-
The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology... 2022To evaluate the association between methylnaltrexone and urine output (UOP) in critically ill children with opioid-associated urinary retention.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the association between methylnaltrexone and urine output (UOP) in critically ill children with opioid-associated urinary retention.
METHODS
This retrospective study included patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit between December 1, 2019, and November 30, 2020, who received methylnaltrexone for opioid-associated oliguria (spontaneous UOP below 1 mL/kg/hr and at least 1 dose of an opioid within the preceding 6 hours).
RESULTS
Twenty-five patients (median age = 5.5 years, IQR 1.7-16.4; median weight = 19 kg, IQR 9-45) were included. Mean methylnaltrexone dose was 0.15 ± 0.006 mg/kg. A statistically significant increase in UOP from baseline to 6 hours following methylnaltrexone was observed (p = 0.001), but not all patients responded. Fourteen patients (56%) had no UOP following methylnaltrexone administration, while 11 (44%) demonstrated a robust increase (median = 0 mL/kg/hr at baseline [IQR 0-0] to 1.96 mL/kg/hr [IQR 1.08-2.22; p = 0.001]) within 6 hours following methylnaltrexone administration. Younger patients responded better than older patients (responder age = 2.5 years [IQR 0.8-7]) versus 11.4 years [IQR 1.75-17.5] for non-responders) (p = 0.04). Both intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SQ) routes were associated with an increase in UOP (IV, p = 0.04; SQ, p = 0.02). The effect persisted for up to 24 hours after administration. Sixty-four percent of patients required urinary catheter placement. Pain scores (averaged 6 hours before and after methylnaltrexone) remained unchanged (p = 0.44).
CONCLUSIONS
Methylnaltrexone may increase spontaneous UOP in some children with opioid-associated urinary retention, but urinary catheterization rates remain high.
PubMed: 35558358
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-27.4.373 -
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy Apr 2018To summarize and evaluate the existing literature regarding medications to treat opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To summarize and evaluate the existing literature regarding medications to treat opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP).
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched using the following terms: constipation, opioid, chronic, pain, noncancer, nonmalignant, methylnaltrexone, alvimopan, lubiprostone, naloxegol, and naldemedine.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION
The search was limited to randomized controlled trials reporting human outcomes. Data extracted included the following: study design, population, intervention, control, outcomes related to OIC and safety, and potential biases assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.
DATA SYNTHESIS
After assessment, 16 of the 190 studies were included: methylnaltrexone (n = 4), naloxegol (n = 3), naldemedine (n = 2), lubiprostone (n = 3), and alvimopan (n = 4). Lubiprostone was the only nonperipherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist included. Only 1 study (naloxegol) used "usual care" (nonstudy laxative) rather than placebo as a comparator. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrated benefit for methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, naldemedine, and lubiprostone, with conflicting evidence for alvimopan. No data suggest that one agent is better than another. Overall risk of bias across all studies was low to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
With risk of bias determined to be low to moderate, published data to date suggest that methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, and naldemedine may be appropriate to treat OIC in patients with CNCP.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Evidence-Based Practice; Humans; Laxatives; Lubiprostone; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Piperidines; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29092627
DOI: 10.1177/1060028017739637 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Feb 2023With the growing rate of aging and the incidence of chronic diseases, there has been an upsurge in opioid prescription and abuse worldwide. This has been associated with...
INTRODUCTION
With the growing rate of aging and the incidence of chronic diseases, there has been an upsurge in opioid prescription and abuse worldwide. This has been associated with increased reports of opioid-related adverse events, particularly opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD), calling for a rational clinical management strategy.
AREAS COVERED
Through searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, English literature was gathered as of 1 January 2017. Furthermore, the USFDA, EMA, TGA, Clinicaltrials.Gov, WHO-ICTRP databases, and the latest guidelines were reviewed to extract ongoing clinical studies and provide an evidence-based expert opinion with detailed information on efficacy, safety, approval status, and pharmacokinetics of the currently used medications.
EXPERT OPINION
Despite the significant burden of OIBD, the clinical development of agents lags behind disease progress. Although in most places, management of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is initiated by lifestyle modifications followed by laxatives, opioid antagonists, and secretagogue agents, there are still major conflicts among global guidelines. The fundamental reason is the lack of head-to-head clinical trials providing inter- and intragroup comparisons between PAMORAs, laxatives, and secretagogue agents. These investigations must be accompanied by further valid biopharmaceutical and economic evaluations, paving the way for rational clinical judgment in each context.
