-
JAMA Psychiatry Jul 2021Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US, yet many individuals with OUD do not receive treatment.
IMPORTANCE
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US, yet many individuals with OUD do not receive treatment.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the cost-effectiveness of OUD treatments and association of these treatments with outcomes in the US.
DESIGN AND SETTING
This model-based cost-effectiveness analysis included a US population with OUD.
INTERVENTIONS
Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine, methadone, or injectable extended-release naltrexone; psychotherapy (beyond standard counseling); overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND); and contingency management (CM).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Fatal and nonfatal overdoses and deaths throughout 5 years, discounted lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs.
RESULTS
In the base case, in the absence of treatment, 42 717 overdoses (4132 fatal, 38 585 nonfatal) and 12 660 deaths were estimated to occur in a cohort of 100 000 patients over 5 years, and 11.58 discounted lifetime QALYs were estimated to be experienced per person. An estimated reduction in overdoses was associated with MAT with methadone (10.7%), MAT with buprenorphine or naltrexone (22.0%), and when combined with CM and psychotherapy (range, 21.0%-31.4%). Estimated deceased deaths were associated with MAT with methadone (6%), MAT with buprenorphine or naltrexone (13.9%), and when combined with CM, OEND, and psychotherapy (16.9%). MAT yielded discounted gains of 1.02 to 1.07 QALYs per person. Including only health care sector costs, methadone cost $16 000/QALY gained compared with no treatment, followed by methadone with OEND ($22 000/QALY gained), then by buprenorphine with OEND and CM ($42 000/QALY gained), and then by buprenorphine with OEND, CM, and psychotherapy ($250 000/QALY gained). MAT with naltrexone was dominated by other treatment alternatives. When criminal justice costs were included, all forms of MAT (with buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone) were associated with cost savings compared with no treatment, yielding savings of $25 000 to $105 000 in lifetime costs per person. The largest cost savings were associated with methadone plus CM. Results were qualitatively unchanged over a wide range of sensitivity analyses. An analysis using demographic and cost data for Veterans Health Administration patients yielded similar findings.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cost-effectiveness analysis, expanded access to MAT, combined with OEND and CM, was associated with cost-saving reductions in morbidity and mortality from OUD. Lack of widespread MAT availability limits access to a cost-saving medical intervention that reduces morbidity and mortality from OUD. Opioid overdoses in the US likely reached a record high in 2020 because of COVID-19 increasing substance use, exacerbating stress and social isolation, and interfering with opioid treatment. It is essential to understand the cost-effectiveness of alternative forms of MAT to treat OUD.
Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Combined Modality Therapy; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Opiate Overdose; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Psychotherapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33787832
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0247 -
World Journal of Surgery Apr 2022The optimal analgesic strategy for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) remains unknown. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The optimal analgesic strategy for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE
The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of different analgesic modalities trialled in AP.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS and Web of Science conducted up until June 2021, identified all randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing analgesic modalities in AP. A pooled analysis was undertaken of the improvement in pain scores as reported on visual analogue scale (VAS) on day 0, day 1 and day 2.
RESULTS
Twelve RCTs were identified including 542 patients. Seven trial drugs were compared: opiates, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), metamizole, local anaesthetic, epidural, paracetamol, and placebo. Across all modalities, the pooled VAS scores showed global improvement from baseline to day 2. Epidural analgesia appears to provide the greatest improvement in VAS within the first 24 h but is equivalent to opiates by 48 h. Within 24 h, NSAIDs offered similar pain-relief to opiates, while placebo also showed equivalence to other modalities but then plateaued. Local anaesthetics demonstrated least overall efficacy. VAS scores for opiate and non-opiate analgesics were comparable at baseline and day 1. The identified RCTs demonstrated significant statistical and methodological heterogeneity in pain-relief reporting.
