-
European Journal of Haematology Mar 2017This review describes the safety of deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), deferasirox (DFX) and combined therapy in young patients less than 25 yr of age with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This review describes the safety of deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), deferasirox (DFX) and combined therapy in young patients less than 25 yr of age with haemoglobinopathies.
METHODS
Searches in electronic literature databases were performed. Studies reporting adverse events associated with iron chelation therapy were included. Study and reporting quality was assessed using AHRQ Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms. Prospective clinical studies were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.
RESULTS
Safety data of 2040 patients from 34 studies were included. Ninety-two case reports of 246 patients were identified. DFX (937 patients) and DFP (667 patients) possess the largest published safety evidence. Fewer studies on combination regimens are available. Increased transaminases were seen in all regimens (3.9-31.3%) and gastrointestinal disorders with DFP and DFX (3.7-18.4% and 5.8-18.8%, respectively). Therapy discontinuations due to adverse events were low (0-4.1%). Reporting quality was selective and poor in most of the studies.
CONCLUSION
Iron chelation therapy is generally safe in young patients, and published data correspond to summary of product characteristics. Each iron chelation regimen has its specific safety risks. DFO seems not to be associated with serious adverse effects in recommended doses. In DFP and DFX, rare, but serious, adverse reactions can occur. Data on combined therapy are scarce, but it seems equally safe compared to monotherapy.
Topics: Chelation Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemoglobinopathies; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Transfusion Reaction
PubMed: 27893170
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12833 -
Cureus Feb 2024This network meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of comparing the efficacy and safety of deferiprone (DFP), deferasirox (DFX), and deferoxamine (DFO) in individuals... (Review)
Review
Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Deferoxamine, Deferasirox, and Deferiprone in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease or Transfusion-Dependent Anemia: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
This network meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of comparing the efficacy and safety of deferiprone (DFP), deferasirox (DFX), and deferoxamine (DFO) in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) or transfusion-dependent anemia. This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)" guidelines. The search was conducted on electronic databases, including PubMed, CINAHIL, and EMBASE, from the inception of databases to January 10, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this study included a change in liver iron concentration (LIC) and a change in ferritin from baseline. For safety analysis, adverse events were compared among three treatment groups. A total of five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that the change in LIC and serum ferritin from baseline was not significantly different in patients with SCD or other anemias. In terms of adverse events, deferiprone was the safest among all. In conclusion, deferiprone demonstrated noninferiority to deferoxamine and deferasirox in measures of iron load, presenting a viable treatment option. Safety outcomes revealed deferasirox carried a higher risk of adverse events compared to deferiprone, supporting its favorable safety profile.
PubMed: 38455804
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53644 -
Expert Review of Hematology 2016Iron chelating agents - deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), and deferasirox (DFX) - are used to treat chronic iron overload in patients with β-thalassemia in an... (Review)
Review
Iron chelating agents - deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), and deferasirox (DFX) - are used to treat chronic iron overload in patients with β-thalassemia in an attempt to reduce morbidity and mortality related to siderosis. Each of the approved iron chelating agents has its own advantages over the others and also has its own risks, whether related to over-chelation or not. In this review, we briefly discuss the methods to monitor the efficacy of iron chelation therapy (ICT) and the evidence behind the use of each iron chelating agent. We also portray the risks and complications associated with each iron chelating agent and recommend strategies to manage adverse events.
Topics: Benzoates; Chelation Therapy; Deferasirox; Deferiprone; Deferoxamine; Disease Management; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Ferritins; Humans; Iron; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Liver; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Myocardium; Pregnancy; Pyridones; Triazoles; beta-Thalassemia
PubMed: 26613264
DOI: 10.1586/17474086.2016.1126176 -
European Journal of Pharmacology Oct 2019Alterations in iron homeostasis are well described in obese patients. The effects of iron chelators on adipose tissue and other organs affected by obesity have been the... (Review)
Review
Alterations in iron homeostasis are well described in obese patients. The effects of iron chelators on adipose tissue and other organs affected by obesity have been the interest of experimental studies, both in vivo and in vitro. The aim of this review was to update the available information indicating the potential of iron chelators as adjuvant drugs in the management of obesity and its comorbidities. The pharmacological actions of iron chelators, mainly deferoxamine, deferasirox, and deferiprone, on adipose tissue and liver alterations associated with obesity, were reviewed. Renal and other organ modifications observed in experimental obesity models (endotoxemia, β-cell function, and systemic inflammation) were included, as well as data from clinical studies that were relevant to this review. The experimental results obtained with iron chelators showed their potential in the control of obesity-induced alterations in the adipose tissue and liver. However, knowledge about the possible systemic effects on endotoxemia and low-grade inflammation in obesity models is still lacking. In endotoxemia in humans, data obtained did not corroborate the anti-inflammatory effect described in experimental models. Clinical and experimental data reveal renal, β-cell protection and inhibition of advanced glycation end products, which have long-term benefits in obesity. Experimental models of obesity demonstrated the beneficial effects of iron chelators on the adipose tissue, liver, kidneys, and β-cells. Hence, clinical studies could be designed to evaluate the potential of iron chelators as a therapeutic option in the management of obesity.
