-
JAMA Surgery Feb 2021Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, with significant morbidity. Short-term results from randomized clinical trials have indicated that... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, with significant morbidity. Short-term results from randomized clinical trials have indicated that laparoscopic lavage is a feasible alternative to resection. However, it appears that no long-term results are available.
OBJECTIVE
To compare long-term (5-year) outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and primary resection as treatments of perforated purulent diverticulitis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This international multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 21 hospitals in Sweden and Norway, which enrolled patients between February 2010 and June 2014. Long-term follow-up was conducted between March 2018 and November 2019. Patients with symptoms of left-sided acute perforated diverticulitis, indicating urgent surgical need and computed tomography-verified free air, were eligible. Those available for trial intervention (Hinchey stages
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were assigned to undergo laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or colon resection based on computer-generated, center-stratified block randomization.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was severe complications within 5 years. Secondary outcomes included mortality, secondary operations, recurrences, stomas, functional outcomes, and quality of life.
RESULTS
Of 199 randomized patients, 101 were assigned to undergo laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and 98 were assigned to colon resection. At the time of surgery, perforated purulent diverticulitis was confirmed in 145 patients randomized to lavage (n = 74) and resection (n = 71). The median follow-up was 59 (interquartile range, 51-78; full range, 0-110) months, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a final analysis of 73 patients who had had laparoscopic lavage (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [13] years; 39 men [53%]) and 69 who had received a resection (mean [SD] age, 63.5 [14] years; 36 men [52%]). Severe complications occurred in 36% (n = 26) in the laparoscopic lavage group and 35% (n = 24) in the resection group (P = .92). Overall mortality was 32% (n = 23) in the laparoscopic lavage group and 25% (n = 17) in the resection group (P = .36). The stoma prevalence was 8% (n = 4) in the laparoscopic lavage group vs 33% (n = 17; P = .002) in the resection group among patients who remained alive, and secondary operations, including stoma reversal, were performed in 36% (n = 26) vs 35% (n = 24; P = .92), respectively. Recurrence of diverticulitis was higher following laparoscopic lavage (21% [n = 15] vs 4% [n = 3]; P = .004). In the laparoscopic lavage group, 30% (n = 21) underwent a sigmoid resection. There were no significant differences in the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire or Cleveland Global Quality of Life scores between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Long-term follow-up showed no differences in severe complications. Recurrence of diverticulitis after laparoscopic lavage was more common, often leading to sigmoid resection. This must be weighed against the lower stoma prevalence in this group. Shared decision-making considering both short-term and long-term consequences is encouraged.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01047462.
Topics: Aged; Colectomy; Diverticulitis, Colonic; Female; Humans; Intestinal Perforation; Laparoscopy; Male; Norway; Peritoneal Lavage; Sweden
PubMed: 33355658
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5618 -
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North... Nov 2021Occult abdominal injuries are common and can be associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Patients with a delayed presentation to care or who are... (Review)
Review
Occult abdominal injuries are common and can be associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Patients with a delayed presentation to care or who are multiply injured are at increased risk of this type of injury, and a high index of suspicion must be maintained. A careful combination of history, physical examination, laboratory, and imaging can be quite helpful in mitigating the risk of a missed occult abdominal injury.
Topics: Abdomen; Abdominal Injuries; Delayed Diagnosis; Emergency Service, Hospital; Hematologic Tests; Humans; Liver Function Tests; Missed Diagnosis; Peritoneal Lavage; Physical Examination; Radiation Dosage; Risk Factors; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 34600638
DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2021.07.009 -
The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal... Dec 2021Whether peritoneal lavage is beneficial for the postoperative outcomes of appendectomy is debatable. This study is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Whether peritoneal lavage is beneficial for the postoperative outcomes of appendectomy is debatable. This study is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that aimed to determine whether peritoneal lavage leads to improved appendectomy outcomes.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published before September 2020. The meta-analysis calculated the pooled effect size by using a random effects model. The primary outcome was the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of surgical-site infection, hospital stay duration, operation time, and readmission incidence.
RESULTS
Eight RCTs involving 1487 patients were reviewed. The lavage group had a nonsignificantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (risk ratio [RR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.18) and surgical-site infection (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.31-1.72) than did the nonirrigation group. Furthermore, the lavage group showed a nonsignificantly shorter hospital stay duration and lower readmission incidence than did the nonirrigation group. However, the lavage group required significantly more operation time than did the nonirrigation group (mean difference: 7.59 min; 95% CI: 4.67-10.50).
CONCLUSION
Our study revealed that performing peritoneal lavage has no advantage over suction or drainage only in appendectomy. Moreover, peritoneal lavage significantly increased operation time. Consequently, for improving efficiency and reducing operation time, we suggest skipping peritoneal irrigation during appendectomy. However, the available evidence is of variable quality; therefore, high-quality prospective RCTs are required in the future.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Drainage; Humans; Peritoneal Lavage
PubMed: 33589397
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.01.001 -
Surgery Today Sep 2015The significance of peritoneal lavage cytology as a prognostic marker has been examined in various types of cancer. However, the meaning of positive peritoneal lavage... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The significance of peritoneal lavage cytology as a prognostic marker has been examined in various types of cancer. However, the meaning of positive peritoneal lavage cytology in colorectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of this review is to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal lavage cytology in colorectal cancer.