Topics: Humans; Analgesics, Opioid; Laxatives; Constipation; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Secretagogues; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Narcotic Antagonists
PubMed: 36548911
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2161883 -
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Mar 2016Currently opioids are the most frequently used medications for chronic noncancer pain. Opioid-induced constipation is the most common adverse effect associated with... (Review)
Review
Currently opioids are the most frequently used medications for chronic noncancer pain. Opioid-induced constipation is the most common adverse effect associated with prolonged use of opioids, having a major impact on quality of life. There is an increasing need to treat opioid-induced constipation. With the recent approval of medications for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation, there are several therapeutic approaches. This review addresses the clinical presentation and diagnosis of opioid-induced constipation, barriers to its diagnosis, effects of opioids in the gastrointestinal tract, differential tolerance to opiates in different gastrointestinal organs, medications approved and in development for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation, and a proposed clinical management algorithm for treating opioid-induced constipation in patients with noncancer pain.
PubMed: 26977281
DOI: 10.1177/2040622315627801 -
Gastroenterology Nursing : the Official... 2017
Topics: Humans; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Piperidines; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid, mu
PubMed: 29210822
DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000326 -
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Sep 2016Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and other gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) significantly deteriorate patients' quality of life... (Review)
Review
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and other gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) significantly deteriorate patients' quality of life and may lead to noncompliance with opioid schedule and undertreatment of pain. Although traditional oral laxatives are the first-line treatment of OIC, they do not address OIBD pathophysiology, and display numerous adverse effects. OIC treatment includes prokinetics (lubiprostone), opioid switch, and changing route of opioid administration. Targeted management of OIBD comprises the use of purely peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORA): naloxegol and methylnaltrexone. Naloxegol (NKTR-118) is a polymer conjugate of the opioid antagonist naloxone. The polyethylene glycol limits naloxegol capacity to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Naloxegol is substrate for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter. The central nervous system penetration of naloxegol is negligible due to reduced permeability and its increased efflux across the BBB, related to P-gp transporter. Naloxegol antagonizes μ- and κ-opioid receptors and displays low affinity to δ-opioid receptors in the GI tract, thereby decreasing OIBD symptoms without reversing central analgesic effects. Naloxegol is metabolised through CYP3A4 to six metabolites, with the majority of the dose (68%) excreted with faeces and less (16%) with urine. The dose of naloxegol equals 25 mg administered orally once daily on a fasting condition. Mild or moderate hepatic impairment has no impact on naloxegol dosing; naloxegol was not studied and is not recommended in patients with hepatic failure. Dose reduction (12.5 mg once daily) and caution is recommended in patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment. Efficacy (bowel movement in 42-49% of patients not responsive to laxatives) and safety of naloxegol were confirmed in studies conducted in patients with OIC and nonmalignant pain. Naloxegol may be useful for cancer patients with OIC, although studies in this population are lacking.
PubMed: 27582887
DOI: 10.1177/1756283X16648869 -
Visceral Medicine Apr 2018Chronic constipation is a very common medical problem with relevant impact on the patients' quality of life. Modern definitions recognize constipation as a... (Review)
Review
Chronic constipation is a very common medical problem with relevant impact on the patients' quality of life. Modern definitions recognize constipation as a polysymptomatic disorder, including various aspects of disturbed defecation. Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach in the management of chronic constipation. Isolated or concomitant evacuation disorders should be identified and may need differential/additional treatment. Baseline measures include lifestyle components and bulking agents. The next step recommends treatment with conventional laxatives. In refractory patients, modern medical therapies, such as the prokinetic prucalopride or the secretagogues linalotide or lubiprostone, may be used effectively. For patients with opioid-induced constipation, the modern concept of peripherally acting µ-opioid antagonists has shown to successfully improve this increasing medical problem and even to potentially increase survival time in terminally ill patients on opioid therapy. Prolonged-released oral naloxone (in fixed combination with oxycodone), oral naloxegol or naldemedine, and subcutaneous methylnaltrexone have all demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. To adequately apply stepwise treatment algorithms, a simple tool to identify treatment failure may improve patient care.
PubMed: 29888241
DOI: 10.1159/000488695 -
American Journal of Health-system... Sep 2014Off-label uses of the peripheral μ-opioid receptor antagonists alvimopan and methylnaltrexone are reviewed.
PURPOSE
Off-label uses of the peripheral μ-opioid receptor antagonists alvimopan and methylnaltrexone are reviewed.
SUMMARY
Alvimopan is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for postoperative ileus after surgeries that include partial bowel resection with primary anastomosis, while methylnaltrexone is approved for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with advanced illness who are receiving palliative care. Literature describing the off-label use of alvimopan in the treatment of OIC and of methylnaltrexone in postoperative ileus was reviewed and included retrospective studies and prospective Phase II-IV trials. Randomized controlled trials did not demonstrate consistent benefit of alvimopan in OIC nor of methylnaltrexone in postoperative ileus. A greater proportion of patients receiving alvimopan for OIC experienced severe adverse cardiovascular events, leading to a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy and discontinuation of its study in this condition. Data are limited and unreplicated for the off-label use of alvimopan for postoperative ileus in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Individual studies suggest benefit with methylnaltrexone for OIC in unlabeled populations, including patients with non-cancer-related pain, opioid dependence, opioid sedation, and opioid use after orthopedic surgery; however, confirmatory evaluations have not been performed.
