-
World Journal of Emergency Surgery :... 2018Damage control resuscitation may lead to postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. These conditions may result in a vicious,... (Review)
Review
Damage control resuscitation may lead to postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. These conditions may result in a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle leading to severe physiologic derangements and multiorgan failure unless interrupted by abdominal (surgical or other) decompression. Further, in some clinical situations, the abdomen cannot be closed due to the visceral edema, the inability to control the compelling source of infection or the necessity to re-explore (as a "planned second-look" laparotomy) or complete previously initiated damage control procedures or in cases of abdominal wall disruption. The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients has been proposed to be effective in preventing or treating deranged physiology in patients with severe injuries or critical illness when no other perceived options exist. Its use, however, remains controversial as it is resource consuming and represents a non-anatomic situation with the potential for severe adverse effects. Its use, therefore, should only be considered in patients who would most benefit from it. Abdominal fascia-to-fascia closure should be done as soon as the patient can physiologically tolerate it. All precautions to minimize complications should be implemented.
Topics: Abdomen; Abdominal Cavity; Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Postoperative Complications; Prophylactic Surgical Procedures; Resuscitation
PubMed: 29434652
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0167-4 -
Tissue & Cell Feb 2017The peritoneum is an extensive serous organ with both epithelial and mesenchymal features and a variety of functions. Diseases such as inflammatory peritonitis and... (Review)
Review
The peritoneum is an extensive serous organ with both epithelial and mesenchymal features and a variety of functions. Diseases such as inflammatory peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis can induce disturbance of the complex physiological functions. To understand the peritoneal response in disease, normal embryonic development, anatomy in healthy conditions and physiology of the peritoneum have to be understood. This review aims to summarize and discuss the literature on these basic peritoneal characteristics. The peritoneum is a dynamic organ capable of adapting its structure and functions to various physiological and pathological conditions. It is a key element in regulation of inflammatory responses, exchange of peritoneal fluid and prevention of fibrosis in the abdominal cavity. Disturbance of these mechanisms may lead to serious conditions such as the production of large amounts of ascites, the generation of fibrotic adhesions, inflammatory peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The difficulty to treat diseases, such as inflammatory peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis, stresses the necessity for new therapeutic strategies. This review provides a detailed background on the peritoneal anatomy, microenvironment and immunologic responses which is essential to generate new hypotheses for future research.
Topics: Carcinoma; Cellular Microenvironment; Humans; Inflammation; Peritoneum; Peritonitis
PubMed: 27890350
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2016.11.004 -
Current Opinion in Critical Care Dec 2021The aim of this study was to outline the management of the patient with the open abdomen. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The aim of this study was to outline the management of the patient with the open abdomen.
RECENT FINDINGS
An open abdomen approach is used after damage control laparotomy, to decrease risk for postsurgery intra-abdominal hypertension, if reoperation is likely and after primary abdominal decompression.Temporary abdominal wall closure without negative pressure is associated with higher rates of intra-abdominal infection and evisceration. Negative pressure systems improve fascial closure rates but increase fistula formation. Definitive abdominal wall closure should be considered once oedema has subsided and the patient has stabilized. Delayed abdominal closure after trauma (>24-48 h) is associated with less achievement of fascial closure and more complications. Protective lung ventilation should be employed early, particularly if respiratory compromise is evident. Conservative fluid management and less sedation may decrease delirium and increase definitive abdominal closure rates. Extubation may be performed before definitive abdominal closure in selected patients. Antibiotic therapy should be brief, targeted and guideline concordant. Survival depends on the underlying disease, the closure method and the course of hospitalization.
SUMMARY
Changes in the treatment of patients with the open abdomen include negative temporary closure, conservative fluid management, early protective lung ventilation, decreased sedation and extubation before abdominal closure in selected patients.
