-
Head & Face Medicine Jul 2021Orthodontic retention aims to maintain optimal teeth positions after active treatment. The stability is affected by numerous factors, including patients' individual... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Orthodontic retention aims to maintain optimal teeth positions after active treatment. The stability is affected by numerous factors, including patients' individual features, thus retention should be adjusted in the most optimal way. Bonding a retainer makes retention less dependent on patient's compliance.
QUESTIONS ARISE
What wire or fiber splint type provides the best treatment stability? What materials should be used to bond the wire or fiber splint? Should be the bonding procedure be direct or indirect? The aim of the study is to assess and synthesize available controlled trials investigating failures of fixed retainers.
METHODS
Literature searches of free text and MeSH terms were performed in Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed Central in order to find studies, referring to failures of fixed retention (12th February 2021). The keywords were: ("orthodontic retainers AND failure AND wire"). The framework of this systematic review according to PICO was: Population: orthodontic patients; Intervention: fixed orthodontic retainer bonding; Comparison: Different protocols of fixed orthodontic retention applied; Outcomes: failure rate, survival rate. Three different specific scales from the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook were used, according to each study type. Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness of retention using fiber reinforced composite and multistranded steel wire.
RESULTS
The search identified 177 potential articles: 114 from PubMed, 41 from Scopus, 20 from Web of Science and 2 from Embase. After excluding studies inconsistent with selection criteria, 21 studies were included and subjected to qualitative analysis. The main outcome investigated was failure rate. This systematic review has some potential limitations due to the heterogeneity of design between included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
No retainer is proved to guarantee a perfect stability of dental alignment. The retainer should be bonded to all adherent teeth, preferably with additional use of bonding resin. No wire or fiber splint present superior characteristics concerning failure rate. Fiber reinforced composite retention is more sensitive to operator skills, and with imperfect bonding technique, failure rate is much higher. During the first 6 months after bonding retainer the patient should be under frequent control. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO database with the number CRD42021233406.
Topics: Dental Bonding; Humans; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Orthodontic Retainers; Orthodontic Wires
PubMed: 34301280
DOI: 10.1186/s13005-021-00281-3 -
BMC Oral Health Jul 2022Before the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination fixed orthodontic devices, such as brackets and wires, cause challenges not only for the orthodontist but also...
BACKGROUND
Before the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination fixed orthodontic devices, such as brackets and wires, cause challenges not only for the orthodontist but also for the radiologist. Essentially, the MRI-safe scan of the fixed orthodontic tools requires a proper guideline in clinical practice. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to examine all aspects of MRI-safe scan, including artifact, thermal, and debonding effects, to identify any existing gaps in knowledge in this regard and develop an evidence-based protocol.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was used in this study. The clinical question in "PIO" format was: "Does MRI examination influence the temperature of the orthodontic devices, the size of artifacts, and the debonding force in patients who have fixed orthodontic bracket and/or wire?" The search process was carried out in PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The search resulted in 1310 articles. After selection according to the eligibility criteria, 18 studies were analyzed by two reviewers. The risk of bias was determined using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool.
RESULTS
Out of the eligible 18 studies, 10 articles examined the heating effect, 6 were about the debonding effect, and 11 measured the size of artifact regarding brackets and wires. Considering the quality assessment, the overall levels of evidence were high and medium. The published studies showed that heating and debonding effects during MRI exposure were not hazardous for patients. As some wires revealed higher temperature changes, it is suggested to remove the wire or insert a spacer between the appliances and the oral mucosa. Based on the material, ceramic and plastic brackets caused no relevant artifact and were MRI-safe. Stainless steel brackets and wires resulted in susceptibility artifacts in the orofacial region and could cause distortion in the frontal lobe, orbits, and pituitary gland. The retainer wires showed no relevant artifact.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the thermal and debonding effects of the fixed orthodontic brackets and wires were irrelevant or resoluble; however, the size of the artifacts was clinically relevant and determined most significantly the feasibility of fixed brackets and wires in MRI examination.
Topics: Artifacts; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Orthodontic Brackets; Orthodontic Wires; Stainless Steel
PubMed: 35854295
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02317-9 -
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical... Apr 2018This literature review investigated a recently developed orthodontic wire composed of a β-titanium alloy known as "Gum Metal" and compared its properties with those of... (Review)
Review
This literature review investigated a recently developed orthodontic wire composed of a β-titanium alloy known as "Gum Metal" and compared its properties with those of conventional wires. The attractive properties of Gum Metal include an ultra-low Young's modulus, non-linear elastic behavior, ultra-high strength, high yield strain, high ductility, and superplastic deformability without work hardening at room temperature. The unique multifunctional characteristics of this new orthodontic wire make it almost ideal for orthodontic applications. The results of this literature review indicate the strong potential use of Gum Metal wire for improving and enhancing the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment.
