-
Pediatric Cardiology Dec 2023The autosomal recessive (AR) form of Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is described both associated with deafness known as Jervell and Lange-Nielsen (JLN) syndrome, and without...
The autosomal recessive (AR) form of Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is described both associated with deafness known as Jervell and Lange-Nielsen (JLN) syndrome, and without deafness (WD). The aim of the study is to report the characteristics of AR LQTS patients and the efficacy of the therapy. Data of all children with AR LQTS referred to the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS from September 2012 to September 2021were included. Three (30%) patients had compound heterozygosity and 7 (70%) had homozygous variants of the KCNQ1 gene, the latter showing deafness. Four patients (40%) presented aborted sudden cardiac death (aSCD): three with previous episodes of syncope (75%), the other without previous symptoms (16.6% of asymptomatic patients). An episode of aSCD occurred in 2/3 (66.7%) of WD and heterozygous patients, while in 2/7 (28%) JLN and homozygous patients and in 2/2 patients with QTC > 600 ms. All patients were treated with Nadolol. In 5 Mexiletine was added, shortening QTc and obtaining the disappearance of the T-wave alternance (TWA) in 3/3. Episodes of aSCD seem to be more frequent in LQTS patients with compound heterozygous variants and WD than in those with JLN and homozygous variants. Episodes of aSCD also appear more frequent in children with syncope or with QTc value > 600 ms, even on beta-blocker therapy, than in patients without syncope or with Qtc < 600 ms. However, our descriptive results should be confirmed by larger studies. Moreover, Mexiletine addition reduced QTc value and eliminated TWA.
Topics: Child; Humans; KCNQ1 Potassium Channel; Mexiletine; Long QT Syndrome; Jervell-Lange Nielsen Syndrome; Syncope; Heart Arrest; Deafness
PubMed: 37597120
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-023-03266-y -
Pharmacological Reports : PR Aug 2014For a long time it has been suspected that epilepsy and cardiac arrhythmia may have common molecular background. Furthermore, seizures can affect function of the central... (Review)
Review
For a long time it has been suspected that epilepsy and cardiac arrhythmia may have common molecular background. Furthermore, seizures can affect function of the central autonomic control centers leading to short- and long-term alterations of cardiac rhythm. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) has most likely a cardiac mechanism. Common elements of pathogenesis create a basis for the assumption that antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) may affect seizure phenomena and interact with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Numerous studies have demonstrated anticonvulsant effects of AADs. Among class I AADs (sodium channel blockers), phenytoin is an established antiepileptic drug. Propafenone exerted low anti-electroshock activity in rats. Lidocaine and mexiletine showed the anticonvulsant activity not only in animal models, but also in patients with partial seizures. Among beta-blockers (class II AADs), propranolol was anticonvulsant in models for generalized tonic-clonic and complex partial seizures, but not for myoclonic convulsions. Metoprolol and pindolol antagonized tonic-clonic seizures in DBA/2 mice. Timolol reversed the epileptiform activity of pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) in the brain. Furthermore, amiodarone, the representative of class III AADs, inhibited PTZ- and caffeine-induced convulsions in mice. In the group of class IV AADs, verapamil protected mice against PTZ-induced seizures and inhibited epileptogenesis in amygdala-kindled rats. Verapamil and diltiazem showed moderate anticonvulsant activity in genetically epilepsy prone rats. Additionally, numerous AADs potentiated the anticonvulsant action of AEDs in both experimental and clinical conditions. It should be mentioned, however, that many AADs showed proconvulsant effects in overdose. Moreover, intravenous esmolol and intra-arterial verapamil induced seizures even at therapeutic dose ranges.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Heart Rate; Humans
PubMed: 24948053
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharep.2014.03.009 -
Pharmacological Research May 2019Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the primary and secondary prevention of patients with ventricular arrhythmias. However, the adverse... (Review)
Review
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the primary and secondary prevention of patients with ventricular arrhythmias. However, the adverse effects of appropriate or inappropriate shocks may require the adjunctive use of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Beta blockers are the cornerstone of pharmacological primary and secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias. In addition to their established efficacy at reducing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, beta-blockers are safe with few side effects. Amiodarone is superior to beta blockers and sotalol for the prevention of ventricular arrhythmia recurrence. However, long-term amiodarone use is associated with significant side effects that limit its utility. Sotalol and mexiletine are the main alternatives to amiodarone with a better side effect profile though they are less efficacious at preventing ventricular arrhythmia recurrence. Dofetilide, azimilide and ranolazine are emerging as therapeutic options for secondary prevention; more studies are needed to assess efficacy and safety in comparison to currently used agents. Beta blockers and amiodarone are the mainstay of therapy in patients experiencing electrical storm; their use reduces the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD intervention as well as affording time until catheter ablation can be considered.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Cardiomyopathies; Catheter Ablation; Defibrillators, Implantable; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed: 30914300
