-
Microbiology Spectrum Feb 2023Carbapenems are a common first-line therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, but carbapenem-resistant (CRE) isolates have become an urgent health concern....
Carbapenems are a common first-line therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, but carbapenem-resistant (CRE) isolates have become an urgent health concern. Klebsiella pneumoniae serine carbapenemases (KPCs) now have been disseminated worldwide and are endemic in many hospitals globally. Isolates producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) or class D OXA-48 carbapenemases are also increasingly common in Europe, although they are less common in the United States. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination of the carbapenem meropenem and vaborbactam, which is a β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine carbapenemases, including KPC-producing isolates. We examined the susceptibility of U.S. multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam. A total of 1,697 MDR isolates were collected in 31 U.S. medical centers in 2016 to 2020. Susceptibility testing was performed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for all CRE strains (MIC values of >2 mg/L for imipenem or meropenem). The rate of susceptibility of all MDR strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, and 86.2% of the isolates were susceptible to meropenem. There were 222 CRE isolates (13.1%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase (81.1%). Thirteen CRE isolates produced NDM (= 7), VIM (= 3), and/or OXA-48-like (= 4) carbapenemases; 29 CRE isolates (13.1%) had no detected carbapenemase. The rate of susceptibility of all CRE strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 93.2%, and the rate of susceptibility of the KPC-producing isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam was 98.9%. The primary carbapenemase in the United States continues to be KPC, while MBL and OXA-48-like carbapenemases remain uncommon. Overall, the rate of susceptibility of these U.S. MDR organisms to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, indicating that meropenem-vaborbactam is a valuable treatment option for Gram-negative infections caused by U.S. MDR organisms. Carbapenems are a common first-line therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, but CRE isolates have become an urgent health concern. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination of the carbapenem meropenem and vaborbactam, which is a β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine carbapenemases, including KPC-producing isolates. We examined the susceptibility of U.S. MDR Gram-negative isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam. A total of 1,697 U.S. MDR isolates collected in 2016 to 2020 were tested. Susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution method. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for all CRE strains (MIC values of >2 mg/L for imipenem or meropenem). The rate of susceptibility of all MDR strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, and 86.2% of the isolates were susceptible to meropenem. A total of 13.1% of the isolates were CRE strains, and KPC was the most common carbapenemase. Overall, the rate of susceptibility of these U.S. MDR organisms to meropenem-vaborbactam indicates that meropenem-vaborbactam is a valuable treatment option for Gram-negative infections caused by U.S. MDR Gram-negative pathogens.
Topics: United States; Meropenem; Carbapenems; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Bacterial Proteins; Imipenem; beta-Lactamases; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gammaproteobacteria; Serine; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 36622238
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04507-22 -
BMC Microbiology May 2023Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the main causes of healthcare-associated infections that threaten public health, and carbapenems, such as meropenem, have been a...
BACKGROUND
Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the main causes of healthcare-associated infections that threaten public health, and carbapenems, such as meropenem, have been a therapeutic option for these infections. Therapeutic failure is mainly due to the antimicrobial resistance of A. baumannii, as well as the presence of persister cells. Persisters constitute a fraction of the bacterial population that present a transient phenotype capable of tolerating supra-lethal concentrations of antibiotics. Some proteins have been suggested to be involved in the onset and/or maintenance of this phenotype. Thus, we investigated the mRNA levels of the adeB (AdeABC efflux pump component), ompA, and ompW (outer membrane proteins) in A. baumannii cells before and after exposure to meropenem.
RESULTS
We found a significant increase (p-value < 0.05) in the expression of ompA (> 5.5-fold) and ompW (> 10.5-fold) in persisters. However, adeB did not show significantly different expression levels when comparing treated and untreated cells. Therefore, we suggest that these outer membrane proteins, especially OmpW, could be part of the mechanism of A. baumannii persisters to deal with the presence of high doses of meropenem. We also observed in the Galleria mellonella larvae model that persister cells are more virulent than regular ones, as evidenced by their LD values.
