-
Injury Mar 2016Infectious mononucleosis (IM) is a common viral illness that predominantly causes sore throat, fever and cervical lymphadenopathy in adolescents and young adults.... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Infectious mononucleosis (IM) is a common viral illness that predominantly causes sore throat, fever and cervical lymphadenopathy in adolescents and young adults. Although usually a benign, self-limiting disease, it is associated with a small risk of splenic rupture, which can be life-threatening. It is common practice therefore to advise avoiding vigorous physical activity for at least 4-6 weeks, however this is not based on controlled trials or national guidelines. We reviewed published case reports of splenic rupture occurring in the context of IM in an attempt to ascertain common factors that may predict who is at risk.
METHOD
A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed for case reports or series published between 1984 and 2014. In total, 52 articles or abstracts reported 85 cases. Data was extracted and compiled into a Microsoft Excel(®) spreadsheet.
RESULTS
The average patient age was 22 years, the majority (70%) being male. The average time between onset of IM symptoms and splenic rupture was 14 days, with a range up to 8 weeks. There was a preceding history of trauma reported in only 14%. Abdominal pain was the commonest presenting complaint of splenic rupture, being present in 88%. 32% were successfully managed non-operatively, whereas 67% underwent splenectomy. Overall mortality was 9%.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
From our data, it appears that men under 30 within 4 weeks of symptom onset are at highest risk of splenic rupture, therefore particular vigilance in this group is required. As cases have occurred up to 8 weeks after the onset of illness, we would recommend avoidance of sports, heavy lifting and vigorous activity for 8 weeks. Should the patient wish to return to high risk activities prior to this, an USS should be performed to ensure resolution of splenomegaly. The majority of cases reviewed had no preceding trauma, although previous studies have suggested this may be so minor as to go unnoticed by the patient. It is therefore prudent to warn patients about the symptoms of splenic rupture to ensure prompt presentation and minimise treatment delay rather than focusing purely on activity limitation.
Topics: Humans; Infectious Mononucleosis; Rupture, Spontaneous; Splenectomy; Splenic Rupture; Splenomegaly
PubMed: 26563483
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.071 -
Neuroradiology Feb 2016Delayed aneurysm rupture and delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhages (DIPH) are poorly understood and often fatal complications of flow diversion (FD) for intracranial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Delayed aneurysm rupture and delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhages (DIPH) are poorly understood and often fatal complications of flow diversion (FD) for intracranial aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for these complications.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review on post-FD delayed aneurysm rupture and DIPH. For each reported case, we collected the following information: aneurysm location, size and rupture status, type of flow diverter used, timing of the hemorrhage, and neurological outcome. We reported descriptive statistics of patients suffering DIPH and delayed aneurysm rupture to determine if there were any characteristics consistently present among patients with these complications.
RESULTS
We identified 81 delayed aneurysm ruptures and 101 DIPH. Of the delayed ruptures, 76.6% (45/58) occurred within 1 month. The prognosis of delayed ruptures was poor, with 81.3% (61/75) experiencing death or poor neurological outcome. Giant aneurysms accounted for 46.3% of ruptures (31/67). Of these aneurysms, 80.9% (55/68) were initially unruptured. Of the delayed ruptured aneurysms, 17.8% (13/73) had prior or concomitant coiling. DIPHs were ipsilateral to the treated aneurysm in 82.2% (60/73) of cases. Of the DIPH, 86.0% (43/50) occurred within 1 month after FDS. Combined morbidity/mortality rate was 68.5% (50/73) following DIPH. Of DIPHs, 23.0% (14/61) occurred in patients with giant aneurysms.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates that giant aneurysms represent almost 50% of delayed aneurysm ruptures in the flow diverter literature. About 2% of delayed ruptures occurred despite associated coiling. A substantial proportion of DIPHs occur early following FDS treatment of giant aneurysms.