CONCLUSION
Trials of alvimopan in the FDA-approved use of methylnaltrexone (OIC) indicate potentially serious cardiovascular safety concerns and conflicting findings of efficacy. Similarly, trials of methylnaltrexone in the FDA-approved use of alvimopan (postoperative ileus) consistently showed no benefit. Evaluations of both drugs in their labeled conditions in populations not endorsed in their product labeling have been limited and largely unreplicated.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Ileus; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Off-Label Use; Piperidines; Postoperative Complications; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
PubMed: 25147168
DOI: 10.2146/ajhp130632 -
JCO Oncology Practice Feb 2022The financial toxicity of anticancer drugs is well-documented, but little is known about the costs of drugs used to manage cancer-associated symptoms. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The financial toxicity of anticancer drugs is well-documented, but little is known about the costs of drugs used to manage cancer-associated symptoms.
METHODS
We reviewed relevant guidelines and compiled drugs used to manage seven cancer-associated symptoms (anorexia and cachexia, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, constipation, diarrhea, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, cancer-associated fatigue, and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting). Using GoodRx website, we identified the retail price (cash price at retail pharmacies) and lowest price (discounted, best-case scenario of out-of-pocket costs) for patients without insurance for each drug or formulation for a typical fill. We describe lowest prices here.
RESULTS
For anorexia and cachexia, costs ranged from $5 US dollars (USD; generic olanzapine or mirtazapine tablets) to $1,156 USD (brand-name dronabinol solution) and varied widely by formulation of the same drug or dosage: for olanzapine 5 mg, $5 USD (generic tablet) to $239 USD (brand-name orally disintegrating tablet). For chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, costs of duloxetine varied from $12 USD (generic) to $529 USD (brand-name). For constipation, the cost of sennosides or polyethylene glycol was <$15 USD, whereas newer agents such as methylnaltrexone were expensive ($1,001 USD). For diarrhea, the cost of generic loperamide or diphenoxylate-atropine tablets was <$15 USD. For exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, only brand-name formulations were available, range of cost, $1,072 USD-$1,514 USD. For cancer-associated fatigue, the cost of generic dexamethasone or dexmethylphenidate was <$15 USD, whereas brand-name modafinil was more costly ($1,284 USD). For a 4-drug nausea and vomiting prophylaxis regimen, costs ranged from $181 USD to $1,430 USD.
CONCLUSION
We highlight the high costs of many symptom control drugs and the wide variation in the costs of these drugs. These findings can guide patient-clinician discussions about cost-effectively managing symptoms, while promoting the use of less expensive formulations when possible.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Costs; Drugs, Generic; Financial Stress; Humans; Neoplasms; Pharmacies
PubMed: 34558297
DOI: 10.1200/OP.21.00466 -
Current Opinion in Endocrinology,... Feb 2016Opioid-based management of noncancer pain has become much more prevalent over the last 2 decades and is responsible for a wide range of side-effects, particularly... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Opioid-based management of noncancer pain has become much more prevalent over the last 2 decades and is responsible for a wide range of side-effects, particularly affecting the intestinal tract causing opioid-induced constipation (OIC). This review will consider results of recent clinical trials that have provided evidence of new pharmacological management options for the treatment of OIC.
RECENT FINDINGS
Supportive use of conventional agents, such as stool softeners, osmotic laxatives, and stimulating laxatives in OIC has limited efficacy. The peripheral μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) methylnaltrexone (MNTX) was first FDA approved for OIC in patients with advanced illness and later also for OIC in noncancer pain patients; clinical trial results indicated MNTX did not reverse opioid analgesia and did not trigger central opioid withdrawal. Another PAMORA, the orally available naloxegol, has also gained recent FDA approval for the treatment of OIC in adults with chronic, noncancer pain. Lubiprostone, a bicyclical fatty acid acting via activation of intestinal chloride channel-2 (ClC-2), was also approved for OIC treatment in patients with noncancer pain.
SUMMARY
PAMORA MNTX and naloxegol and the intestinal chloride channel-2 (ClC-2) activator lubiprostone represent additional possible therapeutic options for the management of OIC in patients with chronic noncancer pain.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chloride Channel Agonists; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Humans; Lubiprostone; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid, mu
PubMed: 26702846
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000220