-
Psychopharmacology Bulletin Jul 2020Opioid medications are a pillar of acute and chronic analgesia, though their use is often accompanied by side-effects, such as opioid-induced constipation.... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Opioid medications are a pillar of acute and chronic analgesia, though their use is often accompanied by side-effects, such as opioid-induced constipation. Unfortunately, tolerance rarely develops to this untoward side effect. This review presents the background, evidence, and indications for the use of Naldemedine (Brand name Symproic 0.2 mg tablets) to treat opioid-induced constipation.
RECENT FINDINGS
Opioids are often used for the treatment of acute and chronic analgesia. Outside of the central effect they exert, they also interact with peripheral receptors, resulting in opioid-induced constipation, the commonest of side effects of chronic opioid usage. Complications include colonic distention, ileus, perforation, and can progress to other serious bowel complications, which can result in hospitalization and fatal events.For the most part, laxatives and other anti-constipation therapies are often inefficient and require intervention directed at the root cause, such as peripheral mu receptor agonists, including methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, and naldemedine. Naldemedine is the most recent to gain FDA approval of the group.An antagonist of Mu, Kappa, and Delta peripheral receptors, Naldemedine, is the only drug to counteract all three receptor classes. It was shown to be both safe and effective when compared with placebo. No data exists to compare its efficacy to that of other members of the group.
SUMMARY
Opioids are frequently used in the management of acute and chronic pain. The most common of the side effects is opioid-induced constipation, secondary to the peripheral activity of opioids. Naldemedine is an FDA-approved, once-daily oral tablet that counteracts this side effect by antagonizing mu, kappa, and delta-opioid receptors and has been shown to be safe and effective. Further investigation including head-to-head clinical trials are required to evaluate the relative efficacy of naldemedine compare with other peripheral opiate receptor antagonists.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Induced Constipation
PubMed: 32733114
DOI: No ID Found -
Pain and Therapy Jun 2021Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a distressing side effect during opioid analgesia and is mainly mediated by gastrointestinal μ-opioid receptors. Methylnaltrexone,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a distressing side effect during opioid analgesia and is mainly mediated by gastrointestinal μ-opioid receptors. Methylnaltrexone, a peripheral μ-opioid receptor antagonist with restricted ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, may alleviate OIC without reversing analgesia. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of methylnaltrexone for the treatment of OIC.
METHODS
This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020187290). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials that compared methylnaltrexone with placebo for the treatment of OIC. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
RESULTS
Eight trials with 2034 participants were included. Compared with placebo, methylnaltrexone significantly increased rescue-free bowel movement (RFBM) within 4 h after the first dose (eight trials; 1833 participants; RR 3.74, 95% CI 3.02-4.62; high-certainty evidence), RFBM within 24 h after the first dose (two trials; 614 participants; RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.52-2.58; moderate-certainty evidence), and RFBM ≥ 3 times per week (three trials; 1,396 participants; RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; moderate-certainty evidence) and decreased need to take rescue laxatives (three trials; 807 participants; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85; moderate-certainty evidence). For safety outcomes, there was no difference in any adverse events between the two groups (eight trials; 2034 participants; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.23; moderate-certainty evidence), including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and flatulence; but for the most commonly reported adverse events, the abdominal pain was higher in methylnaltrexone group than that in placebo group (six trials; 1813 participants; RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.29-4.08; moderate-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSION
Methylnaltrexone is an effective and safe drug for the treatment of OIC, but the safety of abdominal pain should be considered.
PubMed: 33575953
DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00237-0 -
Pain Dec 2014
Topics: Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Male; Morphine; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 25218602
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.008 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Apr 2024Cancer-related pain often requires opioid treatment with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) as its most frequent gastrointestinal side-effect. Both for prevention and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cancer-related pain often requires opioid treatment with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) as its most frequent gastrointestinal side-effect. Both for prevention and treatment of OIC osmotic (e.g. polyethylene glycol) and stimulant (e.g. bisacodyl) laxatives are widely used. Newer drugs such as the peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) and naloxone in a fixed combination with oxycodone have become available for the management of OIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to give an overview of the scientific evidence on pharmacological strategies for the prevention and treatment of OIC in cancer patients.
