-
Therapeutische Umschau. Revue... Jun 2020Arthrocentesis in the Emergency Department Acute joint swelling is a common presentation to the emergency department. Although routine investigations like clinical...
Arthrocentesis in the Emergency Department Acute joint swelling is a common presentation to the emergency department. Although routine investigations like clinical exam, labs and eventually x-ray are usually obtained, definitive diagnosis must be established since timely recognition of septic arthritis in particular is crucial. Definitive diagnosis is achieved by performing an arthrocentesis of the affected joint. While arthrocentesis of larger joints and large effusions (e. g. knee) are relatively easy to perform using the landmark-technique, smaller and less accessible joints (shoulder, elbow, hip) are more difficult to access and it is therefore recommended to use ultrasound guidance. Compared with the landmark-technique, ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis is more successful and less painful. Synovial fluid should be analyzed for cell count with differential, crystals as well as for microbiological analysis such as Gram-stain and culture. Once the diagnosis of septic arthritis has been established, irrigation of the joint should be performed by orthopedic surgery. Antibiotic therapy should be withheld until the sampling of synovial fluid has been completed. After exclusion of septic arthritis, acute arthritis due to crystal arthropathy (CPPD or gout) is treated with either glucocorticoid-infiltration of the joint or with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In this article, the different technical aspects of arthrocentesis are discussed, including asepsis, landmark- and ultrasound-guided access, preanalytics and interpretation of the laboratory results.
Topics: Arthrocentesis; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Joint Diseases; Knee Joint; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 32870099
DOI: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001178 -
Biomedical Papers of the Medical... Mar 2015Arthrocentesis is a very gentle method for lavage of the joint space. The principle consists in the introduction of a pair of needles into the upper joint space and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arthrocentesis is a very gentle method for lavage of the joint space. The principle consists in the introduction of a pair of needles into the upper joint space and subsequent lavage using physiological saline or Ringer's solution. Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint is used in both cases of acute closed lock and treatment of various temporomandibular disorders.
METHODS
A literature search in Pubmed database, using key words: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ), Arthrocentesis, indications, technique, results.
CONCLUSION
Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint is a minimally invasive treatment method at the boundary between conservative and surgical therapy. It is usually performed on an out-patient basis under local anaesthesia. It is used both in cases of acute block caused by displacement of the articular disc and also to treat degenerative inflammatory diseases of the joints. The main objective of arthrocentesis is to wash out inflammatory mediators, release the disc, break adhesions, eliminate pain and improve joint mobility. It is a method with a minimum number of complications, it is simple and not demanding in terms of instruments, and it can be performed repeatedly. For this reason, it has become widespread and very popular in the treatment of internal disorders of the temporomandibular joint.
Topics: Arthrocentesis; Humans; Isotonic Solutions; Ringer's Solution; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Therapeutic Irrigation
PubMed: 23579112
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2013.026 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jan 2019The aims of this narrative review were to examine up-to-date literature in order to evaluate the effectiveness of arthrocentesis or injections with platelet-rich plasma... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
The aims of this narrative review were to examine up-to-date literature in order to evaluate the effectiveness of arthrocentesis or injections with platelet-rich plasma in temporomandibular affections and to compare them to arthrocentesis alone or with hyaluronic acid (HA) or to hyaluronic acid injections.
METHODS
The search of international literature was made on the PMC, PubMed and Cochrane databases, including all full-length text of studies on humans focused on osteoarthritis and disc displacements and their treatment with platelet-rich plasma arthrocentesis or injections. All design studies were included in the review and they were examined for three different outcomes: pain, joint sound and mandibular motion. English papers were only selected.
RESULTS
Even though the low number of studies in this field, arthrocentesis with platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich plasma injections in temporomandibular disorders' management were found to be effective in reducing pain and joint sound as well as in improving mandibular motion in a maximum follow-up of 24 months.
CONCLUSION
Comparison to arthrocentesis alone or to HA use in arthrocentesis or by injections provided encouraging results in terms of the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma use.
Topics: Arthrocentesis; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Injections; Pain Measurement; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Range of Motion, Articular; Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30641957
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20020277 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2022The knowledge gap regarding the topography and anatomy of the dromedary's carpal joint must be bridged to improve diagnostic and treatment procedures such as...
