-
World Journal of Pediatrics : WJP Jun 2019Gastric volvulus (GV) in children is a rare condition. This study reviewed management and outcomes of GV in the pediatric population.
BACKGROUND
Gastric volvulus (GV) in children is a rare condition. This study reviewed management and outcomes of GV in the pediatric population.
METHODS
MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies in English regarding GV in patients < 18 years old between 2008 and 2017, selected by two reviewers. Results were presented as percentages and medians. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate categorical variables, and Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS
Ninety-seven papers with 125 patients were included. The median age was 24 months, with slightly female preponderance. Vomiting was the most common symptom and acute presentation occurred in the majority of cases. History of previous surgery/abdominal trauma was described in 12 and 3 children, respectively. Radiology was diagnostic for GV in most cases. The initial management was surgical in the majority of cases, with most of them including gastropexy, gastrostomy, or gastric resection. Mesenteroaxial GV was associated with acute presentation (P = 0.004) and the latter with ischemia (P < 0.01). Complications occurred in 23 (18.9%) children, esophageal stenosis being the most common. There were eight (6.4%) deaths, and only one recurrence 6 months after endoscopic management. The median follow-up period was 12 months. The inclusion of only case reports/case series, the incomplete reporting from papers, and the short follow-up were limitations of the study.
CONCLUSIONS
GV occurs at a median age of 24 months and requires high suspicion and prompt management, as mortality is considerable. The preferred surgical approach for GV includes variations of gastropexy. Esophageal stenosis is the most common morbidity post-GV management.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Gastroscopy; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Postoperative Complications; Stomach Volvulus
PubMed: 30900131
DOI: 10.1007/s12519-019-00244-4 -
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced... Feb 2022To compare clinical outcomes in infants and children with intestinal malrotation who were treated by laparoscopic or open Ladd's. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To compare clinical outcomes in infants and children with intestinal malrotation who were treated by laparoscopic or open Ladd's. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for studies comparing laparoscopy with open Ladd's for intestinal volvulus through January 5, 2021. Search terms were confined to Title/Abstract: "Intestinal Volvulus" OR "Intestinal malrotation" AND "Laparoscopy" AND "Laparotomy." Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies comparing laparoscopy with open Ladd's in neonates, infants, or children were included. Outcomes evaluated included operative time, time to full feeds, length of hospital stay, rate of conversion, reoperation, overall postoperative complications, postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction, and postoperative volvulus. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous variables; pooled mean differences (MDs) were measured for continuous variables. Fourteen studies were included, comprising 444 patients who underwent laparoscopic approach and 1422 patients who underwent open procedure. Laparoscopy group had shorter operative time (MD = -14.44 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -20.79 to -8.09, < .00001), hospital stay (MD = -4.57 days, 95% CI = -7.58 to -1.56, = .003), and time to full feeds (MD = -3.00 days, 95% CI = -3.80 to -2.19, < .00001). Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure had less overall postoperative complications (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.19-0.65, = .0009), less postoperative adhesive small bowl obstruction (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.19-0.74, = .005), and more postoperative volvulus (OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.23-7.13, = .02). There was no difference in incidence of reoperation rate (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.96-4.33, = .06). Laparoscopic procedure is superior to open Ladd's in operative time, hospital stay, time to full feeds, overall postoperative complication, and postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction. However, more RCTs with adequate follow-up are needed to overcome the limitations of our study.
Topics: Child; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intestinal Obstruction; Intestinal Volvulus; Laparoscopy; Operative Time; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34609912
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0436 -
Endoscopy International Open Jul 2016Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy provides an alternative management option for patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus who are considered too high risk to undergo... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy provides an alternative management option for patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus who are considered too high risk to undergo surgery. We reviewed the literature to assess whether the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines published in 2006 supporting the use of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy are still valid.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. The exploded search terms "Percutaneous Endoscopic Colostomy" and "Sigmoid Volvulus" were used. Librarian support was used to ensure the maximum number of relevant articles were returned. Identified abstracts were then analyzed and included if they met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Five observational studies and 5 case reports were identified that met the inclusion criteria. They provided data on 56 patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus treated with percutaneous endoscopic colostomy placement. Sixteen of the 56 patients were treated with a single percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) tube while 38 patients were treated with 2 PEC tubes. For 2 patients the details of the procedure were unknown. Five patients developed major complications following the procedure: 1 patient developed peritonitis after 4 days, due to fecal contamination secondary to tube migration and 2 patients with cognitive impairment pulled their PEC tubes out. Two other patients died following PEC insertion. Nine patients developed minor complications following the procedure. The most commonly reported minor complication was infection at the PEC site. Four of 56 patients developed a recurrent sigmoid volvulus with a PEC tube in situ.