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.03.020 -
American Journal of Translational... 2021Intersubject variability in drug response, whether related to efficacy or toxicity, is well recognized clinically. Over the years, drug selection from our pharmacologic... (Review)
Review
Intersubject variability in drug response, whether related to efficacy or toxicity, is well recognized clinically. Over the years, drug selection from our pharmacologic armamentarium has moved from providers' preferred choices to more personalized treatments as clinicians' decisions are guided by data from clinical trials. Since the advent of more accessible and affordable pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing, the promise of precise pharmacotherapy has been made. Results have accumulated in the literature with numerous examples demonstrating the value of PGx to improve drug response or prevent drug toxicity. Unfortunately, limited availability of reimbursement policies has dampened the enthusiasm of providers and organizations. The clinical application of PGx knowledge remains difficult for most clinicians under real-world conditions in patients with numerous chronic conditions and polypharmacy. This may be due to phenoconversion, a condition where there is a discrepancy between the genotype-predicted phenotype and the observed phenotype. This condition complicates the interpretation of PGx results and may lead to inappropriate recommendations and clinical decision making. For this reason, regulatory agencies have limited the transfer of information from PGx laboratories directly to consumers, especially recommendations about the use of certain drugs. This mini-review presents cases (mexiletine, propafenone, clopidogrel, warfarin, codeine, procainamide) from historical observations where drug response was modified by phenoconversion. The cases illustrate, from decades ago, that we are still in great need of advanced clinical decision systems that cope with conditions associated with phenoconversion, especially in patients with polypharmacy.
PubMed: 35035679
DOI: No ID Found -
Current Heart Failure Reports Aug 2017Cardiomyopathies due to genetic mutations are a heterogeneous group of disorders that comprise diseases of contractility, myocardial relaxation, and arrhythmias. Our... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Cardiomyopathies due to genetic mutations are a heterogeneous group of disorders that comprise diseases of contractility, myocardial relaxation, and arrhythmias. Our goal here is to discuss a limited list of genetically inherited cardiomyopathies and the specific therapeutic strategies used to treat them.
RECENT FINDINGS
Research into the molecular pathophysiology of the development of these cardiomyopathies is leading to the development of novel treatment approaches. Therapies targeting these specific mutations with gene therapy vectors are on the horizon, while other therapies which indirectly affect the physiologic derangements of the mutations are currently being studied and used clinically. Many of these therapies are older medications being given new roles such as mexiletine for Brugada syndrome and diflunisal for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. A newer targeted therapy, the inhibitor of myosin ATPase MYK-461, has been shown to suppress the development of ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis, and myocyte disarray and is being studied as a potential therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. While this field is too large to be completely contained in a single review, we present a large cross section of recent developments in the field of therapeutics for inherited cardiomyopathies. New therapies are on the horizon, and their development will likely result in improved outcomes for patients inflicted by these conditions.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Brugada Syndrome; Cardiomyopathies; Diflunisal; Genetic Therapy; Humans; Mexiletine; Mutation; Myocardial Contraction
PubMed: 28660543
DOI: 10.1007/s11897-017-0346-8 -
Annals of Clinical and Translational... Nov 2022Patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) often experience muscular weakness under cold exposure. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Observational Study
OBJECTIVE
Patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) often experience muscular weakness under cold exposure.
METHODS
In our previously conducted observational study, we assessed nerve conduction and grip strength to examine the effect of cold exposure on motor function, based on which we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mexiletine hydrochloride in SBMA (MEXPRESS).
RESULTS
In the observational study, 51 consecutive patients with SBMA and 18 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Of the patients with SBMA, 88.0% experienced cold paresis. Patients with SBMA exhibited greater prolongation of ulnar nerve distal latency under cold (SBMA, 5.6 ± 1.1 msec; HC, 4.3 ± 0.6 msec; p <0.001); the change in the distal latencies between room temperature and cold exposure conditions correlated with the change in grip power. In the MEXPRESS trial, 20 participants took mexiletine or lactose, three times a day for 4 weeks with a crossover design. There was no difference in distal latencies at room temperature and under cold exposure between mexiletine and placebo groups as the primary endpoint. However, tongue pressure and 10-sec grip and release test under cold exposure were improved in the mexiletine group. There were no serious adverse events throughout the study period.
INTERPRETATION
Cold paresis is common and associated with prolongation of distal latency in SBMA. The results of the phase II clinical trial revealed that mexiletine showed short-term safety, but it did not restore cold exposure-induced prolongation of distal latency.