The knowledge gap regarding the topography and anatomy of the dromedary's carpal joint must be bridged to improve diagnostic and treatment procedures such as ultrasonography, arthrocentesis, and arthroscopy. Thirty-five distal forelimbs were harvested from 21 dromedaries and studied through gross dissection, casting, ultrasonography, and computerized tomography. Representative three-dimensional models of the joint cavities, recesses, and pouches were obtained using various casting agents. The safety and feasibility of different arthrocentesis approaches were evaluated. This study provides a detailed description of dorsally located joint recesses and palmarly located joint pouches. The dorsomedial and dorsolateral approach is recommended for arthroscopy and arthrocentesis of the radiocarpal and intercarpal joint when the carpus is flexed. However, caution must be exercised during these approaches to prevent needle injury to the articulating cartilage. Caution is necessary to prevent the formation of inadvertent communication between the dorsally located tendon sheaths and joint cavities. Arthrocentesis via the lateral approach to the lateropalmar pouch is the most favourable approach for the radiocarpal joint. A subtendinous synovial bursa was found between the lateropalmar pouch of the radiocarpal joint and the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle. The subtendinous synovial bursa must be considered during the lateral arthrocentesis approach. The palmar approach is not recommended for arthrocentesis due to the high risk of injury to nerves, veins, and arteries located palmarly.
Topics: Animals; Arthrocentesis; Camelus; Carpal Joints; Forelimb; Wrist Joint
PubMed: 35896772
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16801-3 -
MedEdPORTAL : the Journal of Teaching... 2023Musculoskeletal concerns are common, yet residents at our institution lacked arthrocentesis training. We created a workshop to teach residents knee and shoulder...
INTRODUCTION
Musculoskeletal concerns are common, yet residents at our institution lacked arthrocentesis training. We created a workshop to teach residents knee and shoulder arthrocentesis, developed simulated assessment scenarios (SASs) with tools to measure procedural proficiency, and collected validity evidence.
METHODS
A multidisciplinary group conducted a modified Delphi to define content for the workshop, SASs, and assessment tools. We defined minimum thresholds for competence in knee and shoulder arthrocentesis using the modified borderline-group method. We implemented the workshop and SASs in 2020 and 2021 and analyzed assessment tool scoring for statistical reliability and validity. Our program evaluation included SAS performance, participants' survey responses, and change in the number of arthrocenteses performed in the internal medicine (IM) resident primary care clinic.
RESULTS
Sixty-one residents (53 IM, eight physical medicine and rehabilitation [PM&R]) participated. Fifty-two (85%; 46 IM, six PM&R) completed the evaluation survey. We procured data from 48 knee and 65 shoulder SASs for validity evidence. All arthrocentesis SAS performances met the proficiency standard except one resident's shoulder SAS. Validity evidence revealed strong interrater reliability (α = .82 and .77 for knee and shoulder, respectively) and strong relational validity ( < .001 for both procedures). All participants rated workshop quality and usefulness as good or very good. The number of arthrocenteses performed at our institution's primary care clinic increased.
DISCUSSION
We created a workshop to teach residents arthrocentesis and assessment tools with strong validity and reliability evidence. The workshop was well regarded by residents, who applied their arthrocentesis skills during patient care.
Topics: Humans; Shoulder; Arthrocentesis; Reproducibility of Results; Educational Measurement; Internship and Residency
PubMed: 37064429
DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11309 -
Minerva Dental and Oral Science Apr 2023The aim of this paper was to report our experience and to review the literature of arthrocentesis focusing on protocols and results. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of this paper was to report our experience and to review the literature of arthrocentesis focusing on protocols and results.
METHODS
Arthrocentesis with supplemental hyaluronic acid was performed in patients with TMDs between January 2017 and December 2020 at the Division of Maxillofacial Surgery. The maximum interincisal opening (MIO) and pain score were recorded preoperatively (T0), 2 months postoperatively (T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2). A literature search was performed to analyze the same parameters in patients with TMDs. Patient demographic, characteristics and treatment protocols used were also recorded.
RESULTS
This retrospective analysis enrolled 45 patients. Twenty-two patients (20 females, 2 males) with mean age of 37.13 years with internal derangement were included in study group A. Study group B included 23 patients with degenerative joint disease (19 females and 4 males) with mean age of 55.73 years. The outcomes trend of MIO and pain during the follow-up period showed a gradual improvement. Fifty articles meeting the proposed scientific criteria were selected for the literature revision. A range of clinical and procedural variables were analyzed by grouping the studies into two broad categories based on the diagnosis of TMD.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our experience and on the basis of the most accredited scientific studies in the literature, intra-articular injections of HA are beneficial for the improvement of the pain and/or functional symptoms of TMDs.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Arthrocentesis; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Range of Motion, Articular; Pain
PubMed: 37052194
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6329.22.04653-8 -
JAAPA : Official Journal of the... Mar 2016
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Allopurinol; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthrocentesis; Chondrocalcinosis; Colchicine; Diet Therapy; Gout; Gout Suppressants; Humans; Injections, Intra-Articular; Microscopy, Polarization; Radiography; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 26914781
DOI: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000475472.40251.58 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Jul 2023Septic arthritis (SA) in children is an acute inflammatory disease of the joints. If not treated promptly, it could become a surgical emergency. The incidence of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Septic arthritis (SA) in children is an acute inflammatory disease of the joints. If not treated promptly, it could become a surgical emergency. The incidence of the disease in children in Europe is approximately 2-7 per 100,000 children. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate which of these treatments-arthrocentesis, arthrotomy, and arthroscopy-provides better results in children and when to use them.
