-
Journal of Vascular Surgery Sep 2018Outcomes after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) have improved in the last decade. It is unknown whether this has resulted in a reduction of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Outcomes after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) have improved in the last decade. It is unknown whether this has resulted in a reduction of postoperative bowel ischemia (BI). The primary objective was to determine BI prevalence after RAAA repair. Secondary objectives were to determine its major sequelae and differences between open repair (OR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
METHODS
This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42017055920) followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies published from 2005 until 2018. The methodologic quality of observational studies was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. The quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. BI prevalence and rates of BI as cause of death, reoperation, and bowel resection were estimated with meta-analyses with a random-effects model. Differences between OR and EVAR were estimated with pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Changes over time were assessed with Spearman rank test (ρ). Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 101 studies with 52,670 patients were included; 72 studies were retrospective cohort studies, 14 studies were prospective cohort studies, 12 studies were retrospective administrative database studies, and 3 studies were RCTs. The overall methodologic quality of the RCTs was high, but that of observational studies was low. The pooled prevalence of BI ranged from of 0.08 (95% CI, 0.07-0.09) in database studies to 0.10 (95% CI, 0.08-0.12) in cohort studies. The risk of BI was higher after OR than after EVAR (risk ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.25-2.57). The pooled rate of BI as cause of death was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.03-0.05), and that of BI as cause of reoperation and bowel resection ranged between 0.05 and 0.07. BI prevalence did not change over time (ρ, -0.01; P = .93). The funnel plot analysis was highly suggestive of publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of clinically relevant BI after RAAA repair is approximately 10%. Approximately 5% of patients undergoing RAAA repair suffer from severe consequences of BI. BI is less prevalent after EVAR than after OR.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Humans; Intestines; Ischemia; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30146037
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.018 -
PloS One 2020Uterine rupture has a significant public health importance, contributing to 13% of maternal mortality and 74%-92% of perinatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, and 36%... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Uterine rupture has a significant public health importance, contributing to 13% of maternal mortality and 74%-92% of perinatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, and 36% of maternal mortality in Ethiopia. The prevalence and predictors of uterine rupture were highly variable and inconclusive across studies in the country. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and predictor of uterine rupture in Ethiopia.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 checklist. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online databases were searched. The Newcastle- Ottawa quality assessment tool was used for critical appraisal. I2 statistic and Egger's tests were used to assess the heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively. The random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence and odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included, with a total of 91,784 women in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of uterine rupture was 2% (95% CI: 1.99, 3.01). The highest prevalence was observed in the Amhara regional state (5%) and the lowest was in Tigray region (1%). Previous cesarean delivery (OR = 9.95, 95% CI: 3.09, 32.0), lack of antenatal care visit (OR = 8.40, 95% CI: 4.5, 15.7), rural residence (OR = 4.75, 95% CI: 1.17, 19.3), grand multiparity (OR = 4.49, 95% CI: 2.83, 7.11) and obstructed labor (OR = 6.75, 95%CI: 1.92, 23.8) were predictors of uterine rupture.
CONCLUSION
Uterine rupture is still high in Ethiopia. Therefore, proper auditing on the appropriateness of cesarean section and proper labor monitoring, improving antenatal care visit, and birth preparedness and complication readiness plan are needed. Moreover, early referral and family planning utilization are the recommended interventions to reduce the burden of uterine rupture among Ethiopia women.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Ethiopia; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Rural Population; Uterine Rupture
PubMed: 33137135
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240675 -
Heart (British Cardiac Society) Sep 2019To assess the association of metformin prescription with the risk of aortic aneurysm, aortic aneurysm events and the enlargement of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To assess the association of metformin prescription with the risk of aortic aneurysm, aortic aneurysm events and the enlargement of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus for epidemiological studies up to November 2018. We included observational studies which evaluated the association of metformin prescription with the risk of aortic aneurysm disease, and we also included studies involving progression and enlargement of AAA. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted in line with the between-study heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Eight studies enrolling 29 587 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. We found that metformin prescription could significantly limit the enlargement of aortic aneurysm (weighted mean difference: -0.83 mm/year, 95% CI -1.38 to -0.28, I=89.6%) among patients with AAA. Metformin prescription status may be associated with a decreased risk of aortic aneurysm and aortic aneurysm events.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the available epidemiological evidence, metformin prescription could limit the expansion of AAA among patients with this disease, and may be involved with a lower incidence of aortic aneurysm and aortic aneurysm events. Randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm whether metformin could reduce the enlargement of AAA in patients with or without diabetes.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Diabetes Mellitus; Disease Progression; Drug Prescriptions; Drug Utilization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Metformin; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30936409
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314639 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Dec 2021Since Mihata's 2012 proposal to arthroscopically reconstruct the superior capsule of patients with massive irreparable cuff tears, many studies have reported the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Since Mihata's 2012 proposal to arthroscopically reconstruct the superior capsule of patients with massive irreparable cuff tears, many studies have reported the clinical results of this technique using different types of grafts (fascia lata autograft, dermal allograft, porcine dermal xenograft or long head of biceps autograft).
