-
Surgery Apr 2024Surgery offers the only cure for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Data on incidence, perioperative and long-term outcomes...
BACKGROUND
Surgery offers the only cure for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Data on incidence, perioperative and long-term outcomes of portal vein resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are scarce. This study aimed to analyze the outcome and prognostic factors of portal vein resection in surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
METHODS
Consecutive patients were analyzed. Portal vein resection was classified according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Clinicopathologic features and overall and disease-free survival were assessed and compared with standard resection in a matched-pair analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 54 of 666 (8%) resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms patients underwent portal vein resection, including 7 (13%) tangential resections with venorrhaphy (type 1), 2 (4%) patch reconstructions (type 2), 35 (65%) end-to-end anastomoses (type 3), and 10 (19%) graft interpositions (type 4); 52% of those underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, 22% distal pancreatectomy, and 26% total pancreatectomy. Postoperative portal vein thrombosis occurred in 19%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula grades B and C (9% vs 16%; P = .357), complications Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb (28% vs 13%; P = .071), and 90-day mortality rate (2% each) were not significantly different compared with 108 matched patients. The 5-year overall survival was 45% (standard resection: 68%; P = .432), and the 5-year disease-free survival was 25% (standard resection: 34%; P = .716). Radical resection was associated with 5-year overall survival of 51% and 5-year disease-specific survival of 75%.
CONCLUSION
This is the largest single-center analysis evaluating perioperative and long-term outcomes of portal vein resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. The postoperative complication rate after portal vein resection is comparable with standard resection. The 90-day mortality is low. Radical resection leads to excellent 5-year oncological survival.
Topics: Humans; Portal Vein; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Disease-Free Survival; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38262817
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.12.020 -
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Mar 2022Abernethy malformation, or congenital extrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt, is a rare anomaly involving the portal venous system. Despite its rarity, it is...
Abernethy malformation, or congenital extrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt, is a rare anomaly involving the portal venous system. Despite its rarity, it is increasingly being reported, and therefore, it is important to diagnose given the potential adverse clinical consequences if left untreated. It has a spectrum of presentations, ranging from complete lack of symptoms, to causing hepatic carcinoma, hepatic encephalopathy, severe pulmonary hypertension, and diffuse pulmonary arteriovenous malformation. We herein describe the case and echocardiographic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings of a transgender individual, with this anomaly detected incidentally during adulthood.
Topics: Adult; Arteriovenous Fistula; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Portal Vein; Vascular Malformations
PubMed: 35170090
DOI: 10.1111/echo.15324 -
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology Apr 2022We encountered a rare case of a pancreatic head tumor protruding into the portal vein, later diagnosed histopathologically as primary leiomyosarcoma of the portal vein....
We encountered a rare case of a pancreatic head tumor protruding into the portal vein, later diagnosed histopathologically as primary leiomyosarcoma of the portal vein. A 59-year-old woman visited our hospital because of an elevated amylase level during a medical checkup. Computed tomography showed a moderately contrasted, well-defined mass of 35-mm diameter in the pancreatic head with protrusion into the portal vein. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a well-defined and hypoechoic mass. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography showed a high accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose in the pancreas head. We performed a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection. Gross findings of the fixed specimen showed a white solid, multinodular mass in the pancreatic parenchyma with protrusion into the portal vein. Histopathological examination showed proliferation of spindle-shaped eosinophilic cells with intricate bundle-like growth, indicating leiomyosarcoma. Examining the tumor location and invasion suggested portal vein as the origin. Although portal vein primary leiomyosarcoma is rare, leiomyosarcoma should be considered as a differential diagnosis in pancreatic head tumors with protrusion into the portal vein. Precise macroscopic and histopathological examinations can help determine the definitive diagnosis and origin of leiomyosarcoma.
Topics: Female; Humans; Leiomyosarcoma; Middle Aged; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Portal Vein
PubMed: 35230653
DOI: 10.1007/s12328-022-01613-9 -
Cardiovascular and Interventional... Oct 2023To evaluate the safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous mesenteric vein access compared to transsplenic portal vein access for portosystemic shunt placement in patients... (Review)
Review
Safety of Percutaneous Transmesenteric and Transsplenic Access for Portosystemic Shunt Creation in Patients with Portal Vein Obstruction: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literature.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous mesenteric vein access compared to transsplenic portal vein access for portosystemic shunt placement in patients with portal vein obstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eight patients underwent portosystemic shunt creation through either a transsplenic (n = 4) or transmesenteric (n = 4) approach. The superior or inferior mesenteric vein was percutaneously accessed under ultrasound guidance using a 21G needle and a 4F sheath. Hemostasis at the mesenteric access site was achieved with manual compression. For transsplenic access, sheath sizes between 6 and 8F were used and tract embolization with gelfoam was performed.
RESULTS
Portosystemic shunt placement was successful in all patients. While there were no bleeding complications with transmesenteric access, hemorrhagic shock requiring splenic artery embolization occurred in one patient in which the transsplenic approach was used.
CONCLUSION
Ultrasound-guided mesenteric vein access seems feasible and a valid alternative to the transsplenic access in case of portal vein obstruction. Level of Evidence Level 4, case series.
