-
The British Journal of Psychiatry : the... Mar 2020There is strong research evidence to support the pharmacological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a second line to trauma-focused psychological...
There is strong research evidence to support the pharmacological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a second line to trauma-focused psychological interventions. Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and venlafaxine are the best-evidenced drugs, with lower-level evidence for other medications. It is important that prescribing for PTSD is evidence-based.
Topics: Evidence-Based Medicine; Fluoxetine; Humans; Paroxetine; Sertraline; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 32345407
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2020.40 -
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban =... Aug 2022To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in treatment of depression disorder in children and adolescents by network meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in treatment of depression disorder in children and adolescents by network meta-analysis.
METHODS
Databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang Data were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) related to antidepressants in treatment of children and adolescents with depression from inception to December 2021. Quality assessment and data extraction from the included RCTs were performed. Statistical analyses of efficacy and tolerability were conducted with Stata 15.1 software. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCAR) was used to rank the value of the antidepressants.
RESULTS
A total of 33 RCTs were included in 32 articles, involving 6949 patients. There are 13 antidepressants used in total, including amitriptyline, vilazodone, fluoxetine, selegiline, paroxetine, imipramine, desipramine, sertraline, nortriptyline, escitalopram, citalopram, venlafaxine and duloxetine. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of duloxetine ( =1.95, 95% 1.41-2.69), fluoxetine ( =1.73, 95% 1.40-2.14), venlafaxine ( =1.37, 95% 1.04-1.80) and escitalopram ( =1.48, 95% : 1.12-1.95) were significantly higher than that of placebos (all <0.05); the probability cumulative ranks were duloxetine (87.0%), amitriptyline (83.3%), fluoxetine (79.0%), escitalopram (62.7%), etc. The results showed that the intolerability of patients receiving imipramine ( =0.15, 95% 0.08-0.27), sertraline ( =0.33, 95% 0.16-0.71), venlafaxine ( =0.35, 95% 0.17-0.72), duloxetine ( =0.35, 95% 0.17-0.73) and paroxetine ( =0.52, 95% 0.30-0.88) were significantly higher than that of placebos (all <0.05), and the probability cumulative ranks were imipramine (95.7%), sertraline (69.6%), venlafaxine (68.6%), duloxetine (68.2%), etc. Conclusion: Among 13 antidepressants, duloxetine, fluoxetine, escitalopram and venlafaxine are significantly better than placebo in terms of efficacy, but duloxetine and venlafaxine are less well tolerated.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Fluoxetine; Sertraline; Paroxetine; Amitriptyline; Imipramine; Depression; Escitalopram; Network Meta-Analysis; Depressive Disorder, Major; Antidepressive Agents
PubMed: 37202104
DOI: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2022-0145 -
Current Psychiatry Reports Apr 2018This paper reviews recent research on late-life depression (LLD) pharmacotherapy, focusing on updated information for monotherapy and augmentation treatments. We then... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
This paper reviews recent research on late-life depression (LLD) pharmacotherapy, focusing on updated information for monotherapy and augmentation treatments. We then review new research on moderators of clinical response and how to use the information for improved efficacy.
RECENT FINDINGS
A recent review shows that sertraline, paroxetine, and duloxetine were superior to placebo for the treatment of LLD. There is concern that paroxetine could have adverse outcomes in the geriatric population due to anticholinergic properties; however, studies show no increases in mortality, dementia risk, or cognitive measures. Among newer antidepressants, vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in LLD, quetiapine has demonstrated efficacy especially for patients with sleep disturbances, and aripiprazole augmentation for treatment resistance in LLD was found to be safe and effective. Researchers have also been identifying moderators of LLD that can guide treatment. Researchers are learning how to associate moderators, neuroanatomical models, and antidepressant response. SSRI/SNRIs remain first-line treatment for LLD. Aripiprazole is an effective and safe augmentation for treatment resistance. Studies are identifying actionable moderators that can increase treatment response.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Aripiprazole; Depression; Depressive Disorder; Drug Resistance; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Humans; Paroxetine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline; Vortioxetine
PubMed: 29627920
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-018-0899-6 -
BJOG : An International Journal of... Oct 2016Paroxetine is the first non-hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) approved based on the results of two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trials by the Food... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Paroxetine is the first non-hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) approved based on the results of two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trials by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013.
OBJECTIVE
To confirm the effect and safety of paroxetine for vasomotor symptoms (VMS).