Topics: Abdomen; Abdominal Cavity; Abdominal Injuries; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension; Laparotomy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34561356
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000879 -
World Journal of Emergency Surgery :... Jul 2023Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI)... (Review)
Review
Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their successful management typically requires intensive resource utilization, and despite the best therapies, morbidity and mortality remain high. One of the main issues required to appropriately treat IAI that differs from the other etiologies of sepsis is the frequent requirement to provide physical source control. Fortunately, dramatic advances have been made in this aspect of treatment. Historically, source control was left to surgeons only. With new technologies non-surgical less invasive interventional procedures have been introduced. Alternatively, in addition to formal surgery open abdomen techniques have long been proposed as aiding source control in severe intra-abdominal sepsis. It is ironic that while a lack or even delay regarding source control clearly associates with death, it is a concept that remains poorly described. For example, no conclusive definition of source control technique or even adequacy has been universally accepted. Practically, source control involves a complex definition encompassing several factors including the causative event, source of infection bacteria, local bacterial flora, patient condition, and his/her eventual comorbidities. With greater understanding of the systemic pathobiology of sepsis and the profound implications of the human microbiome, adequate source control is no longer only a surgical issue but one that requires a multidisciplinary, multimodality approach. Thus, while any breach in the GI tract must be controlled, source control should also attempt to control the generation and propagation of the systemic biomediators and dysbiotic influences on the microbiome that perpetuate multi-system organ failure and death. Given these increased complexities, the present paper represents the current opinions and recommendations for future research of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, of the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery of Surgical Infection Society Europe and Surgical Infection Society America regarding the concepts and operational adequacy of source control in intra-abdominal infections.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Surgeons; Abdominal Cavity; Intraabdominal Infections
PubMed: 37480129
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00509-4 -
Critical Care (London, England) Mar 2020This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2020. Other selected articles can be found online at... (Review)
Review
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2020. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2020. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.
Topics: Abdominal Cavity; Compartment Syndromes; Critical Illness; Disease Management; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
PubMed: 32204721
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2782-1 -
RoFo : Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiete Der... Oct 2023
Topics: Abdomen; Abdominal Cavity
PubMed: 37793383
DOI: 10.1055/a-2101-8973 -
Urology Feb 2020
Topics: Abdominal Cavity; Male; Urethra
PubMed: 32033676
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.051 -
JSLS : Journal of the Society of... 2019Creating and maintaining a pneumoperitoneum to perform laparoscopy is governed by gas laws and the limiting physical constraints of the abdomen. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Creating and maintaining a pneumoperitoneum to perform laparoscopy is governed by gas laws and the limiting physical constraints of the abdomen.
METHODS
A review of how gas, biomechanical and physical properties affect the abdomen and a systematic structured Medline and PubMed search was conducted to identify relevant studies related to the topic.
RESULTS
Abdominal compliance is a measure of ease of abdominal expansion and is determined by the elasticity of the abdominal wall and diaphragm. It is the change in intra-abdominal volume per change in intra-abdominal pressure. Caution should be exercised with pressures exceeding 12 millimeters mercury since this is defined as intra-abdominal hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS
Abdominal compliance has its limits, is unique for each patient and pressure-volume curves cannot be easily predicted. Using the lowest possible pressure to accomplish the surgical task without compromising surgical outcome is the desired goal. The clinical importance is caution and knowing there is a point where more pressure does not increase working space and only increases pressure.
Topics: Abdominal Cavity; Carbon Dioxide; Compliance; Humans; Insufflation; Laparoscopy; Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial; Pressure
PubMed: 30828242
DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00080 -
Disease-a-month : DM Jan 2019
Topics: Abdominal Cavity; Humans; Hypertension; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension; Pressure
PubMed: 30739646
DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2018.12.001 -
Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie Apr 2016
Topics: Abdominal Cavity; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Digestive System Diseases; Germany; National Health Programs; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Surgical Equipment; Surgical Instruments
PubMed: 27074209
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-105220