Topics: Dental Stress Analysis; Elastic Modulus; Humans; Materials Testing; Orthodontic Wires; Orthodontics; Tensile Strength; Titanium
PubMed: 29655408
DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.010 -
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2020The aim of this study was to evaluate the attractiveness of different types of esthetic orthodontic wires by laypeople and dentists.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the attractiveness of different types of esthetic orthodontic wires by laypeople and dentists.
METHODS
Five different types of orthodontic wires were evaluated: three esthetic wires (Teflon-coated, epoxy resin-coated and rhodium-coated wires), and two metallic wires (stainless steel and NiTi), as control. Monocrystalline ceramic brackets were installed in the maxillary arch of a patient presenting good dental alignment. The five evaluated wires were attached to the orthodontic appliance with an esthetic silicone elastic and photographed. The photographs were evaluated by 163 individuals, 110 dentists and 53 laypeople. The data were statistically evaluated by two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests.
RESULTS
There was a statistically significant difference in the attractiveness among the wires evaluated; the most esthetic was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the Teflon-coated wire, with no significant difference from the stainless steel and NiTi control archwires. There was no significant difference between the groups of evaluators.
CONCLUSION
The most attractive was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the least attractive wire was the Teflon-coated wire, without statistically significant difference to the stainless steel and NiTi wires, used as control.
Topics: Dental Alloys; Esthetics, Dental; Humans; Materials Testing; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Orthodontic Brackets; Orthodontic Wires; Stainless Steel; Surface Properties; Titanium
PubMed: 33503122
DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.6.027-032.oar -
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics =... Jan 2022Gummetal® (Maruemu Works, Osaka, Japan), a new orthodontic wire material successfully used in clinical applications since 2006, is biocompatible and exhibits...
OBJECTIVES
Gummetal® (Maruemu Works, Osaka, Japan), a new orthodontic wire material successfully used in clinical applications since 2006, is biocompatible and exhibits exceptionally high elasticity, nonlinear elastic behavior, plasticity and strength. Systematic comparisons of friction behavior are lacking; thus, the friction of Gummetal® in the binding modus was compared to commonly used low friction wires.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In vivo tests were run with Gummetal®, CoCr (cobalt-chromium Elgiloy®, Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, CO, USA), β‑Ti (β-Titanium TMA®, Ormco, Orange, CA, USA), NiTi (nickel-titanium, NiTi-SE, Dentalline, Birkenfeld, Germany), and stainless steel (SS; Ref. 251-925, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) [dimensions: 0.014 inch (0.35 mm), 0.016 inch (0.40 mm), 0.016 × 0.022 inch (0.40 × 0.56 mm), and 0.019 × 0.025 inch (0.48 × 0.64 mm)-β-Ti not available in the dimension 0.014 inch]. These were combined with Discovery® (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany), Micro Sprint® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany), Clarity™ (3M Unitek), and Inspire Ice™ (Ormco) and slots in the dimension 0.022 inch (0.56 mm) and, except for the 0.019 × 0.025 inch wires, in the dimension 0.018 inch (0.46 mm). They were ligated with a 0.010 inch (0.25 mm) steel ligature (Smile Dental, Ratingen, Germany). Brackets were angulated by applying a moment of force of 10 Nmm against the wire, which was pulled through the slot at 0.2 mm/s.
RESULTS
In 660 tests using 132 bracket-wire combinations, friction loss for Gummetal® was comparable to and, in a few combinations with Micro Sprint®, significantly lower (p < 0.05) than SS and CoCr. The friction for Gummetal® was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than NiTi, and β‑Ti. In some bracket-wire combinations, lower friction was found with round wires compared to rectangular wires, except for the combination with Inspire Ice™, which was higher but not significant. Slot size did not have a significant effect on friction in most combinations.
CONCLUSION
The low friction associated with Gummetal® wires during arch-guided tooth movement will be a valuable addition to the armamentarium of orthodontists.
Topics: Dental Alloys; Dental Stress Analysis; Friction; Materials Testing; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Orthodontic Brackets; Orthodontic Wires; Titanium
PubMed: 34228140
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-021-00317-y -
American Journal of Orthodontics and... Jun 2015
Topics: Dental Alloys; Female; Humans; Male; Molar; Nickel; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Orthodontic Wires; Titanium; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 26038065
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.005 -
American Journal of Orthodontics and... Jul 2016
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Humans; Malocclusion; Orthodontic Wires; Time Factors
PubMed: 27364222
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.007 -
Microscopy Research and Technique May 2022Several mechanical and biological factors may change the orthodontic wire frictional resistance (FR). Titanium dioxide (TiO ) and silica dioxide (SiO ) nanoparticle (NP)...
