-
Psychopharmacology Bulletin Jun 2021Akathisia is a movement disorder affecting the trunk and limbs, characterized by subjective and objective restlessness. Key signs include continual, repetitive rocking,... (Review)
Review
Akathisia is a movement disorder affecting the trunk and limbs, characterized by subjective and objective restlessness. Key signs include continual, repetitive rocking, leg shuffling, and fidgeting. Antipsychotic-induced akathisia is optimally managed by reducing the medication dose or switching to a second generation antipsychotic that is less prone to inducing akathisia. However, since medication changes are often not feasible, we review the available classes of rescue agents for akathisia symptoms. The fitting acronym, "B-CALM", which stands for Beta-blockers, Clonazepam, Anticholinergics, cLonidine and Mirtazapine, will assist prescribers in facile recall of evidence-based treatment options for akathisia. Pharmacological agents such as mianserin, trazodone, Vit B6, amantadine, gabapentin, and pregabalin have also been examined as treatment options for antipsychotic-induced akathisia. Although initial exploratory reports on these agents have been promising, the current evidence is insufficient. Akathisia has a good prognosis when managed early in the course of treatment. A variety of safe rescue agents are available for the management of this condition, however, current evidence best supports the use of propranolol and mirtazapine.
Topics: Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Mirtazapine; Propranolol; Psychomotor Agitation
PubMed: 34421146
DOI: No ID Found -
Health Technology Assessment... Oct 2023Agitation is common and impacts negatively on people with dementia and carers. Non-drug patient-centred care is first-line treatment, but we need other treatment when... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
A pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial to assess the safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of mirtazapine and carbamazepine in people with Alzheimer's disease and agitated behaviours: the HTA-SYMBAD trial.
BACKGROUND
Agitation is common and impacts negatively on people with dementia and carers. Non-drug patient-centred care is first-line treatment, but we need other treatment when this fails. Current evidence is sparse on safer and effective alternatives to antipsychotics.
OBJECTIVES
To assess clinical and cost-effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine and carbamazepine in treating agitation in dementia.
DESIGN
Pragmatic, phase III, multicentre, double-blind, superiority, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of mirtazapine over 12 weeks (carbamazepine arm discontinued).
SETTING
Twenty-six UK secondary care centres.
PARTICIPANTS
probable or possible Alzheimer's disease, agitation unresponsive to non-drug treatment, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score ≥ 45.
INTERVENTIONS
Mirtazapine (target 45 mg), carbamazepine (target 300 mg) and placebo.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score 12 weeks post randomisation. incremental cost per six-point difference in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score at 12 weeks, from health and social care system perspective. Data from participants and informants at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. Long-term follow-up Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory data collected by telephone from informants at 6 and 12 months.
RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING
Participants allocated 1 : 1 : 1 ratio (to discontinuation of the carbamazepine arm, 1 : 1 thereafter) to receive placebo or carbamazepine or mirtazapine, with treatment as usual. Random allocation was block stratified by centre and residence type with random block lengths of three or six (after discontinuation of carbamazepine, two or four). Double-blind, with drug and placebo identically encapsulated. Referring clinicians, participants, trial management team and research workers who did assessments were masked to group allocation.
RESULTS
Two hundred and forty-four participants recruited and randomised (102 mirtazapine, 102 placebo, 40 carbamazepine). The carbamazepine arm was discontinued due to slow overall recruitment; carbamazepine/placebo analyses are therefore statistically underpowered and not detailed in the abstract. placebo-mirtazapine (-1.74, 95% confidence interval -7.17 to 3.69; = 0.53). The number of controls with adverse events (65/102, 64%) was similar to the mirtazapine group (67/102, 66%). However, there were more deaths in the mirtazapine group ( = 7) by week 16 than in the control group ( = 1). Post hoc analysis suggests this was of marginal statistical significance ( = 0.065); this difference did not persist at 6- and 12-month assessments. At 12 weeks, the costs of unpaid care by the dyadic carer were significantly higher in the mirtazapine than placebo group [difference: £1120 (95% confidence interval £56 to £2184)]. In the cost-effectiveness analyses, mean raw and adjusted outcome scores and costs of the complete cases samples showed no differences between groups.
LIMITATIONS
Our study has four important potential limitations: (1) we dropped the proposed carbamazepine group; (2) the trial was not powered to investigate a mortality difference between the groups; (3) recruitment beyond February 2020, was constrained by the COVID-19 pandemic; and (4) generalisability is limited by recruitment of participants from old-age psychiatry services and care homes.