SEARCH STRATEGY
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and four Chinese databases was searched from the date of their inception to 7 June 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs on the effect of paroxetine compared with placebo or no treatment for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women who experienced moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers screened records and extracted the information independently. The included studies were appraised by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We synthesised the data in random-effects models and rated the quality of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.
MAIN RESULTS
Five articles with six RCTs (1571 participants) were included. Paroxetine significantly reduced the frequency of hot flushes by 8.86 per week (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.69-12.04, P < 0.00001, I(2) = 83%) at week 4 and 7.36 per week (95% CI, 4.25-10.46, P < 0.00001, I(2) = 62%) at week 12. The quality of the evidence on the effect of paroxetine for VMS was moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
There was moderate quality of evidence supporting the effectiveness of paroxetine for vasomotor symptoms; however, it causes nausea and dizziness.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
Review finds paroxetine effective for menopausal symptoms with some side effects: evidence strength moderate.
Topics: Adult; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Middle Aged; Paroxetine; Perimenopause; Postmenopause; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; Vasomotor System
PubMed: 27062457
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13951 -
Journal of Pharmacy Practice Jun 2015Studies in recent years have exposed concerns about the safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in menopausal women.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Studies in recent years have exposed concerns about the safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in menopausal women. Numerous studies have examined the use of antidepressants for relief of VMS. Despite recommendations to deny approval of paroxetine mesylate (Brisdelle™) for the treatment of VMS, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently granted it approval for this indication.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate all published literature examining use of paroxetine salts (mesylate and hydrochloride) in the treatment of menopausal VMS.
METHODS
Both PubMed and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) were searched using the keywords hot flashes, vasomotor symptoms, menopause, and paroxetine. In PubMed, MeSH terms were used for paroxetine, menopause, and hot flashes. Searches were limited to humans, English language, and clinical trial design. The references for each study identified in this search process were examined in order to locate any additional relevant articles.
RESULTS
Compared with placebo, paroxetine salts offer a modest benefit in the treatment of menopausal VMS reducing the frequency and severity of weekly hot flashes.
CONCLUSION
Paroxetine (mesylate or hydrochloride) is an effective alternative to HRT for the reduction in VMS in menopausal women. Future head-to-head studies with active medications are needed in order to identify the best algorithm of treatment for this condition.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Menopause; Paroxetine
PubMed: 25107421
DOI: 10.1177/0897190014544785 -
Toxicology in Vitro : An International... Mar 2023Paroxetine is functionally classified as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Paroxetine can induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis through the ROS-MAPK...
INTRODUCTION
Paroxetine is functionally classified as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Paroxetine can induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis through the ROS-MAPK pathway.Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant. This drug induces the expression of p53, thereby activating caspase-3. Amitriptyline has also been studied as a potential candidate for inducing oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in cancer cells, which may be more effective than other chemotherapy drugs. This study aims to to investigate the anticancer effects of paroxetine and amitriptyline and their combination treatment on HT29 and A549 cell lines for the first time.
METHODS
In order to investigate the anticancer effect of two drugs, paroxetine and amitriptyline, on inhibiting the growth of A549 and HT29 cancer cells, oxidative stress factors and LDH enzyme and apoptosis tests were performed.
RESULTS
Two drugs, amitriptyline and paroxetine alone, inhibited the growth of cancer cells in such a way that the inhibitory effect of the cells increased with the increase in the dose of the drug. In the simultaneous exposure of these two drugs, the inhibitory effect was much greater than the effect of single drug exposure. Also, these two drugs have caused LDH leakage and induction of apoptosis.
CONCLUSION
According to the results of the study, it was found that these two drugs have the necessary ability to inhibit the growth of cancer cells by inducing apoptosis and LDH leakage and inducing oxidative stress.
Topics: Humans; Paroxetine; Amitriptyline; A549 Cells; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic
PubMed: 36460226
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105532 -
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2023Recommendations for treating panic disorder (PD) in older patients are scarce. The authors have systematically reviewed whether several recommended medications are... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Recommendations for treating panic disorder (PD) in older patients are scarce. The authors have systematically reviewed whether several recommended medications are superior to others and their optimal doses in this age group.
