-
Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine Apr 2017This study reviewed the efficacy and safety of the three surgical approaches for varicocele (microsurgical, laparoscopic, and open varicocelectomy). A systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study reviewed the efficacy and safety of the three surgical approaches for varicocele (microsurgical, laparoscopic, and open varicocelectomy). A systematic review of the relevant randomized clinical trials was performed. Trials were identified from specialized trials register of the Cochrane UGDP Group, the Cochrane library, additional electronic searches (mainly MEDLINE, EMBSAE, SCI, CBM), and handsearching. Clinical trials comparing microsurgical, laparoscopic and open varicocelectomies were included. Statistical analysis was managed using Review Manager 5.3. Seven clinical trials of 1,781 patients were included. The meta-analysis indicated that compared with open varicocelectomy, microsurgery had a higher pregnancy rate (p=0.002), while there was nonsignificant difference between microsurgical and laparoscopic varicocelectomies or between laparoscopic and open varicocelectomies. Both microsurgical and laparoscopic varicocelectomies had a greater increase in postoperative sperm concentration than open varicocelectomy (p=0.008 and p=0.001, respectively). Microsurgical varicocelectomy also showed better improvement in postoperative sperm motility (p=0.02). Compared with the other two, microsurgical varicocelectomy had the longest operative time (p=0.01 and p=0.0004 respectively). A nonsignificant difference was found in the hospital stay between the three approaches, whereas microsurgical and laparoscopic varicocelectomies had a shorter time to return to work. Moreover, microsurgical varicocelectomy had a lower incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence compared with the others. Analysis of current evidence shows that microsurgical varicocelectomy has a longer operative time, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and recurrence than laparoscopic and open varicocelectomies, and shows a higher pregnancy rate, with a greater increase in postoperative sperm concentration, better improvement in postoperative sperm motility, and shorter time to return to work than open varicocelectomy.
Topics: Adult; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; Fertility; Humans; Infertility, Male; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Microsurgery; Odds Ratio; Postoperative Complications; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Recovery of Function; Return to Work; Risk Factors; Sperm Count; Sperm Motility; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urogenital Surgical Procedures; Varicocele; Young Adult
PubMed: 28301253
DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2016.1265161 -
The Journal of Urology Nov 2015Varicocele is one of the most common genital conditions referred to pediatric urologists. Most adolescents with varicocele are asymptomatic and their fertility future... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Varicocele is one of the most common genital conditions referred to pediatric urologists. Most adolescents with varicocele are asymptomatic and their fertility future (and surgery benefit) is largely unknown. This review assesses varicocele evaluation, management and indications for repair, as well as types and success of varicocelectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed on Embase™, PubMed® and Google Scholar™ for adolescent varicocele. Original research articles and relevant reviews were examined, and a synopsis of these data was generated for a comprehensive review of clinical adolescent varicocele management.
RESULTS
The prevalence of adolescent varicocele is similar to the adult population. While ultrasound is the most sensitive method for determining testicular volumes, orchidometer measurement may be adequate to gauge significant discordance. Significant hypotrophy of the affected testis with poor total testicular volume may indicate a testis at risk and warrant surgical repair. Similar findings have been noted with an associated high peak retrograde venous flow. Testicular hypotrophy often resolves following surgery but may also improve spontaneously if followed through adolescence. Continued scrotal pain despite adequate support or serial abnormal semen analysis in Tanner stage V boys is an indication for varicocelectomy. Artery and lymphatic sparing techniques (microscopic subinguinal or laparoscopic) are associated with the lowest risk of recurrence and complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Overtreatment and under treatment are medically and financially costly. Abnormal serial semen analysis with or without testicular hypotrophy is an indication for varicocele repair. If observation remains the treatment, followup with an adult urologist should be encouraged until paternity is achieved.
