-
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Jan 2022To compare visual outcomes and vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) between subjects before and after photorefractive keratotomy (PRK) and controls. In addition, VRQoL...
PURPOSE
To compare visual outcomes and vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) between subjects before and after photorefractive keratotomy (PRK) and controls. In addition, VRQoL was compared between subjects at different periods of PRK surgery.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study that included subjects with refractive errors aged 19-40 years and age-matched controls. Subjects were divided into three groups: pre-, post-PRK, and control. Subjects in the post-PRK group were divided into three subgroups (1-week, <6-month, and >6-month follow-up visits). Measurements including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE) of manifest refraction, and corneal topography were obtained for all participants. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire was administered to compare VRQOL between groups and between post-refractive surgery subgroups.
RESULTS
A total of 145 participants were included in this study. The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of all participants was 26.29 ± 5.1 years. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in total QIRC scores between groups. The total QIRC score was better in the post-PRK group than in the pre-PRK and control groups. The scores of items included in the convenience, well-being, and health concern domains were significantly higher in the post-PRK group than in the pre-PRK and control groups. Within the post-PRK group, significant differences (P < 0.001) were found in UCVA and SE between the post-PRK subgroups. Uncorrected VA and SE were better in the post-PRK groups who were followed up in the < 6 and > 6 months subgroups than in the 1-week follow-up subgroup (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
A significant improvement in visual outcomes and VRQoL occurred after PRK surgery. Subjects enjoyed their VRQoL after refractive surgery.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Myopia; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Quality of Life; Refraction, Ocular; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34937209
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_16_21 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Dec 2020Over the past two decades, excimer laser-based refractive surgery procedures have been successfully established for their safety and satisfactory visual outcomes.... (Review)
Review
Over the past two decades, excimer laser-based refractive surgery procedures have been successfully established for their safety and satisfactory visual outcomes. Surface ablation procedures or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are practised commonly for the correction of refractive errors including myopia, astigmatism and hyperopia. Satisfactory visual outcomes are achieved in majority of cases, although a very small percentage have issues related to corneal haze, regression, and its associated visual disturbances. To ensure optimal outcomes and to minimize complications, certain keys to success have been designed on the basis of the current review of literature on surface ablation procedures.
Topics: Astigmatism; Cornea; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Myopia; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Refraction, Ocular; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33229660
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2178_20 -
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Jun 2023Isolated from , mitomycin C (MMC) has various applications in the management of corneal and external disease due to its ability to modulate cellular proliferation. It... (Review)
Review
Isolated from , mitomycin C (MMC) has various applications in the management of corneal and external disease due to its ability to modulate cellular proliferation. It has been employed in pterygium surgery, ocular surface neoplasia, and refractive surgery. Currently, there is no definite consensus on the treatment protocols for each of the aforementioned applications. Although its benefits in the management of corneal and external diseases are promising, MMC use has potential complications including endothelial cell loss, corneal perforation, scleral melt, secondary glaucoma, iritis, and endophthalmitis. This article will review the literature regarding the use of MMC in the field of cornea and external disease and describe protocols employed with corresponding outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Mitomycin; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Lasers, Excimer; Cornea
PubMed: 37345314
DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.97932 -
Journal of Cataract and Refractive... Aug 2019The use of a bandage contact lens (BCL) immediately after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) results in less pain. This review analyzed which BCL is most effective in... (Review)
Review
The use of a bandage contact lens (BCL) immediately after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) results in less pain. This review analyzed which BCL is most effective in decreasing pain immediately after PRK and evaluated the reepithelialization process in the treated zone. Two databases, PubMed and Medline, were checked for articles published from January 2005 to May 2018. The keywords were photorefractive keratectomy, PRK, contact lens, and bandage contact lens. The review comprised 13 studies; these studies enrolled 842 patients who had PRK. All studies compared the early postoperative results for two types of BCL material (senofilcon A and lotrafilcon A). Of the materials, the pain scores were lowest with a senofilcon A. The size of the defect in the epithelialized area 1 day after surgery decreased fastest with lotrafilcon A.
Topics: Bandages; Contact Lenses; Eye Pain; Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Photorefractive Keratectomy
PubMed: 31213328
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.045 -
Journal of Optometry 2015Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) remodels corneal stroma to compensate refractive errors. The removal of epithelium and the ablation of stroma provoke the disruption of... (Review)
Review
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) remodels corneal stroma to compensate refractive errors. The removal of epithelium and the ablation of stroma provoke the disruption of corneal nerves and a release of several peptides from tears, epithelium, stroma and nerves. A myriad of cytokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteases participate in the process of corneal wound healing. Their balance will determine if reepithelization and stromal remodeling are appropriate. The final aim is to achieve corneal transparency for restoring corneal function, and a proper visual quality. Therefore, wound-healing response is critical for a successful refractive surgery. Our goal is to provide an overview into how corneal wounding develops following PRK. We will also review the influence of intraoperative application of mitomycin C, bandage contact lenses, anti-inflammatory and other drugs in preventing corneal haze and post-PRK pain.
