-
Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift Fur... Apr 2020Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common illnesses in industrialized nations. Up to 70% of adults suffer from the disease once in their lifetime. This underlines... (Review)
Review
Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common illnesses in industrialized nations. Up to 70% of adults suffer from the disease once in their lifetime. This underlines the necessity and importance of knowing about the differential diagnosis of hemorrhoids. One can differentiate between differential diagnoses of symptoms (bleeding, pain, itching, tumor) and differential diagnoses of the phenotype findings (anal prolapse, mucosal prolapse and rectal prolapse, skin tags, hypertrophied anal papillae, condylomata acuminata, anal fissure, perianal venous thrombosis, anal cancer).
Topics: Adult; Anus Diseases; Diagnosis, Differential; Hemorrhoids; Humans; Pain
PubMed: 32077979
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-020-04553-y -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Dec 2016
Topics: Disease Management; Female; Fissure in Ano; Humans; Rectal Fistula; Rectovaginal Fistula
PubMed: 27824697
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000733 -
Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie Apr 2018
Topics: Fissure in Ano; Humans
PubMed: 29719901
DOI: 10.1055/a-0585-6865 -
Journal of Visceral Surgery Apr 2015Anal fissure is an ulceration of the anoderm in the anal canal. Its pathogenesis is due to multiple factors: mechanical trauma, sphincter spasm, and ischemia. Treatment... (Review)
Review
Anal fissure is an ulceration of the anoderm in the anal canal. Its pathogenesis is due to multiple factors: mechanical trauma, sphincter spasm, and ischemia. Treatment must address these causative factors. While American and British scientific societies have published recommendations, there is no formal treatment consensus in France. Medical treatment is non-specific, aimed at softening the stool and facilitating regular bowel movements; this results in healing of almost 50% of acute anal fissures. The risk of recurrent fissure remains high if the causative factors persist. If non-specific medical treatment fails, specific medical treatment can be offered to reversibly decrease hypertonic sphincter spasm. Surgery remains the most effective long-term treatment and should be offered for cases of chronic or complicated anal fissure but also for acute anal fissure with severe pain or for recurrent fissure despite optimal medical treatment. Surgical treatment is based on two principles that may be combined: decreasing sphincter tone and excision of the anal fissure. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is the best-evaluated technique and remains the gold standard in English-speaking countries. Since LIS is associated with some risk of irreversible anal incontinence, its use is controversial in France where fissurectomy combined with anoplasty is preferred. Other techniques have been described to reduce the risk of incontinence (calibrated sphincterotomy, sphincteroplasty). The technique of forcible uncalibrated anal dilatation is no longer recommended.
Topics: Anal Canal; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Dilatation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fecal Incontinence; Fissure in Ano; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 25305752
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.07.007 -
World Journal of Gastrointestinal... Mar 2024Anal pruritus is a common anorectal symptom that can significantly impair a patient's quality of life, including their mental health. It can be one of the most difficult...
Anal pruritus is a common anorectal symptom that can significantly impair a patient's quality of life, including their mental health. It can be one of the most difficult proctological conditions to treat. Patients often delay seeking medical attention, since it is an embarrassing but non-life-threatening situation. Pruritus ani can be associated with idiopathic and secondary causes, such as anorectal diseases, cancer (anal or colorectal), dermatological and sexually transmitted diseases, fungal infections and systemic diseases. If patients are referred for a colonoscopy, this can sometimes provide the first opportunity to evaluate the perianal area. Classifications of anal pruritus are based on the abnormalities of the perianal skin, one of the most commonly used being the Washington classification. A proper digital anorectal examination is important, as well as an anoscopy to help to exclude anorectal diseases or suspicious masses. Endoscopists should be aware of the common etiologies, and classification of the perianal area abnormalities should be provided in the colonoscopy report. Information on treatment possibilities and follow-up can also be provided. The treatment normally consists of a triple approach: proper hygiene, elimination of irritants, and skin care and protection. Several topical therapies have been described as possible treatments, including steroids, capsaicin, tacrolimus and methylene blue intradermal injections.
PubMed: 38577644
DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.112 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Aug 2017Anal fissure has a very large number of treatment options. The choice is difficult. In an effort to assist in that, choice presented here is a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anal fissure has a very large number of treatment options. The choice is difficult. In an effort to assist in that, choice presented here is a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published treatments for anal fissure that have been studied in randomized controlled trials.
METHODS
Randomized trials were sought in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, EMBASE and the trials registry sites clinicaltrials.gov and who/int/ictrp/search/en. Abstracts were screened, full-text studies chosen, and finally eligible studies selected and abstracted. The review was then divided into those studies that compared two or more surgical procedures and those that had at least one arm that was non-surgical. Studies were further categorized by the specific interventions and comparisons. The outcome assessed was treatment failure. Negative effects of treatment assessed were headache and anal incontinence. Risk of bias was assessed for each study, and the strength of the evidence of each comparison was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS
One hundred and forty-eight eligible trials were found and assessed, 31 in the surgical group and 117 in the non-surgical group. There were 14 different operations described in the surgical group and 29 different non-surgical treatments in the non-surgical group along with partial lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). There were 61 different comparisons. Of these, 47 were reported in 2 or fewer studies, usually with quite small patient samples. The largest single comparison was glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) versus control with 19 studies. GTN was more effective than control in sustained cure (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.63-0.77), but the quality of evidence was very poor because of severe heterogeneity, and risk of bias due to inadequate clinical follow-up. The only comparison to have a GRADE quality of evidence of high was a subgroup analysis of LIS versus any medical therapy (OR 0.12; CI 0.07-0.21). Most of the other studies were downgraded in GRADE due to imprecision.