CONCLUSIONS
Taken together, these data contribute to the understanding of the phenotypic features of A. baumannii persisters and their relation to virulence, as well as highlight OmpW and OmpA as potential targets for drug development against A. baumannii persisters.
Topics: Meropenem; Acinetobacter baumannii; Virulence; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Membrane Proteins; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Bacterial Proteins
PubMed: 37246220
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-023-02904-y -
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine Dec 2022: Antibiotic resistance in cystic fibrosis (CF) is a well-known phenomenon. However, the comprehensive epidemiological impact of antibiotic resistance in CF is not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
: Antibiotic resistance in cystic fibrosis (CF) is a well-known phenomenon. However, the comprehensive epidemiological impact of antibiotic resistance in CF is not clearly documented. So, this meta-analysis evaluated the proportion rates of carbapenem resistance (imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem) in CF based on publication date (1979-2000, 2001-2010, and 2011-2021), continents, pathogens, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). : We searched studies in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (until April 2021). Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 14.0). : The 110 studies included in the analysis were performed in 25 countries and investigated 13,324 pathogens associated with CF. The overall proportion of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem resistance in CF were 43% (95% CI 36-49), 48% (95% CI 40-57), 28% (95% CI 23-33), and 45% (95% CI 32-59), respectively. Our meta-analysis showed that trends of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem-resistance had gradual decreases over time (1979-2021). This could be due to the limited clinical effectiveness of these antibiotics to treat CF cases over time. Among the opportunistic pathogens associated with CF, the highest carbapenem resistance rates were shown in , spp., , and . The highest and lowest carbapenem resistance rates among in CF patients were shown against meropenem (23%) and doripenem (39%). : We showed that trends of carbapenem resistance had decreased over time (1979-2021). This could be due to the limited clinical effectiveness of these antibiotics to treat CF cases over time. Plans should be directed to fight biofilm-associated infections and prevent the emergence of mutational resistance. Systematic surveillance for carbapenemase-producing pathogens in CF by molecular surveillance is necessitated.
Topics: Humans; Meropenem; Doripenem; Carbapenems; Cystic Fibrosis; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Imipenem; Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PubMed: 36568834
DOI: No ID Found -
Biomedical Chromatography : BMC Nov 2021An efficient and reliable method using LC-MS/MS was established and validated for the simultaneous quantification of meropenem and imipenem in rat plasma. An electronic...
An efficient and reliable method using LC-MS/MS was established and validated for the simultaneous quantification of meropenem and imipenem in rat plasma. An electronic spray ion source in the positive multiple reaction monitoring mode was used for the detection and the transitions were m/z 384.6 → m/z 141.2 for meropenem, m/z 300.1 → m/z 141.8 for imipenem and m/z 423.4 → m/z 207.1 for matrine (IS). The calibration curves of meropenem and imipenem were linear in the range of 0.50-200 μg/mL. Satisfactory separation was achieved with a total run time of 3.0 min, the injection volume was 3 μl. The retention times of meropenem, imipenem and IS were 1.19, 1.14 and 1.13 min, respectively. Meropenem and imipenem are easily hydrolyzed in plasma. HEPES was used as a stabilizer and added to the plasma samples immediately after centrifugation. Extractions of meropenem, imipenem and IS were carried out by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The specificity, precision and accuracy, stability, recovery and matrix effects were within acceptance limits. This method was successfully applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics of intravenous injection of meropenem and imipenem single administration or combined with sulbactam in rats. We found that sulbactam has no influence on the pharmacokinetics behavior of meropenem or imipenem.
Topics: Animals; Chromatography, Liquid; Imipenem; Linear Models; Male; Meropenem; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tandem Mass Spectrometry
PubMed: 34060114
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5185 -
Clinical Therapeutics Apr 2020Antibiotic dosing is challenge in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD)... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
PURPOSE
Antibiotic dosing is challenge in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of meropenem and vancomycin in patients undergoing SLED.
METHODS
Consecutive ICU patients undergoing SLED and receiving meropenem and/or vancomycin were prospectively evaluated. Serial blood samples were collected before, during, and at the end of SLED sessions. Antimicrobial concentrations were determined using a validated HPLC method. Noncompartmental PK analysis was performed. AUC was determined for vancomycin. For meropenem, time above MIC was calculated.