METHODS
Three independent authors conducted a systematic review of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and MEDLINE databases to assess studies with any level of evidence that reported the surgical outcome of SA. Two senior investigators evaluated and approved each stage's findings.
RESULTS
A total of 488 articles were found. After screening, we chose 24 articles that were suitable for full-text reading based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of our analysis showed that there are no numerically significant differences reported in the literature on clinical and radiographic outcomes by surgical technique.
CONCLUSIONS
We developed an algorithm that could be used if septic arthritis is suspected. Based on our results, the surgical technique to be used will depend on the operator who will perform it.
PubMed: 37511710
DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071097 -
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation Sep 2021To compare intra-operative and postoperative outcomes between the single-puncture and the standard double-puncture techniques of arthrocentesis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of outcomes with the single-puncture and double-puncture techniques of arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To compare intra-operative and postoperative outcomes between the single-puncture and the standard double-puncture techniques of arthrocentesis.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception up to 31 August 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective studies conducted on patients with temporomandibular joint disorders comparing any type of single-puncture arthrocentesis with standard double-puncture arthrocentesis and reporting intra-operative/postoperative outcomes were included. Assessment of the risk of bias was done with the Cochrane Collaboration risk assessment tool.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies were included (12 were RCTs). Analysis of a limited number of studies indicated no difference in pain or maximal mouth opening (MMO) between the single-puncture type-1 or type-2 and the double-puncture technique at various follow-up intervals. Pooled analysis (four studies) demonstrated that the single-puncture type-2 technique requires significantly less operating time as compared to the double-puncture method. No such difference was noted between single-puncture type-1 and double-puncture techniques. Analysis of two studies indicated significantly reduced intra-operative needle relocations with the single-puncture techniques. Studies were not of high quality with concerns of bias in randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding.
CONCLUSIONS
Limited data indicate no difference in pain or MMO with single- or double-puncture techniques of arthrocentesis. Amongst the three techniques, the single-puncture type-2 technique has the advantages of significantly lower operating time and reduced intra-operative needle relocations and it may be the preferred method of TMJ arthrocentesis in clinical practice.
Topics: Arthrocentesis; Humans; Punctures; Range of Motion, Articular; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34273184
DOI: 10.1111/joor.13228 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jun 2024The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopy compared to arthrocentesis and to conservative treatments for temporomandibular joint... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Arthroscopy versus arthrocentesis and versus conservative treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopy compared to arthrocentesis and to conservative treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders. Thirteen controlled studies on various patient outcomes were included after a systematic search in seven electronic databases. Meta-analyses were conducted separately for arthroscopic surgery (AS) and arthroscopic lysis and lavage (ALL), and short-term (<6 months), intermediate-term (6 months to 5 years), and long-term (≥5 years) follow-up periods were considered. No significant differences in pain reduction and complication rates were found between AS or ALL and arthrocentesis. Regarding improvement in maximum mouth opening (MMO), both AS at intermediate-term and ALL at short-term follow-up were equally efficient when compared to arthrocentesis. However, at intermediate-term follow-up, ALL was superior to arthrocentesis for MMO improvement (mean difference 4.9 mm, 95% confidence interval 2.7-7.1 mm). Trial sequential analysis supported the conclusion of the meta-analysis for MMO improvement for ALL versus arthrocentesis studies at intermediate-term follow-up, but not for the other meta-analyses. Insufficient evidence exists to draw conclusions regarding other patient outcomes or about comparisons between arthroscopy and conservative treatments. Due to the low quality of the primary studies, further research is warranted before final conclusions can be drawn regarding the management of temporomandibular joint disorders.
Topics: Humans; Arthroscopy; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Arthrocentesis; Conservative Treatment
PubMed: 38286713
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.01.006