10/139 adverse events in the placebo group (RR 3.61, 95% CI 2.00 to 6.52; 5 trials, 295 participants) low-quality evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision). Subgroup analyses indicated that there were no between-group differences in pain and function outcomes in participants who did or did not have calcific deposits in the rotator cuff.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the currently available low- to moderate-certainty evidence, there were very few clinically important benefits of shock wave therapy, and uncertainty regarding its safety. Wide clinical diversity and varying treatment protocols means that we do not know whether or not some trials tested subtherapeutic doses, possibly underestimating any potential benefits. Further trials of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for rotator cuff disease should be based upon a strong rationale and consideration of whether or not they would alter the conclusions of this review. A standard dose and treatment protocol should be decided upon before further research is conducted. Development of a core set of outcomes for trials of rotator cuff disease and other shoulder disorders would also facilitate our ability to synthesise the evidence.
Topics: Calcinosis; Exercise Therapy; Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Middle Aged; Muscular Diseases; Patient Dropouts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rotator Cuff; Shoulder Pain; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation; Viscosupplements
PubMed: 32128761
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008962.pub2 -
Atraumatic proximal radial nerve entrapment. Illustrative cases and systematic review of literature.European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Jul 2022The aims of the present study were to describe atraumatic proximal radial nerve entrapment (PRNE) and potential strategies for management.
PURPOSE
The aims of the present study were to describe atraumatic proximal radial nerve entrapment (PRNE) and potential strategies for management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a comprehensive search of 4 electronic databases for studies pertaining to patients with atraumatic PRNE. Studies published between 1930 and 2020 were included. Clinical presentation, nerve conduction studies, electromyography, and treatment methods were reviewed. In order to outline management strategies, 2 illustrative cases of acute PRNE were presented.
RESULTS
We analyzed 12 studies involving 21 patients with 22 PRNE (15 acute and 7 progressive). Sudden or repetitive elbow extension with forceful muscle contraction (n = 16) was the primary mechanism of injury. The two main sites of entrapment were the fibrous arch (n = 7) and hiatus of the lateral intermuscular septum (n = 7). Conservative treatment was performed in 4 patients and allowed for complete clinical recovery in all cases. The remaining 18 patients underwent epineurolysis (n = 16) or resection/repair of hourglass-like constriction (n = 2) between 1.5- and 120-months following diagnosis. Twelve patients experience complete recovery, while partial or no clinical recovery was reported in 1 and 4 cases, respectively; the outcome was unknown in 1 case.
CONCLUSIONS
Atraumatic PRNE is rare and remains challenging with respect to diagnosis and treatment. Current literature suggests that primary sites of entrapment are the fibrous arch and hiatus of the radial nerve at the time of forceful elbow extension.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Case series (IV) & systematic review (I).
Topics: Elbow; Elbow Joint; Humans; Nerve Compression Syndromes; Radial Nerve; Radial Neuropathy
PubMed: 34143309
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03037-6 -
Cureus Nov 2020Radial nerve palsies in closed humeral shaft fractures are common, with an incidence of 7%-17%. The management of radial nerve palsies in closed fractures is often... (Review)
Review
Radial nerve palsies in closed humeral shaft fractures are common, with an incidence of 7%-17%. The management of radial nerve palsies in closed fractures is often expectant, with 70.7% spontaneously recovering within six months. A literature search was conducted for studies on radial nerve palsies in humeral shaft fractures from 2000-2018. A total of 4972 humeral shaft fractures were identified, with an incidence of 12.2% of primary radial nerve palsies. During the exploration, no neurological intervention was performed in nearly 41% of cases, and the most common finding was no evidence of any nerve lesion (35%). Those who underwent neurolysis were more likely to resolve when compared to primary repair or nerve grafting. Overall, there was a high rate of spontaneous radial nerve palsy recovery (85%) with radial nerve exploration increasing rates of resolution. While exploration demonstrates increased resolution, it is yet to be determined which fractures are indicated for nerve exploration.
PubMed: 33335819
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11490 -
Archives of Physical Medicine and... Aug 2018To review scientific literature studying the effectiveness of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
OBJECTIVE
To review scientific literature studying the effectiveness of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
DATA SOURCES
The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database.