Topics: Animals; Homeostasis; Humans; Iron; Iron Chelating Agents; Obesity
PubMed: 31421090
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172614 -
Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2020Chronic iron overload in beta-thalassemia patients after continuous blood transfusions has caused notable morbidity and mortality in these patients. The once-a-day oral... (Review)
Review
Chronic iron overload in beta-thalassemia patients after continuous blood transfusions has caused notable morbidity and mortality in these patients. The once-a-day oral iron chelator, deferasirox has established efficacy and bearable safety in adults and pediatric thalassemia patients. It is now extensively used for the management of transfusional hemosiderosis. However, a number of studies have revealed a few patients continued to be none respondent or intolerant toward the once-a-day regimen of deferasirox even after the administration of maximum dose recommended by the World Health Organization. In the literature, there were three studies showing the boon of twice in a day dosing of deferasirox among transfusional-dependent beta thalassemia patients. Therefore, a nonsystematic review was conducted on above three studies to ascertain the enhanced effectiveness and tolerability of twice per day regimen of deferasirox with the same total dose as that of once daily regimen of deferasirox in unresponsive or intolerant transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT) patients. All the above studies concluded that the twice per day regimen of deferasirox was more efficacious and tolerable among TDT patients when compared to the once-a-day regimen with the same total daily dose. Although there was a significant good results from these studies, there is a need to conduct either muticenter study or randomized control study in a larger number of patients for the better confirmation of the results as all the above studies were conducted in the small number of TDT patients.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Deferasirox; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Patient Education as Topic; beta-Thalassemia
PubMed: 33666193
DOI: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_333_19 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2021Deferasirox is a first-line therapy for iron overload that can sometimes cause kidney damage. To better define the pattern of tubular damage, a systematic literature... (Review)
Review
Deferasirox is a first-line therapy for iron overload that can sometimes cause kidney damage. To better define the pattern of tubular damage, a systematic literature review was conducted on the United States National Library of Medicine, Excerpta Medica, and Web of Science databases. Twenty-three reports describing 57 individual cases could be included. The majority ( = 35) of the 57 patients were ≤18 years of age and affected by thalassemia ( = 46). Abnormal urinary findings were noted in 54, electrolyte or acid-base abnormalities in 46, and acute kidney injury in 9 patients. Latent tubular damage was diagnosed in 11 (19%), overt kidney tubular damage in 37 (65%), and an acute kidney injury in the remaining nine (16%) patients. Out of the 117 acid-base and electrolyte disorders reported in 48 patients, normal-gap metabolic acidosis and hypophosphatemia were the most frequent. Further abnormalities were, in decreasing order of frequency, hypokalemia, hypouricemia, hypocalcemia, and hyponatremia. Out of the 81 abnormal urinary findings, renal glucosuria was the most frequent, followed by tubular proteinuria, total proteinuria, and aminoaciduria. In conclusion, a proximal tubulopathy pattern may be observed on treatment with deferasirox. Since deferasirox-associated kidney damage is dose-dependent, physicians should prescribe the lowest efficacious dose.
PubMed: 34943300
DOI: 10.3390/children8121104 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014The myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) comprises a diverse group of haematopoietic stem cell disorders. Due to symptomatic anaemia, most people with MDS require supportive... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) comprises a diverse group of haematopoietic stem cell disorders. Due to symptomatic anaemia, most people with MDS require supportive therapy including repeated red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. In combination with increased iron absorption, this contributes to the accumulation of iron resulting in secondary iron overload and the risk of organ dysfunction and reduced life expectancy. Since the human body has no natural means of removing excess iron, iron chelation therapy, i.e. the pharmacological treatment of iron overload, is usually recommended. However, it is unclear whether or not the newer oral chelator deferasirox leads to relevant benefit.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral deferasirox for managing iron overload in people with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases up to 03 April 2014: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Biosis Previews, Web of Science, Derwent Drug File and four trial registries: Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), ICTRP (www.who.int./ictrp/en/), and German Clinical Trial Register (www.drks.de).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing deferasirox with no therapy, placebo or with another iron-chelating treatment schedule.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We did not identify any trials eligible for inclusion in this review.
MAIN RESULTS
No trials met our inclusion criteria. However, we identified three ongoing and one completed trial (published as an abstract only and in insufficient detail to permit us to decide on inclusion) comparing deferasirox with deferoxamine, placebo or no treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We planned to report evidence from RCTs that evaluated the effectiveness of deferasirox compared to either placebo, no treatment or other chelating regimens, such as deferoxamine, in people with MDS. However, we did not identify any completed RCTs addressing this question.We found three ongoing and one completed RCT (published as an abstract only and in insufficient detail) comparing deferasirox with deferoxamine, placebo or no treatment and data will hopefully be available soon. These results will be important to inform physicians and patients on the advantages and disadvantages of this treatment option.
