-
Pharmaceutics Aug 2021Deferasirox (DFX) is commonly used to reduce the chronic iron overload (IO) in pediatric patients. However, the drug is characterized by a large pharmacokinetic...
BACKGROUND
Deferasirox (DFX) is commonly used to reduce the chronic iron overload (IO) in pediatric patients. However, the drug is characterized by a large pharmacokinetic variability and approximately 10% of patients may discontinue the treatment due to toxicities. Therefore, the present retrospective study investigated possible correlations between DFX pharmacokinetics and drug-associated toxicities in 39 children (26 males), aged 2-17 years, who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
METHODS
IO was diagnosed by an abdominal magnetic resonance imaging and DFX was started at a median dose of 500 mg/day. DFX plasma concentrations were measured by a high performance liquid chromatographic method with UV detection and they were analysed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.
RESULTS
The pharmacometric analysis demonstrated that DFX pharmacokinetics were significantly influenced by lean body mass (bioavailability and absorption constant), body weight (volume of distribution), alanine and aspartate transaminases, direct bilirubin, and serum creatinine (clearance). Predicted DFX minimum plasma concentrations (C) accounted for 32.4 ± 23.2 mg/L (mean ± SD), and they were significantly correlated with hepatic/renal and hematological toxicities (-value < 0.0001, T-test and Fisher's exact tests) when C threshold values of 7.0 and 11.5 mg/L were chosen, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The population pharmacokinetic model described the interindividual variability and identified C threshold values that were predictive of hepatic/renal and hematological toxicities associated with DFX.
PubMed: 34452199
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081238 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015It has been clearly shown that iron overload adds progressively significant morbidity and mortality in patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT). The... (Review)
Review
It has been clearly shown that iron overload adds progressively significant morbidity and mortality in patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT). The lack of physiological mechanisms to eliminate the excess of iron requires effective iron chelation therapy. The reduced compliance to deferoxamine and the risk of severe hematological adverse events during deferiprone treatment have limited the use of both these drugs to correct iron imbalance in NTDT. According to the principles of evidence-based medicine, following the demonstration of the effectiveness and the safety of deferasirox (Exjade(®)) in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, deferasirox was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2013 for the treatment of iron overload associated with NTDT. This review, assessing the available scientific literature, will focus on the profile of DFX in the treatment of non-transfusional hemosiderosis in patients with NTDT.
Topics: Benzoates; Biomarkers; Deferasirox; Humans; Iron; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Syndrome; Thalassemia; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles
PubMed: 26719673
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S40694 -
Health Science Reports Sep 2021When patients with sickle cell disease have appropriate indications, they can be prescribed hydroxyurea (HU) and deferasirox (DFX) concurrently despite little knowledge...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
When patients with sickle cell disease have appropriate indications, they can be prescribed hydroxyurea (HU) and deferasirox (DFX) concurrently despite little knowledge about how the two medications interact. We wished to analyze whether there was evidence of adverse interaction between HU and DFX when taken simultaneously and hypothesized that those who took both drugs together had similar clinical complications when compared to those who took only one or neither drug.
METHODS
We conducted this retrospective cohort investigation between 2009 and 2016 of persons with SCD in the California Sickle Cell Data Collection Program, a validated database of Californians with SCD a statewide. People in the database who took HU and DFX simultaneously for at least 3 months as compared to those who took either HU or DFX alone or to matched persons who took neither drug were eligible.
RESULTS
We identified 104 people who were prescribed both HU and DFX concurrently, 877 who were prescribed HU only, and 314 who were prescribed DFX only during the study period. We identified 416 matched controls who took neither HU nor DFX. People who took both HU and DFX concurrently had similar rates of ED and inpatient encounters and had similar rates and distribution of adverse effects compared to those who took either HU or DFX alone or took neither drug.
CONCLUSION
Three months of concurrent use of DFX and HU appears safe, but further studies are required to better understand the safety and effectiveness of this medication combination. (Funded by CDC, CDC Foundation, and others).
PubMed: 34277954
DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.323 -
Journal of the American Chemical Society Apr 2022Deferasirox, an FDA-approved iron chelator, has gained increasing attention for use in anticancer and antimicrobial applications. Recent efforts by our group led to the...