STUDY SELECTION
Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential eligible studies.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodologic quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies (2 reviews and 22 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). For physical therapy, moderate evidence was found for myofascial massage therapy versus ischemic compression on latent, or active, trigger points or low-level laser therapy in the short term. For several electrophysical modalities, moderate evidence was found in the short term (ultrasound vs placebo, ultrasound as single intervention vs other nonsurgical interventions, ultrasound vs corticosteroid injection plus a neutral wrist splint, local microwave hyperthermia vs placebo, iontophoresis vs phonophoresis, pulsed radiofrequency added to wrist splint, continuous vs pulsed vs placebo shortwave diathermy, and interferential current vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs a night-only wrist splint). In the midterm, moderate evidence was found in favor of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) added to a neutral wrist splint, in favor of ESWT versus ultrasound, or cryo-ultrasound, and in favor of ultrasound versus placebo. For all other interventions studied, only limited, conflicting, or no evidence was found. No RCTs investigating the long-term effects of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities were found. Because of heterogeneity in the treatment parameters used in the included RCTs, optimal treatment parameters could not be identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Moderate evidence was found for several physical therapy and electrophysical modalities for CTS in the short term and midterm. Future studies should concentrate on long-term effects and which treatment parameters of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities are most effective for CTS.
Topics: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Humans; Physical Therapy Modalities; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28942118
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.482 -
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira 2017Compressive syndromes of the radial nerve have different presentations. There is no consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic methods. The aim of this review is to... (Review)
Review
Compressive syndromes of the radial nerve have different presentations. There is no consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic methods. The aim of this review is to summarize such methods. Eletronic searches related terms, held in databases (1980-2016): Pubmed (via Medline), Lilacs (via Scielo) and Google Scholar. Through pre-defined protocol, we identified relevant studies. We excluded case reports. Aspects of diagnosis and treatment were synthesized for analysis and tables. Quantitative analyzes were followed by their dispersion variables. Fourteen studies were included. All studies were considered as level IV evidence. Most studies consider aspects of clinical history and provocative maneuvers. There is no consensus on the use of electromyography, and methods are heterogeneous. Studies have shown that surgical treatment (muscle release and neurolysis) has variable success rate, ranging from 20 to 96.5%. Some studies applied self reported scores, though the heterogeneity of the population does not allow inferential analyzes on the subject. few complications reported. Most studies consider the diagnosis of compressive radial nerve syndromes essentially clinical. The most common treatment was combined muscle release and neurolysis, with heterogeneous results. There is a need for comparative studies
PubMed: 28642652
DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220172501164801 -
BioMed Research International 2023This is the first systematic review of the relationship between humeral shaft fractures and radial nerve palsy in children. The present comprehensive review is aimed at... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This is the first systematic review of the relationship between humeral shaft fractures and radial nerve palsy in children. The present comprehensive review is aimed at identifying important clinical findings between humeral diaphysis fractures and radial nerve injuries and assessing the effects of treatment.
METHODS
We searched electronic bibliographic databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge, until March 2022. This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the patients, interventions, comparisons, outcomes guidelines.
RESULTS
We identified 23 original papers, of which 10 were eligible for further analysis. Cases of 32 young patients with radial nerve palsy were identified and analyzed. The prevalence of radial nerve palsy was 4.34% (eight cases out of 184 patients with humeral shaft fractures). The radial nerve was most often associated with a simple transverse fracture (12A3, 17 cases (65.4%)).
CONCLUSIONS
Radial nerve injury in humeral shaft fractures in children is rare, with a frequency of 4.34%. We highly recommend early surgical nerve exploration with transverse fractures in the distal third segment combined with primary radial palsy. Furthermore, we recommend making thoughtful decisions regarding early nerve exploration in the Holstein-Lewis fractures. In addition, consideration of early surgical nerve exploration in fractures resulting from high-energy trauma and open fractures despite their morphology is recommended.
Topics: Child; Humans; Radial Neuropathy; Diaphyses; Radial Nerve; Humerus; Humeral Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38075371
DOI: 10.1155/2023/3974604 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery... Dec 2022There are numerous options available for restoration of wrist and finger extension following radial nerve palsy. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review...