CONCLUSION
Although in these case series there is a 21 % risk of morbidity and 5 % risk of mortality from the use of a PEC, this is favorable compared to the mortality risk of 6.6 % to 44 % reported with operative intervention. This review of contemporary literature therefore supports the use of PEC in frail and elderly patients.
PubMed: 27556086
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106957 -
ANZ Journal of Surgery May 2021Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common general surgical presentation and there has been a shift towards non-operative management (NOM) for patients with previous... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common general surgical presentation and there has been a shift towards non-operative management (NOM) for patients with previous abdominal surgery. Historically, exploratory surgery has been mandated for SBO in patients with a virgin abdomen. However, there is increasing evidence for NOM in this group of patients.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search was undertaken between 1995 and 2020 on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed. Primary outcome measures were success and failure rates, whereas secondary outcome measures were morbidity, mortality rates and identifying underlying aetiologies.
RESULTS
Six observational studies were included, with 205 patients in the NOM and 211 patients in the operative group. There was a high success rate of 95.6% and low morbidity rate of 3.1% in the NOM group compared to 88.6% and 26% in the operative group, respectively. Both groups reported no mortalities. The most common aetiologies for SBO in a virgin abdomen were adhesions (63%), malignancy (11%), foreign body/bezoar (5%), internal hernia (4%) and volvulus (4%).
CONCLUSION
NOM for SBO is a safe and feasible option for a select group of clinically stable patients with a virgin abdomen without features of closed-loop obstruction. Adhesions are the most common cause of SBO in this group of patients. Further large-scale prospective clinical studies with standardized NOM modality, homogenous clinical resolution indicators and long-term follow-up data are warranted to allow for quantitative analysis to reinforce this evidence.
Topics: Abdomen; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Intestine, Small; Prospective Studies; Tissue Adhesions
PubMed: 33084181
DOI: 10.1111/ans.16392 -
Pediatric Surgery International Dec 2016Although the principles of the Ladd's procedure for intestinal malrotation in children have remained unchanged since its first description, in the era of minimally... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Although the principles of the Ladd's procedure for intestinal malrotation in children have remained unchanged since its first description, in the era of minimally invasive surgery it is controversial whether laparoscopy is advantageous over open surgery. The aim of our study was to determine whether the surgical approach for the treatment of malrotation had an impact on patient outcome.
METHODS
Using a defined strategy (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science MeSH headings), two investigators independently searched for studies comparing open versus laparoscopic Ladd's procedure in children. Case reports and opinion articles were excluded. Outcome measures included age at operation, time to full enteral feeding, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications. Maneuvers were compared using Fisher's exact test and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
RESULTS
Of 308 abstracts screened, 49 full-text articles were analyzed and nine (all retrospective) met our search criteria. Selected articles included 1003 patients, of whom 744 (74 %) underwent open surgery and 259 (26 %) laparoscopy. Patients who had open surgery were younger (0.9 ± 1.2 years) than those who underwent laparoscopy (2.6 ± 3 years; p < 0.0001). Laparoscopy was converted to open Ladd's in 25.3 % patients. Laparoscopy was associated with faster full enteral feeding (1.5 ± 0.3 days) in comparison to open surgery (4.6 ± 0.1 days, p < 0.0001). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (5.9 ± 4.3 days) than in the open group (11.2 ± 6.7 days; p < 0.0001). Open surgery was associated with higher overall post-operative complication rate (21 %) than laparoscopy (8 %; p < 0.0001). Although there was no difference in the prevalence of post-operative bowel obstruction (open, n = 10 %; laparoscopy, n = 0 % p = 0.07), post-operative volvulus was more frequent in the laparoscopy group (3.5 %) than in the open group (1.4 %, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
Comparative but non-randomized studies indicate that laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is not commonly performed in young children. Although one third of laparoscopic procedures is converted to open surgery, laparoscopy is associated with shorter time to full enteral feeds and length of hospital stay. However, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure seems to have higher incidence of post-operative volvulus. Prospective randomized studies with long follow-up are needed to confirm present outcome data and determine the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach.
Topics: Child; Digestive System Abnormalities; Female; Humans; Infant; Intestinal Volvulus; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27709290
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-016-3974-2 -
Gastroenterology Report Dec 2019Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure of choice for medically refractory ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous...
BACKGROUND
Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure of choice for medically refractory ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. While rare, a pouch volvulus can occur. We aimed to determine the frequency, presentation, and management approach of pouch volvulus in patients with IPAA.
METHODS
A systematic search of published literature was performed by a medical reference librarian on 10 August 2018 and two independent reviewers identified relevant publications, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality based on a validated tool. A retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic electronic medical records identified one case of pouch volvulus between January 2008 and August 2018.
