-
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Apr 2024Constipation is a common problem among patients with cancer. By some accounts, about 60% of cancer patients experience constipation. There is limited empirical evidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Constipation is a common problem among patients with cancer. By some accounts, about 60% of cancer patients experience constipation. There is limited empirical evidence of the clinical effectiveness of pharmacologic agents in opioid-induced constipation in advanced diseases.
OBJECTIVES
We sought to quantitatively summarize the therapeutic effectiveness of the pharmacologic means of managing opioid-induced constipation.
METHODS
Randomized control trials (RCTs) identified from medical literature databases that reported quantitative measures of the effect of pharmacotherapeutic agents to treat opioid induced constipation in patients with cancers and other advanced illnesses were included in this study. A conventional random effects meta-analysis was conducted including >3 trials with the same exposure and outcome assessed, and a network-meta-analysis was conducted for all placebo-controlled trials.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies that examined the effect of various pharmacotherapeutic agents were included. The medications were Methylnatrexone (N = 5), Naldemedine (N = 5), other conventional agents (N = 4) and herbal medicines (N = 4). In conventional meta-analysis, methylnaltrexone increased the proportion achieving rescue-free laxation by 2.68 fold (95% CI: 1.34, 5.37; P = 0.0054) within 4 hours of the administration compared to placebo. In network meta-analysis, the pooled RR of the pharmacotherapeutic agents on rescue-free bowel movements as 2.26 (95% CI: 1.52, 3.36) for methylnaltrexone, 1.58 (95% CI: 0.94, 2.66) for naldemedine, and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.45, 1.23) for polyethylene glycol, compared to placebo.
CONCLUSION
Methylnatrexone and Naldemedine have currently shown promise in randomized trials concerning opioid-induced constipation in cancer and advanced illness. It is imperative that future research ascertain not just the relative therapeutic efficacy but also the cost-benefit analyses of these newer regimens with more commonly used and accessible laxatives.
Topics: Humans; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Narcotic Antagonists; Analgesics, Opioid; Naltrexone; Constipation; Laxatives; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
PubMed: 38092261
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.12.010 -
Scientific African Sep 2021The current crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic around the world has been devastating as many lives have been lost to the novel SARS CoV-2 virus. Thus, there is an urgent...
The current crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic around the world has been devastating as many lives have been lost to the novel SARS CoV-2 virus. Thus, there is an urgent need for the right therapeutic drug to curb the disease. However, there is time constraint in drug development, hence the need for drug repurposing approach, a relatively fast and less expensive alternative. In this study, 1,100 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs were obtained from DrugBank and trimmed to 791 ligands based on illicitness, withdrawal from the market, being chemical agents rather than drugs, being investigational drugs and having molecular weight greater than 500 (Kg/mol). The ligands were docked against six drug targets of the novel SARS CoV-2 - 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro), Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE2), ADP ribose phosphatase of NSP3 (NSP3), NSP9 RNA binding protein (NSP9), RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and Replicase Polyprotein 1a (RP1a). UCSF Chimera, PyRx and Discovery Studio, were used to prepare the proteins, dock the ligands and visualize the complexes, respectively. Remdesivir, Lopinavir and Hydroxychloroquine were used as reference drugs. Pharmacokinetic properties of the ligands were obtained using AdmetSAR. The binding energies of the standard drugs ranged from -5.4 to -8.7 kcal/mol while over 400 of the ligands screened showed binding energy lower than -5.4 kcal/mol. Out of the 791 number of compounds docked, 10, 91, 132, 92, 54 and 96 compounds showed lower binding energies than all the controls against 3CLPro, ACE2, NSP3, NSP9, RP1a and RdRp, respectively. Ligands that bound all target proteins, and showed the lowest binding energies with good ADMET properties and particularly showed the lowest binding against ACE2 are ethynodiol diacetate (-15.6 kcal/mol), methylnaltrexone (-15.5 kcal/mol), ketazolam (-14.5 kcal/mol) and naloxone (-13.6 kcal/mol). Further investigations are recommended for ethynodiol diacetate, methylnaltrexone, ketazolam and naloxone through preclinical and clinical studies to ascertain their effectiveness.