There are numerous options available for restoration of wrist and finger extension following radial nerve palsy. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of nerve transfer for radial nerve palsy. Electronic literature research of PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Lilacs database was conducted in June 2021 using the terms 'Distal nerve transfer' AND 'Radial nerve injury' 'Radial nerve palsy' OR 'Radial nerve paresis' OR 'Median nerve transfer' OR 'wrist extensor' OR 'finger extension' OR 'thumb extension' OR 'wrist motion'. The data extracted included the study details, demographic data, procedure performed and final functional outcome according to the muscle research council scale. A total of 92.59% and 56.52% had satisfactory outcome following distal nerve transfer of median nerve to restore wrist and finger extension respectively. No significant correlation was found between time to injury duration and satisfactory outcomes. Outcomes of nerve transfers are comparable to tendon transfers. Multi-centric studies are needed to compare the results amongst various surgical procedures described. Level III (Therapeutic).
Topics: Humans; Wrist; Nerve Transfer; Fingers; Wrist Joint; Radial Neuropathy; Paralysis
PubMed: 36550081
DOI: 10.1142/S2424835522500953 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Mar 2022Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a rare disease that commonly affects young children. AFM's pathophysiology involves loss of lower motor neurons following a viral... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a rare disease that commonly affects young children. AFM's pathophysiology involves loss of lower motor neurons following a viral infection and induces acute asymmetric flaccid paralysis most commonly in the upper extremities. Nerve transfers have emerged as a treatment option for these patients with permanent motor deficits.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the literature and report safety and efficacy outcomes following nerve transfers for recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation, and elbow flexion and extension in pediatric patients with AFM. Recovery of at least antigravity function was defined as a successful outcome. This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were utilized.
RESULTS
Five studies comprising 44 patients (median age 2.95 years; 71% male), and 93 upper extremity nerve transfers were included. Thirty-eight patients received 65 nerve transfer procedures aiming for recovery of shoulder abduction and/or external rotation with a transfer to the axillary and/or suprascapular nerve. The recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation was achieved in 40.7% (n = 11/27) and 60% (n = 6/10) of patients, respectively. Time from injury to surgery showed an inverse relationship with the odds for successful recovery (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.64-1.02; p = 0.07); however, statistical significance was not reached. Successful recovery of elbow flexion with a transfer to the musculocutaneous was reported at a rate of 92.3% (n = 12/13). Successful re-innervation of the radial nerve with recovery of elbow extension was found in 75% (n = 6/8) of patients. No complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Upper extremity nerve transfers appear to be promising and safe for AFM patients. Shoulder abduction is the most challenging upper extremity function to recover. Further studies are warranted to identify whether nerve transfers are associated with superior outcomes when performed earlier.
Topics: Brachial Plexus Neuropathies; Central Nervous System Viral Diseases; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Myelitis; Nerve Transfer; Neuromuscular Diseases; Range of Motion, Articular; Recovery of Function; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 34982205
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05419-x -
The Journal of Hand Surgery Aug 2022The first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a frequent location of osteoarthritis in the hand. The denervation of the first CMC joint has gained traction as a viable...
PURPOSE
The first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a frequent location of osteoarthritis in the hand. The denervation of the first CMC joint has gained traction as a viable treatment for CMC arthritis. This study reviewed literature on CMC denervation for first CMC arthritis.
METHODS
A systematic review of papers and abstracts was conducted. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Articles including the results of CMC denervation were included. We compiled data on patient demographics, preoperative testing, intraoperative technique, and postoperative outcomes. Anatomic literature was also reviewed to assess agreement on the innervation of the first CMC joint.
RESULTS
Six anatomic studies and 9 clinical studies were included in this systematic review. Pinch strength, grip strength, and Kapandji scores increased on average in patients. Pain relief was noted on average in patients in 5 studies that reported pain outcomes. In studies that reported postoperative complications, the most frequent complications were radial paresthesias, hypoesthesia dorsal and/or distal to the surgical site, and wound infection.
CONCLUSIONS
The innervation of the CMC joint is controversial. This is reflected in clinical practice, wherein varied surgical approaches are used. Carpometacarpal denervation shows promise as an option to treat patients with CMC arthritis without joint instability, but its results vary. Additional clinical studies with longer-term follow-up and control groups are necessary to better determine its longevity and efficacy.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic V.
Topics: Carpometacarpal Joints; Denervation; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Thumb
PubMed: 34509313
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.020