-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2021Major depressive disorders have a significant impact on children and adolescents, including on educational and vocational outcomes, interpersonal relationships, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorders have a significant impact on children and adolescents, including on educational and vocational outcomes, interpersonal relationships, and physical and mental health and well-being. There is an association between major depressive disorder and suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide. Antidepressant medication is used in moderate to severe depression; there is now a range of newer generations of these medications.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate, via network meta-analysis (NMA), the comparative effectiveness and safety of different newer generation antidepressants in children and adolescents with a diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) in terms of depression, functioning, suicide-related outcomes and other adverse outcomes. The impact of age, treatment duration, baseline severity, and pharmaceutical industry funding was investigated on clinician-rated depression (CDRS-R) and suicide-related outcomes.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, the Cochrane Library (Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)), together with Ovid Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO till March 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of six to 18 year olds of either sex and any ethnicity with clinically diagnosed major depressive disorder were included. Trials that compared the effectiveness of newer generation antidepressants with each other or with a placebo were included. Newer generation antidepressants included: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; norepinephrine dopamine reuptake inhibitors; norepinephrine dopamine disinhibitors (NDDIs); and tetracyclic antidepressants (TeCAs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We analysed dichotomous data as Odds Ratios (ORs), and continuous data as Mean Difference (MD) for the following outcomes: depression symptom severity (clinician rated), response or remission of depression symptoms, depression symptom severity (self-rated), functioning, suicide related outcomes and overall adverse outcomes. Random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted in a frequentist framework using multivariate meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-analysis (CINeMA). We used "informative statements" to standardise the interpretation and description of the results.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-six studies were included. There were no data for the two primary outcomes (depressive disorder established via clinical diagnostic interview and suicide), therefore, the results comprise only secondary outcomes. Most antidepressants may be associated with a "small and unimportant" reduction in depression symptoms on the CDRS-R scale (range 17 to 113) compared with placebo (high certainty evidence: paroxetine: MD -1.43, 95% CI -3.90, 1.04; vilazodone: MD -0.84, 95% CI -3.03, 1.35; desvenlafaxine MD -0.07, 95% CI -3.51, 3.36; moderate certainty evidence: sertraline: MD -3.51, 95% CI -6.99, -0.04; fluoxetine: MD -2.84, 95% CI -4.12, -1.56; escitalopram: MD -2.62, 95% CI -5.29, 0.04; low certainty evidence: duloxetine: MD -2.70, 95% CI -5.03, -0.37; vortioxetine: MD 0.60, 95% CI -2.52, 3.72; very low certainty evidence for comparisons between other antidepressants and placebo). There were "small and unimportant" differences between most antidepressants in reduction of depression symptoms (high- or moderate-certainty evidence). Results were similar across other outcomes of benefit. In most studies risk of self-harm or suicide was an exclusion criterion for the study. Proportions of suicide-related outcomes were low for most included studies and 95% confidence intervals were wide for all comparisons. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of mirtazapine (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.03, 8.04), duloxetine (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.72, 1.82), vilazodone (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68, 1.48), desvenlafaxine (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59, 1.52), citalopram (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.76, 3.87) or vortioxetine (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.29, 8.60) on suicide-related outcomes compared with placebo. There is low certainty evidence that escitalopram may "at least slightly" reduce odds of suicide-related outcomes compared with placebo (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43, 1.84). There is low certainty evidence that fluoxetine (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.87, 1.86), paroxetine (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.85, 3.86), sertraline (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.60, 15.22), and venlafaxine (OR 13.84, 95% CI 1.79, 106.90) may "at least slightly" increase odds of suicide-related outcomes compared with placebo. There is moderate certainty evidence that venlafaxine probably results in an "at least slightly" increased odds of suicide-related outcomes compared with desvenlafaxine (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01, 0.56) and escitalopram (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01, 0.56). There was very low certainty evidence regarding other comparisons between antidepressants.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Overall, methodological shortcomings of the randomised trials make it difficult to interpret the findings with regard to the efficacy and safety of newer antidepressant medications. Findings suggest that most newer antidepressants may reduce depression symptoms in a small and unimportant way compared with placebo. Furthermore, there are likely to be small and unimportant differences in the reduction of depression symptoms between the majority of antidepressants. However, our findings reflect the average effects of the antidepressants, and given depression is a heterogeneous condition, some individuals may experience a greater response. Guideline developers and others making recommendations might therefore consider whether a recommendation for the use of newer generation antidepressants is warranted for some individuals in some circumstances. Our findings suggest sertraline, escitalopram, duloxetine, as well as fluoxetine (which is currently the only treatment recommended for first-line prescribing) could be considered as a first option. Children and adolescents considered at risk of suicide were frequently excluded from trials, so that we cannot be confident about the effects of these medications for these individuals. If an antidepressant is being considered for an individual, this should be done in consultation with the child/adolescent and their family/caregivers and it remains critical to ensure close monitoring of treatment effects and suicide-related outcomes (combined suicidal ideation and suicide attempt) in those treated with newer generation antidepressants, given findings that some of these medications may be associated with greater odds of these events. Consideration of psychotherapy, particularly cognitive behavioural therapy, as per guideline recommendations, remains important.
