-
Cancer Biology & Therapy Dec 2023Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective therapies for cancer patients with homologous recombination (HR) deficient tumors. The imipridone ONC206 is an...
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective therapies for cancer patients with homologous recombination (HR) deficient tumors. The imipridone ONC206 is an orally bioavailable dopamine receptor D2 antagonist and mitochondrial protease ClpP agonist that has anti-tumorigenic effects in endometrial cancer via induction of apoptosis, activation of the integrated stress response and modulation of PI3K/AKT signaling. Both PARP inhibitors and imipridones are being evaluated in endometrial cancer clinical trials but have yet to be explored in combination. In this manuscript, we evaluated the effects of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with ONC206 in human endometrioid endometrial cancer cell lines and in a genetically engineered mouse model of endometrial cancer. Our results showed that simultaneous exposure of endometrial cancer cells to olaparib and ONC206 resulted in synergistic anti-proliferative effects and increased cellular stress and apoptosis in both cell lines, compared to either drug alone. The combination treatment also decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and reduced phosphorylation of AKT and S6, with greater effects compared to either drug alone. In the transgenic model of endometrial cancer, the combination of olaparib and ONC206 resulted in a more significant reduction in tumor weight in obese and lean mice compared to ONC206 alone or olaparib alone, together with a considerably decreased Ki-67 and enhanced H2AX expression in obese and lean mice. These results suggest that this novel dual therapy may be worthy of further exploration in clinical trials.
Topics: Female; Humans; Mice; Animals; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Cell Proliferation; Cell Line, Tumor; Antineoplastic Agents; Endometrial Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Phthalazines; Receptors, Dopamine
PubMed: 37069726
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2023.2202104 -
Pharmacological Research Feb 2024Sepsis is a dysregulated response to infection that can result in life-threatening organ failure, and septic cardiomyopathy is a serious complication involving...
Sepsis is a dysregulated response to infection that can result in life-threatening organ failure, and septic cardiomyopathy is a serious complication involving ferroptosis. Olaparib, a classic targeted drug used in oncology, has demonstrated potential protective effects against sepsis. However, the exact mechanisms underlying its action remain to be elucidated. In our study, we meticulously screened ferroptosis genes associated with sepsis, and conducted comprehensive functional enrichment analyses to delineate the relationship between ferroptosis and mitochondrial damage. Eight sepsis-characterized ferroptosis genes were identified in sepsis patients, including DPP4, LPIN1, PGD, HP, MAPK14, POR, GCLM, and SLC38A1, which were significantly correlated with mitochondrial quality imbalance. Utilizing DrugBank and molecular docking, we demonstrated a robust interaction of Olaparib with these genes. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated HL-1 cells and monocytes were used to establish an in vitro sepsis model. Additionally, an in vivo model was developed using mice subjected to cecal ligation and perforation (CLP). Intriguingly, low-dose Olaparib (5 mg/kg) effectively targeted and mitigated markers associated with ferroptosis, concurrently improving mitochondrial quality. This led to a marked enhancement in cardiac function and a significant increase in survival rates in septic mice (p < 0.05). The mechanism through which Olaparib ameliorates ferroptosis in cardiac and leukocyte cells post-sepsis is attributed to its facilitation of mitophagy, thus favoring mitochondrial integrity. In conclusion, our findings suggest that low-dose Olaparib can improve mitochondrial quality by accelerating mitophagy flux, consequently inhibiting ferroptosis and preserving cardiac function after sepsis.
Topics: Humans; Mice; Animals; Mitophagy; Ferroptosis; Molecular Docking Simulation; Sepsis; Phosphatidate Phosphatase; Phthalazines; Piperazines
PubMed: 38228256
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.107056 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Studies using novel antiandrogens (NAA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have shown overall survival benefit. As patients develop... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Studies using novel antiandrogens (NAA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have shown overall survival benefit. As patients develop resistance to NAA therapy, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib in combination with NAA may become a promising therapy. However the overall benefit of olaparib monotherapy or combination therapy still needs to be evaluated. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and toxicity between olaparib, olaparib combined with abiraterone and NAA.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) University Meeting abstracts for randomized controlled trials reporting olaparib and NAA from 2010 up to March, 2023. Network meta-analysis using Stata 16.0 and R 4.4.2, hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the results.
