-
Circulation Journal : Official Journal... Nov 2023Cardiac calmodulinopathy, characterized by a life-threatening arrhythmia and sudden death in the young, is extremely rare and caused by genes encoding calmodulin, namely...
BACKGROUND
Cardiac calmodulinopathy, characterized by a life-threatening arrhythmia and sudden death in the young, is extremely rare and caused by genes encoding calmodulin, namely calmodulin 1 (CALM1), CALM2, and CALM3.Methods and Results: We screened 195 symptomatic children (age 0-12 years) who were suspected of inherited arrhythmias for 48 candidate genes, using a next-generation sequencer. Ten probands were identified as carrying variants in any of CALM1-3 (5%; median age 5 years), who were initially diagnosed with long QT syndrome (LQTS; n=5), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT; n=3), and overlap syndrome (n=2). Two probands harbored a CALM1 variant and 8 probands harbored 6 CALM2 variants. There were 4 clinical phenotypes: (1) documented lethal arrhythmic events (LAEs): 4 carriers of N98S in CALM1 or CALM2; (2) suspected LAEs: CALM2 p.D96G and D132G carriers experienced syncope and transient cardiopulmonary arrest under emotional stimulation; (3) critical cardiac complication: CALM2 p.D96V and p.E141K carriers showed severe cardiac dysfunction with QTc prolongation; and (4) neurological and developmental disorders: 2 carriers of CALM2 p.E46K showed cardiac phenotypes of CPVT. Beta-blocker therapy was effective in all cases except cardiac dysfunction, especially in combination with flecainide (CPVT-like phenotype) and mexiletine (LQTS-like).
CONCLUSIONS
Calmodulinopathy patients presented severe cardiac features, and their onset of LAEs was earlier in life, requiring diagnosis and treatment at the earliest age possible.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Calmodulin; East Asian People; Long QT Syndrome; Phenotype; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Death, Sudden, Cardiac
PubMed: 37380439
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0195 -
SAGE Open Medicine 2016The therapeutic trough range for mexiletine (0.8-2 mcg/mL) was largely established in the setting of arrhythmia prophylaxis following myocardial infarction.
INTRODUCTION
The therapeutic trough range for mexiletine (0.8-2 mcg/mL) was largely established in the setting of arrhythmia prophylaxis following myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVE
Describe the usage patterns of serum mexiletine concentrations and the impact of these concentrations on mexiletine dosing in modern practice for ventricular arrhythmia treatment.
METHODS
A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify serum mexiletine concentrations drawn between December 2004 and December 2014. The primary endpoint was the incidence of mexiletine concentrations drawn as troughs. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of mexiletine concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between adverse events and elevated concentrations, and association between baseline characteristics and mexiletine concentrations.
RESULTS
A total of 237 individual concentrations were included for analysis with 109 (46.0%) drawn appropriately as trough concentrations. Only 31 (13.1%) of the 237 concentrations drawn prompted a dose change. Mexiletine was primarily used for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias (96.2%), and 108 (45.6%) concentrations were drawn in an effort to assess efficacy. The median concentration was statistically different between patients with and without an adverse event (0.8 vs 0.7 mcg/mL, respectively; p = 0.017), but may not represent a clinical significance. Patients with hepatic dysfunction had higher median concentrations compared to those without hepatic dysfunction (1.30 vs 1.07 mcg/mL; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Mexiletine concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose change. This study suggests that routine monitoring of mexiletine concentrations may not be necessary; however, therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered in patients with hepatic dysfunction or to confirm mexiletine absorption in patients where this represents a concern.
PubMed: 27708780
DOI: 10.1177/2050312116670659 -
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Jun 2017Aconite poisoning is relatively rare but is frequently complicated by ventricular dysrhythmias, which may be fatal. Molecular basis of aconite alkaloid ventricular... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Aconite poisoning is relatively rare but is frequently complicated by ventricular dysrhythmias, which may be fatal. Molecular basis of aconite alkaloid ventricular arrhythmogenicity: Aconite exerts its toxic effects due to the presence of an admixture of alkaloids present in all parts of the plant. The major target of these aconite alkaloids is the fast voltage-gates sodium channel, where they cause persistent activation. This blockade of the channel in the activated state promotes automaticity within the ventricular myocardium and the generation of ventricular arrhythmias. Aconitine-induced arrhythmias: Aconite alkaloids are known to cause many different types of disturbance of heart rhythm. However, this focused review specifically looks at ventricular rhythm disturbances, namely ventricular ectopy, ventricular tachycardia, torsades des pointes and ventricular fibrillation.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this review was to identify the outcome of anti-dysrhythmic strategies from animal studies and case reports in humans in order to guide the management of ventricular dysrhythmias in aconite poisoning in humans.