Topics: Adolescent; Antidepressive Agents; Bias; Child; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Desvenlafaxine Succinate; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Female; Fluoxetine; Humans; Male; Mirtazapine; Network Meta-Analysis; Paroxetine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline; Suicidal Ideation; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Vilazodone Hydrochloride; Vortioxetine
PubMed: 34029378
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2 -
Profiles of Drug Substances,... 2018Mirtazapine is one of antidepression which is used mainly in the treatment of depression, moreover, it is sometimes used in the treatment of anxiety disorders, insomnia,... (Review)
Review
Mirtazapine is one of antidepression which is used mainly in the treatment of depression, moreover, it is sometimes used in the treatment of anxiety disorders, insomnia, nausea, and vomiting, and to produce weight gain when desirable. The action of mirtazapine is an antagonist of certain adrenergic and serotonin receptors, and, furthermore, the drug is used strong as antihistamine, and it is occasionally defined as a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA). The comprehensive profile of mirtazapine gives more detailed information about nomenclature, formulae, elemental analysis, and appearance. In addition, the numerous methods of drug synthesis are summarized. Also the profile covers the physicochemical properties as: the value of pK, drug solubility, melting point, X-ray powder diffraction, and analysis methods for example: (compendial, electrochemical, spectroscopic, and method of chromatographic). Besides that, the profile covered pharmacological profile and clinical pharmacokinetics in subtitle's (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination). About 100 references were given as a proof of the above-mentioned studies.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Animals; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Biological Availability; Biotransformation; Drug Compounding; Drug Stability; Humans; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Serotonin Antagonists; Technology, Pharmaceutical
PubMed: 29678261
DOI: 10.1016/bs.podrm.2018.01.002 -
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Apr 2023Several augmentation strategies have been used to improve symptomatology in patients not adequately responding to clozapine. Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Several augmentation strategies have been used to improve symptomatology in patients not adequately responding to clozapine. Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy of different strategies to augment clozapine. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the available RCTs that have evaluated the clinical efficacy of various pharmacological agents, non-pharmacological strategies (occupational therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy), and somatic treatment [electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, etc.)] as augmenting agents to clozapine.
METHODS
Data were extracted using standard procedures, and risk of bias was evaluated. Effect sizes were computed for the individual studies.
RESULTS
Forty-five clinical trials were evaluated. The pooled effect size for various antipsychotic medications was 0.103 (95% CI: 0.288-0.493, < 0.001); when the effect size was evaluated for specific antipsychotics for which more than one trial was available, the effect size for risperidone was -0.27 and that for aripiprazole was 0.57. The effect size for lamotrigine was 0.145, and that for topiramate was 0.392. The effect size for ECT was 0.743 (CI: 0.094-1.392). Risk of bias was low (mean Jadad score - 3.93). Largest effect sizes were seen for mirtazapine (effect size of 5.265). Most of the studies can be considered underpowered and limited by small sample sizes.
CONCLUSIONS
To conclude, based on the findings of the present systematic review and meta-analysis, it can be said that compared to other treatment strategies, clozapine non-responsive patients respond maximum to mirtazapine followed by ECT.
Topics: Humans; Clozapine; Schizophrenia; Mirtazapine; Antipsychotic Agents; Risperidone
PubMed: 36380513
DOI: 10.1017/neu.2022.30 -
International Journal of Clinical... Jul 2017Mirtazapine is a commonly used drug indicated for the treatment of severe depression. It works as a presynaptic α-adrenoreceptor antagonist that increases central...