PURPOSE
The objective of this meta-analysis was to report the clinical and radiological results of these superior capsule reconstructions.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) recommendations were used to conduct this systematic review. A bibliographic search was performed of the electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the MINORS criterion (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies). The inclusion criteria were studies in English evaluating superior capsular reconstruction.
RESULTS
No level I or II studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies were selected from the 97 identified, including 637 shoulders (64% male) with a mean age of 62 years [95% CI: 60.3-63.5]. At the mean follow-up of 24.3 months (12-60), the range of motion was significantly increased from 82.6° [60.0-105.2] to 141.9° [109.9-173.8] in abduction, from 113.1° [98.3-127.9] to 153.3° [147.4-159.2] in elevation, from 35.5° [30.9-40.2] 43.4° [35.4-51.3] in external rotation and from 7.2 [5.4-9] to 9.9 [8.9-10.9] in internal rotation. Functional scores were significantly improved from 5.4 [4.8-5.9] to 1.3 [0.9-1.7] points for VAS, from 42.5 [15.7-69.3] to 59.3 [30.1-88.6] points for Constant, from 39.0% [38.1-39.8] to 79.8% [76.4-83.3] for the SSV, and from 48.2 [45.2-51.1] to 81.2 [77.2-85.1] points for the ASES. The healing rate was 76.1% [64.4-84.9]. The complication rate was 5.6% [1.8-16.3] and the reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rate was 7.1% [3.8-12.8].
CONCLUSION
Superior capsule reconstructions allow satisfactory clinical and radiological results to be obtained at 2 years of follow-up. Due to the small number of high quality comparative studies available, its true place in the therapeutic arsenal cannot be fully confirmed. However, it seems that the best indication for this technique is isolated irreparable rupture of the supraspinatus, in cases of medical treatment failure.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III; meta-analysis of heterogeneous studies.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Fascia Lata; Female; Humans; Male; Range of Motion, Articular; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder Joint; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34560311
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103072 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... 2023Tibialis anterior tendon ruptures are a rare condition with an often-delayed diagnosis due to transient pain and compensation of remaining anterior compartment tendons.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Tibialis anterior tendon ruptures are a rare condition with an often-delayed diagnosis due to transient pain and compensation of remaining anterior compartment tendons. Previous systematic reviews have limited their recommendations to surgical treatment over nonoperative cares given the relatively small sample size in the literature. This current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes amongst the various surgical techniques and define factors that may affect long term patients results. Twenty-six references (217 cases) were identified. Use of extensor tendon autograft (odds ratio [OR] 5.55; I=46%), autograft repair through semitendinosus/gracilis/ plantaris/ Achilles tendon/ peroneus longus ([OR] 4.14; I=71%), or direct repair ([OR] 3.59; I=57%), provided the best postoperative outcomes, whereas allograft repair ([OR] .52; I=77%),and ipsilateral split/ turn-down tibialis anterior tendon ([OR] .69; I=71%), were associated with poorer outcomes. Ruptures fixed in the acute phase ([OR] 8.3; I=26%), were associated with statistically significant better outcomes when compared to these ruptures fixed in the chronic phase ([OR] .52; I=77%). Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that ruptures should be surgically repaired in the acute phase whenever possible and comparable outcomes can be achieved through extensor tendon autograft repair, autograft repair, and direct repair.
Topics: Humans; Tendon Injuries; Muscle, Skeletal; Rupture; Ankle; Achilles Tendon; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36963479
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.01.007 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jul 2023To date, no conclusions have been reached regarding the type of brace worn after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. To this end, a systematic review and meta-analysis of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
To date, no conclusions have been reached regarding the type of brace worn after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. To this end, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted.