Topics: Aneurysm, Ruptured; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Intracranial Aneurysm; Male; Postoperative Complications; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Stents; Survival Rate
PubMed: 26553302
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4 -
Injury Apr 2022Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is one of the most frequently encountered injuries in Sports Medicine. ATR can be managed surgically or conservatively followed by early... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is one of the most frequently encountered injuries in Sports Medicine. ATR can be managed surgically or conservatively followed by early functional rehabilitation or cast immobilization. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an update about the role of early weightbearing (WB) versus late WB on the clinical outcomes of adults with acute ATR.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search in Web of Science, Ovid, Medline/PubMed, and CENTRAL. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared early WB, defined as weight-bearing within 4 weeks of treatment, to late WB for individuals with acute (<14 days) ATR. We sought to evaluate the following outcomes: re-rupture rate, Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS), return to pre-injury sport activity, time to return to work, and adverse event rate. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to represent continuous outcomes while the risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 9 RCTs that enrolled 1046 participants were deemed eligible. There was no significant difference between early WB and late WB in terms of re-rupture rate (RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.16), ATRS (SMD=0.06, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.16), return to pre-injury sport activity (RR=1.05, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.28), time to return to work (SMD=0.03, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.26), or adverse event rate (RR=1.87, 95% CI 0.53 to 6.63).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis shows no difference in the functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes between early functional rehabilitation and cast immobilization for conservatively treat individuals with acute ATR.
Topics: Achilles Tendon; Adult; Conservative Treatment; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rupture; Treatment Outcome; Weight-Bearing
PubMed: 35115168
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.028 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jun 2023Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids are used to treat rotator cuff diseases. However, few reviews have compared the effects of these 2 treatments. In this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
HYPOTHESIS
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids are used to treat rotator cuff diseases. However, few reviews have compared the effects of these 2 treatments. In this study, we compared the effects of PRP and corticosteroid injection on the prognosis of rotator cuff diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
According to the Cochrane Manual of Systematic Review of Interventions, the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched comprehensively. Two independent authors screened suitable studies and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Only randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of PRP and corticosteroid in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries were included, as measured by clinical function and pain during different follow-up periods.
RESULTS
Nine studies with 469 patients were included in this review. In short-term treatment, corticosteroids were superior to PRP in the improvement of Constant, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (mean difference [MD] -5.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.26, 0.06; P = .05 and MD -0.97, 95% CI -1.68, -0.07; P = .03 and MD -6.67, 95% CI -12.85, -0.49; P = .03, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups at midterm (P > .05), and the recovery of the Simple Shoulder Test and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores in PRP treatment was significantly better than that in corticosteroid treatment in the long term (MD: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.68, 1.74; P < .00001 and MD: 6.96, 95% CI: 3.90, 9.61; P < .00001, respectively). In pain reduction based on visual analog scale score, corticosteroids led to better pain reduction (MD: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.03, 1.64; P = .04), but no significant difference was observed in pain reduction between the 2 groups in the any term (P > .05). However, these differences did not reach the minimum clinically important difference.
CONCLUSIONS
Current analysis showed that corticosteroids have better efficacy in short term, whereas PRP is more beneficial for long-term recovery. However, no difference was observed in the mid-term efficacy between the 2 groups. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are also needed to determine the optimal treatment.
Topics: Humans; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Arthroscopy; Pain; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36868297
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.037 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Aug 2018We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the mortality and morbidity of all published case series on thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the mortality and morbidity of all published case series on thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in experienced centers treated with open repair.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature published until April 2017 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for overall in-hospital mortality for TAAA, mortality according to the type of TAAA, spinal cord ischemia, paraplegia and paraparesis, cardiac events, stroke, acute kidney failure, and bowel ischemia. A metaregression analysis was performed with volume of the center, percentage of ruptured cases among the series, length of in-hospital stay, and publication year as covariates.
RESULTS
A total of 30 articles were included in the meta-analysis, corresponding to a total of 9963 patients who underwent open repair for TAAAs (543 ruptured). The pooled mortality rate among all studies was 11.26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.56-13.09). Mortality was 6.97% (95% CI, 3.75-10.90), 10.32% (95% CI, 7.39-13.63), 8.02% (95% CI, 6.37-9.81), and 7.20% (95% CI, 4.19-10.84) for Crawford types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Pooled spinal cord ischemia rate was estimated at 8.26% (95% CI, 6.95-9.67), whereas paraparesis and paraplegia rates were 3.61% (95% CI, 2.25-5.25) and 5% (95% CI, 4.36-5.68), respectively. We estimated a pooled cardiac event rate of 4.41% (95% CI, 1.84-7.95) and a stroke rate of 3.11% (95% CI, 2.36-3.94), whereas the need for permanent dialysis rate was 7.92% (95% CI, 5.34-10.92). Respiratory complications after surgery were as high as 23.01% (95% CI, 14.73-32.49). Metaregression analysis evidenced a statistically significant inverse association between mortality and the volume of cases performed in the vascular center (t = -2.00; P = .005). Interestingly, a more recent year of study publication tended to be associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (t = -1.35; P = .19).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed that despite the advances in open surgical techniques, the morbidity and mortality of the technique continue to remain considerable. Despite the focus on mortality and spinal cord ischemia, respiratory complications, permanent postoperative renal dialysis, stroke rate, and cardiac events also affect the outcome. The estimated trend of lower mortality in high-volume centers suggests that perhaps this type of service should be provided in a few reference centers that have an established record and experience in the management of these patients.