Mirtazapine is a commonly used drug indicated for the treatment of severe depression. It works as a presynaptic α-adrenoreceptor antagonist that increases central noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission, and it is metabolized by the p450 cytochrome oxidase system. There is evidence within the literature to suggest a link between antidepressants and increased liver enzymes, although case reports demonstrating a link between mirtazapine specifically and steatosis are sparse. Here, we present a case of mirtazapine-induced steatosis in a 48-year-old office worker. She presented with painless jaundice of 2 days duration and generalized lethargy and peripheral edema present for 3 weeks beforehand. Extensive investigations were undertaken to identify the cause of her jaundice but no biochemical, blood-borne, or anatomical cause could be found. Mirtazapine was subsequently stopped, and her liver function, both clinically and biochemically, improved rapidly. She made a full recovery after discontinuation of her mirtazapine. .
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Biopsy; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Fatty Liver; Female; Humans; Jaundice; Liver; Liver Function Tests; Mianserin; Middle Aged; Mirtazapine
PubMed: 28427497
DOI: 10.5414/CP202983 -
General Hospital Psychiatry 2015The aim of the present study was to examine weight gain and its association with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics in patients using newer antidepressants.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to examine weight gain and its association with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics in patients using newer antidepressants.
METHODS
The study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 362 consecutive psychiatric patients taking antidepressant drugs for 6 to 36 months were included in the study.
RESULTS
The prevalence rate of weight gain was 55.2%; 40.6% of the patients had a weight gain of 7% or more compared to the baseline. Overall, antidepressant use was significantly related to increased body weight. Specifically, citalopram, escitalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine and mirtazapine, but not fluoxetine, were associated with significant weight gain. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that lower education status, lower body mass index at the onset of antidepressant use and family history of obesity were independent predictors of weight gain ≥7% compared to the baseline.
CONCLUSIONS
The study results suggest that patients who take newer antidepressants might have significant problems related to body weight.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Adult; Citalopram; Cyclohexanols; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Female; Fluoxetine; Humans; Male; Mianserin; Middle Aged; Mirtazapine; Paroxetine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Thiophenes; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Weight Gain
PubMed: 25467076
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.10.011 -
Asian Journal of Psychiatry Jan 2023To integrate all evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological augmentation interventions for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Pharmacological and nonpharmacological augmentation treatments for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis with normalized entropy assessment.
OBJECTIVE
To integrate all evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological augmentation interventions for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS).
METHODS
Six major electronic databases were systematically searched for RCTs published until July 10, 2021. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms, and the secondary outcomes were positive and negative symptoms and acceptability. We performed random-effects network meta-analysis. Normalized entropy was calculated to examine the uncertainty of treatment ranking.
RESULTS
We identified 35 RCTs (1472 patients with 23 active augmentation treatments) with a mean daily clozapine dose of 440.80 (91.27) mg for 1168.22 (710.28) days. Network meta-analysis of overall symptoms (reported as standardized mean difference; 95 % confidence interval) with consistent results indicated that mirtazapine (-4.41; -5.61, -3.21), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (-4.32; -5.43, -3.21), and memantine (-2.02; -3.14, -0.91) were ranked as the best three treatments. For positive symptoms, ECT (-5.18; -5.86, -4.49) was ranked the best with less uncertainty. For negative symptoms, memantine (-3.38; -4.50, -2.26), duloxetine (-3.27; -4.25, -2.29), and mirtazapine (-1.73; -2.71, -0.74) were ranked the best three treatments with less uncertainty. All antipsychotics, N-methyl d-aspartate receptor agonists, and antiepileptics were not associated with more efficacy than placebo. Compared to placebo, only amisulpride had statistically significant lower discontinuation rate (risk ratio: 0.21; 95 % CI: 0.05, 0.93).
CONCLUSION
Add-on mirtazapine, ECT, and memantine were the most efficacious augmentation options for CRS. Data on other important outcomes such as cognitive functioning or quality of life were rarely reported, making further large-scale, well-designed RCTs necessary. (PROSPERO number, CRD42021262197.).
Topics: Humans; Clozapine; Network Meta-Analysis; Entropy; Memantine; Mirtazapine; Antipsychotic Agents; Schizophrenia
PubMed: 36470132
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103375 -
Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 2019This chapter addresses the following FDA-approved medications for the treatment of major depressive disorder available for use in the United States including bupropion,...