Topics: Alkylating Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Contact Lenses; Cornea; Corneal Opacity; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Mitomycin; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Postoperative Complications; Regeneration; Wound Healing
PubMed: 25444646
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2014.09.001 -
International Ophthalmology Dec 2023The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of combined photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) on intraocular...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of combined photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) on intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with keratoconus (KC).
METHODS
We included 64 eyes of 34 patients (19 males and 15 females; age: 19-40y) with stages 1-2 keratoconus which had undergone combined wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross linking. Two other groups of patients were added as controls: the PRK group including 110 eyes of 57 patients (23 males and 34 females; age: 18-44y) which had undergone wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy for myopic refractive errors, and the CXL group including 36 eyes of 23 patients (14 males and 9 females; age: 12-38y) with keratoconus, not filling the inclusion criteria for combined PRK and CXL, which had undergone corneal collagen cross-linking. IOP was recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up visits.
RESULTS
Preoperative IOP in both CXL (12.1 ± 2.53 mmHg) and PRK + CXL (13.2 ± 2.50 mmHg) groups was significantly lower than PRK group (15.8 ± 3.10 mmHg) (F = 30.505, p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, IOP showed no statistically significant difference between the three studied groups (F = 1.821, p = 0.164). At 6 months postoperatively, IOP in the CXL group (14.6 ± 2.64 mmHg) was significantly higher than both PRK (13.4 ± 2.27 mmHg) and PRK + CXL (13.3 ± 2.62 mmHg) groups (F = 3.721, p = 0.026). At 12 months postoperatively, IOP in the CXL group (14.3 ± 2.69 mmHg) was significantly higher than the PRK group (13.2 ± 2.23 mmHg) and was higher than PRK + CXL group (13.3 ± 2.59 mmHg) although not statistically significant (F = 3.393, p = 0.035). Regarding the percent of change from preoperative IOP, a statistically significant difference between the three studied groups was detected at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (H = 117.459, 109.303, 122.694 respectively, p < 0.001). The median percent of change from preoperative IOP in the PRK group was -16.7%, -15%, and -16.7%, in the CXL group was + 14.3%, + 19.4%, and + 19.1%, while in PRK + CXL group was 0% at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. (Post-hoc power analysis 75%).
CONCLUSIONS
Combined PRK and CXL in patients with KC shows no significant effect on IOP, in contrast to either procedure performed separately.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Adolescent; Child; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Keratoconus; Corneal Cross-Linking; Intraocular Pressure; Photosensitizing Agents; Prospective Studies; Visual Acuity; Riboflavin; Cornea; Cross-Linking Reagents; Corneal Topography
PubMed: 37861937
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-023-02886-w -
Journal of Cataract and Refractive... May 2021To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictability of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) for correcting myopia, astigmatism, and hyperopia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictability of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) for correcting myopia, astigmatism, and hyperopia.
SETTING
Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
DESIGN
Meta-analysis of retrospective or prospective studies.
METHODS
Relevant studies were collected from Medline and included when meeting the following predefined criteria: randomized controlled trials, at least 1 of the main outcome measures as efficacy, safety, or predictability, and 1 common TransPRK laser (Schwind Amaris). The parameters estimates and 95% CI were derived from random-effects meta-analysis to account for possible heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Because hyperopia studies did not meet the inclusion criteria, the results are centered on myopia and astigmatism. Sixteen studies with a total of 1924 treated eyes were included in the meta-analysis. The mean efficacy, safety, and predictability had a probability of 94% (CI, 0.86-0.97), 0% (CI, 0.00-0.03), and 89% (CI, 0.82-0.93), respectively. The mean correction index, difference vector, and index of success had a value of 1.01 (CI, 1.01-1.02), 0.20 (CI, 0.06-0.34), and 0.12 (CI, 0.07-0.18), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This summary estimate showed that TransPRK was highly effective, safe, and predictable in correcting myopia and/or astigmatism.