CONCLUSIONS
LIS is superior to non-surgical therapies in achieving sustained cure of fissure. Calcium channel blockers were more effective than GTN and with less risk of headache, but with only a low quality of evidence. Anal incontinence, once thought to be a frequent risk with LIS, was found in various subgroups in this review to have a risk between 3.4 and 4.4%. Among the surgical studies, manual anal stretch performed worse than LIS in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults. For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure, open LIS and closed LIS appear to be equally efficacious, with a moderate GRADE quality of evidence. All other GRADE evaluations of procedures were low to very low due mostly to imprecision.
Topics: Anal Canal; Calcium Channel Blockers; Fecal Incontinence; Fissure in Ano; Humans; Nitroglycerin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sphincterotomy; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 28795245
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1664-2 -
Missouri Medicine 2020Anorectal conditions are one of the most common problems evaluated by primary care physicians. Most patients present with rectal pain, rectal bleeding, or purulent... (Review)
Review
Anorectal conditions are one of the most common problems evaluated by primary care physicians. Most patients present with rectal pain, rectal bleeding, or purulent drainage per rectum. Colorectal conditions have overlapping symptoms. Thorough history and careful anorectal examination can differentiate common anorectal conditions like hemorrhoids, anorectal abscesses, anal fistula, anal fissure, and anal condyloma. Most of these conditions can be diagnosed and treated without imaging.
Topics: Anus Diseases; Colorectal Surgery; Diagnosis, Differential; Fissure in Ano; Hemorrhoids; Humans; Primary Health Care
PubMed: 32308242
DOI: No ID Found -
Techniques in Coloproctology Jul 2020
Topics: Anal Canal; Chronic Disease; Fissure in Ano; Humans; Rectal Fistula
PubMed: 32476079
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02253-2 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Dec 2023The management of anal fissure: ACPGBI position statement was written 15 years ago. [KLR Cross et al., Colorectal Dis, 2008]. Our aim was to update the guideline and... (Review)
Review
AIM
The management of anal fissure: ACPGBI position statement was written 15 years ago. [KLR Cross et al., Colorectal Dis, 2008]. Our aim was to update the guideline and provide recommendations on the most effective treatment for patients with anal fissures utilising a multidisciplinary, rigorous guideline methodology.
METHODS
The development process consisted of six phases. In phase 1 we defined the scope of the guideline. The patient population included patients with acute and chronic anal fissure. The target group was all practitioners (primary and secondary care) treating patients with fissures and, in addition, healthcare workers and patients who desired information regarding fissure management. In phase 2 we formed a guideline development group (GDG) including a methodologist. In phase 3 review questions were formulated, using a reversed PICO process, starting with possible recommendations based on the GDG's knowledge. In phase 4 a comprehensive literature search focused on existing systematic reviews addressing each review question, supplemented by more recent studies if appropriate. In phase 5 data were extracted from the included papers and checked by the GDG. If indicated, meta-analysis of systematic review data was updated by the GDG. During phase 6 the GDG members decided what recommendations could be made based on the evidence in the literature and strength of the recommendation was assessed using 'grade'.
RESULTS
This guideline is divided into two sections: Primary care which includes (i) diagnosis; (ii) basic treatment; (iii) topical treatment; and secondary care which includes (iv) botulinum toxin therapy; (v) surgical intervention and (vi) special situations (including pregnancy and breast-feeding patients, children, receptive anal intercourse and low-pressure fissures). A total of 23 recommendations were formulated. A new term clinically healed was described by the GDG.
CONCLUSION
This guideline provides an up-to-date evidence-based summary of the current knowledge of the management of anal fissure and may serve as a useful guide for clinicians as well as a potential reference for patients.
Topics: Child; Humans; Chronic Disease; Fissure in Ano; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom
PubMed: 37926920
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16762 -
The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology... Apr 2020An anal fissure (AF) is a linear tear in the distal anal canal and is one of the most common causes of anal pain. Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a symptomatic growth and...
BACKGROUND/AIMS
An anal fissure (AF) is a linear tear in the distal anal canal and is one of the most common causes of anal pain. Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a symptomatic growth and distal displacement of normal anal cushions. Numerous studies have addressed the contributing factors of these conditions, yet the results remain controversial. In this study, we hypothesize that increasing patients' awareness of hidden risk factors could reduce the rate of HD and AF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A questionnaire-based controlled study was planned. After power analysis, patients with HD (n=60) and AF (n=60) were enrolled consecutively into the study group and compared with the control group (n=60) of healthy individuals. The survey was designed to assess the participants' toilet and dietary habits and anxiety risk. Odds ratios were calculated and a binary logistic regression model was constructed to identify associated factors.
RESULTS
Hard stools, spending more than 5 minutes in the toilet, frequent straining during defecation, and increased spice intake were more frequent in the patients with HD; and hard fecal consistency, time elapsed in toilet greater than 5 min, straining during defecation, and high anxiety risk were more frequent in the patients with AF as compared to the control group (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Possible associations were identified between habitual factors or conditions (i.e., fecal consistency, the time elapsed in the toilet, straining during defecation) and anxiety and benign anorectal diseases (i.e., HD and AF). Patients should be advised about these hidden threats.
Topics: Adult; Anxiety; Case-Control Studies; Conservative Treatment; Cross-Sectional Studies; Defecation; Feeding Behavior; Female; Fissure in Ano; Hemorrhoids; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Patient Education as Topic; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 32412899
DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19183