Topics: Adolescent; Disease Management; Fertility; Humans; Male; Semen Analysis; Varicocele
PubMed: 26119668
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.079 -
Andrologia Nov 2022The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether oral antioxidant supplementation improves sperm quality in men with infertility and varicocele... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Improvement in sperm quality by oral antioxidant supplementation in infertile men with varicocele who have not undergone surgical repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether oral antioxidant supplementation improves sperm quality in men with infertility and varicocele (VCL) who have not undergone surgical repair. In men with infertility and VCL who had not undergone surgical repair oral antioxidant supplementation significantly increased sperm concentration (WMD +5.86 × 10 /ml 95% CI: +1.47 to +10.24, p < 0.01; random effects model, six studies, 213 patients), total motility (WMD + 3.76%, 95% CI: +0.18 to +7.34, p = 0.04; random effects model, three studies, 93 patients), progressive motility (WMD + 6.38%, 95% CI: +3.04 to +9.71, p < 0.01; random effects model, three studies, 84 patients) and seminal volume (WMD +0.55 ml, 95%CI: +0.06 to +1.04, p = 0.03; random effects model, four studies, 120 patients). On the other hand, no significance difference was observed in sperm morphology (WMD +3.89%, 95% CI: -0.14 to +7.92, p = 0.06; random effects model, five studies, 187 patients). In conclusion, limited evidence suggests that the use of oral antioxidants in men with infertility and VCL, who have not undergone surgical repair improves their seminal volume, sperm concentration, total and progressive motility.
Topics: Antioxidants; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Semen; Sperm Count; Sperm Motility; Spermatozoa; Varicocele
PubMed: 35819022
DOI: 10.1111/and.14533 -
Phlebology May 2022This study is aimed to evaluate the association between varicocele and other vascular diseases through a systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study is aimed to evaluate the association between varicocele and other vascular diseases through a systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for studies that reported varicocele and other vascular diseases published before 30 June 2021. The meta-analysis was performed by Revman V.5.2 to calculate the pooled odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Subsequently, the impact of publication bias was evaluated, and sensitivity analysis as performed to assess our results' robustness.
RESULTS
In total, seven case-control studies, including 803 varicocele cases and 727 controls, were included. Our meta-analysis results showed that the varicocele patients had a higher risk of saphenofemoral insufficiency when compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR]: 2.80; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.03, 3.84; < 0.00001). Additionally, varicocele patients also had a higher risk of lower extremity venous insufficiency when compared with the control group (OR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.58, 3.47; < 0.0001). However, there was no statistical difference in hemorrhoid risk between both groups (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.28, 4.59; = 0.87).
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated that varicocele patients have higher risk of saphenofemoral and lower extremity venous insufficiencies but not the risk of hemorrhoids.
Topics: Hemorrhoids; Humans; Lower Extremity; Male; Varicocele; Vascular Diseases; Veins
PubMed: 35199618
DOI: 10.1177/02683555211069247 -
Journal of Pediatric Urology Oct 2017The prevalence of varicoceles is as high as 15% in children and adolescents. Optimal management of varicoceles has not been consolidated. Options include observation,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of varicoceles is as high as 15% in children and adolescents. Optimal management of varicoceles has not been consolidated. Options include observation, radiological intervention, or surgical varicocelectomy.
OBJECTIVE
Herein, we aim to assess the outcomes of radiological and surgical interventions for varicocele in children and adolescents evaluated by RCTs.
STUDY DESIGN
The study subjects were children and adolescents up to 21 years old, diagnosed with varicocele and allocated to receive either "surgical or radiological intervention" or "no treatment".
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (Ovid platform), Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for RCTs reporting on varicocele treatment in children and adolescents up to June 23, 2016. Only RCTs with patients aged under 21 years were included. Main outcomes of interest included changes in testicular size, semen analysis parameters, surgical adverse events and failures.