RESULTS
The frequency of pouch volvulus from one large published study reporting long-term outcomes of IPAA was 0.18% (3/1,700). A total of 22 patients (18 ulcerative colitis) were included (median age 32 years, 73% females). Median time to volvulus after IPAA was 36 months while median interval to volvulus diagnosis from symptom onset was 24 hours. Abdominal pain was the most commonly reported symptom (76%). The diagnosis was made primarily by abdominal computed tomography (13/17 patients, 76%). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 1 of 11 patients (9%). Surgery was performed in 20 patients and pouch-pexy and pouch excision were the most frequent surgical operations. A redo IPAA was performed in five patients (25%).
CONCLUSION
Pouch volvulus is a rare but serious complication of IPAA and should be suspected even in the absence of obstruction symptoms. Endoscopic treatment often fails and surgery is effective when performed early.
PubMed: 31857902
DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goz045 -
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery :... Feb 2023The optimal timing of delivery for pregnancies complicated by prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to find... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The optimal timing of delivery for pregnancies complicated by prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to find whether elective or expectant delivery is associated with improved neonatal outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies up to 2021 that reported timing of delivery for prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were then performed in group 1: moderately preterm (gestational age [GA]: 34-35 weeks) elective delivery versus expectant management after GA 34-35 weeks; and group 2: near-term (GA: 36-37 weeks) elective delivery versus expectant management after GA 36-37 weeks. The following clinical outcomes were evaluated: length of stay (LOS), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) days, bowel morbidity (atresia, perforation, and volvulus), sepsis, time of first feeding, short gut syndrome and respirator days, and mortality.
RESULTS
Two randomized controlled trials (RCT)s and eight retrospective cohort studies were included, comprising 629 participants. Moderately preterm elective delivery failed to improve clinical outcomes. However, near-term elective delivery significantly reduced bowel morbidity (7.4 vs. 15.4%, relative risk = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18, 0.74; = 0.005; I2 = 0%) and TPN days (mean difference =-13.44 days; 95% CI: -26.68, -0.20; = 0.05; I2 = 45%) compared to expectant delivery. The mean LOS was 39.2 days after near-term delivery and 48.7 days in the expectant group ( = 0.06).
CONCLUSION
Based on the data analyzed, near-term elective delivery (GA 36-37 weeks) appears to be the optimal timing for delivery of pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis as it is associated with less bowel morbidity and shorter TPN days. However, more RCTs are necessary to better validate these findings.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Infant; Gastroschisis; Watchful Waiting; Gestational Age
PubMed: 35817335
DOI: 10.1055/a-1896-5345 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Dec 2016To determine the incidence of internal hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery and evaluate the risk factors and strategies in the management of this serious... (Review)
Review
AIM
To determine the incidence of internal hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery and evaluate the risk factors and strategies in the management of this serious complication.
METHOD
Two databases (MEDLINE from 1946 and Embase from 1949) were searched to mid-September 2015. The search terms included volvulus or internal hernia and laparoscopic colorectal surgery or colorectal surgery or anterior resection or laparoscopic colectomy. We found 49 and 124 articles on MEDLINE and Embase, respectively, an additional 15 articles were found on reviewing the references. After removal of duplicates, 176 abstracts were reviewed, with 33 full texts reviewed and 15 eligible for qualitative synthesis.
RESULTS
The incidence of internal hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is low (0.65%). Thirty-one patients were identified. Five cases were from two prospective studies (5/648, 0.8%), 20 cases were from seven retrospective studies (20/3165, 0.6%) and six patients were from case reports. Of the 31 identified cases, 21 were associated with left-sided resection, four with right sided resection, two with transverse colectomy, one with a subtotal colectomy and in three cases the operation was not specified. The majority of cases (64.3%) were associated with a restorative left sided resection. Nearly all cases occurred within 4 months of surgery. All patients required re-operation and reduction of the internal hernia and 35.7% of cases required a bowel resection. In 52.2% of cases, the mesenteric defect was closed at the second operation and 52.6% of cases were successfully managed laparoscopically. There were three deaths (0.08%).
CONCLUSION
Mesenteric hernias are a rare but important complication of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The evidence does not support routine closure for all cases, but selective closure of the mesenteric defect during left-sided restorative procedures in high-risk patients at the initial surgery may be considered.
