-
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jun 2023Temporomandibular joint disorders are a heterogenic group of clinical conditions, which impair physiological functioning of the masticatory system. Arthrocentesis of the... (Review)
Review
Temporomandibular joint disorders are a heterogenic group of clinical conditions, which impair physiological functioning of the masticatory system. Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint has become a widely approved method for non-invasive treatment, bridging the gap between conservative and surgical approaches. Regardless of technique, treatment is based upon joint lavage and lysis of the inflammatory fibrous tissue adhesions, which, in turn, improves joint mobility and reduces pain and closed lock. Recently, approaches for intra-articular injections have been proposed as adjuvant or replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the most efficient technique of arthrocentesis. A systematic search based on PRISMA guidelines, including a computer search with specific keywords, a reference list search and a manual search, was performed. Relevant articles were selected after three search rounds for final review. The studies pulled for the analysis presented information about the relevant predictors, including the technique of arthrocentesis (single- or two-needle method), fluid used for lavage (Ringer lactate or saline), volume of the fluid, application of the injectable, number of interventions, pain (VAS) and mouth opening scores (MMO) and follow-up. All cohorts showed improvement in mouth opening, but significant pain reduction was observed only in cohorts treated either by arthrocentesis alone or arthrocentesis followed by intra-articular injectables. Intra-articular injectables used alone failed to reduce pain post-operatively when compared to other cohorts. We concluded that both double-needle and single-puncture arthrocentesis techniques are equally efficient. Application of the adjuvant injectable did not improve the outcomes of arthrocentesis performed alone. The volume of the fluid used for joint lavage and its chemical composition were not significant in clinical outcomes. However, due to the lack of homogeneity in the study settings, a meta-analysis could not be applied and a systematic review was conducted. We still, however, state that there is a knowledge gap in the current literature regarding the use of injectables alone, as well as a longitudinal follow-up, which provides information about treatment efficiency. More high-quality and randomized controlled trials are required to shed light on this subject.
PubMed: 37445474
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134439 -
Cranio : the Journal of... May 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between ultrasound (US)-guided arthrocentesis and conventional arthrocentesis for the management of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between ultrasound (US)-guided arthrocentesis and conventional arthrocentesis for the management of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, BioMed Central, CENTRAL, and Google scholar databases were searched up to April 1 2020 for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing US-guided and conventional arthrocentesis.
RESULTS
Four RCTs were included. Pooled analysis did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in pain or maximal mouth opening (MMO) scores after 1 week and 1 month of follow-up between US-guided and conventional arthrocentesis. Studies also reported data on intra-operative needle relocations and operating time but with conflicting results.
CONCLUSION
This study indicates that the use of US during arthrocentesis may not improve postoperative pain and MMO in the short term. Data on intra-operative outcomes are scarce and conflicting for any definitive conclusions. Further high-quality adequately powered RCTs are required to strengthen current evidence.
Topics: Humans; Arthrocentesis; Temporomandibular Joint; Treatment Outcome; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 33044909
DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1829870 -
Wiadomosci Lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland :... 2023The aim: To study the consequences of temporomandibular joint injury and efficacy of arthrocentesis for treatment of post-traumatic internal temporoman-dibular disorders.
OBJECTIVE
The aim: To study the consequences of temporomandibular joint injury and efficacy of arthrocentesis for treatment of post-traumatic internal temporoman-dibular disorders.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Materials and methods: 24 patients who experienced trauma history in the head without jaw fractures underwent CT, ultrasound and/or MRI. TMJ ar¬throcentesis was performed according to a modified method of D. Nitzan (1991) under local anesthesia by means of blockade of the peripheral branch of the auricular-temporal nerve on the background of intravenous sedation.