PubMed: 34308004
DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00845 -
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie Apr 2017More than 6 million people in Germany suffer from chronic pain which greatly impairs their wellbeing. Often the only therapeutic option is to use class 2 or 3 analgesic... (Review)
Review
More than 6 million people in Germany suffer from chronic pain which greatly impairs their wellbeing. Often the only therapeutic option is to use class 2 or 3 analgesic opioids in the WHO classification, as class 1 analgesics may be toxic or of limited efficacy. However, the high incidence of opioid side effects leads to high discontinuation rates. Thus, the success of opioid treatment is also highly dependent on the management of the safety and tolerability of the treatment. Most opioid side effects, such as nausea and sedation, predominantly occur in the initial phase of therapy. In contrast, opioid-induced constipation can last throughout opioid therapy. First-line treatment with laxatives does not solve the problem in all patients. Possible second-line therapies include opioid receptor antagonists, such as Naloxone, oral-administered Naloxegol, or subcutaneously given Methylnaltrexone. The discussion also covers the management of other common side effects of opioids, such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, micturition disorder, and further symptoms.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Germany; Humans; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28363231
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103348 -
The Journal of Emergency Medicine Feb 2022Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent consequence of opioid analgesia that may increase patient risk for emergency department visits and hospitalization.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent consequence of opioid analgesia that may increase patient risk for emergency department visits and hospitalization. Methylnaltrexone is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of OIC.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the safety and efficacy of a single methylnaltrexone dose.
METHODS
Results were pooled from three randomized, placebo-controlled methylnaltrexone (MNTX) studies in opioid-treated patients with advanced illness and OIC, despite treatment with conventional laxatives. Baseline assessments included demographics, disease/treatment characteristics, and functional levels. Efficacy endpoints included rescue-free laxation (RFL) rates within 4 and 24 h, time to first RFL, pain score change, and adverse events (AEs) after a single MNTX dose or placebo.
RESULTS
The analysis included 281 patients receiving MNTX and 237 receiving placebo. Mean age was 66.2 years for MNTX and 65.8 for placebo; ∼50% were men. The most frequent primary diagnosis was cancer (MNTX = 70.5%; placebo = 66.2%) and most (∼98%) were receiving at least one laxative at baseline. RFL occurred in 61.4% vs. 16.0%, and 72.1% vs. 40.1% MNTX vs. placebo patients, within 4 and 24 h of the initial dose, respectively. Relative to placebo, MNTX use reduced the time to first RFL, with most MNTX-treated patients achieving RFL within 2 h. Baseline and posttreatment pain scores were similar (p = 0.9556 vs. placebo for current and worst pain change from baseline), demonstrating that MNTX did not negatively affect opioid analgesia. Most AEs were gastrointestinal related and dissipated by the second dose.
CONCLUSIONS
Methylnaltrexone provides early RFL without compromising analgesia in patients receiving chronic opioid therapy.
Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Male; Naltrexone; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
PubMed: 34893381
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.012 -
Journal of Cellular Physiology Nov 2021The Mu-opioid receptor (MOR) has been implicated in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Methylnaltrexone (MNTX), an antagonist of MOR, has shown to inhibit tumor growth and...