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest mirtazapine is not clinically or cost-effective (compared to placebo) for agitation in dementia. There is little reason to recommend mirtazapine for people with dementia with agitation.
FUTURE WORK
Effective and cost-effective management strategies for agitation in dementia are needed where non-pharmacological approaches are unsuccessful.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This trial is registered as ISRCTN17411897/NCT03031184.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 27, No. 23. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Carbamazepine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Mirtazapine; Pandemics; Quality of Life; Technology Assessment, Biomedical
PubMed: 37929672
DOI: 10.3310/VPDT7105 -
Forensic Science International Jul 2017Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotoninergic antidepressant agent that stimulates norepinephrine and serotonin release while also blocking serotonin...
Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotoninergic antidepressant agent that stimulates norepinephrine and serotonin release while also blocking serotonin receptors (5-HT2 and 5-HT3). Although the drug is used extensively, at present we do not know of any fatal cases due to mirtazapine alone. On the contrary, the published literature describes several fatal poisoning cases related to the intake of mirtazapine together with other drugs. Here we describe a fatal case of mirtazapine self-poisoning, since the other drug detected (lorazepam), was within the therapeutic range. Analyses were performed by LC-MS/MS on body fluids and a hair sample and mirtazapine concentration measured in blood was very high: 9.3mg/L. N-Desmethylmirtazapine was also quantitated. We then compared our results with those of previously published cases. In conclusion, even though mirtazapine can be considered a relatively safe drug, taking a large amount alone or in combination with other drugs, could lead to death.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Chromatography, Liquid; Humans; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Mianserin; Middle Aged; Mirtazapine; Suicide
PubMed: 28535979
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.025 -
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of... May 2024Mirtazapine (MTZ) is an antidepressant drug with an exceptional pharmacological profile. It also has an excellent safety and tolerability profile. The present review... (Review)
Review
Mirtazapine (MTZ) is an antidepressant drug with an exceptional pharmacological profile. It also has an excellent safety and tolerability profile. The present review provides a pharmacological update on MTZ and summarizes the research findings of MTZ's effects on different diseases. MTZ is hypothesized to have antidepressant effects because of the synergy between noradrenergic and serotonergic actions and is effective in treating major depressive disorder and depression associated with epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory disease. In cancer patients, MTZ significantly reduced sadness, nausea, sleep disruption, and pain and improved quality of life. Also, it has promising effects on Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, dysthymia, social anxiety disorder, alcohol dependency, posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, pain syndromes, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and sleep disorders. Additionally, MTZ is potentially therapeutic in different situations associated with depression, such as liver, kidney, cardiovascular, respiratory, infertility, heavy metal-induced neurotoxicity, and pruritus. Potent antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic bioactivities mediate these promising effects. These positive outcomes of the scientific investigations motivate more and more clinical trials for a golden exceptional antidepressant in different conditions.
Topics: Humans; Mirtazapine; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic
PubMed: 37943296
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-023-02818-6 -
American Journal of Therapeutics Aug 2020
Topics: Humans; Male; Mirtazapine; Prostatism
PubMed: 32769393
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001140 -
The American Journal of Psychiatry Jan 2024The authors investigated the clinical outcomes of commonly used antidepressants among older adults who initiated first-time antidepressants for depression by analyzing...
OBJECTIVE
The authors investigated the clinical outcomes of commonly used antidepressants among older adults who initiated first-time antidepressants for depression by analyzing the 1-year risk of selected clinically relevant outcomes.
METHODS
This cohort study used nationwide Danish registry data and included all older adults who redeemed a first-time (since 1995) antidepressant prescription with an indication of depression between 2006 and 2017. Only the 10 most frequently redeemed antidepressants were included in the analyses. Outcomes included discontinuation, switching, augmentation, psychiatric hospital contacts, suicide attempt or self-harm, fall-related injuries, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Poisson regression models, controlling for potential confounders.