Deferasirox, an FDA-approved iron chelator, has gained increasing attention for use in anticancer and antimicrobial applications. Recent efforts by our group led to the identification of this core as an easy-to-visualize aggregation-induced emission platform, or AIEgen, that provides a therapeutic effect equivalent to deferasirox ( , , 3, 1278-1283). However, the emission wavelength of the first-generation system overlapped with that of Syto9, a green emissive dye used to indicate live cells. Here, we report a library of deferasirox derivatives with various fluorescence emission profiles designed to overcome this limitation. We propose referring to systems that show promise as both therapeutic and optical imaging agents as "illuminoceuticals". The color differences between the derivatives were observable to the unaided eye (solid- and solution-state) and were in accord with the Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage (CIE) chromaticity diagram 1913. Each fluorescent derivative successfully imaged the respective spherical and rod shapes of methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and . They also displayed iron-dependent antibiotic activity. Three derivatives, (), (), and (), display emission features that are sufficiently distinct so as to permit the multiplex (triplex) imaging of both MRSA and stimulated emission depletion microscopy. The present deferasirox derivatives allowed for the construction of a multi-fluorophore sensor array. This array enabled the successful discrimination between Gram-positive/Gram-negative and drug-sensitive/drug-resistant bacteria. Antibiotic sensitivity and drug-resistant mutants from clinically isolated strains could also be identified and differentiated.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Deferasirox; Fluorescence; Iron Chelating Agents; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PubMed: 35421310
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c01155 -
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical... 2016
Topics: Adolescent; Aged; Allergens; Benzoates; Blood Transfusion; Child; Deferasirox; Desensitization, Immunologic; Drug Eruptions; Female; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Male; Postoperative Complications; Triazoles; Withholding Treatment
PubMed: 26489716
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.09.007 -
Expert Review of Hematology Jul 2018Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are at increased risk of iron overload due to ineffective erythropoiesis and chronic transfusion therapy. The clinical... (Review)
Review
Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are at increased risk of iron overload due to ineffective erythropoiesis and chronic transfusion therapy. The clinical consequences of iron overload include cardiac and/or hepatic failure, endocrinopathies, and infection risk. Areas covered: Iron chelation therapy (ICT) can help remove excess iron and ultimately reduce the clinical consequences of iron overload. The authors reviewed recent (last five years) English-language articles from PubMed on the topic of iron overload-related complications and the use of ICT (primarily deferasirox) to improve outcomes in patients with MDS. Expert commentary: While a benefit of ICT has been more firmly established in other transfusion-dependent conditions, such as thalassemia, its role in reducing iron overload in MDS remains controversial due to the lack of prospective controlled data demonstrating a survival benefit. Orally administered chelation agents (e.g. deferasirox) are now available, and observational and/or retrospective data support a survival benefit of using ICT in MDS. The placebo-controlled TELESTO trial (NCT00940602) is currently examining the use of deferasirox in MDS patients with iron overload, and is evaluating specifically whether use of ICT to alleviate iron overload can also reduce iron overload-related complications in MDS and improve survival.
Topics: Blood Transfusion; Deferasirox; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate; Transfusion Reaction
PubMed: 29902097
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2018.1486188 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2017Thalassaemia is a hereditary anaemia due to ineffective erythropoiesis. In particular, people with thalassaemia major develop secondary iron overload resulting from... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Thalassaemia is a hereditary anaemia due to ineffective erythropoiesis. In particular, people with thalassaemia major develop secondary iron overload resulting from regular red blood cell transfusions. Iron chelation therapy is needed to prevent long-term complications.Both deferoxamine and deferiprone are effective; however, a review of the effectiveness and safety of the newer oral chelator deferasirox in people with thalassaemia is needed.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral deferasirox in people with thalassaemia and iron overload.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 12 August 2016.We also searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Biosis Previews, Web of Science Core Collection and three trial registries: ClinicalTrials.gov; the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; and the Internet Portal of the German Clinical Trials Register: 06 and 07 August 2015.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled studies comparing deferasirox with no therapy or placebo or with another iron-chelating treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.