METHODS
A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was completed from inception up to 22 October 2022. Randomized and non-randomized studies were systematically selected. Bowel function and adverse drug events were assessed.
RESULTS
Twenty trials (prevention: five RCTs and three cohort studies; treatment: ten RCTs and two comparative cohort studies) were included in the review. Regarding the prevention of OIC, three RCTs compared laxatives with other laxatives, finding no clear differences in effectivity of the laxatives used. One cohort study showed a significant benefit of magnesium oxide compared with no laxative. One RCT found a significant benefit for the PAMORA naldemedine compared with magnesium oxide. Preventive use of oxycodone/naloxone did not show a significant difference in two out of three other studies compared to oxycodone or fentanyl. A meta-analysis was not possible. Regarding the treatment of OIC, two RCTs compared laxatives, of which one RCT found that polyethylene glycol was significantly more effective than sennosides. Seven studies compared an opioid antagonist (naloxone, methylnaltrexone or naldemedine) with placebo and three studies compared different dosages of opioid antagonists. These studies with opioid antagonists were used for the meta-analysis. Oxycodone/naloxone showed a significant improvement in Bowel Function Index compared to oxycodone with laxatives (MD -13.68; 95 % CI -18.38 to -8.98; I = 58 %). Adverse drug event rates were similar amongst both groups, except for nausea in favour of oxycodone/naloxone (RR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.31-0.83; I = 0 %). Naldemedine (NAL) and methylnaltrexone (MNTX) demonstrated significantly higher response rates compared to placebo (NAL: RR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.64-2.61, I = 0 %; MNTX: RR 3.83, 95 % CI 2.81-5.22, I = 0 %). With regard to adverse events, abdominal pain was more present in treatment with methylnaltrexone and diarrhea was significantly more present in treatment with naldemedine. Different dosages of methylnaltrexone were not significantly different with regard to both efficacy and adverse drug event rates.
CONCLUSIONS
Magnesium oxide and naldemedine are most likely effective for prevention of OIC in cancer patients. Naloxone in a fixed combination with oxycodone, naldemedine and methylnaltrexone effectively treat OIC in cancer patients with acceptable adverse events. However, their effect has not been compared to standard (osmotic and stimulant) laxatives. More studies comparing standard laxatives with each other and with opioid antagonists are necessary before recommendations for clinical practice can be made.
Topics: Humans; Laxatives; Analgesics, Opioid; Narcotic Antagonists; Constipation; Oxycodone; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Magnesium Oxide; Cohort Studies; Naloxone; Polyethylene Glycols; Neoplasms; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Naltrexone
PubMed: 38452708
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102704 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) comprises gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, including dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, gastric stasis, bloating, abdominal pain, and... (Review)
Review
Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) comprises gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, including dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, gastric stasis, bloating, abdominal pain, and opioid-induced constipation, which significantly impair patients' quality of life and may lead to undertreatment of pain. Traditional laxatives are often prescribed for OIBD symptoms, although they display limited efficacy and exert adverse effects. Other strategies include prokinetics and change of opioids or their administration route. However, these approaches do not address underlying causes of OIBD associated with opioid effects on mostly peripheral opioid receptors located in the GI tract. Targeted management of OIBD comprises purely peripherally acting opioid receptor antagonists and a combination of opioid receptor agonist and antagonist. Methylnaltrexone induces laxation in 50%-60% of patients with advanced diseases and OIBD who do not respond to traditional oral laxatives without inducing opioid withdrawal symptoms with similar response (45%-50%) after an oral administration of naloxegol. A combination of prolonged-release oxycodone with prolonged-release naloxone (OXN) in one tablet (a ratio of 2:1) provides analgesia with limited negative effect on the bowel function, as oxycodone displays high oral bioavailability and naloxone demonstrates local antagonist effect on opioid receptors in the GI tract and is totally inactivated in the liver. OXN in daily doses of up to 80 mg/40 mg provides equally effective analgesia with improved bowel function compared to oxycodone administered alone in patients with chronic non-malignant and cancer-related pain. OIBD is a common complication of long-term opioid therapy and may lead to quality of life deterioration and undertreatment of pain. Thus, a complex assessment and management that addresses underlying causes and patomechanisms of OIBD is recommended. Newer strategies comprise methylnaltrexone or OXN administration in the management of OIBD, and OXN may be also considered as a preventive measure of OIBD development in patients who require opioid administration.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists
PubMed: 25931815
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S32684 -
American Journal of Physiology.... Oct 2021Remifentanil impairs swallowing, and disturbed accommodation to bolus volume may be one of the underlying causes. It is not fully understood whether remifentanil-induced... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Remifentanil impairs swallowing, and disturbed accommodation to bolus volume may be one of the underlying causes. It is not fully understood whether remifentanil-induced swallowing dysfunction is mediated by peripheral or central mechanisms. So, this study aimed to investigate if remifentanil-induced swallowing dysfunction is dependent on the bolus volume and whether the effect of remifentanil could be counteracted by methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting opioid antagonist. Nineteen healthy volunteers were included in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Study participants received target-controlled remifentanil infusions and placebo infusions in a randomized order. Methylnaltrexone was administered by intravenous injection of doses of 0.3 mg/kg. Recordings of pressure and impedance data were acquired using a combined manometry and impedance solid-state catheter. Data were analyzed from three series of bolus swallows, baseline, during study medication exposure, and 15 min after methylnaltrexone. Remifentanil induced significant effects on multiple pharyngeal and esophageal function parameters. No significant differences in remifentanil-induced swallowing dysfunction related to different bolus volumes were found. Pharyngeal effects of remifentanil were not significantly counteracted by methylnaltrexone, whereas on the distal esophageal level, effects on distension pressures were counteracted. Changes in pharyngeal and esophageal pressure flow variables were consistent with previous results on remifentanil-induced swallowing dysfunction and uniform across all bolus volumes. The effects of remifentanil on the pharyngeal level and on the proximal esophagus appear to be predominantly centrally mediated, whereas the effects of remifentanil on the distal esophagus may be mediated by both central and peripheral mechanisms. In this randomized controlled trial, we used the "Swallow Gateway" online platform to analyze the effects of remifentanil on pharyngeal and esophageal swallowing. It is not fully understood whether remifentanil-induced swallowing dysfunction is mediated by peripheral or central mechanisms. By using methylnaltrexone, we demonstrated that effects of remifentanil on pharyngeal swallowing were predominantly centrally mediated, whereas its effects on the distal esophagus may be mediated by both central and peripheral mechanisms.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Deglutition; Drug Antagonism; Esophagus; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Muscle Contraction; Muscle Relaxation; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pharynx; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Remifentanil
PubMed: 34261364
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00137.2021 -
The American Journal of Hospice &... Nov 2016Opioid-related bowel dysfunction is a common and potentially severe adverse effect from treatment with opioid analgesics. Its development is not dose related, nor do... (Review)
Review
Opioid-related bowel dysfunction is a common and potentially severe adverse effect from treatment with opioid analgesics. Its development is not dose related, nor do patients develop tolerance. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) can lead to fecal impaction, bowel obstruction, and bowel perforation as well as noncompliance with opioid analgesics and poor quality of life. Routine administration of laxatives is necessary to maintain bowel function, and, in refractory cases, other modalities must be pursued. Available options are limited but include peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), including methylnaltrexone. Naloxegol is a newly developed PAMORA that is available through the oral route. At the therapeutic dose of 25 mg daily, naloxegol is effective and safe, with a limited side effect profile and is associated with preservation of centrally mediated analgesia. In this article, we discuss the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse effects, clinical trials, and cost considerations of naloxegol. Finally, we discuss its potential role as a novel key treatment for OIC in palliative medicine patients.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Drug Interactions; Humans; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 26150678
DOI: 10.1177/1049909115593937 -
The American Surgeon Mar 2022Postoperative ileus (POI) is a surgical complication resulting in increased morbidity and length of stay (LOS). Usual care for POI includes bowel rest and gastric...