FINDINGS
A total of 24 patients receiving vancomycin and 21 receiving meropenem were included; 170 plasma samples were obtained. Median serum vancomycin and meropenem concentrations before SLED were 24.5 and 28.0 μg/mL, respectively; after SLED, 14 and 6 μg/mL. Mean removal was 42% with vancomycin and 78% with meropenem. With vancomycin, 19 (83%), 16 (70%), and 15 (65%) patients would have achieved the target (AUC >400) considering MICs of 1, 2, and 4 mg/L, respectively. With meropenem, 17 (85%), 14 (70%), and 10 (50%) patients would have achieved the target (100% of time above MIC) if infected with isolates with MICs of 1, 4, and 8 mg/L, respectively.
IMPLICATIONS
SLED clearances of meropenem and vancomycin were 3-fold higher than the clearance described by continuous methods. Despite this finding, overall high PK/PD target attainments were obtained, except for at higher MICs. We suggest a maintenance dose of 1 g TID or BID of meropenem. With vancomycin, a more individualized approach using therapeutic drug monitoring should be used, as commercial assays are available.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Critical Illness; Female; Humans; Hybrid Renal Replacement Therapy; Intensive Care Units; Male; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Vancomycin; Young Adult
PubMed: 32199609
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.02.011 -
The Journal of Antibiotics May 2022The emergence of bacterial resistance poses a serious threat to public health. One of the most important resistance mechanisms against β-lactam antibiotics is the...
The emergence of bacterial resistance poses a serious threat to public health. One of the most important resistance mechanisms against β-lactam antibiotics is the production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). In this study, α-lipoic acid (LA) and methimazole (MMI), which have been used in clinical practice as non-antibacterial drugs and as a supplement, were chosen to explore their potential to be metallo-β-lactamases inhibitors (MBLIs). Enzyme inhibition assays showed that LA and MMI had moderate inhibitory activity against NDM-1 but no activity against VIM-2 and IMP-7. Antibacterial assays to determine synergy, demonstrated that the combination of LA or MMI with meropenem (MER) reduced the MIC value of MER against NDM-1 producing E. coli 16 times and 4 times, respectively, lower than that of MER alone. The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values were calculated to be less than 0.5, indicating that both LA and MMI had synergistic antibacterial effects with MER against all three MBLs expressing E. coli strains. The time-kill studies also suggested that LA and MMI were effective in restoring the antibacterial effect of MER. These findings revealed that LA and MMI are potential carbapenem enhancers, and provide a starting point for the development of potent MBLIs.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Escherichia coli; Meropenem; Methimazole; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Thioctic Acid; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases
PubMed: 35197545
DOI: 10.1038/s41429-022-00513-x -
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Jun 2022This therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) grand round describes a patient with serious valproic acid intoxication. A total valproic acid level of 844 mg/L and an unbound...
This therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) grand round describes a patient with serious valproic acid intoxication. A total valproic acid level of 844 mg/L and an unbound valproic acid level of 604 mg/L were observed. Meropenem was administered to enhance the clearance of valproic acid. This off-label usage of meropenem is based on the drug-drug interaction between carbapenems and valproic acid, which reduced the level of valproic acid within 24 hours after administration.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Humans; Meropenem; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 35170557
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000973 -
Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2021Meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the two most common nosocomial pathogens causing ventilator-associated pneumonia. To combat...
BACKGROUND
Meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the two most common nosocomial pathogens causing ventilator-associated pneumonia. To combat this resistance, different combinations of antibiotics have been evaluated for their efficacy in laboratories as well as in clinical situations.
AIM
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of combined colistin and meropenem against meropenem-resistant isolates of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa by checkerboard method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty meropenem-resistant isolates of A. baumannii (n = 25) and P. aeruginosa (n = 25) from endotracheal aspirates were studied. The MIC of colistin and meropenem was found using the microbroth dilution method. The fractional inhibitory concentration was calculated for the combination of antibiotics by checkerboard assay and the antibiotic interactions were assessed. Fisher's exact test was carried out for statistical comparison of categorical variables.