MAIN RESULTS
Sixteen studies involving 1807 randomised participants (range 23 to 586 participants) were included. Twelve two-arm studies compared deferasirox to placebo (two studies) or deferoxamine (seven studies) or deferiprone (one study) or the combination of deferasirox and deferoxamine to deferoxamine alone (one study). One study compared the combination of deferasirox and deferiprone to deferiprone in combination with deferoxamine. Three three-arm studies compared deferasirox to deferoxamine and deferiprone (two studies) or the combination of deferasirox and deferiprone to deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapy respectively (one study). One four-arm study compared two different doses of deferasirox to matching placebo groups.The two studies (a pharmacokinetic and a dose-escalation study) comparing deferasirox to placebo (n = 47) in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia showed that deferasirox leads to net iron excretion. In these studies, safety was acceptable and further investigation in phase II and phase III studies was warranted.Nine studies (1251 participants) provided data for deferasirox versus standard treatment with deferoxamine. Data suggest that a similar efficacy can be achieved depending on the ratio of doses of deferoxamine and deferasirox being compared. In the phase III study, similar or superior efficacy for the intermediate markers ferritin and liver iron concentration (LIC) could only be achieved in the highly iron-overloaded subgroup at a mean ratio of 1 mg of deferasirox to 1.8 mg of deferoxamine corresponding to a mean dose of 28.2 mg per day and 51.6 mg per day respectively. The pooled effects across the different dosing ratios are: serum ferritin, mean difference (MD) 454.42 ng/mL (95% confidence interval (CI) 337.13 to 571.71) (moderate quality evidence); LIC evaluated by biopsy or SQUID, MD 2.37 mg Fe/g dry weight (95% CI 1.68 to 3.07) (moderate quality evidence) and responder analysis, LIC 1 to < 7 mg Fe/g dry weight, risk ratio (RR) 0.80 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.92) (moderate quality evidence). The substantial heterogeneity observed could be explained by the different dosing ratios. Data on mortality (low quality evidence) and on safety at the presumably required doses for effective chelation therapy are limited. Patient satisfaction was better with deferasirox among those who had previously received deferoxamine treatment, RR 2.20 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.57) (moderate quality evidence). The rate of discontinuations was similar for both drugs (low quality evidence).For the remaining comparisons in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia, the quality of the evidence for outcomes assessed was low to very low, mainly due to the very small number of participants included. Four studies (205 participants) compared deferasirox to deferiprone; one of which (41 participants) revealed a higher number of participants experiencing arthralgia in the deferiprone group, but due to the large number of different types of adverse events reported and compared this result is uncertain. One study (96 participants) compared deferasirox combined with deferiprone to deferiprone with deferoxamine. Participants treated with the combination of the oral iron chelators had a higher adherence compared to those treated with deferiprone and deferoxamine, but no participants discontinued the study. In the comparisons of deferasirox versus combined deferasirox and deferiprone and that of deferiprone versus combined deferasirox and deferiprone (one study, 40 participants), and deferasirox and deferoxamine versus deferoxamine alone (one study, 94 participants), only a few patient-relevant outcomes were reported and no significant differences were observed.One study (166 participants) included people with non-transfusion dependent thalassaemia and compared two different doses of deferasirox to placebo. Deferasirox treatment reduced serum ferritin, MD -306.74 ng/mL (95% CI -398.23 to -215.24) (moderate quality evidence) and LIC, MD -3.27 mg Fe/g dry weight (95% CI -4.44 to -2.09) (moderate quality evidence), while the number of participants experiencing adverse events and rate of discontinuations (low quality evidence) was similar in both groups. No participant died, but data on mortality were limited due to a follow-up period of only one year (moderate quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Deferasirox offers an important treatment option for people with thalassaemia and secondary iron overload. Based on the available data, deferasirox does not seem to be superior to deferoxamine at the usually recommended ratio of 1 mg of deferasirox to 2 mg of deferoxamine. However, similar efficacy seems to be achievable depending on the dose and ratio of deferasirox compared to deferoxamine. Whether this will result in similar efficacy and will translate to similar benefits in the long term, as has been shown for deferoxamine, needs to be confirmed. Data from randomised controlled trials on rare toxicities and long-term safety are still limited. However, after a detailed discussion of the potential benefits and risks, deferasirox could be offered as the first-line option to individuals who show a strong preference for deferasirox, and may be a reasonable treatment option for people showing an intolerance or poor adherence to deferoxamine.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzoates; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Deferasirox; Deferiprone; Deferoxamine; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Ferritins; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Patient Satisfaction; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thalassemia; Triazoles
PubMed: 28809446
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007476.pub3 -
Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and... 2019Deferoxamine (DFO) or Deferiprone (DFP) or Deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy and DFO and DFP combination therapy (DFO+DFP) were four commonly implemented now chelation... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Deferoxamine (DFO) or Deferiprone (DFP) or Deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy and DFO and DFP combination therapy (DFO+DFP) were four commonly implemented now chelation regimens for the iron overloaded of β-thalassemia major. This systematic review aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of four chelation regimens and provide evidence for the rational use of chelation regimens for β-thalassemia major therapy in the clinic.
METHODS
A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Data, and WanFang Data was conducted in April 2018. In addition, a manual search was performed. Two researchers, working independently, selected the papers, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included documents. Each included paper was evaluated using a checklist developed by Drummond .