CONCLUSIONS
There is remarkable paucity of level 1 evidence to guide pain management in AP with small datasets per study. Epidural administration appears effective within the first 24 h of AP although infrequently used and featured in only a single RCT. NSAIDs are an effective opiate sparing alternative during the first 24 h.
Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Local; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Opiate Alkaloids; Pain; Pain Management; Pancreatitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34994837
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06420-w -
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &... Mar 2020There is little information on human exposure to carcinogens and other toxicants related to opiate use, alone or in combination with tobacco.
BACKGROUND
There is little information on human exposure to carcinogens and other toxicants related to opiate use, alone or in combination with tobacco.
METHODS
Among male participants of the Golestan Cohort Study in Northeast Iran, we studied 28 never users of either opiates or tobacco, 33 exclusive cigarette smokers, 23 exclusive users of smoked opiates, and 30 opiate users who also smoked cigarettes (dual users; 21 smoked opiates and 9 ingested them). We quantified urinary concentrations of 39 exposure biomarkers, including tobacco alkaloids, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), and volatile organic compounds (VOC), and used decomposition to parse out the share of the biomarker concentrations explained by opiate use and nicotine dose.
RESULTS
Dual users had the highest concentrations of all biomarkers, but exclusive cigarette smokers and exclusive opiate users had substantially higher concentrations of PAH and VOC biomarkers than never users of either product. Decomposition analysis showed that opiate use contributed a larger part of the PAH concentrations than nicotine dose, and the sum of 2- and 3-hydroxyphenanthrene (∑-phe) resulted almost completely from opiate use. Concentrations of most VOC biomarkers were explained by both nicotine dose and opiate use. Two acrylamide metabolites, a 1,3-butadiene metabolite and a dimethylformamide metabolite, were more strongly explained by opiate use. Acrylamide metabolites and ∑-phe were significantly higher in opiate smokers than opiate eaters; other biomarkers did not vary by the route of opiate intake.
CONCLUSIONS
Both cigarette smokers and opiate users (by smoking or ingestion) were exposed to many toxicants and carcinogens.
IMPACT
This high exposure, particularly among dual opiate and cigarette users, can have a substantial global public health impact.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Biomarkers; Carcinogens; Cigarette Smoking; Cohort Studies; Humans; Iran; Male; Middle Aged; Opiate Alkaloids; Smoking, Non-Tobacco Products; Tobacco Products
PubMed: 31915141
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1212 -
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters Jul 2021The antibacterial properties of close noscapine analogs have not been previously reported. We used our pDualrep2 double-reporter High Throughput Screening (HTS) platform...
The antibacterial properties of close noscapine analogs have not been previously reported. We used our pDualrep2 double-reporter High Throughput Screening (HTS) platform to identify a series of noscapine derivatives with promising antibacterial activity. The platform is based on RPF (SOS-response/DNA damage) and Katushka2S (inhibition of translation) proteins and simultaneously provides information on antibacterial activity and the mechanism of action of small-molecule compounds against E. coli. The most potent compound exhibited an MIC of 13.5 µM(6.25 µg/ml) and a relatively low cytotoxicity against HEK293 cells (CC = 71 µM, selectivity index: ~5.5). Some compounds from this series induced average Katushka2S reporter signals, indicating inhibition of translation machinery in the bacteria; however, these compounds did not attenuate translation in vitro in a luciferase-based translation assay. The most effective compounds did not significantly arrest the mitotic cycle in HEK293 cells, in contrast to the parent compound in a flow cytometry assay. Several molecules showed activity against clinically relevant gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial strains. Compounds from the discovered series can be reasonably regarded as good templates for further development and evaluation.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cell Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Structure; Noscapine; Structure-Activity Relationship
PubMed: 33892103
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128055 -
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine Aug 2020Several studies have shown an association between asthma and opiate abuse. This retrospective study aims to analyse the demographic, toxicological, and seasonal... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Several studies have shown an association between asthma and opiate abuse. This retrospective study aims to analyse the demographic, toxicological, and seasonal differences in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects who died of opiates. In addition, the relationship between toxicological levels of opiates and histologic grade of lung inflammation is examined. Deaths from 2013 to 2018 involving opiates as the primary cause of death in Cook County, Illinois (USA) were reviewed. Twenty-six cases of opiate deaths of individuals with a history of asthma and lung histology slides available were identified. In comparison, 40 cases of deaths due to opiates only were analysed. A check-list system for the evaluation of the grade of microscopic inflammation in asthma was developed. We found statistically significant differences between the asthmatics and the non-asthmatics regarding demography (age and race) and toxicology (6-MAM presence). In particular, the "opiate and asthma group" was mainly composed of African-American subjects, in contrast with the "opiate group", consisting mostly of Caucasian. The mean age was significantly higher in the "opiate and asthma group" compared with the "opiate group". A greater presence of 6-MAM was detected in the "opiate group" compared with the "opiate and asthma group". While we expected to find that low opiate levels would lead to deaths in asthmatics and, in particular, that lower opiate concentrations would cause deaths in subjects with higher grades of histologic inflammation, our study suggests that the quantity of drug and the level of inflammation are not statistically significant in the determination of death. We, therefore, recommend histologic examination of the lungs to evaluate for asthma, particularly in suspected low-level opiate-related deaths, to help further clarify any relationship between asthma and opiate use.
