-
Medicine Apr 2021Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is caused by an inflammatory injury to the lung. Dysregulated inflammation is the cardinal feature of ARDS. Methylprednisolone... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is caused by an inflammatory injury to the lung. Dysregulated inflammation is the cardinal feature of ARDS. Methylprednisolone is an option for treating ARDS. However, the benefits and adverse effects of methylprednisolone have not been well assessed in patients with ARDS. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone against ARDS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The electronic database of Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone for ARDS were included. Revman 5.3 and Stata 15.0 were used to conduct the analysis. The fixed-effects model was used to calculate summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs).
RESULTS
Ten RCTs studies involving 692 patients with ARDS. The summary results demonstrated that, compared with placebo, methylprednisolone had a statistically significant effect on mortality (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43-0.95, I2 = 42%); the time of mechanical ventilation (MD) = -2.70, 95% CI: -3.31 to -2.10; I2 = 0%) in patients with ARDS, but it was not associated with increased rates of adverse events (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.34-1.86; I2 = 58%).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that Methylprednisolone is safe against ARDS. It may reduce mortality and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation. However, well-designed and large-sample studies were required to fully characterize the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone against ARDS.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Case-Control Studies; Data Management; Humans; Inflammation; Methylprednisolone; Middle Aged; Mortality; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Safety; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33832136
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025408 -
Steroids Jul 2022The roles of methylprednisolone in treatment of patients with COVID-19 remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The roles of methylprednisolone in treatment of patients with COVID-19 remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone in treatment of COVID-19 patients. PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing methylprednisolone and no glucocorticoids treatment in patients with COVID-19. Statistical pooling was reported as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI). Thirty-three studies were eligible, including 5 randomized trials and 28 observational studies. Meta-analysis showed that compared with no glucocorticoids, methylprednisolone in treatment of COVID-19 patients was associated with reduced short-term mortality (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.89), less need for ICU admission (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.91) and mechanical ventilation (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.84), increased 28-day ventilator-free days (MD 2.81; 95% CI 2.64-2.97), without increasing risk of secondary infections (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82-1.32), but could prolong duration of viral shedding (MD 1.03; 95% CI 0.25-1.82). Subgroup analyses revealed that low-dose (≤2mg/kg/day) methylprednisolone treatment for ≤ 7 days in severe COVID-19 patients was associated with relatively better clinical outcomes, without increasing duration of viral shedding. Compared with no glucocorticoids, methylprednisolone treatment in COVID-19 patients is associated with reduced short-term mortality and better clinical outcomes, without increasing secondary infections, but could slightly prolong duration of viral shedding. Patients with severe COVID-19 are more likely to benefit from short-term low-dose methylprednisolone treatment (1-2 mg/kg/day for ≤ 7 days).
Topics: Coinfection; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Methylprednisolone; Respiration, Artificial; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 35346661
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2022.109022 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Aug 2018
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Aged, 80 and over; Colon, Sigmoid; Colonic Diseases; Colonoscopy; Diagnosis, Differential; Diarrhea; Female; Humans; Methylprednisolone; Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous
PubMed: 30089809
DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0081-0 -
BMC Infectious Diseases May 2023The preferred agent of glucocorticoids in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The preferred agent of glucocorticoids in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19.
METHODS
By searching the electronic literature database including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, the clinical studies comparing methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in the treatment of severe COVID-19 were selected according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted and literature quality was assessed. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. The secondary outcomes were the rates of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation, PaO/FiO ratio, plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, hospital stay, and the incidence of severe adverse events. Statistical pooling applied the fixed or random effects model and reported as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.0.
RESULTS
Twelve clinical studies were eligible, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine non-RCTs. A total of 2506 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed, of which 1242 (49.6%) received methylprednisolone and 1264 (50.4%) received dexamethasone treatment. In general, the heterogeneity across studies was significant, and the equivalent doses of methylprednisolone were higher than that of dexamethasone. Our meta-analysis showed that methylprednisolone treatment in severe COVID-19 patients was related to significantly reduced plasma ferritin and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio compared with dexamethasone, and that no significant difference in other clinical outcomes between the two groups was found. However, subgroup analyses of RCTs demonstrated that methylprednisolone treatment was associated with reduced short-term mortality, and decreased CRP level compared with dexamethasone. Moreover, subgroup analyses observed that severe COVID-19 patients treated with a moderate dose (2 mg/kg/day) of methylprednisolone were related to a better prognosis than those treated with dexamethasone.