Topics: Aged; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Aortic Rupture; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Clinical Competence; Hospitals, High-Volume; Hospitals, Low-Volume; Humans; Length of Stay; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30037680
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.410 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Aug 2022This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies.
DATA SOURCES
Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to "uterine rupture," "first trimester," and "early pregnancy" from database inception to September 30, 2020.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded.
METHODS
Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series.
RESULTS
Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%).
CONCLUSION
Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Uterine Rupture
PubMed: 35487324
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.035 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery May 2019Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) represent a significant burden of disease worldwide, and their rupture, without treatment, has an invariably high mortality rate.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) represent a significant burden of disease worldwide, and their rupture, without treatment, has an invariably high mortality rate. Whereas some risk factors for ruptured AAAs (rAAAs) are well established, such as hypertension, smoking, and female sex, the impact of seasonal and meteorologic variables is less clear. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine whether these variables are associated with rAAA.
METHODS
Review methods were according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We calculated pooled proportions and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the different months and seasons. Funnel plots were constructed to assess for publication bias. Given the poor methodologic quality of included studies, a sensitivity analysis was performed on better-quality studies, which scored 6 and above of 9 in the author-modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
The pooled proportion of rAAA was highest in the autumn season (incidence rate, 26.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25.6%-27.7%; I = 15.4%), followed by winter (incidence rate, 26.2%; 95% CI, 24.1%-28.2%; I = 72.4%), and lowest in summer (incidence rate, 21.1%; 95% CI, 19.3%-23.0%; I = 70.4%). The IRRs of rAAA were -6.9% (95% CI, -9.8% to -3.9%), -19.5% (95% CI, -22% to -16.8%), +10.5% (95% CI, 7.2%-13.9%), and +18.1% (95% CI, 15%-22%) in spring, summer, autumn, and winter compared with the remaining seasons, respectively (all P < .0001), thus affirming existence of seasonal variation. The pooled proportion of rAAA was highest in December (incidence rate, 8.9%; 95% CI, 7.1%-10.9%; I = 54.5%) but lowest in July (incidence rate, 5.7%; 95% CI, 4.2%-7.3%; I = 54.5%). The IRR was significantly the highest in January (IRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; P = .031) but lowest in July (IRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.87; P < .0001). There is also some evidence for a possible association with atmospheric pressure. Associations with temperature and daylight hours, however, are at best speculative.
CONCLUSIONS
Autumn and winter are significantly associated with a higher incidence of rAAAs, and autumn is associated with the highest rupture incidence of all the seasons. However, the inability to appropriately control for other confounding factors known to increase the risk of AAA rupture precludes any additional recommendations to alter current provision of vascular services on the basis of these data.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm; Aortic Rupture; Atmospheric Pressure; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Seasons; Time Factors; Weather
PubMed: 30792059
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.030 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Aug 2023Calcific tendinitis is a relatively common shoulder disorder, with 7%-17% of individuals with shoulder pain having rotator cuff calcium deposits. Several nonoperative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Calcific tendinitis is a relatively common shoulder disorder, with 7%-17% of individuals with shoulder pain having rotator cuff calcium deposits. Several nonoperative interventions, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasonography-guided needling (UGN), and surgical techniques have been described to treat calcific tendonitis with satisfactory outcomes. Clinical guidelines are lacking for surgical excision in cases refractory to nonoperative treatment. Several arthroscopic and open operative techniques have been described to treat calcific tendonitis with satisfactory clinical outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials is to compare outcomes and complications of nonoperative vs. operative management of chronic calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff, to provide evidence-based treatment guidelines for practitioners.
METHODS
EMBASE, PubMed, and OVID [MEDLINE] were searched from database inception until February 20, 2022, for randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes related to operative or nonoperative management for calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. Clinical outcomes including pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (CMS), and resolution of calcific deposits were evaluated. Continuous data at last follow-up was pooled into mean differences using a random effects model for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies (2212 nonoperative patients and 140 operative patients) met the final inclusion criteria. Pooled mean difference in VAS for ESWT was -3.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.38, -2.27); P < .001), compared to -4.83 (95% CI -5.44, -4.22; P < .001) for UGN, and -4.65 (95% CI -5.47, -3.82; P < .001) for the operative interventions. Pooled mean difference in CMS score after ESWT was 18.30 (95% CI 10.95, 25.66; P < .001) compared to 22.01 (95% CI 8.17, 35.84; P = .002) for UGN, and 38.35 (95% CI 31.68, 45.02; P < .001) for the operative interventions. Eighty-five percent of patients receiving operative and 67% of patients receiving UGN management had complete radiographic resolution of calcific deposit.