Topics: Astigmatism; Germany; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Prospective Studies; Refraction, Ocular; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33252562
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000487 -
Lasers in Medical Science Feb 2021This study aimed to compare the visual outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), with and without the iris registration (IR) technology. The retrospective cohort... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
This study aimed to compare the visual outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), with and without the iris registration (IR) technology. The retrospective cohort study was performed for wavefront-guided PRK using the Technolas 217z100 excimer laser system in patients with myopic astigmatism (cylinder error - 2 to - 4 diopter [D]). Eyes were divided into IR group (IRPRK) and non-IR group (non-IRPRK). Visual acuity (VA), cylindrical refraction, and the astigmatic vector components using the Alpins method were compared between the two groups preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Fifty IRPRK patients (66% female, mean age 30.56 ± 6.31 years) and 50 non-IRPRK (60% female, mean age 29.60 ± 5.63 years) were enrolled. The mean logMAR uncorrected VA improved from 0.89 ± 0.44 to 0.032 ± 0.05 in the IRPRK group (P < 0.001) and from 0.89 ± 0.46 to 0.042 ± 0.06 postoperatively while follow-up in the non-IRPRK group (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding mean uncorrected distance VA (P = 0.4), corrected distance VA (P = 0.5), spherical equivalent (P = 0.16), defocus equivalent (P = 0.18), and absolute cylinder (P = 0.94). More than 90% eyes were within ± 1.00 D of emmetropia in both groups. Moreover, Alpins vector analysis revealed that no significant differences were found in any astigmatic parameters between the two groups (P > 0.05). Wavefront-guided PRK independent of the IR status is effective, safe, and predictable in patients with myopic astigmatism. No statistical significance was observed supporting data for the better outcome of visual acuity and astigmatism correction using IR in comparison with a non-IR system.
Topics: Adult; Astigmatism; Female; Humans; Iris; Lasers, Excimer; Male; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32297251
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03010-5 -
Journal Francais D'ophtalmologie Apr 2021Visual rehabilitation in keratoconus is a challenge, notably because of the significant irregular astigmatism and optical aberrations that it induces. Many surgical... (Review)
Review
Visual rehabilitation in keratoconus is a challenge, notably because of the significant irregular astigmatism and optical aberrations that it induces. Many surgical techniques have been developed in addition to, or in the case of failure of, spectacles and rigid gas permeable contact lenses: intracorneal ring segments, intraocular lenses, excimer laser and, as a last resort, keratoplasty. Excimer laser photoablates the cornea, allowing remodeling of its surface. There are various treatment modes (wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided), allowing performance of a customized treatment if needed. Its use in keratoconus has been described since the 2000s, alone or in combination with other procedures. For example, the combination of photoablation and corneal cross linking, a technique that increases corneal rigidity and in so doing can slow or even stop the progression of keratoconus, proved its efficacy and safety in many studies, and various protocols have been described. A triple procedure, including intracorneal ring segments, excimer laser and cross linking, has also given some very promising results in progressive keratoconus, providing a significative improvement in visual acuity and topographic data. The combination of excimer laser and intraocular lenses remains a poorly explored lead that might provide some satisfactory results. The objective of this review is to summarize the recent data on excimer laser in keratoconus management.
Topics: Astigmatism; Cornea; Corneal Topography; Humans; Keratoconus; Lasers, Excimer; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Refraction, Ocular; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33573798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.08.018 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Dec 2020Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) eye surgery is widely used for patients at risk for corneal ectasia to maintain an aspheric corneal shape. Wavefront-guided (WFG)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) eye surgery is widely used for patients at risk for corneal ectasia to maintain an aspheric corneal shape. Wavefront-guided (WFG) ablation profile was designed to reduce pre-existing higher-order aberrations (HOA). We aimed to compare the corneal aberrations and visual outcomes between WFG and Wavefront Optimized (WFO) PRK in patients with myopia. Eight randomized clinical trials were included. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL at March 2020, and updated the search in September 2020 using relevant keywords, The data were extracted and pooled as Mean Difference (MD) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI), using Review Manager software (version 5.4). Pooled results showed no significance between Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) and Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) between both groups underwent WFG and WFO PPR after three months follow up (MD = -0.03; 95% CI: [-0.06, 0.00]; P = 0.07), (MD = -0.02; 95% CI: [-0.04, 0.01]; P = 0.22) respectively. Although, no significant difference between mean manifest cylinder after three and 12 months follow up, but the total MD for mean manifest cylinder difference was significantly lower with the WFG treatment method (MD = -0.12, (95% CI: [0.23:-0.01], P = 0.03). This shows a slight advantage of the WFG over the WFO method. The visual performance showed similarity and excellent refractive outcomes in both WFO and WFG PRK. No significant statistical differences between the two approaches. On further comparison, there was a slight advantage of the WFG over the WFO method.
Topics: Corneal Wavefront Aberration; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Prospective Studies; Refraction, Ocular; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33229644
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2921_20