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that compared with dexamethasone, methylprednisolone could reduce the systemic inflammatory response in severe COVID-19, and its effect was equivalent to that of dexamethasone on other clinical outcomes. It should be noted that the equivalent dose of methylprednisolone used was higher. Based on the evidence of subgroup analyses of RCTs, methylprednisolone, preferably at a moderate dose, has an advantage over dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19.
Topics: Humans; Glucocorticoids; Methylprednisolone; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 37147596
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08280-2 -
Acta Clinica Croatica Dec 2021Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic diseases in children, and cannot be controlled with conventional antiepileptic drugs in 30% of cases. Therefore, in these...
Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic diseases in children, and cannot be controlled with conventional antiepileptic drugs in 30% of cases. Therefore, in these cases, alternative approach such as corticosteroid therapy (CT) is used. The aim of this study was to analyze different types of CT used to treat drug-resistant childhood epilepsies, treated at Rijeka University Hospital Centre during a 5-year period (2016-2020). This retrospective study included 32 patients. The following parameters were analyzed: number of patients with a particular diagnosis, average age (in months) at the onset of epilepsy, average epilepsy duration (in months) prior to CT, average number of antiepileptic drugs used prior to CT, presence of changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), presence of comorbidities, and types of CT. The average age at the onset of epilepsy was 14 months and average epilepsy duration prior to CT was 16 months. On average, 5 antiepileptic drugs were used prior to CT. MRI changes were present in 53.13% and comorbidities in 81.25% of study patients. Prednisone therapy was used in 28.13%, combined therapy with prednisone and methylprednisolone in 65.63%, and methylprednisolone in 6.25% of patients. Study results revealed the use of CT for particular diagnosis to differ among the centers, as well as within the same center, so it is important to highlight the importance of reaching universal guidelines for CT therapy of childhood epilepsies.
Topics: Child; Humans; Anticonvulsants; Prednisone; Retrospective Studies; Epilepsy; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Methylprednisolone
PubMed: 36405001
DOI: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.s3.04 -
Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie Jun 2018
Topics: Humans; Lung; Methylprednisolone; Pain; Pulmonary Surgical Procedures; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
PubMed: 29933472
DOI: 10.1055/a-0603-5158 -
International Journal of Infectious... Sep 2022In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of intravenous dexamethasone and methylprednisolone on the treatment of inpatients with COVID-19. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of intravenous dexamethasone and methylprednisolone on the treatment of inpatients with COVID-19.
METHODS
In this randomized clinical trial, 143 patients under 80 years of age with moderate to severe COVID-19 were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: dexamethasone (8 mg/day) and methylprednisolone (60 mg/day in two divided doses). The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes included: duration of oxygen therapy, absolute leukocyte and lymphocyte count, hypokalemia, hyperglycemia, intensive care unit admission, and mortality in the two groups for 28 days. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 26 using t-test, chi-square, and analysis of variance.
RESULTS
The duration of hospitalization was significantly (P <0.001) shorter in the dexamethasone group than in the methylprednisolone group (8 [95% confidence interval [CI]:6-10] and 11 [95% CI: 7-14], respectively). In addition, the duration of oxygen therapy in the dexamethasone group (7 [95% CI: 5-9]) was significantly (P <0.001) shorter than in the methylprednisolone group (10 [95% CI: 5.5-14]). The mortality rate was 17.1% (95% CI: 8.1-26.1) in the dexamethasone group and 12.3% (95% CI: 4.6-20.0) in the methylprednisolone group, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.46).
CONCLUSION
Results showed better effectiveness of 8 mg/day dexamethasone compared with 60 mg/day methylprednisolone based on the shorter hospital stay, which can be considered in the therapeutic protocol of COVID-19.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
IRCT20210223050466N1.
Topics: Dexamethasone; Humans; Methylprednisolone; Oxygen; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 35817286
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.019 -
Revista Alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco,... 2019
Topics: Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Methylprednisolone
PubMed: 31606026
DOI: 10.29262/ram.v66i3.639 -
Drug Metabolism and Disposition: the... Jun 2024The pharmacokinetics (PK) of methylprednisolone (MPL) exhibited tissue-specific saturable binding and reversible conversion with its metabolite, methylprednisone (MPN)....