RESULTS
Four trials reported olaparib, olaparib plus abiraterone and apalutamide plus abiraterone. radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was significantly lower in patients on apalutamide plus abiraterone compared to olaparib (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.06-1.93). rPFS was similar for olaparib plus abiraterone and olaparib (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.99-1.84); likewise, olaparib plus abiraterone and apalutamide plus abiraterone were similar (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.83-1.35). In addition, there was no significant difference between the three interventions for OS. But olaparib has the highest probability of being a preferred treatment for improving rPFS and OS.
CONCLUSION
rPFS was in favor of olaparib compared with apalutamide plus abiraterone. But there were no difference between olaparib plus abiraterone and either olaparib or apalutamide plus abiraterone. Apalutamide plus abiraterone might be the most preferred intervention in cases where AEs are involved.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY2023100072.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 38027160
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1225033 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Mar 2023The phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 study (NCT02477644) showed that addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients...
BACKGROUND
The phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 study (NCT02477644) showed that addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients in PAOLA-1.
METHODS
Baseline clinical and molecular data, and PFS, were compared between older (aged ≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years). Factors associated with olaparib efficacy, and safety in age subgroups, were also assessed.
RESULTS
Of 806 randomised patients, 292 (36.2%) were ≥65 years. A lower proportion of older versus younger patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (61.0% versus 76.2%) and upfront surgery (42.0% versus 55.7%). Older patients were less likely to have a BRCA1/2 mutation (17.1% versus 36.7%) or homologous recombination deficiency-positive status (34.1% versus 55.7%). After median follow-up of 22.1 months, median PFS was 21.6 months with olaparib versus 16.6 months with placebo in the older population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.75), comparable with the younger population (median 22.9 versus 16.9 months; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77). PFS benefits were observed in patients with a BRCA mutation or homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumours. Incidence of olaparib-related grade ≥3 adverse events in older patients was comparable with that of younger patients (36.8% versus 31.7%) although hypertension and anaemia were more common in older patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred in older patients receiving olaparib.
CONCLUSION
Older patients enrolled in PAOLA-1 achieved similar PFS benefits compared with younger patients, with a similar safety profile.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; Bevacizumab; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 36634389
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.029 -
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Feb 2024This study aimed to compare the radiosensitizing effect of the PARP inhibitor, Olaparib, between proton and X-rays irradiations in BRCA-proficient breast cancer (BC)...
PURPOSE
This study aimed to compare the radiosensitizing effect of the PARP inhibitor, Olaparib, between proton and X-rays irradiations in BRCA-proficient breast cancer (BC) cells.
METHODS
Two BRCA-proficient BC cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and T47D BC, were used. Cell proliferation was assessed using the CCK-8 assay, and radiosensitivity was determined through the clonogenic survival assay. Flow cytometry was employed to analyze cell cycle distribution and apoptosis. The kinetics of DNA damage repair were evaluated using γH2AX immunofluorescence imaging and the comet assay. Tumor spheroid assays were conducted to test radiosensitivity in a three-dimensional culture condition.
RESULTS
Olaparib sensitized both MDA-MB-231 and T47D cells to proton and X-ray irradiation in the clonogenic assay. MDA-MB-231 cells exhibited a higher dose enhancement factor for Olaparib than T47D cells. Olaparib increased radiation-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis specifically in MDA-MB-231 cells. γH2AX immunostaining and the comet assay showed Olaparib augmented radiation-induced DNA damage and apoptosis. The enhancement effect of Olaparib was more pronounced in proton irradiation than in X-ray irradiation, particularly in MDA-MB-231 cells than T47D cells. Both radiation and Olaparib dose-dependently inhibited spheroid growth in both cell lines. The synergy scores demonstrated that Olaparib interacted more strongly with protons than X-rays. The addition of an ATR inhibitor further enhanced Olaparib-induced proton radiosensitization in MDA-MB-231 cells.