METHODS
An English literature search was performed on all studies published between 1998 and 2014 that compared the detection of peritoneal free cancer cells with survival or recurrence.
RESULTS
Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. All studies employed one (or more) of the three techniques used to detect free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity: (1) conventional cytology, (2) immunocytochemistry or (3) polymerase chain reaction. The incidence of positive peritoneal lavage cytology ranged from 2.2 to 47.2% across the studies. The factors correlated with positive peritoneal lavage cytology were tumor penetration and metastases (lymph node, liver and peritoneum). In nine studies, positive lavage findings were associated with a worse survival, and it was associated with increased recurrence in 13 studies.
CONCLUSION
Positive peritoneal lavage cytology seems to be an indicator of a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the prognostic impact of peritoneal lavage cytology, by comparing the different methods used for the collection of the peritoneal lavage.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytodiagnosis; Humans; Incidence; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Peritoneal Lavage; Prognosis; Specimen Handling; Survival Rate
PubMed: 25373362
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-1066-2 -
Advanced Science (Weinheim,... Jul 2023Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the mostcommon form of distant metastasis and one of the leading causes of death in gastriccancer (GC). For locally advanced GC, clinical...
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the mostcommon form of distant metastasis and one of the leading causes of death in gastriccancer (GC). For locally advanced GC, clinical guidelines recommend peritoneal lavage cytology for intraoperative PM detection. Unfortunately, current peritoneal lavage cytology is limited by low sensitivity (<60%). Here the authors established the stimulated Raman molecular cytology (SRMC), a chemical microscopy-based intelligent cytology. The authors firstly imaged 53 951 exfoliated cells in ascites obtained from 80 GC patients (27 PM positive, 53 PM negative). Then, the authors revealed 12 single cell features of morphology and composition that are significantly different between PM positive and negative specimens, including cellular area, lipid protein ratio, etc. Importantly, the authors developed a single cell phenotyping algorithm to further transform the above raw features to feature matrix. Such matrix is crucial to identify the significant marker cell cluster, the divergence of which is finally used to differentiate the PM positive and negative. Compared with histopathology, the gold standard of PM detection, their SRMC method could reach 81.5% sensitivity, 84.9% specificity, and the AUC of 0.85, within 20 minutes for each patient. Together, their SRMC method shows great potential for accurate and rapid detection of PM from GC.
Topics: Humans; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Stomach Neoplasms; Peritoneal Lavage; Microscopy; Artificial Intelligence
PubMed: 37114845
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202300961 -
The Journal of Physiological Sciences :... May 2017Disseminated metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis, and its management in the peritoneal or pleural cavity is crucial in the treatment of cancer. Recent studies... (Review)
Review
Disseminated metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis, and its management in the peritoneal or pleural cavity is crucial in the treatment of cancer. Recent studies show that ion and water transporters play important roles in fundamental cellular functions, including the regulation of cell volume that would be involved in the cancer process. Here, we review the evidence for hypotonic treatments of cancer and evaluate the potential of the cellular physiological approach in clinical management. The regulation of extracellular osmolality is a promising method, with several studies demonstrating the cytocidal effects of hypotonic solution on cancer cells. Peritoneal lavage with distilled water (DW) during surgery is reported to improve the survival rate of patients with spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. The in vitro studies included in this review also indicate the cytocidal effects of hypotonic shock on esophageal, gastric, colonic, pancreatic, and liver cancer cells with several unique methods and apparatuses, such as a differential interference contrast microscope connected to a digital video camera, a high-resolution flow cytometer and re-incubation analysis. The in vivo studies demonstrate the safeness of a peritoneal injection of DW into mice and indicate that the development of dissemination nodules can be prevented by the pre-incubation of cancer cells with DW or the peritoneal injection of DW. We also demonstrate that the blockade of Cl channels/transporters enhances the cytocidal effects of hypotonic shock by inhibiting regulatory volume decrease in various cancer cells. A deeper understanding of molecular mechanisms may lead to the discovery of these cellular physiological approaches as a novel therapeutic strategy for disseminated metastasis.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Hypotonic Solutions; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasms; Osmolar Concentration; Osmotic Pressure; Peritoneal Lavage
PubMed: 28185236
DOI: 10.1007/s12576-017-0528-x -
Pancreas Jul 2016The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of peritoneal lavage in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of peritoneal lavage in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that compared peritoneal lavage with conservative treatment for severe acute pancreatitis. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included complications rate, proportion of need for operation, length of hospital stay, and medical costs.
RESULTS
A total of 899 patients from 15 studies were subjected to this systematic review. Peritoneal lavage did significantly decrease the mortality (relative risk, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.66; P < 0.01), with low heterogeneity among the studies (I = 7%). Peritoneal lavage also seemed to significantly alter any of the other end points.