Topics: Adult; Black or African American; Age Distribution; Asthma; Coroners and Medical Examiners; Female; Heroin Dependence; Humans; Inflammation; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Opiate Alkaloids; Opioid-Related Disorders; Organ Size; Pulmonary Edema; Retrospective Studies; United States; White People; Young Adult
PubMed: 32738646
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102030 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2015The review represents one in a family of four reviews focusing on a range of different interventions for drug-using offenders. This specific review considers... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The review represents one in a family of four reviews focusing on a range of different interventions for drug-using offenders. This specific review considers pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing drug use or criminal activity, or both, for illicit drug-using offenders.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders in reducing criminal activity or drug use, or both.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Fourteen electronic bibliographic databases up to May 2014 and five additional Web resources (between 2004 and November 2011). We contacted experts in the field for further information.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any pharmacological intervention a component of which is designed to reduce, eliminate or prevent relapse of drug use or criminal activity, or both, in drug-using offenders. We also report data on the cost and cost-effectiveness of interventions.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
Fourteen trials with 2647 participants met the inclusion criteria. The interventions included in this review report on agonistic pharmacological interventions (buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone) compared to no intervention, other non-pharmacological treatments (e.g. counselling) and other pharmacological drugs. The methodological trial quality was poorly described, and most studies were rated as 'unclear' by the reviewers. The biggest threats to risk of bias were generated through blinding (performance and detection bias) and incomplete outcome data (attrition bias). Studies could not be combined all together because the comparisons were too different. Only subgroup analysis for type of pharmacological treatment were done. When compared to non-pharmacological, we found low quality evidence that agonist treatments are not effective in reducing drug use or criminal activity, objective results (biological) (two studies, 237 participants (RR 0.72 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.00); subjective (self-report), (three studies, 317 participants (RR 0.61 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18); self-report drug use (three studies, 510 participants (SMD: -0.62 (95% CI -0.85 to -0.39). We found low quality of evidence that antagonist treatment was not effective in reducing drug use (one study, 63 participants (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.70) but we found moderate quality of evidence that they significantly reduced criminal activity (two studies, 114 participants, (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.74).Findings on the effects of individual pharmacological interventions on drug use and criminal activity showed mixed results. In the comparison of methadone to buprenorphine, diamorphine and naltrexone, no significant differences were displayed for either treatment for self report dichotomous drug use (two studies, 370 participants (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.55), continuous measures of drug use (one study, 81 participants, (mean difference (MD) 0.70, 95% CI -5.33 to 6.73); or criminal activity (one study, 116 participants, (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.88) between methadone and buprenorphine. Similar results were found for comparisons with diamorphine with no significant differences between the drugs for self report dichotomous drug use for arrest (one study, 825 participants, (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.51) or naltrexone for dichotomous measures of reincarceration (one study, 44 participants, (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.26), and continuous outcome measure of crime, (MD -0.50, 95% CI -8.04 to 7.04) or self report drug use (MD 4.60, 95% CI -3.54 to 12.74).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
When compared to non-pharmacological treatment, agonist treatments did not seem effective in reducing drug use or criminal activity. Antagonist treatments were not effective in reducing drug use but significantly reduced criminal activity. When comparing the drugs to one another we found no significant differences between the drug comparisons (methadone versus buprenorphine, diamorphine and naltrexone) on any of the outcome measures. Caution should be taken when interpreting these findings, as the conclusions are based on a small number of trials, and generalisation of these study findings should be limited mainly to male adult offenders. Additionally, many studies were rated at high risk of bias.
Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Crime; Criminals; Female; Heroin; Humans; Male; Methadone; Naltrexone; Narcotics; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 26035084
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010862.pub2 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Dec 2016Opiate use is associated with deficits in decision-making. However, the impact of abstinence and co-morbid factors, like head injury and poly-substance abuse, on this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Opiate use is associated with deficits in decision-making. However, the impact of abstinence and co-morbid factors, like head injury and poly-substance abuse, on this ability, is currently unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to assess 1) the magnitude of decision-making deficits in opiate users; 2) whether co-morbid factors moderate the severity of these deficits; 3) whether ex-opiate users demonstrate smaller decision-making deficits than current users; and 4) whether the length of abstinence is related to the magnitude of decision-making deficits. We analysed 22 studies that compared the performance of current and ex-opiate users to healthy controls on decision-making measures such as the Iowa Gambling Task. Current users demonstrated a moderately strong impairment in decision-making relative to controls, which was not significantly moderated by co-morbid factors. The magnitude of the impairment did not significantly differ between studies assessing current or ex-users, and this impairment was not related to length of abstinence. Thus, it appears that opiate users have relatively severe decision-making deficits that persist at least 1.5 years after cessation of use.
Topics: Decision Making; Gambling; Humans; Neuropsychological Tests; Opiate Alkaloids; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 27649645
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.011 -
Sleep Sep 2023Long-term use of sodium oxybate (SXB), (also called gamma-hydroxybutyrate [GHB]) attenuates the cataplexy and sleepiness of human narcolepsy. We had previously found...
Long-term use of sodium oxybate (SXB), (also called gamma-hydroxybutyrate [GHB]) attenuates the cataplexy and sleepiness of human narcolepsy. We had previously found that chronic opiate usage in humans and long-term opiate administration to mice significantly increased the number of detected hypocretin/orexin (Hcrt) neurons, decreased their size, and increased Hcrt level in the hypothalamus. We also found that opiates significantly decreased cataplexy in human narcoleptics as well as in narcoleptic mice and that cessation of locus coeruleus neuronal activity preceded and was tightly linked to cataplectic attacks in narcoleptic dogs. We tested the hypothesis that SXB produces changes similar to opiates and now report that chronic SXB administration significantly increased the size of Hcrt neurons, the reverse of what we had seen with opiates in humans and mice. Levels of Hcrt in the hypothalamus were nonsignificantly lower, in contrast to the significant increase in hypothalamic Hcrt level after opiates. SXB decreased tyrosine hydroxylase levels in the locus coeruleus, the major descending projection of the hypocretin system, also the reverse of what we saw with opioids. Therefore despite some similar effects on narcoleptic symptomatology, SXB does not produce anatomical changes similar to those elicited by opiates. Analysis of changes in other links in the cataplexy pathway might further illuminate SXB's mechanism of action on narcolepsy.