RESULTS
The number of records was initially 968, and eight papers met the final eligibility criteria. All the included eight papers were cost-utility analyses, and their methodological quality was fair. In these eight papers, nineteen studies were present. Nine studies of DFX versus DFO had contradictory results. Out of the nineteen studies, three studies of DFX versus DFP established that using DFP was cost-effective. Three studies of DFP versus DFO proved that using DFP was cost-effective. One survey of DFO+DFP versus DFO found that using DFO was cost-effective. One study of DFO+DFP versus DFP found that using DFP was cost-effective. Moreover, there were two studies of DFO+DFP versus DFX, but we cannot be sure which one of two chelation regimens was cost-effective.
CONCLUSION
In brief, DFP is cost-effective, followed by DFO or DFX, when an iron chelator is to be used alone for β-thalassemia iron overload treatment. All studies that compared DFO+DFP with DFO (or DFP) monotherapy established that the DFO+DFP was not cost-effective. Existing studies about DFO+DFP versus DFX could not prove which one of two chelation regimens was cost-effective. However, due to the low number of DFO+DFP versus DFO (or DFP or DFX) monotherapy studies, more extensive, high-quality research is required for further analysis and confirmation of our findings. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness is not an absolute issue when in different countries (regions) the results are opposite for other countries (regions). As a result, the local/national context had a substantial influence on the results of the pharmacoeconomic evaluation.
PubMed: 31308912
DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2019.036 -
The Journal of International Advanced... Apr 2017In this study, we aimed to detect the incidences of ototoxicity in patients with hemoglobinopathies taking deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone, and deferasirox using the...
OBJECTIVE
In this study, we aimed to detect the incidences of ototoxicity in patients with hemoglobinopathies taking deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone, and deferasirox using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale to obtain more objective data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty-five transfusion-dependent patients were evaluated in this study. The NCI CTCAE scale was used to assess ototoxicity levels. The average ferritin and hemoglobin levels, the type of iron chelator, and the duration of therapy of all the patients were recorded.
RESULTS
Ototoxicity was observed in 15 patients (31.9 %), all of whom were taking DFO. The median age was 19.5 (6-43) in patients without ototoxicity and 29 (16-50) in those with ototoxicity; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The median ferritin and pre-tx Hb levels were 1391 ng/mL and 9.06 mg/dL, respectively, in patients with ototoxicity and 986.7 ng/mL and 9.24 mg/dL, respectively, in those without ototoxicity; these differences were not significant (p>0.05). Ototoxicity was not observed in the eight patients who used only deferasirox and deferiprone.
CONCLUSION
The ototoxicity incidence with DFO at doses below 50 mg/kg/day was 27.3%. Deferiprone and deferasirox were not associated with ototoxic effects in patients taking these drugs.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Chelation Therapy; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ear Diseases; Female; Humans; Incidence; Iron Chelating Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Thalassemia; Turkey
PubMed: 27879229
DOI: 10.5152/iao.2016.1852 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2021With the aim of repositioning commercially available drugs for the inhibition of the anti-apoptotic myeloid cell leukemia protein, Mcl-1, implied in various cancers,...
INTRODUCTION
With the aim of repositioning commercially available drugs for the inhibition of the anti-apoptotic myeloid cell leukemia protein, Mcl-1, implied in various cancers, five molecules, highlighted from a published theoretical screening, were selected to experimentally validate their affinity toward Mcl-1.
RESULTS
A detailed NMR study revealed that only two of the five tested drugs, Torsemide and Deferasirox, interacted with Mcl-1. NMR data analysis allowed the complete characterization of the binding mode of both drugs to Mcl-1, including the estimation of their affinity for Mcl-1. Biological assays evidenced that the biological activity of Torsemide was lower as compared to the Deferasirox, which was able to efficiently and selectively inhibit the anti-apoptotic activity of Mcl-1. Finally, docking and molecular dynamics led to a 3D model for the Deferasirox:Mcl-1 complex and revealed the positioning of the drug in the Mcl-1 P2/P3 pockets as well as almost all synthetic Mcl-1 inhibitors. Interestingly, contrary to known synthetic Mcl-1 inhibitors which interact through Arg263, Deferasirox, establishes a salt bridge with Lys234.
CONCLUSION
Deferasirox could be a potential candidate for drug repositioning as Mcl-1 inhibitor.
Topics: Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Deferasirox; Drug Repositioning; Lenalidomide; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Molecular Structure; Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 Protein; Oxcarbazepine; Risperidone; Torsemide
PubMed: 34949914
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S323077