Several mechanical and biological factors may change the orthodontic wire frictional resistance (FR). Titanium dioxide (TiO ) and silica dioxide (SiO ) nanoparticle (NP) coatings may be used to improve the characteristics of materials, reducing FR between archwire and bracket. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the FR of orthodontic wires with and without coating in both dry and wet environments and measure the surface roughness (SR). One hundred and eighty segments of rectangular Cr-Ni orthodontic wires (Morelli Co, Brazil) were divided into three groups according to the NP coating applied: TiO group; SiO group; and control group. The SR parameters were measured in an optical profilometer, the surface morphology was analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and FR was performed in a universal testing machine in dry and wet environments (n = 30). The statistical analysis was performed using the Generalized Estimated Equations model with a Bonferroni post-test (α = 0.05). It was observed that SiO NP coating decreased FR significantly when compared to the TiO and control groups, in both environments (p < .001). The SiO and TiO groups presented statistically lower SR than the control group and were similar to each other (p < .001). The SiO group presented the lower depth of Valley parameter than the TiO group (p < .001). The SEM showed that the TiO coating had the most heterogeneous surface morphology than the SiO and control groups. The orthodontic wires with NP coating modified the FR and morphology. The SiO coating reduced FR in both dry and wet environments and decreased SR. Titanium dioxide (TiO ) and silica dioxide (SiO ) nanoparticles coatings may be used to reduce frictional resistance (FR) between archwire and bracket as well as to improve surface morphology. The SiO coating reduced FR in both dry and wet environments and decreased the SR of Cr-Ni orthodontic wire. The TiO coating promoted the most heterogeneous surface morphology of Cr-Ni orthodontic wire.
Topics: Dental Alloys; Friction; Materials Testing; Nanoparticles; Orthodontic Brackets; Orthodontic Wires; Silicon Dioxide; Surface Properties; Titanium
PubMed: 34997799
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.24049 -
The Angle Orthodontist Jan 2021The purpose of this cohort study was to evaluate the effect of self-ligating brackets (SB) and other related factors that influence orthodontic treatment time. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this cohort study was to evaluate the effect of self-ligating brackets (SB) and other related factors that influence orthodontic treatment time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a two-armed prospective study. Consecutively treated patients who were recruited from a private practice were enrolled and asked to choose between SB and conventional brackets (CB). If the patient did not have a preference, that patient was randomly allocated. An identical archwire sequence was used, and all patients were treated by a single orthodontist. Treatment duration, number of bracket failures, poor oral hygiene, poor elastic wear, whether or not to orthodontic mini-implants (OMI) were used, OMI failure, extraction, American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index, and arch length discrepancy were measured and statistically analyzed using t-tests, correlation analysis, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Stepwise regression analysis was conducted to generate an equation to predict treatment duration.
RESULTS
A total of 134 patients with an average age of 22.73 years were included. The average treatment duration was 28.63 months. ANCOVA showed no significant difference in treatment duration between CB and SB. Stepwise regression analysis could explain 64.6% of the variance in treatment duration using five variables.
CONCLUSIONS
SB did not exhibit a significant reduction in treatment time as compared with CB. Patient cooperation, extractions, and malocclusion severity had a significant impact on treatment duration.
Topics: Adult; Cohort Studies; Dental Implants; Humans; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Orthodontic Brackets; Orthodontic Wires; Prospective Studies; Young Adult
PubMed: 33289803
DOI: 10.2319/050220-379.1 -
Journal of the World Federation of... Aug 2023The straight-wire appliance is an individualized, fully-programmed appliance system that has been in clinical use since the early 1970s. A study of tooth positions in... (Review)
Review
The straight-wire appliance is an individualized, fully-programmed appliance system that has been in clinical use since the early 1970s. A study of tooth positions in individuals with naturally occurring harmonious occlusions led to the discovery of the Six Keys to Normal (Optimal) Occlusion which provided data for bracket features and prescription values incorporated into the straight-wire appliance. It was based on the notion that tooth anatomy, morphology, and optimal positions were alike enough among individuals, regardless of age, sex, or race to justify using prefabricated brackets with average prescription values. New technologies have led to advancements in appliance customization. Customized brackets can be made-to-order with one-of-a-kind prescription values and bracket base contours that fit precisely to the morphologic characteristics of the teeth. If costs and material qualities were comparable, would treatment efficiency or treatment outcomes be superior when using a customized appliance compared with a prefabricated straight-wire appliance? If not, why not?
Topics: Humans; Orthodontic Wires; Orthodontic Brackets; Dental Occlusion; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37419789
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.06.004