RESULTS
Nine eligible studies were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis based on available outcomes data demonstrated an improvement in testicular volume (mean difference 3.18 mL, 95% CI 1.94-4.42) and in sperm count (mean difference 25.54 × 10/mL, 95% CI 12.84-38.25) in patients who underwent radiological or surgical treatment compared with conservative management.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on current available randomized controlled trials, there is low to moderate level of evidence that radiological or surgical treatment of adolescent varicocele is associated with improved testicular size/growth and sperm concentration. The ultimate effects on fertility and paternity rates are not known.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Varicocele; Young Adult
PubMed: 28851509
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.07.008 -
Human Fertility (Cambridge, England) Jul 2023Genetic association studies (GAS) may have the capability to probe the genetic susceptibility alleles in many disorders. This systemic review aimed to assess whether an... (Review)
Review
Genetic association studies (GAS) may have the capability to probe the genetic susceptibility alleles in many disorders. This systemic review aimed to assess whether an association exists between gene(s)/allelic variant(s), and varicocele-related male infertility (VRMI). This review included 19 GAS that investigated 26 genes in 1,826 men with varicocele compared to 2,070 healthy men, and 263 infertile men without varicocele. These studies focussed on candidate genes and relevant variants, with glutathione S-transferase gene being the most frequently studied ( = 5) followed by the nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS3) gene ( = 3) and the phosphoprotein tyrosine phosphatase 1 gene ( = 2). In one study the genes for NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1, sperm protamine, human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, polymerase gamma, heat shock protein 90, mitochondrial DNA, superoxide dismutase 2, transition nuclear protein 1, and transition nuclear protein 2, were assessed. There is no clear indication that any of these polymorphisms are sturdily associated with VRMI. However, three studies established that the polymorphic genotype (GT + TT) for polymorphism of the gene is more frequent in varicocele patients. Further endeavours such as standardising reporting, exploring complementary designs, and the use of GWAS technology are justified to help replicate these early findings.
PubMed: 34587863
DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1983214 -
European Urology Focus Jan 2023The benefits and harms of varicocele treatment versus observation in adult infertile males are still controversial. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
The benefits and harms of varicocele treatment versus observation in adult infertile males are still controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically pool the evidence on outcomes of varicocele treatment (any surgical or radiological) versus observation in adult infertile men.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Only prospective randomized and nonrandomized studies were included until November 2021. The primary outcome was pregnancy rate; the secondary outcomes were improvements in sperm concentration, normal morphology, and progressive sperm motility after treatment compared to baseline. Men ≥18 yr of age with any-grade varicoceles were included.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Of 557 articles identified, 12 were eligible for inclusion, involving 1357 patients. Varicoceles were treated surgically in ten and radiologically in four studies. Varicocele treatment improved pregnancy rates (odds ratio 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.65; p = 0.048) and sperm concentration (mean difference 12.34 million/ml, 95% CI 3.49-21.18; p = 0.006) compared with observation. Proportions of spermatozoa with normal morphology and progressive motility were not statistically different from those with observation. However, considering treatment arm only, sperm concentration, progressive motility, and normal sperm morphology were improved compared with baseline. A subgroup analysis showed that the benefit of varicocele treatment is evident in men with an abnormal semen analysis. The main limitation is represented by the heterogeneity of the included studies, mostly in terms of study population, fertility of the partner, outcome evaluation, lack of long-term outcomes, and intermediate/high risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment of any-grade varicoceles may improve pregnancy rates and sperm concentration in adult infertile men, while benefits in sperm motility and normal morphology are less clear.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of all published prospective trials on varicocele treatment, significant evidence emerged on its benefit in terms of improved pregnancy rates and sperm concentration, while benefits in sperm motility and morphology are less clear.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Male; Adult; Varicocele; Prospective Studies; Sperm Motility; Semen; Fertility