RESULTS
Results: The ages of the patients varied between 18 and 44 years, and mean was 32,58 years. The causes of trauma were diverse, as traffic accident - 3 (12,5%), assault 12 (50%), hit by materials 3 (12, 5%), and fall-down 6 (25%). According to clinical and radiological signs after traumatic temporomandibular disorders, patients were divided into two groups according to Wilkes classification (1989): 13 patients with stage II (early-middle) and 11 - with stage III (middle).The control ultrasound and MRI carried out 3-6 months after arthrocentesis showed no signs of hemarthrosis in 84.61% of patients with intra-articular disorders of the second degree, and in 72.72% of patients with internal disorders of the third degree, the position and function of the articular disc was restored.
CONCLUSION
Conclusions: Arthrocentesis with TMJ lavage is a minimally invasive surgical manipulation that has proven itself in temporomandibular disorders of traumatic origin, in particular after fractures of the articular process of the mandible.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Arthrocentesis; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Temporomandibular Joint; Fractures, Bone; Accidents, Traffic
PubMed: 36883504
DOI: 10.36740/WLek202301121 -
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and... Oct 2022YouTube has been increasingly used as a source of information by patients in the field of health, but many studies revealed poor information quality. This study...
BACKGROUND
YouTube has been increasingly used as a source of information by patients in the field of health, but many studies revealed poor information quality. This study evaluated the content and quality of YouTube videos on Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis (TMJA) as an information resource for patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
YouTube search with the two keywords "temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis" and "temporomandibular joint lavage" was performed. The first 160 videos were listed for each term according to relevancy. Results were assessed for inclusion and categorized for source, purpose, target, arthrocentesis method described, and the narrator of the videos. An evaluation was performed independently by two oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The quality of videos was analyzed for the content and defined as poor, moderate, and excellent. DISCERN was also performed by scoring between 0 and 5.
RESULTS
A total of 43 videos were evaluated. The most upload source was individual users (46.5%) and the most video upload purpose was information for professionals (37.2%). The method with the most information about was the two-needle technic, which had a rate of 44.2 percent. The average usefulness score of the videos was 3.00 and 57.1% of the videos resulted in poor quality. A statistically significant positive high correlation was found between DISCERN and usefulness scoring (r = 0.793; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The majority of YouTube videos are of poor quality and this situation affects the patients' decisions about treatment. Health professionals should be aware of the content on YouTube and produce high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date information for patient education.
Topics: Arthrocentesis; Humans; Social Media; Temporomandibular Joint; Video Recording
PubMed: 35278759
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.03.011 -
Journal of Cranio-maxillo-facial... Jan 2023This retrospective study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with different temporomandibular joint (TMJ) treatments. Patients were included in the study according to...
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with different temporomandibular joint (TMJ) treatments. Patients were included in the study according to the following inclusion criteria: 1) arthrogenous and/or myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD); 2) Dimitroulis classification category between 1-4; 3) conservative treatment without any improvement at least for 3 months; 4) indication for one of the following TMD treatments: injection of botulinum toxin; arthrocentesis; arthroscopy, and open surgery without alloplastic material; and 5) age ≥16 years. An independent satisfaction questionnaire with 11 queries was applied via phone call to all patients, which included 6 questions using a 10-point Likert scale and 5 yes-or-no questions. The principal outcome was the overall satisfaction with the clinical result of the treatment, and the secondary outcomes were specific satisfaction with the following: 1) pain reduction; 2) range of mouth opening; 3) chewing ability; 4) postoperative recovery; 5) the fulfillment of expectations; 6) treatment choice; 7) treatment recommendation to a friend; and 8) the need for another intervention. Anxiety and depression were also included as variables. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests. A total of 120 patients (mean age 41.20 ± 17.78 years) were enrolled, comprising 109 women (90%) and 11 men (10%). The overall clinical satisfaction of all patients was 8.24 ± 2.23 (mean ± SD), and 97 patients (80.8%) stated that they would repeat the treatment. Patients submitted to TMJ arthrocentesis and arthroscopy had higher overall clinical satisfaction (9.09 ± 0.971 and 9.03 ± 1.13, p = 0.021) followed by open surgery (8.38 ± 1.84). The authors observed three statistically significant correlations: 1) overall clinical satisfaction and patient expectations (r = 0.803; p < 0.0001); 2) overall clinical satisfaction and post-treatment pain (r = -0.299; p = 0.003); and (3) the presence of depression and the need for further TMJ treatment (r = 0.186; p = 0.043). Within the limitations of the study it seems that patient expectations should be addressed ad initium, and the presence of a diagnosis of depression with concomitant TMD must alert the clinical team and patient for the possible need of additional treatment.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Adolescent; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Patient Satisfaction; Range of Motion, Articular; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Arthrocentesis; Pain; Patient Outcome Assessment
PubMed: 36739190
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.01.006 -
JB & JS Open Access 2021The use of ultrasound guidance during knee arthrocentesis has proven to increase operator confidence and accuracy, particularly in novice healthcare providers. Realistic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The use of ultrasound guidance during knee arthrocentesis has proven to increase operator confidence and accuracy, particularly in novice healthcare providers. Realistic and practical means of teaching this procedure to medical trainees are needed. This study is intended to assess the feasibility and efficacy of using formalin-embalmed human cadavers in the instruction of ultrasound-guided knee arthrocentesis to medical trainees.
METHODS
Twenty participants received a 30-minute didactic orientation detailing the principles of ultrasound-guided knee arthrocentesis, followed by a training practicum performed on human cadavers. The practicum included a 25-minute training period, followed by a 15-minute assessment period. Participants were objectively assessed on their ability to independently aspirate synovial fluid from the suprapatellar bursa using ultrasound guidance. Digital pretraining and posttraining questionnaires were administered to evaluate each participant's confidence in their ability to independently locate the site of optimal needle placement and successfully aspirate synovial fluid with the guidance of ultrasound imaging.
RESULTS
An analysis via the Wilcoxon rank sum testing revealed that participant self-confidence increased significantly after training across all assessment items (p < 0.0001). Fifteen participants (75%) successfully aspirated 1 mL of synovial fluid on their first attempt, whereas 3 participants (15%) were successful on their second attempt. Two participants (10%) failed to perform a successful aspiration within the 15-minute time limit. The average time required to aspirate 1 mL of synovial fluid was 41 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound images of the formalin-embalmed suprapatellar bursa are of sufficient quality to use in the instruction of arthrocentesis to medical trainees. Brief instruction using formalin-embalmed cadaver models significantly increases trainee confidence and prepares first-year medical students to successfully and independently perform ultrasound-guided knee arthrocentesis.
PubMed: 34522834
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00071 -
American Journal of Physical Medicine &... May 2023
Topics: Humans; Arthrocentesis; Treatment Outcome; Temporomandibular Joint
PubMed: 36228201
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002118 -
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dec 2018The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of intra-articular analgesics in improving outcomes after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of intra-articular analgesics in improving outcomes after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar databases was performed for papers in English published up to December 2017 reporting the use of intra-articular analgesics after TMJ arthrocentesis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), comparative studies, retrospective studies, and case series were included while case reports, technical reports, animal studies, cadaveric studies, and review papers were excluded.
RESULTS
Of the six studies included in the review, three were RCTs, two were randomized comparative studies, and one was a retrospective study. Both opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been used after TMJ arthrocentesis. Morphine, tramadol, fentanyl, buprenorphine, tenoxicam, and COX-2 inhibitors are the drugs used till date. Placebo-controlled studies reported improved outcomes after TMJ arthrocentesis with morphine and fentanyl but no such results with buprenorphine and tenoxicam. Tramadol was found to be better than COX-2 inhibitor. The quality of literature was not high.
CONCLUSIONS
There is inconclusive evidence in literature on the benefits of using intra-articular analgesics after TMJ arthrocentesis. Well-designed high-quality RCTs with standard protocol studying the effects of intra-articular opioids and NSAIDS after TMJ arthrocentesis would provide stronger evidence on its use.
Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthrocentesis; Humans; Injections, Intra-Articular
PubMed: 30196484
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-018-0720-z -
Journal of Cranio-maxillo-facial... Aug 2021The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes obtained with the use of glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and methylsulfonylmethane (GCM) supplementation... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Does glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and methylsulfonylmethane supplementation improve the outcome of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis management with arthrocentesis plus intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection. A randomized clinical trial.
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes obtained with the use of glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and methylsulfonylmethane (GCM) supplementation after arthrocentesis plus intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) injection. A randomized clinical trial was implemented with adult participants with TMJ-OA who were referred to the author's clinic between February 2014 and May 2015. The sample was entirely composed of patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with a one-session arthrocentesis plus intraarticular HA injection only (control group), or an initial one-session arthrocentesis plus intraarticular HA injection followed by 3 months of GCM supplementation (study group). The predictor variable was management (treatment) technique. The outcome variables were visual analog scale evaluations (masticatory efficiency, pain complaint, joint sound) and mandibular mobility (maximal interincisal opening [MIO], and lateral and protrusive motions of the mandible). The outcome variables were recorded preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Thirty-one participants were enrolled in the study. Five were lost during follow-up. The final study sample consisted of 26 participants (age 28.35 ± 10.85 y): 14 in the control group (age 28.71 ± 10.94 y); and 12 in the study group (age 27.92 ± 11.20 y). Pain complaints (p < 0.001) and joint sounds (p = 0.030 for the control group; p = 0.023 for the study group) showed statistically significant decreases. Masticatory efficiency (p < 0.001 for the control group; p = 0.040 for the study group) and lateral mandibular motion (p = 0.040 for the control group; p = 0.004 for study group) showed statistically significant increases in both groups, whereas MIO and protrusive mandibular motion showed no significant changes in either group (p > 0.05). After estimating the differences between the follow-up and baseline outcomes, the mean changes in the primary outcome variables (VAS scores, MIO, and mandibular motion) showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). Progressions (reparative remodeling) of hard-tissue TMJ structures were observed on CBCT scans of some participants in both groups. These findings suggested that the use of GCM supplementation after arthrocentesis plus intraarticular HA injection produced no additional clinical benefits or improvements for patients with TMJ-OA compared with arthrocentesis plus intraarticular HA injection alone.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Arthrocentesis; Chondroitin Sulfates; Dietary Supplements; Dimethyl Sulfoxide; Glucosamine; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Injections, Intra-Articular; Osteoarthritis; Range of Motion, Articular; Sulfones; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 33685850
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.012 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2018Septic arthritis is an inflammatory joint disease that is induced by pathogens such as . Infection of the joint triggers an acute inflammatory response directed by... (Review)
Review
Septic arthritis is an inflammatory joint disease that is induced by pathogens such as . Infection of the joint triggers an acute inflammatory response directed by inflammatory mediators including microbial danger signals and cytokines and is accompanied by an influx of leukocytes. The recruitment of these inflammatory cells depends on gradients of chemoattractants including formylated peptides from the infectious agent or dying cells, host-derived leukotrienes, complement proteins and chemokines. Neutrophils are of major importance and play a dual role in the pathogenesis of septic arthritis. On the one hand, these leukocytes are indispensable in the first-line defense to kill invading pathogens in the early stage of disease. However, on the other hand, neutrophils act as mediators of tissue destruction. Since the elimination of inflammatory neutrophils from the site of inflammation is a prerequisite for resolution of the acute inflammatory response, the prolonged stay of these leukocytes at the inflammatory site can lead to irreversible damage to the infected joint, which is known as an important complication in septic arthritis patients. Thus, timely reduction of the recruitment of inflammatory neutrophils to infected joints may be an efficient therapy to reduce tissue damage in septic arthritis.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Arthritis, Infectious; Arthrocentesis; Arthroscopy; Cell Movement; Chemokines; Humans; Inflammation; Joints; Leukotrienes; Neutrophil Infiltration; Neutrophils; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Suction
PubMed: 29401737
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020468