RESULTS
A synergistic effect between colistin and meropenem was observed in 18/25 (72%) and 6/25 (24%) isolates of Acinetobacter baumannnii and P. Aeruginosa, respectively, with fractional inhibitory concentration indices of ≤0.5. None of the tested isolates exhibited antagonism.
CONCLUSION
Our results showed that combinations of colistin and meropenem are associated with improvement in minimum inhibitory concentration and may be a promising strategy in treating meropenem-resistant A. baumannii respiratory tract infections.
Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colistin; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Synergism; Humans; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PubMed: 34169905
DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_1013_20 -
Clinical Therapeutics Apr 2020Meropenem and vaborbactam is an intravenous beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic active against multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria. It may...
PURPOSE
Meropenem and vaborbactam is an intravenous beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic active against multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria. It may be a suitable treatment for inpatient and outpatient management of infections, and the intravenous admixture stability is therefore important for optimal utilization. The purpose of this study was to determine the stability of meropenem and vaborbactam in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) infusion bags and elastomeric pumps at room and refrigerated temperatures.
METHODS
Meropenem and vaborbactam vials were reconstituted according to manufacturer instructions and diluted in PVC infusion bags to final concentrations of 4, 8, and 16 mg/mL and in elastomeric pumps to 11.4 mg/mL (n = 5 replicates per concentration and per temperature). PVC bags and elastomeric pumps were stored at room temperature (~24 °C) or in the refrigerator (~4 °C) and sampled over 12 and 144 h, respectively. Stability was defined as the duration that meropenem and vaborbactam concentrations remained ≥90% of the original concentrations.
FINDINGS
All room temperature replicates across the tested concentrations retained meropenem and vaborbactam stability over 12 h and displayed concentration-dependent degradation. Refrigerated studies resulted in meropenem and vaborbactam stability at all tested concentrations up to 120 h.
IMPLICATIONS
Meropenem and vaborbactam in PVC bags (4, 8, and 16 mg/mL) and elastomeric pumps (11.4 mg/mL) were stable for 12 h at room temperature and 120 h when refrigerated. These stability data allow for enhanced flexibility in the preparation, storage, wastage, and administration of meropenem and vaborbactam in the hospital and outpatient setting.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Boronic Acids; Drug Combinations; Drug Stability; Elastomers; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Infusion Pumps; Infusions, Intravenous; Meropenem; Polyvinyl Chloride; Refrigeration; Temperature
PubMed: 32139176
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.01.021 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2022Biofilms colonize medical devices and are often recalcitrant to antibiotics. Interkingdom biofilms, where at least a bacterium and a fungus are present, increase the...
Biofilms colonize medical devices and are often recalcitrant to antibiotics. Interkingdom biofilms, where at least a bacterium and a fungus are present, increase the likelihood of therapeutic failures. In this work, a three-species biofilm model including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans was used to study the activity of the antibiotics moxifloxacin and meropenem, the antifungal caspofungin, and combinations of them against interkingdom biofilms. The culturable cells and total biomass were evaluated to determine the pharmacodynamic parameters of the drug response for the incubation with the drugs alone. The synergic or antagonistic effects (increased/decreased effects) of the combination of drugs were analyzed with the highest-single-agent method. Biofilms were imaged in confocal microscopy after live/dead staining. The drugs had limited activity when used alone against single-, dual-, and three-species biofilms. When used in combination, additive effects against single- and dual-species biofilms and increased effects (synergy) against biomass of three-species biofilms were observed. In addition, the two antibiotics showed different patterns, moxifloxacin being more active when targeting S. aureus and meropenem when targeting E. coli. All these observations were confirmed by confocal microscopy images. Our findings highlight the interest in combining caspofungin with antibiotics against interkingdom biofilms.
Topics: Antifungal Agents; Biofilms; Candida albicans; Caspofungin; Escherichia coli; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxifloxacin; Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 34930026
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02149-21