METHODS
A review of the literature in English was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar from 1966 to July 2016 using the search terms "aconite/aconitine"; "aconite/aconitine + poisoning" and "aconite/aconitine + dysrhythmia". 168 human case-reports and case-series were identified by these searches, of which 103 were rejected if exposure to aconite did not result in ventricular dysrhythmias, if it was uncertain as to whether aconite had been ingested, if other agents were co-ingested, if there was insufficient information to determine the type of treatments administered or if there was insufficient information to determine outcome. Thus, 65 case reports of probable aconite poisoning that resulted in ventricular dysrhythmias were identified. Toxicokinetic data in aconite poisoning: Data were only available in three papers; the presence of ventricular rhythm disturbances directly correlated with the concentration of aconite alkaloids in the plasma.
MANAGEMENT
54 of 65 cases developed ventricular tachycardia, six developed torsades des pointes, 15 patients developed ventricular fibrillation, 10 developed ventricular ectopics and one developed a broad complex tachycardia not otherwise specified; each dysrhythmia was regarded as separate and patients may have had more than one dysrhythmia. 10 patients died, giving a mortality of 15%. In total, 147 treatments were administered to 65 patients. 46 of the interventions were assessed by the authors as having been associated with successful restoration of sinus rhythm. Flecainide administration was accompanied by dysrhythmia termination in six of seven cases. Mexiletine was connected with correcting dysrhythmias in 3 of 3 cases. Procainamide administration was associated with return to sinus rhythm in 2 of 2 cases. Prolonged cardio-pulmonary resuscitation was administered to 15 patients where it was associated with a return to sinus rhythm in nine of these. Amiodarone was linked to success in correcting dysrhythmias in 11 of 20 cases. Cardiopulmonary bypass use was associated with a return to sinus rhythm in four out of six cases. Epinephrine was documented as being employed on four occasions, and was associated with a restoration of sinus rhythm on two of these. Magnesium sulphate administration was accompanied by dysrhythmia termination in two of nine cases. Direct cardioversion was associated with a return of sinus rhythm in 5 of 30 cases. However, it is not certain whether the drug treatment influenced the course of the dysrhythmia.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the evidence available from human case reports, flecainaide or amiodarone appear to be more associated with a return to sinus rhythm than lidocaine and/or cardioversion, although it is not established whether the administration of treatment caused reversion to normal sinus rhythm. The potential beneficial effects of amiodarone were not observed in animal studies. This may be due to intra-species differences between ion channels or relate to the wider cardiovascular toxicity of aconite that extends beyond arrhythmias. Prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered as an integral part of good clinical care as "time-buying" strategies to allow the body to excrete the toxic alkaloids. There may also be a role for mexiletine, procainamide and magnesium sulphate.
Topics: Aconitum; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Calcium; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Databases, Factual; Disease Models, Animal; Electric Countershock; Heart Conduction System; Humans; Neurons; Poisoning; Sodium; Sodium Channels; Toxicokinetics; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed: 28421842
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1291944 -
JAMA Neurology Jan 2021Cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN) is a common generalized slowly progressive neuropathy, second in prevalence only to diabetic neuropathy. Most patients with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Patient Assisted Intervention for Neuropathy: Comparison of Treatment in Real Life Situations (PAIN-CONTRoLS): Bayesian Adaptive Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Trial.
IMPORTANCE
Cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN) is a common generalized slowly progressive neuropathy, second in prevalence only to diabetic neuropathy. Most patients with CSPN have significant pain. Many medications have been tried for pain reduction in CSPN, including antiepileptics, antidepressants, and sodium channel blockers. There are no comparative studies that identify the most effective medication for pain reduction in CSPN.