BACKGROUND
Postoperative ileus (POI) is a surgical complication resulting in increased morbidity and length of stay (LOS). Usual care for POI includes bowel rest and gastric decompression. It has been questioned if methylnaltrexone (MNTX), a peripheral opioid antagonist, could be used as treatment for POI. The purpose of this study was to determine if MNTX is effective and safe for POI treatment.
METHODS
This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients ⩾ 18 years with a POI. Patients with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, small bowel obstruction, and gastrointestinal malignancy were excluded. The intervention was MNTX administration. The primary outcome was time to ileus resolution. Secondary outcomes included LOS, duration of nasogastric tube, total parenteral nutrition requirement, and incidence of gastrointestinal perforations.
RESULTS
110 patients were included in the analysis; 28 received MNTX. Time to ileus resolution was 9.9 days for the MNTX group and 11.4 days for the control group ( = .38). Duration of gastric decompression was 4.6 days for the MNTX group and 4.2 days for the control group ( = .71). Length of stay was 19.9 days for the MNTX group and 19.7 days for the control group ( = .96). The percentage of TPN requirement was 17.9% in the MNTX group and 22.0% in the control group ( = .65). No gastrointestinal perforations were observed in either group.
CONCLUSION
For the treatment of POI, MNTX did not significantly reduce time to resolution of ileus, LOS, duration of gastric decompression, or TPN requirements. However, no gastrointestinal perforations were seen, indicating that MNTX may be safely used in these patients.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ileus; Intestinal Perforation; Intubation, Gastrointestinal; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Parenteral Nutrition; Postoperative Complications; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34645328
DOI: 10.1177/00031348211048825 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Jan 2021Postoperative ileus (POI) and constipation are common secondary effects of opioids and carry significant clinical and economic impacts. μ-Opioid receptors mediate... (Review)
Review
Postoperative ileus (POI) and constipation are common secondary effects of opioids and carry significant clinical and economic impacts. μ-Opioid receptors mediate opioid analgesia in the central nervous system (CNS) and gastrointestinal-related effects in the periphery. Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) block the peripheral effects of opioids in the gastrointestinal tract, while maintaining opioid analgesia in the CNS. While most are not approved for POI or postoperative opioid-induced constipation (OIC), PAMORAs have a potential role in these settings via their selective effects on the μ-opioid receptor. This review will discuss recent clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of PAMORAs, with a focus on alvimopan (Entereg) and methylnaltrexone (Relistor) in patients with POI or postoperative OIC. We will characterize potential factors that may have impacted the efficacy observed in phase 3 trials and discuss future directions for the management and treatment of POI.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Ileus; Narcotic Antagonists; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 32779081
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04671-x -
Molecular Pain May 2023Activation of neurons and glial cells in the dorsal root ganglion is one of the key mechanisms for the development of hyperalgesia. The aim of the present study was to...
Activation of neurons and glial cells in the dorsal root ganglion is one of the key mechanisms for the development of hyperalgesia. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of neuroglial activity in the development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Male rats were treated with morphine daily for 3 days. The resultant phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 in the dorsal root ganglion was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. Pain hypersensitivity was analyzed using behavioral studies. The amount of cytokine expression in the dorsal root ganglion was also analyzed. Repeated morphine treatment induced hyperalgesia and marked induction of phosphorylated ERK1/2 in the neurons and satellite glial cells on day 3. An opioid receptor antagonist, toll like receptor-4 inhibitor, MAP/ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitor and gap junction inhibitor inhibited morphine-induced hyperalgesia and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Morphine treatment induced alteration of cytokine expression, which was inhibited by the opioid receptor antagonist, toll like receptor-4 inhibitor, MEK inhibitor and gap junction inhibitor. Dexamethasone inhibited morphine-induced hyperalgesia and ERK1/2 phosphorylation after morphine treatment. The peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonist, methylnaltrexone, inhibited hyperalgesia and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Morphine activates ERK1/2 in neurons and satellite glial cells in the dorsal root ganglion via the opioid receptor and toll like receptor-4. ERK1/2 phosphorylation is gap junction-dependent and is associated with the alteration of cytokine expression. Inhibition of neuroinflammation by activation of neurons and glia might be a promising target to prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia.
PubMed: 37254240
DOI: 10.1177/17448069231181973