This chapter addresses the following FDA-approved medications for the treatment of major depressive disorder available for use in the United States including bupropion, mirtazapine, trazodone, vortioxetine, and vilazodone. These medications do not belong to one of the previously featured classes of antidepressants discussed in the preceding chapters. Each medication featured in this chapter has a unique structure and properties that target diverse receptors in the central nervous system. These diverse targets are distinct from other classes of medications used to treat major depressive disorder. This chapter will provide an overview of each medication's indication for use, history of development, pharmacology, metabolism, dosing recommendations, onset of action, use in special populations, safety and tolerability, adverse effects, potential interactions with additional medications, and data regarding possible overdose with available treatments.Bupropion was initially developed for its combined effects on the norepinephrine and dopamine neurotransmitters. Currently, bupropion is the only antidepressant on the market in the United States with no appreciable activity on serotonin concentrations in the central nervous system. Bupropion is extensively metabolized in humans into three active metabolites including hydroxybupropion, threohydrobupropion, and erythrohydrobuproprion each with substantial antidepressant activity. The most serious side effect of bupropion is the development of seizures, so the dose must be gradually titrated to a maximum dose of 450 mg per day of the immediate-release formulation and 400 mg per day of the sustained-release formulation. Additional adverse effects include agitation, dry mouth, insomnia, headaches, migraines, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and tremor. The onset of action of bupropion is 2 weeks with full efficacy attained at 4 weeks of treatment. Bupropion produced similar depression remission rates when compared to SSRIs with a median time to relapse of 44 weeks. Bupropion has additionally been approved for smoking cessation and may have a combined role in treating nicotine cravings and depression.Mirtazapine has a unique method of action by enhancing norepinephrine and serotonin neurotransmission by blocking the alpha-2 presynaptic adrenoceptors resulting in increased release of serotonin at the nerve terminals. Mirtazapine additionally binds to the 5-HT, 5-HT, and H receptors resulting in increased sedation, which is the most common side effect. Additional side effects include increased appetite and weight gain, dizziness, and transient elevations in cholesterol levels and liver function tests. Mirtazapine is unlike any other antidepressant in that it also has a hormonal effect that reduces cortisol levels within the body. Patients on mirtazapine showed significant improvement in symptoms of major depressive disorder within the first 1-2 weeks of treatment with long-term studies at 40 weeks showing continued improvements in response rates in addition to lower relapse rates. Mirtazapine has an antagonistic effect at the central presynaptic 5-HT receptors and alpha-2 adrenergic inhibitory autoreceptors and heteroreceptors resulting in increased norepinephrine release with an indirect release of serotonin due to increased noradrenergic input to the raphe nucleus. Mirtazapine has an effective dose range from 15 to 45 mg once daily with a long half-life preventing dose adjustments more often than every 1-2 weeks.Trazadone is a 5-HT and 5-HT receptor antagonist and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. While trazodone has only been FDA approved for use in the treatment of major depressive disorder, it has been used off label for numerous conditions including insomnia, anxiety, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, substance abuse, schizophrenia, bulimia, and fibromyalgia. The most common adverse reaction is drowsiness, followed by dizziness, dry mouth, and nervousness. In the United States, trazadone is the second most commonly prescribed agent used to treat insomnia. The hypnotic action of this medication at lower doses is attributed primarily to the antagonism of the 5-HT receptors, H receptors, and alpha-1 adrenergic receptors. The most active metabolite is m-chlorophenylpiperazine produced by the CYP enzyme, which is a more profound inhibitor of serotonin reuptake as compared to the parent molecule of trazadone. The maximum outpatient dose should not exceed 400 mg per day in divided doses, but in hospitalized patients, the dose may be increased to a maximum dose of 600 mg daily in divided doses while the patient is being actively monitored for side effects. One third of inpatients and one half of outpatients had a significant therapeutic response to trazadone by the end of the first week with the remainder of patients responding in 2-4 weeks of therapy.Vortioxetine is a novel antidepressant classified by the World Health Organization as a N06AX antidepressant that was derived from studies targeting the combination of direct serotonin transporter inhibition and 5-HT receptor modulation leading to rapid desensitization of the somatodendritic 5-HT autoreceptors and activation of the postsynaptic 5-HT receptors. This medication is an antagonist at 5-HT, 5-HT, and 5-HT receptors, an agonist at 5-HT receptors, and a partial agonist at 5-HT receptors. Blockade of the 5-HT receptor was noted to produce increased levels of serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and histamine in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, which are known to be associated with the development of depression. The most common adverse effect is nausea followed by sexual dysfunction, constipation, and vomiting. The maximum dose of vortioxetine is 20 mg daily with