OBJECTIVE
To determine which medication (pregabalin, duloxetine, nortriptyline, or mexiletine) is most effective for reducing neuropathic pain and best tolerated in patients with CSPN.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
From December 1, 2014, through October 20, 2017, a bayesian adaptive, open-label randomized clinical comparative effectiveness study of pain in 402 participants with CSPN was conducted at 40 neurology care clinics. The trial included response adaptive randomization. Participants were patients with CSPN who were 30 years or older, with a pain score of 4 or greater on a numerical rating scale (range, 0-10, with higher scores indicating a higher level of pain). Participant allocation to 1 of 4 drug groups used the utility function and treatment's sample size for response adaptation randomization. At each interim analysis, a decision was made to continue enrolling (up to 400 participants) or stop the whole trial for success (80% power). Patient engagement was maintained throughout the trial, which helped guide the study and identify ways to communicate and disseminate information. Analysis was performed from December 11, 2015, to January 19, 2018.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were randomized to receive nortriptyline (n = 134), duloxetine (n = 126), pregabalin (n = 73), or mexiletine (n = 69).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was a utility function that was a composite of the efficacy (participant reported pain reduction of ≥50% from baseline to week 12) and quit (participants who discontinued medication) rates.
RESULTS
Among the 402 participants (213 men [53.0%]; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [13.4] years; 343 White [85.3%]), the utility function of nortriptyline was 0.81 (95% bayesian credible interval [CrI], 0.69-0.93; 34 of 134 [25.4%] efficacious; and 51 of 134 [38.1%] quit), of duloxetine was 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.68-0.92; 29 of 126 [23.0%] efficacious; and 47 of 126 [37.3%] quit), pregabalin was 0.69 (95% CrI, 0.55-0.84; 11 of 73 [15.1%] efficacious; and 31 of 73 [42.5%] quit), and mexiletine was 0.58 (95% CrI, 0.42-0.75; 14 of 69 [20.3%] efficacious; and 40 of 69 [58.0%] quit). The probability each medication yielded the highest utility was 0.52 for nortriptyline, 0.43 for duloxetine, 0.05 for pregabalin, and 0.00 for mexiletine.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This study found that, although there was no clearly superior medication, nortriptyline and duloxetine outperformed pregabalin and mexiletine when pain reduction and undesirable adverse effects are combined to a single end point.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02260388.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics; Bayes Theorem; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Male; Mexiletine; Middle Aged; Neuralgia; Nortriptyline; Pain Management; Polyneuropathies; Pregabalin; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32809014
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2590 -
NeuroRehabilitation 2020The role of systemic use of local anesthetics in the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) is still unclear. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The role of systemic use of local anesthetics in the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) is still unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of systemic local anesthetics for NP.
METHODS
To summarize and to discuss the rehabilitation perspective on the published Cochrane Systematic Review "Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain" by Challapalli V et al.RESULTS:The review included 30 RCTs including patients with NP treated with iv lidocaine, oral mexiletine, lidocaine and mexiletine, or oral tocainide. Low-to-moderate quality of the evidence suggest that intravenous lidocaine or oral mexiletine may slightly reduce NP vs placebo, but the efficacy of these drugs is comparable to anticonvulsants or morphine.
CONCLUSIONS
Systemic administration of local anesthetics is not supported by scientific evidence for pain relief as well as for functional improvement.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Humans; Lidocaine; Mexiletine; Neuralgia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32716331
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-209006 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021The short QT syndrome type 1 (SQT1) is linked to hERG channel mutations (e.g., N588K). Drug effects on hERG channel gating kinetics in SQT1-cells have not been...
The short QT syndrome type 1 (SQT1) is linked to hERG channel mutations (e.g., N588K). Drug effects on hERG channel gating kinetics in SQT1-cells have not been investigated. This study used hiPSC-CMs of a healthy donor and a SQT1-patient carrying the N588K mutation and patch clamp to examine the drug effects on hERG channel gating kinetics. Ajmaline, amiodarone, ivabradine, flecainide, quinidine, mexiletine and ranolazine inhibited the hERG channel current (I) less strongly in hiPSC-CMs from the SQTS1-patient (SQT1-hiPSC-CMs) comparing with cells from the healthy donor (donor-hiPSC-CMs). Quinidine and mexiletine reduced, but ajmaline, amiodarone, ivabradine and ranolazine increased the time to peak of I similarly in SQT1-hiPSC-CMs and donor-hiPSC-CMs. Although regarding the shift of activation and inactivation curves, tested drugs showed differential effects in donor- and SQT1-hiPSC-CMs, quinidine, ajmaline, ivabradine and mexiletine but not amiodarone, flecainide and ranolazine reduced the window current in SQT1-hiPSC-CMs. Quinidine, ajmaline, ivabradine and mexiletine differentially changed the time constant of recovery from inactivation, but all of them increased the time constant of deactivation in SQT1-hiPSC-CMs. The window current-reducing and deactivation-slowing effects may be important for the antiarrhythmic effect of ajmaline, ivabradine, quinidine and mexiletine in SQT1-cells. This information may be helpful for selecting drugs for treating SQT1-patients with hERG channel mutation.