METHODS
A database search of studies involving patients with PD with/without agoraphobia aged ≥ 60 years was carried out using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Clinical Trials.gov, from their inception dates to 1 March 2023. Only four (published from 2002 to 2010) of the 1292 records screened were included. A risk of bias assessment was provided. This systematic review was performed using The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
RESULTS
Two studies were randomized clinical trials, whereas two were open-label, including paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline; three studies reported short-term evaluations, whereas one study included a 26-week follow-up. Medications provided benefits, with good tolerability. Preliminary results suggested greater benefits of paroxetine in reducing panic attacks vs. cognitive - behavioral therapy, and an earlier decrease in PAs with escitalopram vs. citalopram. Risk of bias was considerable.
CONCLUSIONS
The pharmacological management of PD in older patients has received no attention. Findings are scant, dated, and affected by methodological flaws; thus, they do not provide significant advances.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Panic Disorder; Paroxetine; Citalopram; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Escitalopram; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37676054
DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2254938 -
European Neuropsychopharmacology : the... Jan 2023Antidepressant drugs are prescribed to patients with depressive, anxiety disorders, and other conditions. Evidence about antidepressant discontinuation syndrome (ADS)... (Review)
Review
Antidepressant drugs are prescribed to patients with depressive, anxiety disorders, and other conditions. Evidence about antidepressant discontinuation syndrome (ADS) and related outcomes is sparse, although potentially burdensome in some patients. The present state-of-the-art review aims to appraise the most current evidence about ADS critically. ADS has been documented for most antidepressant drugs, although most literature focuses on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors prescribed for depression. While down-titration cannot exclude the chance of ADS, it is nonetheless warranted in the clinical setting, especially for short half-life and sedative compounds such as paroxetine. Integrative management with concurrent pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy may minimize the eventual unpleasant effects arising within the discontinuation process. In addition, patient-tailored interventions and education should be part of the discontinuation strategy. Future research must rely on broadly accepted definitions for ADS and related phenomena such as antidepressant withdrawal and shed further light on the underpinning neurobiology. Discriminating between ADS-related phenomena and relapse of depression is likewise warranted, along with a neuroscience-based nomenclature instead of a class one.
Topics: Humans; Antidepressive Agents; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Paroxetine; Anxiety Disorders; Anxiety; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome
PubMed: 36345093
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.10.005 -
The Primary Care Companion For CNS... Jan 2018
Topics: Humans; Paroxetine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 29381271
DOI: 10.4088/PCC.17l02113 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2023Osteoarthritis (OA), a common chronic joint disease, is characterized by cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone reconstruction. NF-κB signaling pathway-activated...
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritis (OA), a common chronic joint disease, is characterized by cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone reconstruction. NF-κB signaling pathway-activated inflammation and NLRP3-induced pyroptosis play essential roles in the development of OA. In this study, we examine whether paroxetine can inhibit pyroptosis and reduce osteoclast formation, thereby delaying the destruction of knee joints.
METHODS
We employed high-density cultures, along with quantitative polymerase chain reactions and Western blotting techniques, to investigate the effects of paroxetine on extracellular matrix synthesis and degradation. The expression levels of NF-κB and pyroptosis-related signaling pathway proteins were examined by Western blotting and immunofluorescence. Furthermore, the impact of paroxetine on RANKL-induced osteoclast formation was evaluated through TRAP staining and F-actin ring fluorescence detection. To investigate the role of paroxetine in vivo, we constructed a mouse model with destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) surgery. Safranin O-Fast Green staining, Hematoxylin-Eosin staining, and immunohistochemistry were conducted to observe the extent of knee joint cartilage deformation. In addition, TRAP staining was used to observe the formation of osteoclasts in the subchondral bone.
RESULTS
In the in vitro experiments with ATDC5, paroxetine treatment attenuated IL-1β-induced activation of the pyroptosis-related pathway and suppressed extracellular matrix catabolism by inhibiting the NF-kB signaling pathway. In addition, paroxetine treatment decreased the expression of RANKL-induced osteoclast marker genes and reduced osteoclast formation. In animal experiments conducted in vivo, mice treated with paroxetine exhibited thicker knee cartilage with a smoother surface compared to the DMM group. Additionally, the formation of osteoclasts in the subchondral bone was reduced in the paroxetine-treated mice. Further analysis revealed that paroxetine treatment played a role in preserving the balance of the extracellular matrix and delaying knee joint degeneration.
CONCLUSION
Paroxetine can inhibit pyroptosis and reduce osteoclast formation via inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway, suggesting that it may have therapeutic effects in patients with OA.
Topics: Animals; Mice; NF-kappa B; Chondrocytes; Osteoclasts; Paroxetine; Pyroptosis; Signal Transduction; Osteoarthritis, Knee
PubMed: 37605762
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S417598