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of methylprednisolone (MPL) exhibited tissue-specific saturable binding and reversible conversion with its metabolite, methylprednisone (MPN). Blood and 11 tissues were collected in male rats after intravenous (i.v.) bolus doses of 50 mg/kg MPL and 20 mg/kg MPN and upon i.v. infusion of MPL and MPN at 0.3, 3, and 10 mg/h per kg. The concentrations of MPL and MPN were simultaneously measured. A comprehensive physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was applied to describe the plasma and tissue profiles and estimate PK parameters of the MPL/MPN interconversion system. Both dosed and formed MPL and MPN were in rapid equilibrium or achieved steady-state rapidly in plasma and tissues. MPL tissue partitioning was nonlinear, with highest capacity in liver (322.9 ng/ml) followed by kidney, heart, intestine, skin, spleen, bone, brain, muscle, and lowest in adipose (2.74 ng/ml) and displaying high penetration in lung. The tissue partition coefficient of MPN was linear but widely variable (0.15∼5.38) across most tissues, with nonlinear binding in liver and kidney. The conversion of MPL to MPN occurred in kidney, lung, and intestine with total clearance of 429 ml/h, and the back conversion occurred in liver and kidney at 1342 ml/h. The irreversible elimination clearance of MPL was 789 ml/h from liver and that of MPN was 2758 ml/h with liver accounting for 44%, lung 35%, and kidney 21%. The reversible metabolism elevated MPL exposure in rats by 13%. This highly complex PBPK model provided unique and comprehensive insights into the disposition of a major corticosteroid. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our dual physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) study and model of methylprednisolone/methylprednisone (MPL/MPN) with multiple complexities reasonably characterized and parameterized their disposition, and provided greater insights into the interpretation of their pharmacodynamics in rats. Drug knowledge gained in this study may be translatable to higher-order species to appreciate the clinical utility of MPL. The complex model itself is instructive for advanced PBPK analysis of drugs with reversible metabolism and/or nonlinear tissue partitioning features.
Topics: Animals; Methylprednisolone; Male; Rats; Tissue Distribution; Models, Biological; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Liver
PubMed: 38653502
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.124.001711 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Mar 2022Racial/ethnic minorities are at higher risk for severe COVID-19. This may be related to social determinants that lead to chronic inflammatory states. The aims of the...
BACKGROUND
Racial/ethnic minorities are at higher risk for severe COVID-19. This may be related to social determinants that lead to chronic inflammatory states. The aims of the study were to determine if there are racial/ethnic disparities with inflammatory markers and association of methylprednisolone to in hospital survival.
METHODS
This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years of age and admitted for severe COVID-19 pneumonia between March and June 2020 in 13 Hospitals in New Jersey, United States. Patients who received other formulation of corticosteroids were not included. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves were performed to test for discriminatory ability of each inflammatory makers. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression assessed the association of variables to in hospital survival.
RESULTS
Propensity matched sample (n = 759) between no methylprednisolone (n = 380) and methylprednisolone (n = 379) had 338 Whites, 102 Blacks, 61 Asian/Indians, and 251 non-Black non-White Hispanics. Compared to CRP, area under receiving operating characteristic curve for d-dimer in Hispanics (0.742) was statistically different (DeLong Test P = 0.0041). Multivariate cox regression showed that different variables in Blacks [age ≥ 60 years (HR = 3.71, P = 0.0281), mechanical ventilation (HR = 5.07, P = 0.0281) and creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL (HR = 3.61, P = 0.0007)], Whites [cancer (HR = 1.68, P = 0.0213), qSOFA score of 1 (HR = 1.81, P = 0.0213), qSOFA score of 2 (HR = 5.16, P < 0.0001), qSOFA score of 3 (HR = 11.81, P < 0.0001) and creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL (HR = 2.16, P = 0.0006)], Hispanics [hypertension (HR = 2.52, P = 0.0007), cancer (HR = 2.99, P = 0.0244 and D-dimer ≥ 2 mcg/mL (HR = 2.22, P = 0.0077)], and Asian/Indians [ chronic kidney disease (HR = 6.36, P = 0.0031) and CRP > 20 mg/L (HR = 5.02, P = 0.0032)] were statistically significant for mortality. Low dose and high dose methylprednisolone were significantly associated with prolonged survival in Whites [low dose (HR = 0.37, P < 0.0001) and high dose (HR = 0.48, P < 0.0183)] and Asian/Indians [low dose (HR = 0.13, P = 0.0101) and high dose (HR = 0.15, P = 0.01)]. However, high dose was not associated with improved survival compared to low dose. Methylprednisolone was not associated with prolonged survival in Blacks and Hispanics.
CONCLUSION
Racial/Ethnic disparities with inflammatory markers preclude the use of one marker as a predictor of survival. Methylprednisolone is associated with prolonged survival in Asian/Indians and Whites.
Topics: Ethnicity; Humans; Inflammation; Methylprednisolone; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; United States; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 35287602
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07237-1