The Mu-opioid receptor (MOR) has been implicated in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Methylnaltrexone (MNTX), an antagonist of MOR, has shown to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in lung cancer cell lines. The effect of MNTX on other cell lines such as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has not been investigated. We measured the expression and activity of the receptor in different HNSCC cell lines. Then, we evaluated the impact of modulating the expression MOR and the effect of MNTX on the proliferation, clonogenic activity, invasion, and migration of two HNSCC (FaDu and MDA686Tu) cell lines expressing MOR and one cell line (UMSCC47) not expressing the receptor. We also evaluated the impact of MNTX on tumor growth and metastasis formation in vivo. Activation of the receptor with [d-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol] (DAMGO) caused a significant reduction in cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels in FaDu cells. Knockdown of MOR inhibited in vitro aggressive cell behaviors on FaDu and MDA686Tu cells and correlated with a reduction in markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In vitro studies showed that MNTX strongly inhibited the proliferation, clonogenic activity, invasion, and migration of FaDu and MDA686Tu cells but has no effect on UMSCC47 cells. In vivo experiments demonstrated that MNTX suppresses tumor growth in HNSCC cell tumor-bearing mice. Our studies indicate that MOR could be considered as a therapeutic target to treat HNSCC.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Nude; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Signal Transduction; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Tumor Burden; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; Mice
PubMed: 34038587
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.30421 -
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity Jul 2020We hypothesized that elevations of microparticles (MPs) would occur with morphine administration to mice. Repetitive dosing to induce anti-nociceptive tolerance...
We hypothesized that elevations of microparticles (MPs) would occur with morphine administration to mice. Repetitive dosing to induce anti-nociceptive tolerance increases blood-borne MPs by 8-fold, and by 10-fold in deep cervical lymph nodes draining brain glymphatics. MPs express proteins specific to cells including neutrophils, microglia, astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes. Interleukin (IL)-1β content of MPs increases 68-fold. IL-1β antagonist administration diminishes blood-borne and cervical lymph node MPs, and abrogates tolerance induction. Intravenous polyethylene glycol Telomer B, a surfactant that lyses MPs, and intraperitoneal methylnaltrexone also inhibit MPs elevations and tolerance. Critically, neutropenic mice do not develop anti-nociceptive tolerance, elevations of blood-borne or cervical node MPs. Immunohistochemical evidence for microglial activation by morphine does not correlated with the MPs response pattern. Neutrophil-derived MPs appear to be required for morphine-induced anti-nociceptive tolerance. Further, patients entering treatment for opioid use disorder exhibit similar MPs elevations as do tolerant mice.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Mice; Analgesics, Opioid; Brain; Cell-Derived Microparticles; Drug Tolerance; Morphine; Nociception; Opioid-Related Disorders
PubMed: 32001343
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.01.017 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021Opioids are administered to cancer patients in the period surrounding tumour excision, and in the management of cancer-associated pain. The effects of opioids on tumour... (Review)
Review
Opioids are administered to cancer patients in the period surrounding tumour excision, and in the management of cancer-associated pain. The effects of opioids on tumour growth and metastasis, and their consequences on disease outcome, continue to be the object of polarised, discrepant literature. It is becoming clear that opioids contribute a range of direct and indirect effects to the biology of solid tumours, to the anticancer immune response, inflammation, angiogenesis and importantly, to the tumour-promoting effects of pain. A common misconception in the literature is that the effect of opioid agonists equates the effect of the mu-opioid receptor, the major target of the analgesic effect of this class of drugs. We review the evidence on opioid receptor expression in cancer, opioid receptor polymorphisms and cancer outcome, the effect of opioid antagonists, especially the peripheral antagonist methylnaltrexone, and lastly, the evidence available of a role for opioids through non-opioid receptor mediated actions.
PubMed: 35004315
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.792290 -
BMC Palliative Care 2014Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the major symptoms in palliative care with a prevalence of 30-50%. Methylnaltrexone for the treatment of OIC is significantly...
Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of methylnaltrexone in resolving constipation induced by different opioid subtypes combined with laboratory analysis of immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects of methylnaltrexone.