METHODS
According to the updated guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, all related literature in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from their establishment to March 1, 2022, were searched systematically. Outcome measures included the Constant score, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index, visual analog scale (VAS) score, shoulder joint range of motion (ROM), and failure events of rotator cuff healing. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of RCT.
RESULTS
Two independent reviewers (Chen, Wu) reviewed 275 articles, of which only five met the inclusion criteria, and four were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 302 patients. The overall risk of bias was high in two RCTs, unclear in one, and low in two. Considering the clinical outcomes, the Constant score (P = .08 mean deviation [MD], 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.42 to 6.53), WORC (P = .23; MD, 3.32; 95%CI, -2.15 to 8.79), VAS score (P = .09; MD -1.27; 95%CI, -2.75 to 0.21), ROM (P = .1; MD, 4.75; 95%CI, -0.98 to 10.48), and failure events of rotator cuff healing (P = .78; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95%CI, 0.32 to 2.37) did not significantly differ between the abduction brace and simple sling after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that wearing abduction braces after rotator cuff repair neither improved the Constant score, VAS, and WORC scores, and ROM of the shoulder joint, nor did it reduce the risk of re-tearing. Therefore, a simple sling may be a better option in terms of cost effectiveness. It is expected that studies with larger and more homogeneous samples will help verify our results.
Topics: Humans; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Braces; Treatment Outcome; Shoulder Joint; Arthroscopy
PubMed: 37085009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.018 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Aug 2022Studies have investigated the effects of gender on vascular surgery care. However, to the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive synthesis of the literature has been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Studies have investigated the effects of gender on vascular surgery care. However, to the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive synthesis of the literature has been performed on the presentation severity and postoperative outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), carotid artery stenosis (CAS), peripheral artery disease (PAD), and type B aortic dissection (TBAD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the sex and gender differences in the presentation severity and outcomes for patients who had undergone major vascular surgery.
METHODS
The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from their inception to December 2020. All observational studies and randomized controlled trials that had evaluated the gender differences in presentation severity or outcomes for patients who had undergone open or endovascular AAA or TBAD repair, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, or lower extremity bypass or angioplasty were included. The presentation severity was defined as follows: AAA (symptomatic or ruptured vs asymptomatic), carotid artery disease (symptomatic vs asymptomatic), PAD (chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI] vs claudication), and TBAD (complicated vs uncomplicated). The postoperative outcomes included long-term mortality, stroke, amputation, revascularization, and graft and/or stent thrombosis. A random effects model was used to derive the odds ratios (ORs), risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 236 studies met the inclusion criteria for our systematic review. Of the 236 studies, 86 (n = 2,099,534 patients), 62 (n = 2,300,888 patients), 28 (n = 2,394,143 patients), and 4 (n = 4525 patients) had evaluated the effects of gender on the outcomes for patients with AAA, CAS, PAD, and TBAD, respectively. The female patients were more likely to have presented with a ruptured AAA (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09-1.28) and CLTI (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19) than were the male patients. The all-cause mortality for those with an AAA (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.20-1.52) and those with PAD (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23) was higher for the women. However, the female patients with CAS had had lower all-cause mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94). No sex differences were found in the TBAD outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
We found that female patients who had undergone vascular surgery were associated with more severe disease at presentation, with a greater proportion of ruptured AAAs and CLTI. This potentially contributes to the higher mortality rates for female patients with AAAs and PAD compared with male patients. Future studies are needed to evaluate the reasons for these disparities, and greater efforts are required to support women in receiving more timely vascular surgical care.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Carotid Stenosis; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35257798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.030 -
Foot & Ankle Specialist Jun 2022Rupture of the plantar fascia is a rare condition. It can also occur spontaneously and with no history of disease of the plantar fascia, above all in athletes. This...
INTRODUCTION
Rupture of the plantar fascia is a rare condition. It can also occur spontaneously and with no history of disease of the plantar fascia, above all in athletes. This review aims to systematically analyze all cases described in the literature regarding the rupture of the plantar fascia, evaluating incidence, risk factors, and treatments, considering which procedures show the best outcomes and the highest success rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane review computerized databases was performed, focusing on articles about cases of rupture of the plantar fascia; 18 studies fulfilled all the criteria and were analyzed. There were no randomized controlled trials.