PubMed: 34025432
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.675003 -
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 2023Mexiletine, a class IB antiarrhythmic, is a structural analog of lidocaine. Our knowledge of mexiletine overdose is based on lidocaine overdose reports. Only a few cases...
BACKGROUND
Mexiletine, a class IB antiarrhythmic, is a structural analog of lidocaine. Our knowledge of mexiletine overdose is based on lidocaine overdose reports. Only a few cases of mexiletine overdose have been reported, including fatal overdoses. Mexiletine toxicity primarily affects the central nervous, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems.
CASE
A 16-year-old female was brought to our hospital by ambulance after taking an unknown dose of mexiletine in a suicide attempt. Ventricular fibrillation developed while in the ambulance; cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started and spontaneous circulation returned within 1 min. The patient had been taking oral mexiletine for 1 month to treat primary erythromelalgia. Her vital signs were normal, but she was unconscious. Following gastric lavage she was transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit. Midazolam and levetiracetam were required due to uncontrolled seizures. During the first hour of hospitalization, severe dyskinesia characterized by abnormal involuntary large hyperkinetic movements in all 4 extremities was observed and successfully treated with 2 doses of intravenous biperiden. The patient was discharged on day 6 of hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS
Mexiletine overdose can be life-threatening. In addition to rapid and effective resuscitation, rapid identification and management of cardiovascular and central nervous system manifestations are key to preventing morbidity and mortality. The presented case had severe dyskinesia that was successfully treated with repeated doses of biperiden. Biperiden did not cause arrhythmia. Based on the presented case, we think biperiden should be considered for the treatment of movement disorders in cases of mexiletine overdose.
Topics: Humans; Dyskinesias; Mexiletine; Female; Adolescent; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Drug Overdose; Erythromelalgia; Biperiden; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37661688
DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2023.84 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Mar 2024Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are the most common ventricular arrhythmia that are encountered in the clinical practice. Recent data suggests that high PVC... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are the most common ventricular arrhythmia that are encountered in the clinical practice. Recent data suggests that high PVC burden may lead to the development of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (PVC-CM) even in patients without structural heart disease. Treatment for effective suppression of PVCs, can reverse PVC-CM. Both antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation (CA) are recognized treatment modalities for any cardiac arrhythmias. However, with increasing preference of CA, the role of AADs needs further defining regarding their efficacy, safety, indications and patient selection to treat PVC-CM.
METHODS
To ascertain the role of AADs to treat PVC-CM; whether they are indicated to treat PVC-CM, and if so, when, we interrogated PubMed and other search engines for English language publications with key words premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), cardiomyopathy, anti-arrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and pharmacological agents. All publications were carefully reviewed and scrutinized by the authors for their inclusion in the review paper. For illustration of cases, ethical standard was observed as per the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, and the patient was treated as per the prevailing standard of care. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for conducting the ablation procedure.
RESULTS
Our literature search specifically the pharmacological treatment of PVC-CM with AADs revealed significant paradigm shift in treatment approach for PVCs and PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. No major large, randomized control trials of AADs versus CA for PVC-CM were found. We found that beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers are particularly effective in the treatment of PVCs originating from right ventricular outflow tract. For Class Ic AADs - flecainide and propafenone, small clinical studies showed Class Ic AADs to be effective in PVC suppression, but their usage was not recommended in patients with significant coronary artery disease. Mexiletine was found to have modest effect on PVC suppression. Studies showed sotalol to significantly reduce PVCs frequency in patients receiving both low and high doses. Studies also showed amiodarone to have higher successful PVC suppression, but not recommended as a first-line treatment for patients with idiopathic PVCs in the absence of symptoms and left ventricular dysfunction. For dronedarone, no major clinical data were available.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available data in the literature, we conclude that AADs play important role in the treatment of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. However, appropriate patient selection criteria are vitally important, and in general terms AADs are indicated or polymorphic PVCs, epicardial PVCs; and when CA procedure is contraindicated, or not feasible or failed.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Ventricular Premature Complexes; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Cardiomyopathies; Catheter Ablation
PubMed: 37676022
DOI: 10.1111/jce.16055 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2020The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of mexiletine in 112 patients affected by genetically confirmed non-dystrophic myotonias. The...