improvement in symptoms of depression noted at 2 weeks with a full therapeutic effect observed at 4-6 weeks.Vilazodone is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT receptor partial agonist. This medication works by enhancing serotonergic activity in the central nervous system through selective inhibition of serotonin reuptake with no significant effects noted on norepinephrine or dopamine uptake. Vilazodone additionally binds with high affinity to the 5-HT receptors as a partial agonist resulting in faster onset of action, greater efficacy, and better tolerability with reduced sexual side effects when compared to other SSRIs. The most common adverse effects were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and insomnia. Additional reported adverse effects included dizziness, dry mouth, fatigue, abnormal dreams, decreased libido, arthralgias, and palpitations which were self-limited with resolution in 4-5 days after starting the medication. The recommended therapeutic dose of vilazodone is 40 mg daily with improvement noted in depressive symptoms within 1 week of initiating therapy with increased remission rates noted at 6 weeks of therapy.The medications featured in this chapter do not fall within the major categories of antidepressant classes but add additional unique mechanisms for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Each medication targets different receptors in the central nervous system involved in the development of depression. Resolution of depressive symptoms and response rates of these medications are similar to SSRIs with reduced side effects that can often lead to discontinuation of therapy. Use of these unique medications allows clinicians to target specific symptoms and comorbidities often associated with depression resulting in improved symptom resolution and long-term maintenance of remission.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Humans; Mirtazapine; Serotonin; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 30194544
DOI: 10.1007/164_2018_167 -
JAMA Oncology Mar 2024Currently there is no standard therapy to improve cancer-related anorexia, hampering survival. Mirtazapine has been suggested as a feasible option in this context. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Currently there is no standard therapy to improve cancer-related anorexia, hampering survival. Mirtazapine has been suggested as a feasible option in this context.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of mirtazapine on appetite and energy consumption in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial including adults was performed in a tertiary cancer care center from August 2018 to May 2022 with a follow-up of 8 weeks. Overall, 134 patients were screened; 114 were assessed for eligibility and 28 were excluded.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mirtazapine, 15 mg, or placebo for 2 weeks followed by a dose escalation to 30 mg until week 8 or placebo. Both groups received nutritional assessment and dietary advice.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Appetite was assessed by the Anorexia Cachexia Scale and energy intake. Dietary parameters were evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, with a 24-hour dietary recall, and energy quantification based on the Mexican system of nutritional equivalents.
RESULTS
A total of 86 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to the placebo (n = 43) or the mirtazapine group (n = 43). The mean (SD) age was 63.5 (11.2) years, 41 were women (57.7%) and had adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale score of 1, stage IV NSCLC, and were receiving first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference in appetite scores in patients who received mirtazapine or placebo after 4 and 8 weeks. After 4 weeks, mirtazapine significantly increased energy intake (379.3 kcal; 95% CI, 1382.6-576.1; P < .001) including proteins (22.5 g; 95% CI, 11.5-33.4; P = .001), carbohydrates (43.4 g; 95% CI, 13.1-73.8; P = .006), and fats (13.2 g; 95% CI, 6.0-20.4; P = .006). Fats intake was significantly higher in patients in the mirtazapine group (14.5 g vs 0.7 g; P = .02) after 8 weeks. The mirtazapine group significantly decreased the proportion of patients with sarcopenia (82.8% vs 57.1%, P = .03) at 8 weeks. Patients on mirtazapine tolerated the treatment well, but reported a higher perception of nightmares at 2 weeks based on a 10 cm VAS score (0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-1] vs 0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-0] in the control group; P = .009) but this finding was nonsignificant after 4 and 8 weeks.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
In this randomized clinical trial of patients with advanced NSCLC, there was no difference in appetite scores in all patients who received mirtazapine or placebo, but the mirtazapine group had a significant increase in energy intake through the 4- and 8-week follow-up, mainly in fat intake, which is a better and crucial source of energy. The addition of mirtazapine in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and anorexia may help these patients achieve their energy requirements and improve health-related quality of life, specifically emotional and cognitive functioning.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04748523.
Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Anorexia; Appetite Stimulants; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Double-Blind Method; Lung Neoplasms; Mirtazapine; Quality of Life; Adult
PubMed: 38206631
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5232 -
American Journal of Therapeutics
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatism; Mirtazapine
PubMed: 35104061
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001473