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical treatment of chronic calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff results in larger improvement in functional outcome scores and comparable pain reduction to nonoperative interventions, particularly UGN. Both operative and nonoperative treatment modalities are likely to have clinically significant improvements in function and pain, and thus it is reasonable to trial UGN and ESWT as first-line treatment. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be needed to support one treatment over the other. High-quality randomized controlled trials directly comparing nonoperative interventions to operative interventions in patients prior to failing conservative treatment are needed to establish high-quality evidence-based guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Rotator Cuff; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tendinopathy; Shoulder; Shoulder Pain; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37080421
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.017 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Oct 2015To identify the indications and outcomes in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To identify the indications and outcomes in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy.
METHODS
The electronic databases Embase, Medline, HealthStar, and PubMed were searched from 1946 to July 19, 2014. Two blinded reviewers searched, screened, and evaluated the data quality of the studies using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scale. Data were abstracted in duplicate. Agreement and descriptive statistics are presented.
RESULTS
Six studies were included (3 prospective case series and 3 retrospective chart reviews), with a total of 448 hips examined. The most common indications for revision hip arthroscopy included residual femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), labral tears, and chondral lesions. The mean interval between revision arthroscopy and the index procedure was 25.6 months. Overall, the modified Harris Hip Score improved by a mean of 33.6% (19.3 points) from the baseline score at 1-year follow-up. In 14.6% of patients, further surgical procedures were required, including re-revision hip arthroscopy (8.0%), total hip replacement (5.6%), and hip resurfacing (1.0%). Female patients more commonly underwent revision hip arthroscopy (59.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
The current evidence examined in this review supports revision hip arthroscopy as a successful intervention to improve functional outcomes (modified Harris Hip Score) and relieve pain in patients with residual symptoms after primary FAI surgery, although the outcomes are inferior when compared with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI. The main indication for revision is a candidate who has symptoms due to residual cam- or pincer-type deformity that was either unaddressed or under-resected during the index operation. However, it is important to consider that the studies included in this review are of low-quality evidence. Surgeons should consider incorporating a minimum 2-year follow-up for individuals after index hip-preservation surgery because revisions tended to occur within this time frame.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
Topics: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroscopy; Female; Femoracetabular Impingement; Hip; Hip Joint; Humans; MEDLINE; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Management; Prospective Studies; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Rupture
PubMed: 26033461
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.039 -
Digestive Endoscopy : Official Journal... Sep 2015Iatrogenic perforation of the gut during endoscopy remains an uncommon but critical complication with significant morbidity and probable mortality than usual surgical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Iatrogenic perforation of the gut during endoscopy remains an uncommon but critical complication with significant morbidity and probable mortality than usual surgical treatment. Some authors have adopted a non-surgical closure method in chosen cases and, since 1993, endoclips have been used to close perforation in the stomach. The endoscopic practice of endoclips has been commonly used in the gut for hemostasis. Currently, the use of endoscopic techniques is increasing for the closure of endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopic perforations that improved with endoscopic closure in the literature prior to 2008 have been previously described. In the present article, we present a descriptive review of cases with iatrogenic perforation in the gut treated with endoclips between 2008 and 2014.
METHODS
Comprehensive literature screening and a systematic review using PubMed and Medline was done for all reports published between January 2008 and December 2014 using the endoclip technique in the closure of iatrogenic perforations.
RESULTS
A total of 47 studies published between 2008 and 2014 using endoclips for the closure of iatrogenic perforations of the gut (nine esophagus, 11 stomach, 15 duodenum, 12 colon and rectum) were found. All studies were explained briefly and summarized in a table.
CONCLUSIONS
There is strong evidence to show the efficacy of endoclips in the management of iatrogenic perforations, especially when recognized early. Limitations of endoclipping such as inefficiency against large perforations may be overcome by improving novel techniques in the future.
Topics: Acute Disease; Colon; Duodenum; Emergencies; Endoscopy; Esophageal Perforation; Female; Forecasting; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Intestinal Perforation; Male; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Patient Safety; Rectum; Stomach Rupture; Surgical Instruments; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25919698
DOI: 10.1111/den.12482