Topics: Benzoates; Chelation Therapy; Deferasirox; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Triazoles
PubMed: 25348770
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007461.pub3 -
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Apr 2021To assess the efficacy and safety of dual oral iron chelation therapy (deferiprone and deferasirox) in decreasing iron overload status, using serum ferritin and liver... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Efficacy and Safety of Combined Oral Chelation with Deferiprone and Deferasirox on Iron Overload in Transfusion Dependent Children with Thalassemia - A Prospective Observational Study.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of dual oral iron chelation therapy (deferiprone and deferasirox) in decreasing iron overload status, using serum ferritin and liver and cardiac MRI as indicators, in transfusion dependent thalassemic children.
METHODS
This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital for a period of one year. Children with thalassemia between 2 and 18 y of age with serum ferritin above 1500 ng/ml were started on oral deferiprone and deferasirox. They were followed up for one year. Serum ferritin and MRI quantification of liver and cardiac iron concentration was done at enrolment and end of 12 mo. They were also monitored monthly for any adverse effects.
RESULTS
Twenty one thalassemic children with mean age of 7.8 y (range 4-12 y) and a mean ferritin value of 3129 + 1231.5 ng/ml were enrolled. Mean serum ferritin decreased by 1226.3 ng/ml (p = 0.047, 95% CI =10.2, 1504.3) with 16.8% fall from baseline. The reduction in ferritin correlated significantly with the initial ferritin level (spearman's rho = 0.742, p = 0.001). Mean liver iron concentration and myocardial iron concentration did not change significantly. Red color urine, transient rise in creatinine and liver enzymes were noted during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS
Combined oral chelation with deferiprone and deferasirox significantly decreases the serum ferritin level in children with severe iron overload. The drugs were tolerated well without any serious adverse effects.
Topics: Benzoates; Child; Deferasirox; Deferiprone; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Pyridones; Thalassemia; beta-Thalassemia
PubMed: 32661609
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-020-03442-5 -
Hemoglobin Sep 2021Deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) are the most well-known, efficacious and safe chelators to reduce the serum ferritin (SF) level in multi transfused thalassemic...
Comparative Efficacy and Safety Between Deferiprone and Deferasirox with Special Reference to Serum Ferritin Level and Cardiac Function in Bengali β-Thalassemia Major Children.
Deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) are the most well-known, efficacious and safe chelators to reduce the serum ferritin (SF) level in multi transfused thalassemic children, although there are few reports available for assessing the efficacy between DFP and DFX. We compared the efficacy of DFP DFX as iron chelating drugs in β-thalassemia major (β-TM) patients. Pediatric patients diagnosed to carry β-TM, aged between 2 and 10 years, were recruited. A suitable data collection form and questionnaire were used. Paired and unpaired -tests were used to compare the safety and efficacy of the chelating drugs DFP and DFX. The mean SF level at the 12th month was found to be 3016.73 ± 670.04 ng/mL ( = 0.002) in the DFX-treated group, which was quite significant in contrast to DFP response, where the value was 3204.06 ± 690.15 ng/mL ( = 0.14). There is no statistically significant ( = 0.15) difference on relative changes of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), between these two groups. The adverse effects were transient and none of them required stoppage of therapy. Deferasirox is more effective when compared to DFP in reducing chelating drug-related complications and iron overload specially in multiple transfusion dependent β-TM patients.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Deferasirox; Deferiprone; Ferritins; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; beta-Thalassemia
PubMed: 34758688
DOI: 10.1080/03630269.2021.1999258 -
Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Sep 2020Endocrine system dysfunctions are the significant complications of excessive iron overload in beta thalassemia patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the...
Endocrine system dysfunctions are the significant complications of excessive iron overload in beta thalassemia patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of chelation with deferasirox on endocrine complications. The study group consisted of children with beta thalassemia who had been evaluated for the growth and pubertal development, bone metabolism, thyroid/parathyroid functions, glucose metabolism dysfunctions in the department of pediatric hematology of Ankara Dışkapı Child Health and Diseases Hematology Oncology Training And Research Hospital between 2009-2011 and reevaluated after deferasirox chelation therapy in 2018. Thirty-one transfusion dependent beta-thalassemia patients were enrolled for the study. Seventeen (54.8%) patients were male and the mean age was 16.9 ± 3.8 (9-23) years. Splenectomy was performed in 11 patients (35.5%). In the initial evaluation, 26 patients (84%) received deferoxamine and/or deferiprone and five (17%) patients received deferasirox as a chelator; in the final evaluation all patients were receiving deferasirox. The mean duration of deferasirox treatment was 5.9 ± 2.02 years (1-10 years). Of the 26 patients who had endocrine complications between 2009-2011, 18 were recovered. In the final evaluation, eight patients (25%) developed new endocrinopathies. The frequency of endocrine complications seen before the deferasirox treatment (83%) was higher than the frequency of complications while receiving deferasirox treatment (25.8%) (p < 0,05). In this study, it was determined that both existing endocrine abnormalities were reduced and recent developed problems were less likely with long-term deferasirox treatment in thalassemia patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Deferasirox; Endocrine System Diseases; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Splenectomy; beta-Thalassemia
PubMed: 32131650
DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2020.1734124