RESULTS
The study sample included 93,883 older adults (mean age, 78.0 years, SD=7.5 years; 56% female). The most frequently prescribed antidepressants were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (citalopram, 47.04%; escitalopram, 11.81%; fluoxetine, 0.55%; paroxetine, 0.52%; sertraline, 11.17%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine, 0.71%; venlafaxine, 1.54%), a tricyclic antidepressant (amitriptyline, 1.86%), and two atypical antidepressants (mianserin, 1.93%; mirtazapine, 22.87%). Compared with users of sertraline (the reference drug in this analysis, as Danish guidelines recommend it as the first-choice treatment for depression), users of most of the other nine antidepressants had a significantly higher risk of discontinuation (e.g., mirtazapine: IRR=1.55, 95% CI=1.50-1.61; venlafaxine: IRR=1.22, 95% CI=1.12-1.32), switching (amitriptyline: IRR=1.45, 95% CI=1.15-1.81; venlafaxine: IRR=1.47, 95% CI=1.20-1.80), augmentation, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Overall, mirtazapine and venlafaxine users had the most adverse outcomes compared with sertraline users. These results remained consistent in analyses stratified by sex and age (≤75 years vs. >75 years).
CONCLUSIONS
This real-world evidence suggests that clinical outcomes may vary among initiators of commonly used antidepressants in older adults, which may inform benefit-risk evaluation at treatment initiation, and highlights the importance of careful selection of antidepressant treatment.
Topics: Female; Humans; Aged; Male; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Sertraline; Depression; Cohort Studies; Mirtazapine; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Cardiovascular Diseases; Denmark
PubMed: 37849303
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230356 -
JAMA Network Open Mar 2024Antipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA) occurs in 14% to 35% of patients treated with antipsychotics and is associated with increased suicide and decreased adherence in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Antipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA) occurs in 14% to 35% of patients treated with antipsychotics and is associated with increased suicide and decreased adherence in patients with schizophrenia. However, no comprehensive review and network meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the efficacy of treatments for AIA.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy associated with AIA treatments.
DATA SOURCES
Three databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were systematically searched by multiple researchers for double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing active drugs for the treatment of AIA with placebo or another treatment between May 30 and June 18, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Selected studies were RCTs that compared adjunctive drugs for AIA vs placebo or adjunctive treatment in patients treated with antipsychotics fulfilling the criteria for akathisia, RCTs with sample size of 10 patients or more, only trials in which no additional drugs were administered during the study, and RCTs that used a validated akathisia score. Trials with missing data for the main outcome (akathisia score at the end points) were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data extraction and synthesis were performed, estimating standardized mean differences (SMDs) through pairwise and network meta-analysis with a random-effects model. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the severity of akathisia measured by a validated scale at the last available end point.
RESULTS
Fifteen trials involving 492 participants compared 10 treatments with placebo. Mirtazapine (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -1.20; 95% CI, -1.83 to -0.58), biperiden (6 mg/d for ≥14 days; SMD, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.34), vitamin B6 (600-1200 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.57 to -0.26), trazodone (50 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.14), mianserin (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.44 to -0.19), and propranolol (20 mg/d for ≥6 days; SMD, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.22) were associated with greater efficacy than placebo, with low to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 34.6%; 95% CI, 0.0%-71.1%). Cyproheptadine, clonazepam, zolmitriptan, and valproate did not yield significant effects. Eight trials were rated as having low risk of bias; 2, moderate risk; and 5, high risk. Sensitivity analyses generally confirmed the results for all drugs except for cyproheptadine and propranolol. No association between effect sizes and psychotic severity was found.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, mirtazapine, biperiden, and vitamin B6 were associated with the greatest efficacy for AIA, with vitamin B6 having the best efficacy and tolerance profile. Trazodone, mianserin, and propranolol appeared as effective alternatives with slightly less favorable efficacy and tolerance profiles. These findings should assist prescribers in selecting an appropriate medication for treating AIA.
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Biperiden; Cyproheptadine; Gallopamil; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Network Meta-Analysis; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trazodone; Vitamin B 6; Akathisia, Drug-Induced
PubMed: 38451521
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1527 -
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey Jan 2020Hyperemesis gravidarum (HEG) affects 0.3% to 3% of pregnancies and requires additional therapies beyond those commonly used for less severe instances of nausea and... (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
Hyperemesis gravidarum (HEG) affects 0.3% to 3% of pregnancies and requires additional therapies beyond those commonly used for less severe instances of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP). Differentiating between NVP and HEG is a vital yet challenging function for any obstetrician. The literature for management of HEG is lacking compared with that of NVP.
OBJECTIVE
Review etiology of NVP/HEG highlights key considerations in the workup of HEG as they compare to NVP and explore management options for recalcitrant HEG focusing principally on how they affect maternal and fetal outcomes and secondarily on where data are nonprescriptive.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
This was a literature review primarily using PubMed and Google Scholar.
