-
Drugs & Aging Feb 2023Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents...
Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the older population given overlap with other causes of encephalopathy, complicating diagnosis, and the common occurrence of multiple comorbid diseases complicates treatment. First-line therapy involves the use of rescue benzodiazepine in the form of intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, intramuscular or intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam. Second-line therapies include parenteral levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, valproate and lacosamide, and underlying comorbidities guide the choice of appropriate medication, while third-line therapies may be influenced by the patient's code status as well as the cause and type of SE. The standard of care for convulsive SE is treatment with an intravenous anesthetic, including midazolam, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital. There is currently limited evidence guiding appropriate therapy in patients failing third-line therapies. Adjunctive strategies may include immunomodulatory treatments, non-pharmacological strategies such as ketogenic diet, neuromodulation therapies and surgery in select cases. Surrogate decision makers should be updated early and often in refractory episodes of SE and informed of the high morbidity and mortality associated with the disease as well as the high probability of subsequent epilepsy among survivors.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Midazolam; Status Epilepticus; Diazepam; Benzodiazepines
PubMed: 36745320
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00998-z -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Feb 2021Age-related changes in disposition of diazepam and its principal active metabolite, desmethyldiazepam (DMDZ), during and after extended dosage with diazepam were studied... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Age-related changes in disposition of diazepam and its principal active metabolite, desmethyldiazepam (DMDZ), during and after extended dosage with diazepam were studied in healthy volunteers. Eight elderly subjects (ages 61-78 years) and 7 young subjects (21-33 years) received 2.5 mg of diazepam twice daily for 15 days. Predose (trough) concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were measured during the 15 days of dosing, and in the postdosage washout period. Kinetic properties were determined by nonlinear regression using a sequential drug-to-metabolite pharmacokinetic model. Steady-state plasma concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were 30% to 35% higher in elderly subjects compared to young volunteers, and steady-state clearances correspondingly lower, though differences did not reach significance. Large and significant differences were found between young and elderly groups in mean half-life of diazepam (31 vs 86 hours; P < .005) and DMDZ (40 vs 80 hours; P < .02). Half-life values from the multiple-dose study were closely correlated with values from previous single-dose studies of diazepam (R = 0.85) and DMDZ (R = 0.94) in the same subjects. With extended dosing of diazepam in the elderly, slow accumulation and delayed washout of diazepam and DMDZ is probable. After discontinuation, withdrawal or rebound effects are reduced in likelihood, but delayed recovery from sedative effects is possible due to slow elimination of active compounds. Safe treatment of elderly patients with diazepam is supported by understanding of age-related changes in pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aging; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Diazepam; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Young Adult
PubMed: 32856316
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1726 -
Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Jan 2021Distresses may induce behavioral phenotypes constituting heuristic models for psychopharmacology studies. In several species, including , antidepressants counteract...
Distresses may induce behavioral phenotypes constituting heuristic models for psychopharmacology studies. In several species, including , antidepressants counteract stress-induced phenotypes allowing the use of these models to test new psychoactive drugs. Here, we developed a novel and time-efficient protocol to provoke stress-induced phenotypes in for the study of psychopharmacological agents. In the first experiment, flies ( = 12/groups) were exposed to a random-sequence of different types of stresses during nearly 24 h (including social isolation, fasting, heat, and electric shock), a protocol named short-term variable stress (SVS). Second, flies were exposed to a single stressful stimulus (social isolation, fasting, heat shock or electric shock, = 12/groups). Next, flies submitted to SVS protocol were treated with vehicle, diazepam or fluoxetine ( = 12/groups). At the end of the stress protocols, behavioral phenotypes were evaluated in the open field (OF) and sucrose preference tests. In comparison to the unstressed group, flies exposed to SVS exhibited hyperactivity, as well as shorter times exploring the boundaries of the OF. In contrast to fasting stress, SVS reduced sucrose preference in flies. By analyzing the effects of individual stimuli on fly behavior, fasting and electric shock appear to be the predominant influences on the SVS-induced behaviors. Although fluoxetine or diazepam reduced the initial locomotor activity of flies, no treatment prevented the sequelae of SVS. Altogether, this study provides a time-efficient model system for the study of stress-mediated hyperactivity and anhedonia-like state resistant to fluoxetine and diazepam. The applications of SVS in to preclinical psychopharmacology require further studies. LAY SUMMARY Exposition to unpredictable stress plays a significant role in psychiatric disorder's onset. Behavioral traits of these disorders can be partially modeled in rodents aimed at developing psychopharmacological therapies. However, studies in rodents were questioned by ethical issues. Focused on 3Rs principles, we developed a preclinical model for stress and psychopharmacology research in . Variable stress induced behavioral alterations, including hyperlocomotion and reduced preference for sucrose in flies. However, behavioral alterations were resistant to fluoxetine and diazepam.