RESULTS
A total of 155 patients (157 foot) were included in this systematic review. Considering all the studies included, 12 patients had a spontaneous rupture, 138 patients had a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis, and 130 patients were treated with local injections of corticosteroid before the rupture. Only 2 cases of bilateral rupture were reported. In all, 15 studies reported conservative treatment, with a total of 154 patients (156 feet) included. Operative treatment was reported in 3 studies, with 3 patients (3 feet) treated.
CONCLUSIONS
Ruptures of the plantar fascia are very rare in asymptomatic patients and more common in patients treated with injection of steroids in the plantar fascia. Conservative treatment, although not standardized in the literature, led to good outcomes in most cases. Chronic ruptures of the fascia should be considered for operative treatment.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
Level III.
Topics: Fascia; Fasciitis, Plantar; Foot; Humans; Rupture; Rupture, Spontaneous
PubMed: 33307799
DOI: 10.1177/1938640020974889 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Oct 2015To report a systematic literature review of late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the results of a pooled... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To report a systematic literature review of late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the results of a pooled analysis of causes, treatment, and outcomes.
METHODS
Electronic information sources and bibliographic reference lists were interrogated using a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary searches; 11 articles were ultimately identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The articles reported a total of 190 patients who were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Mortality within 30 days or during the admission with aneurysm rupture was a primary endpoint; major perioperative morbidity was a secondary endpoint. A meta-analysis was performed for 30-day/in-hospital mortality using the random effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 152 ruptures occurred after 16,974 EVAR procedures reported by 8 of the case series, giving an incidence of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.05]. The mean time to rupture was 37 months. Twenty-nine percent (95% CI 20 to 39) of the patients had at least one previous secondary endovascular intervention following the initial EVAR, and 37% (95% CI 30 to 45) were not compliant with surveillance. Type I and III endoleaks were the predominant causes of rupture. Open surgical treatment was undertaken in 61% (95% CI 53 to 68) of the patients who underwent treatment. The pooled estimate for perioperative mortality was 32% (95% CI 24 to 41). A significantly lower mortality was found with endovascular treatment than open surgical management (p=0.027).
CONCLUSION
Graft-related endoleaks appear to be the predominant causes of late aneurysm rupture. Quality of and compliance with post-EVAR surveillance are important factors in late rupture; a large proportion of late ruptures are amenable to endovascular treatment.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endoleak; Endovascular Procedures; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26286073
DOI: 10.1177/1526602815601405 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014One to eight per cent of women suffer third-degree perineal tear (anal sphincter injury) and fourth-degree perineal tear (rectal mucosa injury) during vaginal birth, and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
One to eight per cent of women suffer third-degree perineal tear (anal sphincter injury) and fourth-degree perineal tear (rectal mucosa injury) during vaginal birth, and these tears are more common after forceps delivery (28%) and midline episiotomies. Third- and fourth-degree tears can become contaminated with bacteria from the rectum and this significantly increases in the chance of perineal wound infection. Prophylactic antibiotics might have a role in preventing this infection.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for reducing maternal morbidity and side effects in third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2014) and the reference lists of retrieved articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing outcomes of prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no antibiotics in third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the trial reports for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified and included one trial (147 women from a pre-planned sample size of 310 women) that compared the effect of prophylactic antibiotic (single-dose, second-generation cephalosporin - cefotetan or cefoxitin, 1 g intravenously) on postpartum perineal wound complications in third- or fourth-degree perineal tears compared with placebo. Perineal wound complications (wound disruption and purulent discharge) at the two-week postpartum check up were 8.20% and 24.10% in the treatment and the control groups respectively (risk ratio (RR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 0.96). However, the high failed-appointment rate may limit the generalisability of the results. The overall risk of bias was low except for incomplete outcome data. The quality of the evidence using GRADE was moderate for infection rate at two weeks' postpartum, and low for infection rate at six weeks' postpartum.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although the data suggest that prophylactic antibiotics help to prevent perineal wound complications following third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, loss to follow-up was very high. The results should be interpreted with caution as they are based on one small trial.
Topics: Anal Canal; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cefotetan; Cefoxitin; Cephalosporins; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Perineum; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectum; Rupture; Wound Infection
PubMed: 25289960
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005125.pub4