CONCLUSION
This study found that Olaparib enhanced radiation efficacy in BRCA-proficient breast cancer cells, with a more pronounced effect observed with proton irradiation compared to X-ray irradiation. Combining Olaparib with an ATR inhibitor increased the radiosensitizing effect of protons.
Topics: Humans; Female; X-Rays; Protons; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Phthalazines; Apoptosis; Piperazines
PubMed: 37902934
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07150-4 -
International Journal of Cancer Aug 2023In the primary analysis of the phase III OlympiAD trial, olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
In the primary analysis of the phase III OlympiAD trial, olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We report subgroup analyses for the final analysis at a median OS follow-up of 18.9 months (olaparib) and 15.5 months (TPC). Patients (N = 302) with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC and ≤2 previous lines of chemotherapy for mBC were randomized 2:1 to open-label olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or TPC. All subgroup analyses were prespecified except site of metastases. Investigator-assessed median PFS was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-8.4; 176/205 events) for olaparib and 3.8 months (95% CI 2.8-4.2; 83/97 events) for TPC (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.39-0.66). In subgroup analyses, median PFS hazard ratios (95% CI) favored olaparib: hormone receptor status (triple-negative: 0.47, 0.32-0.69; hormone receptor-positive: 0.52, 0.36-0.75); gBRCAm (BRCA1: 0.49, 0.35-0.71; BRCA2: 0.49, 0.33-0.74); site of metastases (visceral/CNS: 0.53, 0.40-0.71; non-visceral: 0.45, 0.23-0.98); prior chemotherapy for mBC (yes: 0.51, 0.38-0.70; no: 0.49, 0.30-0.82); prior platinum-based chemotherapy for BC (yes: 0.49, 0.30-0.83; no: 0.50, 0.37-0.69); progressive disease at randomization (yes: 0.48, 0.35-0.65; no: 0.61, 0.36-1.07). Investigator-assessed objective response rates were higher across all subgroups with olaparib (35-68%) vs TPC (5-40%). Global health status/health-related quality of life increased in all subgroups with olaparib vs decreased/no change with TPC. These data confirm the consistency of olaparib benefit across patient subgroups in OlympiAD.
Topics: Female; Humans; BRCA1 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; Germ-Line Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Quality of Life
PubMed: 36971103
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34525 -
Cells Mar 2023The PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib is currently the drug of choice for serous ovarian cancer (OC), especially in patients with homologous recombination (HR) repair...
The PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib is currently the drug of choice for serous ovarian cancer (OC), especially in patients with homologous recombination (HR) repair deficiency associated with deleterious mutations. Unfortunately, OC patients who fail to respond to PARPi or relapse after treatment have limited therapeutic options. To elucidate olaparib resistance and enhance the efficacy of olaparib, intracellular factors exploited by OC cells to achieve decreased sensitivity to PARPi were examined. An olaparib-resistant OC cell line, PEO1-OR, was established from PEO1 cells. The anticancer activity and action of olaparib combined with inhibitors of the ATR/CHK1 pathway (ceralasertib as ATRi, MK-8776 as CHK1i) in olaparib-sensitive and -resistant OC cell lines were evaluated. Whole-exome sequencing revealed that PEO1-OR cells acquire resistance through subclonal enrichment of secondary mutations that restore functional full-length protein. Moreover, PEO1-OR cells upregulate HR repair-promoting factors (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51) and PARP1. Olaparib-inducible activation of the ATR/CHK1 pathway and G2/M arrest is abrogated in olaparib-resistant cells. Drug sensitivity assays revealed that PEO1-OR cells are less sensitive to ATRi and CHK1i agents. Combined treatment is less effective in olaparib-resistant cells considering inhibition of metabolic activity, colony formation, survival, accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks, and chromosomal aberrations. However, synergistic antitumor activity between compounds is achievable in PEO1-OR cells. Collectively, olaparib-resistant cells display co-existing HR repair-related mechanisms that confer resistance to olaparib, which may be effectively utilized to resensitize them to PARPi via combination therapy. Importantly, the addition of ATR/CHK1 pathway inhibitors to olaparib has the potential to overcome acquired resistance to PARPi.