Topics: Anhedonia; Animals; Diazepam; Disease Models, Animal; Drosophila; Fluoxetine; Stress, Psychological
PubMed: 32319840
DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2020.1759547 -
Epilepsia Sep 2022The primary goal of treatment for seizure clusters is cessation of the cluster to avoid progression to more severe conditions, such as prolonged seizures and status... (Review)
Review
The primary goal of treatment for seizure clusters is cessation of the cluster to avoid progression to more severe conditions, such as prolonged seizures and status epilepticus. Rescue therapies are key components of treatment plans for patients with seizure clusters. Three rescue therapies are approved in the United States for the treatment of seizure clusters: diazepam rectal gel, midazolam nasal spray, and diazepam nasal spray. This review characterizes the pharmacological function of rescue therapies for seizure clusters, as well as describing γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABA ) receptor functions. GABA receptors are heteropentamers, consisting primarily of α1-6, β1-3, γ2, and δ subunits in the central nervous system. These subunits can traffic to and from the membrane to regulate membrane potential. Benzodiazepines, such as diazepam and midazolam, are positive allosteric modulators of GABA receptors, the activation of which leads to an increase in intracellular chloride, hyperpolarization of the cell membrane, and a reduction in excitation. GABA receptor subunit mutations, dysregulation of trafficking, and degradation are associated with epilepsy. Although benzodiazepines are effective GABA receptor modulators, individual formulations have unique profiles in practice. Diazepam rectal gel is an effective rescue therapy for seizure clusters; however, adults and adolescents may have social reservations regarding its administration. Intranasal delivery of midazolam or diazepam is a promising alternative to rectal administration because these formulations offer easy, socially acceptable administration and exhibit a rapid onset. Off-label benzodiazepines, such as orally disintegrating lorazepam and intranasal use of an intravenous formulation of midazolam via nasal atomizer, are less well characterized regarding bioavailability and tolerability compared with approved agents.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Diazepam; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Midazolam; Nasal Sprays; Receptors, GABA-A; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
PubMed: 35999174
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17341 -
Pharmacological Reports : PR Oct 2017Statins and benzodiazepines are widely used drugs, especially in ischemic heart disease, where exacerbation caused by anxiety can even lead to cardiac death. There have...
BACKGROUND
Statins and benzodiazepines are widely used drugs, especially in ischemic heart disease, where exacerbation caused by anxiety can even lead to cardiac death. There have not been any reports of statin drug interaction with anxiolytics so far, but it is possible that these drugs interact with each other. We examined the effect of chronic oral administration of simvastatin on the anxiolytic activity and pharmacokinetics of diazepam in rats.
METHODS
Studies were conducted on male Wistar Han rats treated with simvastatin (2.5, 5, 10, 20mg/kg) for 4-6 weeks, and/or diazepam (2.5, 5, 10mg/kg) administered once on the day of the study. Evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic interaction was based on the behavioral tests: elevated plus maze (EPM) test and the Vogel conflict test (VCT). The assessment of the potential pharmacokinetic interaction was based on measurements of concentrations of diazepam and its metabolites in the blood of animals.
RESULTS
Diazepam 5 and 10mg/kg given together with simvastatin 10 and 20mg/kg showed no anxiolytic effect in the EPM test. In the VCT diazepam combinations with simvastatin did not produce any anxiolytic effect either, with an exception of the co-administration of diazepam 10mg/kg and simvastatin 10mg/kg. Simvastatin (20mg/kg) significantly reduced the area under curve (AUC) of diazepam by 51.6% and temazepam by 54.6%.
CONCLUSIONS
Abolition of diazepam anxiolytic effect during concomitant use of simvastatin is probably caused by diminished bioavailability of diazepam, although pharmacodynamic interaction between these drugs cannot be excluded.
Topics: Animals; Anticholesteremic Agents; Anxiety; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Diazepam; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male; Rats; Simvastatin
PubMed: 28666152
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.03.012 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2023We aimed to evaluate the potential anxiolytic effects of premedication with pregabalin, compared with diazepam and placebo. We conducted this non-inferiority,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
We aimed to evaluate the potential anxiolytic effects of premedication with pregabalin, compared with diazepam and placebo. We conducted this non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in ASA classification I-II patients aged 18-70 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. They were allocated to receive pregabalin (75 mg the night before surgery and 150 mg 2 h before surgery), diazepam (5 and 10 mg in the same manner) or placebo. Preoperative anxiety was evaluated using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) and Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) before and after premedication. Sleep quality, sedation level, and adverse effects were assessed as secondary outcomes. A total of 231 patients were screened and 224 completed the trial. The mean change (95%CI) in anxiety scores from before to after medication in pregabalin, diazepam, and placebo groups for VNRS were - 0.87 (- 1.43, - 0.30), - 1.17 (- 1.74, - 0.60), and - 0.99 (- 1.56, - 0.41), and for APAIS were - 0.38 (- 1.04, 0.28), - 0.83 (- 1.49, - 0.16), and - 0.27 (- 0.95, 0.40). The difference in change for pregabalin versus diazepam was 0.30 (- 0.50, 1.11) for VNRS and 0.45 (- 0.49, 1.38) for APAIS, exceeding the limit of inferiority for APAIS of 1.3. Sleep quality was statistically different between pregabalin and placebo groups (p = 0.048). Sedation in pregabalin and diazepam groups were significantly higher than placebo group (p = 0.008). No significant differences of other side effects, except dry mouth was higher in placebo group compared with diazepam (p = 0.006). The study filed to provide evidence at non-inferiority of pregabalin compared to diazepam. Furthermore, premedication with either pregabalin or diazepam did not significantly reduce the preoperative anxiety in comparison to placebo, despite the fact that both resulted in higher levels of sedation. Clinicians should weigh the benefits and risks of premedication with these 2 drugs.Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20190424001 (24/04/2019) Registry URL: https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ .
Topics: Humans; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Pregabalin; Diazepam; Anxiety; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Anesthesia, General; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37322140
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36616-0 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Dec 2023Protein posttranslational modification regulates synaptic protein stability, sorting and trafficking, and is involved in emotional disorders. Yet the molecular...
Protein posttranslational modification regulates synaptic protein stability, sorting and trafficking, and is involved in emotional disorders. Yet the molecular mechanisms regulating emotional disorders remain unelucidated. Here we report unknown roles of protein palmitoylation/nitrosylation crosstalk in regulating anxiety-like behaviors in rats. According to the percentages of open arm duration in the elevated plus maze test, the rats were divided into high-, intermediate- and low-anxiety groups. The palmitoylation and nitrosylation levels were detected by acyl-biotin exchange assay, and we found low palmitoylation and high nitrosylation levels in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) of high-anxiety rats. Furthermore, we observed that 2-bromopalmitate (2-BP), a palmitoylation inhibitor, induced anxiety-like behaviors, accompanied with decreased amplitude and frequency of mEPSCs and mIPSCs in the BLA. Additionally, we also found that inhibiting nNOS activity with 7-nitroindazole (7-NI) in the BLA caused anxiolytic effects and reduced the synaptic transmission. Interestingly, diazepam (DZP) rapidly elevated the protein palmitoylation level and attenuated the protein nitrosylation level in the BLA. Specifically, similar to DZP, the voluntary wheel running exerted DZP-like anxiolytic action, and induced high palmitoylation and low nitrosylation levels in the BLA. Lastly, blocking the protein palmitoylation with 2-BP induced an increase in protein nitrosylation level, and attenuating the nNOS activity by 7-NI elevated the protein palmitoylation level. Collectively, these results show a critical role of protein palmitoylation/nitrosylation crosstalk in orchestrating anxiety behavior in rats, and it may serve as a potential target for anxiolytic intervention.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Basolateral Nuclear Complex; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Lipoylation; Motor Activity; Anxiety; Diazepam
PubMed: 37948993
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115859 -
Neuropharmacology Jun 2023Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 4 inhibitor that is nonselective at subtypes PDE4A-D. It modulates ethanol and GABAergic responses via protein kinase A...
Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 4 inhibitor that is nonselective at subtypes PDE4A-D. It modulates ethanol and GABAergic responses via protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation of specific GABA receptor subunits and has opposite effects on ethanol-induced ataxia in wild-type and GABA β3-S408/409A knock-in mice. We hypothesized that these different effects are due to preferential actions at different PDE4 subtypes. To test this hypothesis, we compared effects of selective PDE4 inhibitors on responses to ethanol and GABAergic drugs in male and female C57BL/6J mice. The PDE4B inhibitor A33 accelerated recovery from ataxia induced by ethanol and diazepam but did not alter ataxia induced by propofol. The PDE4D inhibitor D159687 accelerated recovery from diazepam-induced ataxia but prolonged recovery from ethanol- and propofol-induced ataxia. A33 shortened, while D159687 prolonged, the sedative-hypnotic effects of ethanol. Both drugs shortened diazepam's sedative-hypnotic effects. The modulatory effects of A33 and D159687 were completely prevented by the PKA inhibitor H89. Only D159687 prevented development of acute functional tolerance to ethanol-induced ataxia. D159687 transiently reduced two-bottle choice drinking in male and female mice that had consumed ethanol for 3 weeks and transiently reduced two-bottle choice, every-other-day drinking in male mice. A33 did not alter ethanol drinking in either procedure. Neither drug altered binge-like ethanol consumption or blood ethanol clearance. Thus, D159687 produced behavioral effects similar to apremilast, although it produced a more transient and smaller reduction in drinking. These results indicate that PDE4D inhibition contributes to apremilast's ability to reduce ethanol drinking, whereas PDE4B inhibition is not involved.
Topics: Mice; Male; Female; Animals; Ethanol; Propofol; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Ataxia; Diazepam
PubMed: 36935006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109508 -
Nature Neuroscience Mar 2022Benzodiazepines are widely administered drugs to treat anxiety and insomnia. In addition to tolerance development and abuse liability, their chronic use may cause...
Benzodiazepines are widely administered drugs to treat anxiety and insomnia. In addition to tolerance development and abuse liability, their chronic use may cause cognitive impairment and increase the risk for dementia. However, the mechanism by which benzodiazepines might contribute to persistent cognitive decline remains unknown. Here we report that diazepam, a widely prescribed benzodiazepine, impairs the structural plasticity of dendritic spines, causing cognitive impairment in mice. Diazepam induces these deficits via the mitochondrial 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO), rather than classical γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors, which alters microglial morphology, and phagocytosis of synaptic material. Collectively, our findings demonstrate a mechanism by which TSPO ligands alter synaptic plasticity and, as a consequence, cause cognitive impairment.
Topics: Animals; Benzodiazepines; Cognition; Diazepam; Mice; Microglia; Mitochondrial Proteins; Receptors, GABA
PubMed: 35228700
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01013-9 -
Phytotherapy Research : PTR May 2023Anxiety disorders are prevalent conditions in the world population, whose standard approaches include pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and combinations of these... (Review)
Review
Anxiety disorders are prevalent conditions in the world population, whose standard approaches include pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and combinations of these interventions. Different classes of psychopharmaceuticals are recommended as the first line of drugs to treat these disorders, which can have several adverse effects, treatment resistance, dependence, and drug-drug interactions making it necessary to search for new therapeutic agents. In particular, diazepam (DZP), a prototype drug from the group of benzodiazepines, has been commonly used and evaluated for its efficacy and safety in different anxiety disorders in clinical trials. DZP is also the most widely used reference standard in in vivo pharmacological assays of natural compounds. However, translating the results obtained in different rodent species and physiological anxiety tests instead of psychopathological animal models that can be of clinical application remains challenging. A systematic review of scientific articles published between 2010 and 2020 that included in vivo pre-clinical tests to define the anxiolytic, sedative and/or hypnotic effect of flower extracts is proposed. PRISMA and Rayyan were used for the selection of studies using four databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and QInsight), using the keywords: "Animals," "Anxiolytic," "Diazepam," "Elevated Plus Maze," "Flower Extracts," "Insomnia," "In vivo," "Mice," "Open Field Test," "Pre clinical" and "Sedative." The characteristics of anxiety studies in animal models, other studies related to locomotor activity, and the hypnotic effect of the extracts were compiled. Twenty-four articles were included, 21 of them performed the animal model of anxiety-like behavior of the elevated plus maze, seven the open field test, and six the light-dark box test. The locomotor activity was evaluated in 10 studies after the administration of the extracts to the animals to define their sedative effect, where only one defined that the extract (Matricaria chamomilla) had a sedative effect. The plants declared with this type of activity were Achyranthes aspera, Alcea aucheri, Brassica nigra, Cananga odorata, Carthamus tinctorius, Chrysanthemum indicum, Citrus aurantium, Couroupita guianensis, Echium amoenum, Erythrina berteroana, Gardenia jasminoides, Hibiscus tilliaceus, Lavandula officinalis, Lawsonia inermis, Matricaria chamomilla, Melia azedarach, Nerium oleander, Passiflora incarnata, Plumeria rubra, Salix aegyptiaca, Syzygium aromaticum, Tagetes erecta, Tilia americana. Although this review showed that some flower extracts have an anxiolytic effect as effective as diazepam, their therapeutic utility in anxiety disorders remains to be extensively demonstrated. Hence, more reliable and predictive behavioral tests and appropriate strategies for the experimental designs are needed to obtain more conclusive evidence with clinical significance.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Research Design; Plant Extracts; Anxiety; Diazepam; Oils, Volatile; Maze Learning; Flowers; Behavior, Animal
PubMed: 37039741
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7830