Topics: Humans; Mexiletine; Bulbo-Spinal Atrophy, X-Linked; Pressure; Tongue; Muscle Weakness; Paresis
PubMed: 36208052
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51667 -
Clinical Research in Cardiology :... Jun 2024Despite impressive developments in the field of ventricular arrhythmias, there is still a relevant number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who require... (Review)
Review
Despite impressive developments in the field of ventricular arrhythmias, there is still a relevant number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who require antiarrhythmic drug therapy and may, e.g., in otherwise drug and/or ablation refractory situations, benefit from agents known for decades, such as mexiletine. Through its capability of blocking fast sodium channels in cardiomyocytes, it has played a minor to moderate antiarrhythmic role throughout the recent decades. Nevertheless, certain patients with structural heart disease suffering from drug-refractory, i.e., mainly amiodarone refractory ventricular arrhythmias, as well as those with selected forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) may nowadays still benefit from mexiletine. Here, we outline mexiletine's cellular and clinical electrophysiological properties. In addition, the application of mexiletine may be accompanied by various potential side effects, e.g., nausea and tremor, and is limited by several drug-drug interactions. Thus, we shed light on the current therapeutic role of mexiletine for therapy of ventricular arrhythmias and discuss clinically relevant aspects of its indications based on current evidence.
Topics: Mexiletine; Humans; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38353682
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02383-9 -
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters Aug 2021In the United States, approximately one million individuals are hospitalized every year for arrhythmias, making arrhythmias one of the top causes of healthcare...
In the United States, approximately one million individuals are hospitalized every year for arrhythmias, making arrhythmias one of the top causes of healthcare expenditures. Mexiletine is currently used as an antiarrhythmic drug but has limitations. The purpose of this work was to use normal and Long QT syndrome Type 3 (LQTS3) patient-derived human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes to identify an analog of mexiletine with superior drug-like properties. Compared to racemic mexiletine, medicinal chemistry optimization of substituted racemic pyridyl phenyl mexiletine analogs resulted in a more potent sodium channel inhibitor with greater selectivity for the sodium over the potassium channel and for late over peak sodium current.
Topics: Cardiac Conduction System Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; Long QT Syndrome; Mexiletine; Molecular Structure; Myocytes, Cardiac; NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; Pyridines; Structure-Activity Relationship
PubMed: 34062251
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128162 -
Current Medicinal Chemistry 2016Mexiletine is an oral class IB antiarrhythmic agent. Although it was primarily studied for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, it has been demonstrated to be... (Review)
Review
Mexiletine is an oral class IB antiarrhythmic agent. Although it was primarily studied for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, it has been demonstrated to be useful also for the treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy, neuropathic pain, skeletal muscle channelopathies, and recently amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. This review presents a detailed report on the different synthetic routes to racemic and homochiral mexiletine developed in the last decades, as well as analytical studies regarding enantioseparation methods and enantiomeric excess determination. Finally, some analogues of mexiletine reported in the literature, most of which along with pharmacological studies, have been mentioned.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Diabetic Nephropathies; Humans; Mexiletine; Stereoisomerism
PubMed: 27183983
DOI: 10.2174/0929867323666160517120234 -
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 2024In France, mexiletine - a class I antiarrhythmic drug - can be prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia of the skeletal muscles in adult patients with... (Review)
Review
In France, mexiletine - a class I antiarrhythmic drug - can be prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia of the skeletal muscles in adult patients with myotonic dystrophy under a compassionate use programme. Mexiletine is used according to its summary of product characteristics, which describes its use for myotonia treatment in adult patients with non-dystrophic myotonia, a different neuromuscular condition without cardiac involvement. A cardiac assessment is required prior to initiation and throughout treatment due to potential proarrhythmic effects. The presence of conduction system disease, the most common cardiac manifestation of myotonic dystrophy, mandates repeated cardiac evaluations in patients with this condition, and becomes even more important when they are given mexiletine. A group of experts, including three neurologists and five cardiologists from French neuromuscular reference centres, were involved in a task force to develop a treatment algorithm to guide mexiletine use in myotonic dystrophy. The recommendations are based on data from a literature review of the safety of mexiletine-treated patients with myotonic dystrophy, the compassionate use protocol for mexiletine and the personal clinical experience of the experts. The main conclusion of the expert group is that, although existing safety data in mexiletine-treated patients with myotonic dystrophy are reassuring, cardiac assessments should be reinforced in such patients compared with mexiletine-treated patients with non-dystrophic myotonia. This expert opinion to guide mexiletine treatment in patients with myotonic dystrophy should help to reduce the risk of severe adverse events and facilitate interactions between specialists involved in the routine care of patients with myotonic dystrophy.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Algorithms; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Clinical Decision-Making; Compassionate Use Trials; Consensus; France; Mexiletine; Myotonic Dystrophy; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
PubMed: 38677940
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2024.03.001