RESULTS
Short-course corticosteroids and treatment for have the most favorable risk-reward profiles of the 4 pharmacologic therapies evaluated. Mirtazapine and diazepam may have a place in highly selected patients. If nutritional supplementation is required, enteral nutrition is strictly preferred to parenteral nutrition. Postpyloric feeding approaches are less likely to induce vomiting. Surgically placed feeding tubes are less likely to be dislodged and may be worth the invasive insertion procedure if nasogastric or nasojejunal tubes are not tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Hyperemesis gravidarum is a diagnosis reserved for refractory cases of NVP and therefore by definition poses treatment challenges. Any clinical presentation that lent itself to prescriptive, algorithmic management would likely fall short of the diagnostic criteria for HEG. However, data can inform management on a patient-by-patient basis or at least help patient and provider understand risks and benefits of therapies reserved for refractory cases.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Diazepam; Disease Management; Enteral Nutrition; Female; Humans; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Mirtazapine; Patient Selection; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care
PubMed: 31999353
DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000746 -
Current Problems in Dermatology 2016Paraneoplastic itch occurs as the result of a systemic reaction to an underlying malignancy. Paraneoplastic itch is most commonly associated with lymphoproliferative... (Review)
Review
Paraneoplastic itch occurs as the result of a systemic reaction to an underlying malignancy. Paraneoplastic itch is most commonly associated with lymphoproliferative malignancies and solid tumors that result in cholestasis. Paraneoplastic itch may occur in the absence of a primary rash or in association with dermatologic conditions such as erythroderma, acanthosis nigricans, dermatomyositis, Grover's disease, and eruptive seborrheic keratosis. Treatment of paraneoplastic itch is centered on targeting the underlying malignancy responsible for the systemic reaction. In cases of malignancy that are refractive to treatment, other therapies have been found to be effective for paraneoplastic itch, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mirtazapine, gabapentin, thalidomide, opioids, aprepitant, and histone deacetylase inhibitors.
Topics: Acantholysis; Acanthosis Nigricans; Analgesics, Opioid; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Aprepitant; Dermatitis, Exfoliative; Dermatomyositis; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Ichthyosis; Immunosuppressive Agents; Keratosis, Seborrheic; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Paraneoplastic Syndromes; Pruritus; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Thalidomide
PubMed: 27578084
DOI: 10.1159/000446060 -
Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior Jan 2023Clinical studies have described the efficacy of various therapeutic approaches. Results are inconsistent and clinical application is limited. Clinical trials have...
BACKGROUND
Clinical studies have described the efficacy of various therapeutic approaches. Results are inconsistent and clinical application is limited. Clinical trials have suggested that individual variability in the response to pharmacological therapies and sex affects the efficacy of some antidepressant drugs. Mouse strain-dependent variability influenced the response to antidepressant drugs. Some mouse strains respond faster and better to antidepressants than other mouse strains. We recently reported a series of preclinical studies that showed that dosing of mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and serotonergic antidepressant, in male and female Wistar rats decreased cocaine-induced locomotor activity and attenuated the induction and expression of cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the mirtazapine effects, on cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in male and female mice of the C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ strains, which differ in sensitivity to the cocaine motor effects and response to antidepressant drugs.
METHODS
Male and female BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J inbred mice (20-25 g) were daily dosed with 10 mg/kg of cocaine during the induction and expression of locomotor sensitization. During drug withdrawal, cocaine was withdrawn, and the groups received daily mirtazapine (30 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline. Mirtazapine was administered 30 min before cocaine. After each administration, locomotor activity for each animal was recorded for 30 min in transparent Plexiglass activity chambers.
RESULTS
Cocaine-induced locomotor activity were greater in C57BL/6J strain mice than BALB/cJ strain mice during the induction and expression phase of locomotor sensitization. The female mice of both strains showed a higher cocaine locomotor response than males and mirtazapine significantly decreased cocaine-induced locomotor activity, as well as the induction and expression of locomotor sensitization, regardless of mouse strain or sex.
CONCLUSION
The results suggest mirtazapine may be considered an effective therapeutic option to treat cocaine use disorder in men and women with very diverse genetic backgrounds.
Topics: Rats; Mice; Female; Male; Animals; Cocaine; Mirtazapine; Rats, Wistar; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Antidepressive Agents; Mice, Inbred Strains
PubMed: 36481182
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173507