Topics: Humans; Female; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Ovarian Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; DNA Damage; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; BRCA2 Protein; Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins
PubMed: 37048111
DOI: 10.3390/cells12071038 -
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Apr 2022PARP inhibition represents the dawn of precision medicine for treating prostate cancer. Despite this advance, questions remain regarding the use of PARP inhibitors...
PARP inhibition represents the dawn of precision medicine for treating prostate cancer. Despite this advance, questions remain regarding the use of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) for the treatment of this disease, including (i) how specifically do PARPi-sensitive tumor cells respond to treatment, and (ii) how does PARPi resistance develop? To address these questions, we characterized response to olaparib in sensitive LNCaP and C4-2B cells and developed two olaparib-resistant derivative cell line models from each, termed LN-OlapR and 2B-OlapR, respectively. OlapR cells possess distinct morphology from parental cells and display robust resistance to olaparib and other clinically relevant PARPis, including rucaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib. In LNCaP and C4-2B cells, we found that olaparib induces massive DNA damage, leading to activation of the G2-M checkpoint, activation of p53, and cell-cycle arrest. Furthermore, our data suggest that G2-M checkpoint activation leads to both cell death and senescence associated with p21 activity. In contrast, both LN-OlapR and 2B-OlapR cells do not arrest at G2-M and display a markedly blunted response to olaparib treatment. Interestingly, both OlapR cell lines harbor increased DNA damage relative to parental cells, suggesting that OlapR cells accumulate and manage persistent DNA damage during acquisition of resistance, likely through augmenting DNA repair capacity. Further impairing DNA repair through CDK1 inhibition enhances DNA damage, induces cell death, and sensitizes OlapR cells to olaparib treatment. Our data together further our understanding of PARPi treatment and provide a cellular platform system for the study of response and resistance to PARP inhibition.
Topics: Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Humans; Male; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 35086956
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0604 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Jun 2022This qualitative study sought to learn patients' perspectives on olaparib - including maintenance olaparib - in their own words.
PURPOSE
This qualitative study sought to learn patients' perspectives on olaparib - including maintenance olaparib - in their own words.
METHODS
Olaparib-treated patients were interviewed by phone. A semi-structured interview guide that focused on symptoms and quality of life was formulated in alignment with the study objective. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed with content analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty olaparib-treated patients were interviewed. Four themes emerged: (1) The Long Cancer Journey. Patients prescribed olaparib appear to have had a long cancer journey, sometimes with prior cancer ("I had breast cancer in 1996") and sometimes with a long interval from an ovarian cancer diagnosis; (2) Adherence. Despite this journey, patients were adherent to olaparib ("I set it for an alarm 15 min before I have to take [olaparib] and then exactly when I'm supposed to take it"); (3) Adherence Despite Challenges. Adherence continued despite side effects (although olaparib was "pretty tolerable"). This adherence also continued despite cost ("…for a month's supply, mine was $15,837… and my insurance covered some of it but not near enough"), and (4) Modifications in Perceptions of BRCA Status. Olaparib as cancer therapy influenced perceptions of BRCA mutations ("But I… I have to tell you, I'm grateful that I qualified to be on Lynparza®").
CONCLUSION
Although oral maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer is relatively new, patients appear willing to take olaparib long term; and they seem to take great lengths to remain adherent, despite having sometimes had a long cancer journey.
Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35146567
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06879-w -
Cancer Discovery Aug 2019A recent study investigated the mechanisms underlying the interaction between olaparib and cediranib in non--mutant ovarian cancer. Cediranib may confer sensitivity to...
A recent study investigated the mechanisms underlying the interaction between olaparib and cediranib in non--mutant ovarian cancer. Cediranib may confer sensitivity to olaparib by increasing tumor hypoxia and inhibiting platelet-derived growth factor receptor, which reduces and expression, thus decreasing homology-deficient DNA repair.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; BRCA1 Protein; Down-Regulation; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Quinazolines; Rad51 Recombinase
PubMed: 31182430
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2019-064