PubMed: 36151030
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.014 -
European Urology Focus May 2023The outcomes and morbidity following treatment for persistent or varicocele recurrence remain controversial. (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
The outcomes and morbidity following treatment for persistent or varicocele recurrence remain controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review relating to the outcomes following treatment (any surgical or radiological) for varicocele persistence/recurrence.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Prospective and retrospective observational or interventional studies were included until March 2022. Outcomes were pregnancy rate, improvements in semen parameters after treatment compared with those at baseline, pain control, complication rates, and repeat treatment approach. Men of any age with any-grade persistent/recurrent varicoceles were included.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Of 913 articles identified, 18 with 1073 patients were eligible for inclusion. The mean time between the first and repeat treatment ranged between 5.3 and 73.3 months. The indication for repeat treatment was infertility in eight and pain control in six out of 18 studies, whereas four did not provide details for the indication. Of the patients with recurrent/persistent varicoceles initially treated using a radiological intervention, 83.8% underwent another radiological procedure, whereas 16.2% underwent a surgical procedure. Of those initially treated with a surgical procedure, 77.8% underwent a further surgical procedure, whereas 22.2% underwent a radiological procedure. The rate of success of repeat treatment was 60-100%. The reported complications were as follows: hydrocele (up to 16%), testicular atrophy (up to 2%), scrotal hematoma (up to 1.6%), wound infection (up to 6.6%), chronic pain (up to 2.9%), injury to other organs (up to 10%), and thrombophlebitis (up to 5.8%). The rate of symptom resolution was >90% for pain control. Pregnancy rates were 17-58% at 12-month follow-up. Semen parameters improved after repeat treatment compared with that at baseline in 87.5% of studies. The main limitations are the high risk of bias according to the Newcastle and Ottawa Scale, heterogeneity of the included studies, and small simple size.
CONCLUSIONS
Treating any grade of persistent/recurrent varicoceles has a good rate of success, pregnancy, and pain control, but there is still a risk of complications. Repeat treatment with the same interventional modality is feasible. The level of evidence is overall low.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this systematic review on persistent or recurrent varicoceles, we showed that repeat treatment with radiological or surgical procedures was feasible, with good success, pregnancy, and pain control rates at follow-up. However, repeat treatment was associated with a higher risk of complications than reported in the published literature relating to patients having their first intervention.
Topics: Male; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Varicocele; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Pregnancy Rate; Chronic Pain
PubMed: 36443199
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.008 -
The World Journal of Men's Health Apr 2023Despite the significant role of varicocele in the pathogenesis of male infertility, the impact of varicocele repair (VR) on conventional semen parameters remains...
PURPOSE
Despite the significant role of varicocele in the pathogenesis of male infertility, the impact of varicocele repair (VR) on conventional semen parameters remains controversial. Only a few systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) have evaluated the impact of VR on sperm concentration, total motility, and progressive motility, mostly using a before-after analytic approach. No SRMA to date has evaluated the change in conventional semen parameters after VR compared to untreated controls. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of VR on conventional semen parameters in infertile patients with clinical varicocele compared to untreated controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A literature search was performed using Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICOS) model (Population: infertile patients with clinical varicocele; Intervention: VR [any technique]; Comparison: infertile patients with clinical varicocele that were untreated; Outcome: sperm concentration, sperm total count, progressive sperm motility, total sperm motility, sperm morphology, and semen volume; Study type: randomized controlled trials and observational studies).