BACKGROUND
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the major symptoms in palliative care with a prevalence of 30-50%. Methylnaltrexone for the treatment of OIC is significantly more effective than placebo, but only in about fifty percent of the patients regardless of dose increase. Dose increases cause increased toxicity without additional efficacy, and are therefore not recommended. While methylnaltrexone is a μ-receptor antagonist, only a few opioids are solely μ-receptor agonists. Therefore, the response to methylnaltrexone may be determined by the receptor-profile of a specific opioid. In addition, methylnaltrexone may also affect the immune system and angiogenesis as was found in pre-clinical studies. Primary aim of this study is to determine differences in the efficacy of methylnaltrexone prescribed to resolve opioid induced constipation between three commonly used opioid subtypes: morphine sulphate, oxycodone and fentanyl. Secondary aim is to explore potential immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects of methylnaltrexone.
METHODS
In this multi-center, prospective, parallel group trial we will evaluate the efficacy of methylnaltrexone in resolving OIC occurring as a side effect of the most common opioid subtypes: morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl. In total 195 patients with OIC despite prophylactic laxatives will receive methylnaltrexone every other day up to fourteen days. Patients will report its effect in a laxation diary. Group allocation is based on the opioid type the patient is using. At the start and end of the study period patients complete the Bowel Function Index questionnaire. A subgroup of the patients will donate blood for analysis of immunomodulatory- and anti-angiogenic effects of methylnaltrexone.
DISCUSSION
In this study we aim to determine the efficacy of methylnaltrexone per opioid subtype to reduce constipation. We expect that the outcome of this study will improve the clinical use of methylnaltraxone.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01955213 and in the Dutch trial register: NTR4272.
PubMed: 25165428
DOI: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-42 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2015This article describes the second update of a Cochrane review on the effectiveness of laxatives for the management of constipation in people receiving palliative care.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This article describes the second update of a Cochrane review on the effectiveness of laxatives for the management of constipation in people receiving palliative care. Previous versions were published in 2006 and 2010 where we also evaluated trials of methylnaltrexone; these trials have been removed as they are included in another review in press. In these earlier versions, we drew no conclusions on individual effectiveness of different laxatives because of the limited number of evaluations. This is despite constipation being common in palliative care, generating considerable suffering due to the unpleasant physical symptoms and the availability of a wide range of laxatives with known differences in effect in other populations.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effectiveness and differential efficacy of laxatives used to manage constipation in people receiving palliative care.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science (SCI & CPCI-S) for trials to September 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating laxatives for constipation in people receiving palliative care.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. The appropriateness of combining data from the studies depended upon clinical and outcome measure homogeneity.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified five studies involving the laxatives lactulose, senna, co-danthramer, misrakasneham, docusate and magnesium hydroxide with liquid paraffin. Overall, the study findings were at an unclear risk of bias. As all five studies compared different laxatives or combinations of laxatives, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. There was no evidence on whether individual laxatives were more effective than others or caused fewer adverse effects.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This second update found that laxatives were of similar effectiveness but the evidence remains limited due to insufficient data from a few small RCTs. None of the studies evaluated polyethylene glycol or any intervention given rectally. There is a need for more trials to evaluate the effectiveness of laxatives in palliative care populations. Extrapolating findings on the effectiveness of laxatives evaluated in other populations should proceed with caution. This is because of the differences inherent in people receiving palliative care that may impact, in a likely negative way, on the effect of a laxative.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anthraquinones; Cathartics; Constipation; Humans; Lactulose; Magnesium Hydroxide; Naltrexone; Palliative Care; Paraffin; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Senna Extract
PubMed: 25967924
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003448.pub4 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Aug 2016The evidence for treatment of constipation in palliative care patients is poor. The condition of these patients is often complex, and results from studies performed in... (Review)
Review
The evidence for treatment of constipation in palliative care patients is poor. The condition of these patients is often complex, and results from studies performed in other patient groups cannot be extrapolated unconditionally. However, macrogol (polyethylene glycol), lactulose and sodium picosulphate seem to be well tolerated, and methylnaltrexone could be used in opioid-induced constipation, if the patients are not at risk from gastrointestinal perforation. The patients should be offered quiet and private surroundings, and attention should be payed to securing an optimal body position for defecation.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Defecation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Laxatives; Palliative Care; Posture
PubMed: 27550785
DOI: No ID Found