Topics: Humans; Mice; Animals; Dogs; Orexins; Sodium Oxybate; Cataplexy; Locus Coeruleus; Narcolepsy; Neurons; Opiate Alkaloids
PubMed: 37155728
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsad135 -
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing :... Oct 2022To examine the effects of preoperative gabapentin administration on postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy (T/A) in a single... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
To examine the effects of preoperative gabapentin administration on postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy (T/A) in a single ambulatory surgery location within a pediatric healthcare organization.
DESIGN
This randomized, controlled pilot study enrolled patients age 3-18 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of I-II undergoing T/A.
METHODS
Both gabapentin and placebo groups were given study medication preoperatively and received standard opiate regimens intraoperatively and postoperative pain instructions. Outcome measurements included: time to first analgesic medication in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), mean acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and opiate doses in mg/kg. Additionally, we examined pain scores, medication use, and side effects reported by daily pain diaries completed by patients/families for 3 days postoperatively.
FINDINGS
Forty-nine patients were included in final analysis (gabapentin n = 26, placebo n = 23). Demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups were similar; the majority (46 of 49) were under the age of 13. Both groups received opiates in PACU. Some patients in both groups received hydrocodone/acetaminophen postoperatively. There were no reported differences in side effects between groups. Gabapentin group reported less use of opiates, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen post-discharge. We identified small effect sizes for opiates and acetaminophen, and medium effect size for ibuprofen (80.1% gabapentin versus 100% placebo, RR 0.81 [95% CI 0.67-0.97]). Median pain scores were 4 on a scale of 10 for both groups for all 3 days of follow-up. Overall median satisfaction score was 9, with a mean difference of 0.35 (95% CI -0.78 - 1.37). Analysis of variance revealed no difference in pain scores or satisfaction per pain diaries between the groups in general and no difference in score trajectory.
CONCLUSIONS
We were able to establish a rigorous process and feasibility to launch a larger, multi-center trial to examine this important issue. There remain few evidence-based options for acute pain relief in pediatric surgical populations besides opiates Identifying opiate alternatives that are effective, cost efficient and safe are needed for pediatric tonsillectomy patients.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Adenoidectomy; Adolescent; Aftercare; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Gabapentin; Humans; Hydrocodone; Ibuprofen; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Patient Discharge; Pilot Projects; Premedication; Tonsillectomy
PubMed: 35256248
DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.11.011 -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2020Studying the origin of opiate and/or opiate metabolites in individual urine specimens after consumption of cold syrups is vital for patients, doctors, and law...
Studying the origin of opiate and/or opiate metabolites in individual urine specimens after consumption of cold syrups is vital for patients, doctors, and law enforcement. A rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method using "dilute-and-shoot" analysis without the need for extraction, hydrolysis and/or derivatization has been developed and validated. The approach provides linear ranges of 2.5-1000 ng mL for 6-acetylmorphine, codeine, chlorpheniramine, and carbinoxamine, 2.5-800 ng mL for morphine and morphine-3-β-d-glucuronide, and 2.5-600 ng mL for morphine-6-β-d-glucuronide and codeine-6-β-d-glucuronide, with excellent correlation coefficients (R > 0.995) and matrix effects (< 5%). Urine samples collected from the ten participants orally administered cold syrups were analyzed. The results concluded that participants consuming codeine-containing cold syrups did not routinely pass urine tests for opiates, and their morphine-codeine concentration ratios (M/C) were not always < 1. In addition, the distribution map of the clinical total concentration of the sum of morphine and codeine against the antihistamines (chlorpheniramine or carbinoxamine) were plotted for discrimination of people who used cold syrups. The 15 real cases have been studied by using M/C rule, cutoff value, and distribution map, further revealing a potential approach to determine opiate metabolite in urine originating from cold syrups.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Chlorpheniramine; Codeine; Female; Forensic Medicine; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Opiate Alkaloids; Pyridines; Young Adult
PubMed: 32098143
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25040972