RESULTS
A total of 1,632 abstracts were initially assessed for eligibility. Sixteen studies were finally included with a total of 2,420 infertile men with clinical varicocele (1,424 patients treated with VR 996 untreated controls). The analysis showed significantly improved post-operative semen parameters in patients compared to controls with regards to sperm concentration (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.739; 95% CI 1.129 to 2.349; p<0.001; I²=97.6%), total sperm count (SMD 1.894; 95% CI 0.566 to 3.222; p<0.05; I²=97.8%), progressive sperm motility (SMD 3.301; 95% CI 2.164 to 4.437; p<0.01; I²=98.5%), total sperm motility (SMD 0.887; 95% CI 0.036 to 1.738; p=0.04; I²=97.3%) and normal sperm morphology (SMD 1.673; 95% CI 0.876 to 2.470; p<0.05; I²=98.5%). All the outcomes showed a high inter-study heterogeneity, but the sensitivity analysis showed that no study was sensitive enough to change these results. Publication bias was present only in the analysis of the sperm concentration and progressive motility. No significant difference was found for the semen volume (SMD 0.313; 95% CI -0.242 to 0.868; I²=89.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides a high level of evidence in favor of a positive effect of VR to improve conventional semen parameters in infertile men with clinical varicocele. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first SRMA to compare changes in conventional semen parameters after VR with changes in parameters of a control group over the same period. This is in contrast to other SRMAs which have compared semen parameters before and after VR, without reference to a control group. Our findings strengthen the available evidence and have a potential to upgrade professional societies' practice recommendations favoring VR to improve conventional semen parameters in infertile men.
PubMed: 36326166
DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.220142 -
Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2023The ideal surgical approach for the management of varicocele in children and adolescents remains controversial. Several techniques are available including artery- or...
BACKGROUND
The ideal surgical approach for the management of varicocele in children and adolescents remains controversial. Several techniques are available including artery- or lymphatic-sparing with optical magnification ( open inguinal or sub-inguinal approach), laparoscopic, antegrade and retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to appraise the clinical outcomes of these techniques in children and adolescents.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS
A systematic review was conducted (1997-2023). Meta-analysis or proportional meta-analysis for non-comparative studies (Freeman-Tukey transformation) using the random effects model was conducted. Results are expressed as overall proportion % and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
We identified 1910 studies; 632 duplicates were removed, 1278 were screened, 203 were reviewed and 56 were included, with 12 reporting on 2 different techniques (total of 68 data sets). Optical magnification inguinal approach (498 cases): recurrence 2.5% (0.6-5.6), hydrocele 1.6% (0.47-3.4), testicular atrophy 1% (0.3-2.0), complications 1.1% (0.2-2.6); optical magnification sub-inguinal approach (592 cases): recurrence 2.1% (0.7-4.4), hydrocele 1.26% (0.5-2.3), testicular atrophy 0.5% (0.1-1.3), complications 4% (1.0-8.8). Laparoscopic with mass-ligation/division (1943 cases): recurrence 2.9% (1.5-4.6), hydrocele 11.4% (8.3-14.9); complications 1.5% (0.6-2.9); laparoscopic with lymphatic-sparing (974 cases): recurrence 2.4% (1.5-3.5), hydrocele 1.2% (0.45-3.36), complications 1.2% (0.05-3.9); laparoscopic with artery-sparing (228 cases): recurrence 6.6% (2.3-12.9), hydrocele 6.5% (2.6-12.0). Antegrade embolization/sclerotherapy (403 cases): recurrence 7.6% (5.2-10.4), hydrocele 0.8% (0.17-1.9), technical failure 0.6% (0.1-1.6), complications 4.0% (2.3-6.1); retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy (509 cases): recurrence 6.9% (4.6-9.5), hydrocele 0.8% (0.05-2.5), technical failure 10.2% (4.6-17.6), and complications 4.8% (1.0-11.2).
CONCLUSION
The recurrence rate varies between 2.1% and 7.6% and is higher with the embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. Post-operative hydrocele rate varies between 0.8% and 11.4% and is higher with the laparoscopic mass-ligation/division technique. Testicular atrophy has not been reported with the laparoscopic and embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. The retrograde embolization technique is associated with 10% technical failure (inability to complete the procedure). The laparoscopic lymphatic-sparing technique is characterized by the lowest recurrence rate, incidence of hydrocele and other complications, and no reports of testicular atrophy.
PubMed: 37868369
DOI: 10.1177/17562872231206239