Topics: Colorectal Surgery; Hernia, Abdominal; Humans; Intestinal Volvulus; Laparoscopy; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27440227
DOI: 10.1111/codi.13464 -
Pediatric Surgery International Apr 2023Ladd's Procedure has been the surgical intervention of choice in the management of congenital intestinal malrotation for the past century. Historically, the procedure... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ladd's Procedure has been the surgical intervention of choice in the management of congenital intestinal malrotation for the past century. Historically, the procedure included performing an appendectomy to prevent future misdiagnosis of appendicitis, since the location of the appendix will be shifted to the left side of the abdomen. This study consists of two parts. A review of the available literature on appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure and then a survey sent to pediatric surgeons about their approach (to remove the appendix or not) while performing a Ladd's procedure and the clinical reasoning behind their approach.
METHODS
The study consists of 2 parts: (1) a systematic review was performed to extract articles that fulfill the inclusion criteria; (2) a short online survey was designed and sent by email to 168 pediatric surgeons. The questions in the survey were centered on whether a surgeon performs an appendectomy as part of the Ladd's procedure or not, as well as their reasoning behind either choice.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded five articles, the data from the available literature are inconsistent with performing appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure. The challenge of leaving the appendix in place has been briefly described with minimal to no focus on the clinical reasoning. The survey demonstrated that 102 responses were received (60% response rate). Ninety pediatric surgeons stated performing an appendectomy as part of the procedure (88%). Only 12% of pediatric surgeons are not performing appendectomy during Ladd's procedure.
CONCLUSION
It is difficult to implement a modification in a successful procedure like Ladd's procedure. The majority of pediatric surgeons perform an appendectomy as part of its original description. This study has identified gaps in the literature pertaining to analyze the outcomes of performing Ladd's procedure without an appendectomy which should be explored in future research.
Topics: Child; Humans; Appendectomy; Laparoscopy; Intestinal Volvulus; Digestive System Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 37010655
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-023-05437-7 -
Lancet (London, England) Apr 2015Advances in diagnostic techniques and perioperative care have greatly improved the outcome of neonatal surgery. Despite this, disparity still exists in the outcome of...
BACKGROUND
Advances in diagnostic techniques and perioperative care have greatly improved the outcome of neonatal surgery. Despite this, disparity still exists in the outcome of neonatal surgery between high-income countries and low-income and middle-income countries. This study reviews publications on neonatal surgery in Africa over 20 years with a focus on challenges of management, trends in outcome, and potential interventions to improve outcome.
METHODS
We did a literature review by searching PubMed and African Index Medicus for original articles published in any language between January, 1995, and September, 2014, with the search terms "neonatal surgery" and "Africa", further supplemented by "(surgery OR anaesthesia) AND (neonatal OR newborn) AND (developing countries OR Africa)". A data extraction sheet was used to collect information, including type of study, demographics, number of cases, outcome, challenges, and suggestions to improve outcome. For the meta-analysis, data were analysed by χ(2) test or Student's t-test as appropriate. In all, the significance level was set to p<0·05.
FINDINGS
We identified 859 published papers, of which 51 studies from 11 countries met the inclusion criteria. The 16 studies in the first 10 years (before 2005; group A) were compared with the 35 in the last 10 years (2005-14; group B). Nigeria (n=32; 62·7%), South Africa (n=7; 13·7%), Tanzania (n=2; 3·9%), and Tunisia (n=2; 3·9%) were the predominant source of the publications, of which were retrospective in 38 (74·5%) studies and prospective in 13 (25·5%) studies. The mean sample size of the studies was 97·8 (range 5-640). Overall, 4989 neonates were studied, with median age of 6 days (range 1-30). Common neonatal conditions reported were intestinal atresia in 28 (54·9%) studies, abdominal wall defects in 27 (52·9%), anorectal malformations in 24 (47·1%), and Hirschsprung's disease, necrotising enterocolitis, and volvulus neonatorum in 23 (45·1%) each. Mortality was lowest (<3%) in spina bifida and facial cleft procedures, and highest (>50%) in emergency neonatal surgeries involving bowel perforation, bowel resection, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, oesophageal atresia, and ruptured omphalocele or gastroschisis. Overall average mortality rate was higher in group A than in group B (36·9% vs 29·1%; p<0·001), but mortality did not vary between the groups for similar neonatal conditions. The major documented challenges were delayed presentation and inadequate facilities in 39 (76·5%) studies, dearth of trained support personnel in 32 (62·7%), and absence of neonatal intensive care in 29 (56·9%). The challenges varied from country to country but did not differ in the two groups.
INTERPRETATION
Improvement has been achieved in outcomes of neonatal surgery in Africa in the past two decades, although several of the studies reviewed are retrospective and poorly designed. Cost-effective adaptations for neonatal intensive care, improved health-care funding, coordinated neonatal surgical care via regional centres, and collaboration with international partners are potential interventions that could help to address the challenges and further improve outcome.
FUNDING
None.
PubMed: 26313083
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60830-3