The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of mexiletine in 112 patients affected by genetically confirmed non-dystrophic myotonias. The study was performed at the Neurophysiologic Division of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome and the Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome. The treatment was accepted by 59 patients according to clinical severity, individual needs, and concerns about a chronic medication. Forty-three patients were affected by recessive congenita myotonia, 11 by sodium channel myotonia, and five by dominant congenital myotonia. They underwent clinical examination before and after starting therapy, and Electromyography (EMG). A number of recessive myotonia patients underwent a protocol of repetitive nerve stimulations, for detecting and quantifying the transitory weakness, and a modified version of the Timed Up and Go test, to document and quantify the gait impairment. Treatment duration ranged from 1 month to 20 years and the daily dosages in adults ranged between 200 and 600 mg. No patient developed cardiac arrhythmias causing drug discontinuation. Mexiletine was suspended in 13 cases (22%); in three patients, affected by Sodium Channel myotonia, because flecainide showed better efficacy; in one patient because of a gastric cancer antecedent treatment; in four patients because of untreatable dyspepsia; and five patients considered the treatment not necessary. In our experience, mexiletine is very useful and not expensive. We did not observe any hazarding cardiac arrhythmias. Dyspepsia was the most frequent dose-limiting side effect.
PubMed: 32655465
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00300 -
Europace : European Pacing,... Aug 2018Experimental studies and clinical reports suggest antiarrhythmic properties of mexiletine in different arrhythmias. We aimed at investigating mexiletine in experimental... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
AIMS
Experimental studies and clinical reports suggest antiarrhythmic properties of mexiletine in different arrhythmias. We aimed at investigating mexiletine in experimental models of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as in long-QT- (LQTS) and short-QT-syndrome (SQTS).
METHODS AND RESULTS
In 15 isolated rabbit hearts, erythromycin (300 µM) was infused for simulation of long-QT-2-syndrome. In further 13 hearts, veratridine was administered to simulate long-QT-3-syndrome. Both drugs induced a significant QT-prolongation (erythromycin: +87 ms, P < 0.01; veratridine: +19 ms, P < 0.05) and increased dispersion of repolarization (erythromycin: +55 ms, P < 0.01; veratridine +31 ms, P < 0.01). Additional infusion of mexiletine (25 µM) resulted in a significant reduction of dispersion (erythromycin: -43 ms, P < 0.01; veratridine: -26 ms, P < 0.05). Reproducible induction of torsade de pointes was observed in 13 of 15 erythromycin-treated hearts (192 episodes) and 6 of 13 veratridine-treated hearts (36 episodes). Additional infusion of mexiletine significantly reduced ventricular tachycardia (VT) incidence. With mexiletine, only 3 of 15 erythromycin-treated hearts (27 episodes) and 1 of 13 veratridine-treated hearts (2 episodes) presented polymorphic VT. In additional 9 hearts, the IK-ATP-channel-opener pinacidil was employed to simulate SQTS and significantly abbreviated ventricular repolarization (QT-interval: -18 ms, P < 0.05) and enhanced induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Mexiletine reversed the effects of pinacidil, increase refractory period (+127 ms, P < 0.01) and significantly suppressed induction of VF. In further 13 hearts AF was induced by combined treatment with acetylcholine/isoproterenol. Mexiletine also increased atrial refractory period (+80 ms, P < 0.01) and thereby effectively suppressed atrial fibrillation.
CONCLUSION
Acute infusion of mexiletine significantly reduced the occurrence of polymorphic VT in the presence of pharmacologically simulated LQTS. Furthermore, mexiletine demonstrated potent antiarrhythmic properties in a model of SQTS and in AF.
Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease Models, Animal; Heart Conduction System; Heart Rate; Isolated Heart Preparation; Long QT Syndrome; Mexiletine; Rabbits; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Time Factors
PubMed: 29016765
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux221