-
Digestive Surgery 2020Bile duct injury (BDI) is a devastating complication following cholecystectomy. After initial management of BDI, patients stay at risk for late complications including...
BACKGROUND
Bile duct injury (BDI) is a devastating complication following cholecystectomy. After initial management of BDI, patients stay at risk for late complications including anastomotic strictures, recurrent cholangitis, and secondary biliary cirrhosis.
METHODS
We provide a comprehensive overview of current literature on the long-term outcome of BDI. Considering the availability of only limited data regarding treatment of anastomotic strictures in literature, we also retrospectively analyzed patients with anastomotic strictures following a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) from a prospectively maintained database of 836 BDI patients.
RESULTS
Although clinical outcomes of endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical treatment of BDI are good with success rates of around 90%, quality of life (QoL) may be impaired even after "clinically successful" treatment. Following surgical treatment, the incidence of anastomotic strictures varies from 5 to 69%, with most studies reporting incidences around 10-20%. The median time to stricture formation varies between 11 and 30 months. Long-term BDI-related mortality varies between 1.8 and 4.6%. Of 91 patients treated in our center for anastomotic strictures after HJ, 81 (89%) were treated by percutaneous balloon dilatation, with a long-term success rate of 77%. Twenty-four patients primarily or secondarily underwent surgical revision, with recurrent strictures occurring in 21%.
CONCLUSIONS
The long-term impact of BDI is considerable, both in terms of clinical outcomes and QoL. Treatment should be performed in tertiary expert centers to optimize outcomes. Patients require a long-term follow-up to detect anastomotic strictures. Strictures should initially be managed by percutaneous dilatation, with surgical revision as a next step in treatment.
Topics: Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y; Bile Ducts; Cholangitis; Cholecystectomy; Constriction, Pathologic; Dilatation; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Jejunum; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Recurrence; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 30654363
DOI: 10.1159/000496432 -
Surgical Endoscopy Jul 2019The drawback of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with the double-stapling technique (DST) using a transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA)...
Stenosis after esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-double-stapling technique using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the patient's left side following laparoscopic total gastrectomy.
BACKGROUND
The drawback of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with the double-stapling technique (DST) using a transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) following laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is not only the high incidence of stenosis but also the presence of intractable stenosis that is refractory to endoscopic treatments.
METHODS
From November 2013 to December 2016, 24 patients with gastric cancer underwent intracorporeal circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-double-stapling technique (hemi-DST) using the OrVil™ in antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the left side of the patient following LTG to prevent twisting of the esophagojejunostomy and lifted jejunum, which might cause intractable stenosis of the esophagojejunostomy.
RESULTS
In this patient series, no twisting of the esophagojejunostomy and lifted jejunum was encountered intraoperatively or postoperatively. Two stenoses of the esophagojejunostomy occurred. Because neither was involved with twisting and both were localized at the anastomotic plane, endoscopic treatments including balloon dilation and electrocautery incisional therapy were successful in both cases. There were no patients with intractable stenosis in this series.
CONCLUSIONS
Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-DST using the OrVil™ in antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the left side of the patient can be one option for a circular stapling technique in LTG due to its prevention of intractable stenosis of the esophagojejunostomy that is refractory to endoscopic treatments.
Topics: Aged; Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y; Constriction, Pathologic; Esophagostomy; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Jejunostomy; Laparoscopy; Male; Middle Aged; Stomach Neoplasms; Suture Techniques
PubMed: 30341648
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6484-6 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Apr 2021
Topics: Colon; Constriction, Pathologic; Gastroschisis; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Intestinal Atresia; Jejunum; Male
PubMed: 33853208
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMicm2029281 -
Magyar Sebeszet Aug 2015The authors report the case of a 68-year-old patient who presented with dysphagia 4 months after a mesh-reinforced antireflux surgery. Examinations revealed partial...
CASE PRESENTATION
The authors report the case of a 68-year-old patient who presented with dysphagia 4 months after a mesh-reinforced antireflux surgery. Examinations revealed partial penetration of the mesh into the esophagus. During an expedited surgery, the mesh was removed through thoraco-laparotomy. Distal esophagus and proximal gastric resections were carried out due to longitudinal perforation site and esophageal stricture, and the continuity of the alimentary tract was restored with jejunal interposition. At the 3-month follow-up visit the patient was asymptomatic and a swallow examination showed normal conditions after the surgery.
DISCUSSION
Several studies have shown that primary closure of large hiatal hernias is associated with high recurrence rate. In order to reduce this ratio, mesh reinforcement of the crural repair was introduced to prevent reherniation. Therefore, the incidence of recurrence has indeed decreased, however, mesh-related complications have increased. Because of the special anatomical site, the mesh around the gastroesophageal junction is in continuous movement and this can potentially lead to complications such as esophageal erosion, perforation or extensive fibrosis and stenosis. These complications may cause severe, even life-threatening conditions that could only be treated with difficult surgeries. Based on the experience of our case and the review of the literature, we would like to highlight one of the potential, serious complications of mesh-reinforced hiatal repair.
PubMed: 26284803
DOI: 10.1556/1046.68.2015.4.4 -
Radiographics : a Review Publication of... Aug 2023Radiologic evaluation of neonatal bowel obstruction is challenging owing to the overlapping clinical features and imaging appearances of the most common differential...
Radiologic evaluation of neonatal bowel obstruction is challenging owing to the overlapping clinical features and imaging appearances of the most common differential diagnoses. The key to providing an appropriate differential diagnosis comes from a combination of the patient's gestational age, clinical features, and imaging findings. While assessment of radiographs can confirm bowel obstruction and indicate whether it is likely proximal or distal, additional findings at upper or lower gastrointestinal contrast study together with use of US are important in providing an appropriate differential diagnosis. The authors provide an in-depth assessment of the appearances of the most common differential diagnoses of proximal and distal neonatal bowel obstruction at abdominal radiography and upper and lower gastrointestinal contrast studies. These are divided into imaging patterns and their associated differential diagnoses on the basis of abdominal radiographic findings. These findings include esophageal atresia variants including the "single bubble," "double bubble," and "triple bubble" and distal bowel obstruction involving the small and large bowel. Entities discussed include esophageal atresia, hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, pyloric atresia, duodenal atresia, duodenal web, malrotation with midgut volvulus, jejunal atresia, ileal atresia, meconium ileus, segmental volvulus, internal hernia, colonic atresia, Hirschsprung disease, and functional immaturity of the large bowel. The authors include the advantages of abdominal US in this algorithm, particularly for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, duodenal web, malrotation with midgut volvulus, and segmental volvulus. RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Intestinal Volvulus; Esophageal Atresia; Pyloric Stenosis, Hypertrophic; Intestinal Obstruction; Duodenal Obstruction; Digestive System Abnormalities; Radiography, Abdominal; Duodenal Diseases
PubMed: 37471246
DOI: 10.1148/rg.230035 -
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal =... Dec 2021Objective To explore the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with Heyde syndrome (HS) who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods Electronic... (Review)
Review
Objective To explore the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with Heyde syndrome (HS) who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Ovid, WANFANG, VIP and CNKI were searched to identify all case reports of HS patients undergoing AVR surgery, using different combinations of search terms "Heyde syndrome", "gastrointestinal bleeding", "aortic stenosis", and "surgery". Three authors independently extracted the clinical data including the patients' characteristics, aortic stenosis severity, gastrointestinal bleeding sites, surgical treatments and prognosis. Results Finally, 46 case reports with 55 patients aging from 46 to 87 years, were determined eligible and included. Of them, 1 patient had mild aortic stenosis, 1 had moderate aortic stenosis, 42 had severe aortic stenosis, and 11 were not mentioned. Gastrointestinal bleeding was detected in colon (=8), jejunum (=6), ileum (=4), cecum (=3), duodenal (=3) and multiple sites (=8). No specific bleeding site was identified in 23 patients. Preoperative hemoglobin level ranged from 43 to 117 g/L. All but one of 16 patients showed decreased level of high molecule weight von Willebrand factor. Of the 55 patients, 43 underwent AVR, and 12 received transcatheter AVR. Aortic valves of 14 cases were replaced by mechanical valves, and 33 cases by biological valves. All patients recovered well during the follow-up, except 5 patients. One patient who had perivalvular leakage and gastrointestinal bleeding after AVR underwent the second AVR. Two patients had recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. Two patients died of life-threatening acute subdural hematoma and multiple organ failure, respectively. Conclusions HS is a rare syndrome characterized by aortic stenosis and gastrointestinal bleeding. AVR is an effective treatment for HS.
Topics: Angiodysplasia; Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34986967
DOI: 10.24920/003881 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2022Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EoGE) is a rare digestive disorder characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach and intestines. In the diagnosis of EoE, it is... (Review)
Review
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EoGE) is a rare digestive disorder characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach and intestines. In the diagnosis of EoE, it is extremely important to recognize distinctive endoscopic findings and accurately detect increased eosinophilia in gastrointestinal tissues. However, endoscopic findings of EoGE in the small intestine remain poorly understood. Therefore, we conducted a literature review of 16 eligible papers. Redness or erythema was the most common endoscopic finding in the small bowel, followed by villous atrophy, erosion, ulceration, and edema. In some cases, stenosis due to circumferential ulceration was observed, which led to retention of the capsule during small bowel capsule endoscopy. Although many aspects of small bowel endoscopic findings in EoGE remain elusive, the findings presented in this review are expected to contribute to the further development of EoGE practice.
PubMed: 36611405
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010113 -
Orvosi Hetilap Feb 2023Esophageal cancer is the most common cause of esophageal resections. Esophageal replacement is still a significant challenge for surgeons, because complications can be...
Esophageal cancer is the most common cause of esophageal resections. Esophageal replacement is still a significant challenge for surgeons, because complications can be expected in over 50% and death also occurs between 4-7%. Complications can be divided into early and late categories and into general and specific complications. From a surgical point of view, early and late specific complications are the most important aspects. Between 1993 and 2012, 540 esophageal resections were performed due to malignant tumors at the Department of Surgery, Medical Center of the University of Pécs. Stomach was used for replacement in 445 cases, colon in 38 cases, and jejunum in 57 cases. The anastomosis with stomach replacement was located to the neck in 275 cases and to the thorax in 170 cases. The colon was pulled up to the neck in each case. There were 29 cases of free jejunal replacements located to the neck, and 28 cases with a Roux-loop reconstruction located to the thorax. In the case of gastric replacement, anastomotic insufficiency developed in 55 cases, graft necrosis occurred in 8 cases, and early anastomosis stricture developed in 30 cases. These numbers are 3 conduit necrosis and 2 strictures in cases of colonic replacements. There was one anastomosis failure in the case of a thoracic jejunum replacement. Also one conduit necrosis was observed in the free jejunal neck transplantation group. Among late special complications, dysphagia is the most important, the causes of which were found in the order of frequency: anastomotic stricture, conduit obstruction, peptic and ischemic stricture, foreign body, local recurrence, functional causes, new malignant tumor in the esophageal remnant after resection and malignant tumor emerging in the replaced organ. Causes may overlap each other, and their treatment may be conservative, endoscopic or surgical. Surgical treatment is usually the last option to restore the ability to swallow and can present a significant challenge even to experienced centers. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(7): 243-252.
Topics: Humans; Constriction, Pathologic; Stomach; Deglutition Disorders; Anastomosis, Surgical; Colon
PubMed: 36806103
DOI: 10.1556/650.2023.32715 -
Heliyon Jul 2023A systematic review of international case reports of patients with Heyde syndrome (HS) treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was conducted to explore... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review of international case reports of patients with Heyde syndrome (HS) treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was conducted to explore the clinical characteristics of this group of patients and sirgical success. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and CNKI, were searched with combinations of the search terms, Heyde syndrome, gastrointestinal bleeding, aortic stenosis, angiodysplasia and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. All case reports were screened according to inclusion criteria, and HS patient data was summarized.
RESULTS
A total of 31 case reports concerned patients with a history of aortic stenosis and repeated gastrointestinal bleeding. Ultrasonic cardiograms (UCG) were recorded for 27 cases, including those with critical aortic stenosis (n = 26). Gastrointestinal sequelae were reported in 22 cases with duodenal and jejunal being the most common (n = 9). High-molecular-weight multimers of von Willebrand Factor (vWF-HMWM) were measured in 17 cases with the majority being lower (n = 15) and the minority normal (n = 2). All patients experienced recurrent bleeding after medication and endoscopic therapy and symptoms improved after TAVI (31/31). vWF was at normal levels in 11/12 cases post-TAVI. Twenty-five patients were followed up and 22 had no recurrence of symptoms giving an efficacy rate of 88% for TAVI in HS patients.
CONCLUSIONS
HS is characterized by angiodysplasia, aortic stenosis and von Willebrand disease with frequent recurrence of bleeding after drug and endoscopic treatment. TAVI is an effective therapy with an 88% resolution rate.
PubMed: 37539190
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17952 -
Clinical Radiology Mar 2021Term neonatal bowel obstruction is common, and absence of treatment is potentially catastrophic. There is a relatively narrow differential diagnosis, with causes... (Review)
Review
Term neonatal bowel obstruction is common, and absence of treatment is potentially catastrophic. There is a relatively narrow differential diagnosis, with causes categorised as either low or high bowel obstruction. The commonest causes of low bowel obstruction include anorectal malformations (ARM), Hirschsprung's disease, ileal atresia, meconium ileus, meconium plug, and colonic atresia. The commonest causes of high bowel obstruction include duodenal atresia, duodenal stenosis/web, jejunal atresia, and malrotation with volvulus (and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis usually presenting in slightly older infants). Diagnosis can be decided using a step-wise binary decision tool that includes the appropriate imaging steps and evaluation of bowel calibre. This paper presents the decision-making tool from the presenting features, through plain radiographic findings and, where necessary, the additional radiological investigations to assist the general radiologist, novice paediatric radiologist and paediatric surgeon. The tool is pictorial, with the radiological findings accompanied by eight schematics, serving as a simplified visual aid for memorizing the imaging patterns of the differential diagnosis. The imaging and decision-making steps allow for a rapid, simplified diagnosis that can benefit patients by recommending when to perform surgery, when to perform further imaging, and when imaging can act in a therapeutic manner.
Topics: Clinical Decision-Making; Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Intestinal Obstruction; Intestines
PubMed: 33097229
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.09.016