CONCLUSIONS
Peritoneal lavage shows robustly beneficial effect in patients with severe acute pancreatitis in this systematic review. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the general high risk of bias in these included studies.
Topics: Acute Disease; Humans; Length of Stay; Pancreatitis; Peritoneal Lavage; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27295532
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000530 -
World Journal of Emergency Surgery :... Mar 2023Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of IOPL in patients with IAIs.
METHODS
The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang, and CBM databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2022. Random-effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR), mean difference, and standardized mean difference. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of the evidence.
RESULTS
Ten RCTs with 1318 participants were included, of which eight studies on appendicitis and two studies on peritonitis. Moderate-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (0% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.02-6.39]), intra-abdominal abscess (12.3% vs. 11.8%; RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.70-1.48]; I = 24%), incisional surgical site infections (3.3% vs. 3.8%; RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.18-2.86]; I = 50%), postoperative complication (11.0% vs. 13.2%; RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.39-1.41]; I = 64%), reoperation (2.9% vs. 1.7%; RR,1.71 [95% CI, 0.74-3.93]; I = 0%) and readmission (5.2% vs. 6.6%; RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.48-1.87]; I = 7%) in patients with appendicitis when compared to non-IOPL. Low-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (22.7% vs. 23.3%; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.45-2.09], I = 0%) and intra-abdominal abscess (5.1% vs. 5.0%; RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.16-6.98], I = 0%) in patients with peritonitis when compared to non-IOPL.
CONCLUSION
IOPL with saline use in patients with appendicitis was not associated with significantly decreased risk of mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, incisional surgical site infection, postoperative complication, reoperation, and readmission compared with non-IOPL. These findings do not support the routine use of IOPL with saline in patients with appendicitis. The benefits of IOPL for IAI caused by other types of abdominal infections need to be investigated.
Topics: Humans; Peritoneal Lavage; Abdominal Abscess; Peritonitis; Surgical Wound Infection; Appendicitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36991507
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6 -
Surgical Endoscopy Oct 2022This study aimed to compare laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis during a 36 month follow-up of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to compare laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis during a 36 month follow-up of the LOLA trial.
METHODS
Within the LOLA arm of the international, multicentre LADIES trial, patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis were randomised between laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy. Outcomes were collected up to 36 months. The primary outcome of the present study was cumulative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations (including stoma reversals), stoma rates, and sigmoidectomy rates in the lavage group.
RESULTS
Long-term follow-up was recorded in 77 of the 88 originally included patients, 39 were randomised to sigmoidectomy (51%) and 38 to laparoscopic lavage (49%). After 36 months, overall cumulative morbidity (sigmoidectomy 28/39 (72%) versus lavage 32/38 (84%), p = 0·272) and mortality (sigmoidectomy 7/39 (18%) versus lavage 6/38 (16%), p = 1·000) did not differ. The number of patients who underwent a reoperation was significantly lower for lavage compared to sigmoidectomy (sigmoidectomy 27/39 (69%) versus lavage 17/38 (45%), p = 0·039). After 36 months, patients alive with stoma in situ was lower in the lavage group (proportion calculated from the Kaplan-Meier life table, sigmoidectomy 17% vs lavage 11%, log-rank p = 0·0268). Eventually, 17 of 38 (45%) patients allocated to lavage underwent sigmoidectomy.
CONCLUSION
Long-term outcomes showed that laparoscopic lavage was associated with less patients who underwent reoperations and lower stoma rates in patients alive after 36 months compared to sigmoidectomy. No differences were found in terms of cumulative morbidity or mortality. Patient selection should be improved to reduce risk for short-term complications after which lavage could still be a valuable treatment option.
Topics: Diverticulitis; Diverticulitis, Colonic; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intestinal Perforation; Laparoscopy; Peritoneal Lavage; Peritonitis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35606544
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09326-3 -
Early Human Development Jun 2016Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a neonatal surgical emergency. At its early stages, the management of NEC is largely medical using broad-spectrum antibiotics, gut... (Review)
Review
Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a neonatal surgical emergency. At its early stages, the management of NEC is largely medical using broad-spectrum antibiotics, gut rest and total parental nutrition. The only absolute indication for surgery is an intra-abdominal perforation. There are several relative indications for surgery based on clinical, biochemical and radiological parameters. Once the decision to intervene is made, several approaches may be taken. Peritoneal lavage can be used as a salvage procedure or definitive management in some cases. The most common approach taken is bowel resection with enterostomy formation. There is a role for primary anastomosis of bowel in limited NEC. In severe, multi-focal NEC a high diverting jejunostomy or "clip and drop technique" can be used. Laparoscopy has a limited role and is not widespread. The surgical complications of NEC include stoma related morbidity, anastomotic leak/stricture and short-bowel syndrome. Long-term data on neurodevelopmental outcomes is sparse but the present literature is suggestive of a negative impact in cases of surgically managed NEC.
Topics: Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Enterostomy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Peritoneal Lavage; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 27032753
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.03.002