Topics: Humans; Portal Vein; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic; Liver Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Ultrasonography; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37311839
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03484-0 -
Journal of Investigative Surgery : the... Jun 2022In pediatric liver transplantation, the optimal size of the transplanted liver ranges between 0.8% and 4.0% of the recipient's weight. Sometimes, the graft weight...
In pediatric liver transplantation, the optimal size of the transplanted liver ranges between 0.8% and 4.0% of the recipient's weight. Sometimes, the graft weight exceeds this upper limit, characterizing the large-for-size condition potentially associated with reduced blood flow and worsening of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Therefore, it would be beneficial to increase the portal flow through arterialization of the portal vein. Fifteen pigs underwent large-for-size liver transplants. They were divided into two groups: control (CTRL 6 animals - conventional technique) and arterialization - a shunt was established between the portal vein and the splenic artery (ART 9 animals). Hemodynamic, biochemical, histological, and molecular variables were compared. : Arterialization resulted in a significant increase in portal vein pressure but no changes in other hemodynamic variables, as shown in the analysis of variance. It was observed lower ALT values ( = 0.007), with no differences regarding the values of blood pH and lactate ( = 0.54 and = 0.699 respectively) or histological variables (edema, steatosis, inflammation, necrosis, and IRI - = 1.0, = 0.943, = 0.174, = 0.832, = 0.662, respectively). The molecular studies showed significantly increased expression of IL6 after 3 hours of reperfusion ( = 0.048) and decreased expression of ICAM immediately after reperfusion ( = 0.03). The regression analysis suggested a positive influence of portal flow and pressure on biochemical parameters. : Arterialization of the portal vein showed no histological, biochemical, or molecular benefits in large-for-size transplantation.
Topics: Animals; Hemodynamics; Humans; Liver; Liver Transplantation; Portal Vein; Reperfusion; Swine
PubMed: 34965813
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2021.2021333 -
Future Oncology (London, England) 2015First International Consensus Meeting, Hamburg, Germany, 27-28 February 2015 More than 160 participants took part in the conference for 2 days. A total of 58 world...
First International Consensus Meeting, Hamburg, Germany, 27-28 February 2015 More than 160 participants took part in the conference for 2 days. A total of 58 world renown experts on ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) were invited from all over the world. The faculty was divided into many different subgroups that were in contact during the 2-3 months before the conference analyzing all the most important aspects of this technique and summarizing it in a common structured work to be presented during the congress, giving final recommendations in the form of bulleted point statements. The aim was to gain a solid basis of preliminary agreement on many controversial aspects of ALPPS. A poster area was also organized with 35 posters reporting mostly mono-institutional experiences on single aspects of the technique from all five continents.
Topics: Hepatectomy; Humans; Ligation; Liver; Portal Vein
PubMed: 26260803
DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.145 -
Medical Physics Oct 2023It was still controversial that whether the increase of splenic vein (SV) diameter increased the risk of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which was a severe disease with...
BACKGROUND
It was still controversial that whether the increase of splenic vein (SV) diameter increased the risk of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which was a severe disease with high mortality, in the clinic.
PURPOSES
This study, using computational fluid dynamics method, aimed to investigate how the increase of SV diameter affects the portal vein hemodynamics under different anatomical and geometric features of the portal venous system, thus how it induced to PVT.
METHODS
The ideal models of the portal system, including different anatomical structures according to the location of left gastric vein (LGV) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV), and different geometric morphological parameters models were established to carry out numerical simulation in this study. In addition, the morphological parameters of real patients were measured to verify the numerical simulation results.
RESULTS
First, the wall shear stress (WSS) and helicity intensity, which were closely related to the occurrence of thrombosis, gradually decreased with the increase of SV diameter in all models. However, the degree of decrease was bigger in following models: (1) the models with LGV and IMV linking to SV compared with them linking to PV; (2) the models with big angle of PV and SV compared with small angle. In addition, the morbidity of PVT was higher when LGV and IMV linked to SV rather than them linked to PV in the real patients. Moreover, the angle of PV and SV was also different between PVT and non-PVT patients (125.53° ± 16.90° vs. 115.03° ± 16.10°, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Whether the increase of SV diameter will result in PVT is depended on the anatomical structure of portal system and the angle between PV and SV, this is also the reason leading to the clinical controversy that the increase of SV diameter is the risk factor of PVT.
Topics: Humans; Portal Vein; Splenic Vein; Venous Thrombosis; Liver Cirrhosis; Thrombosis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37227701
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16481 -
RoFo : Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiete Der... Jul 2016
Topics: Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Noonan Syndrome; Portal Vein; Premature Birth; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Vascular Malformations
PubMed: 27355633
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-103692 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Jul 2022Right hepatectomy occasionally requires portal vein resection (PVR) and causes postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT).
BACKGROUND
Right hepatectomy occasionally requires portal vein resection (PVR) and causes postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT).
METHODS
A total of 247 patients who underwent right hepatectomy were evaluated using a three-dimensional analyzer to identify the morphologic changes in the portal vein (PV). The patients' characteristics were compared between the PVR group (n = 73) and non-PVR group (n = 174), and risk factors for PVT were investigated. The PVR group were subdivided into the wedge resection (WR) group (n = 38) and segmental resection (SR) group (n= 35).
RESULTS
Postoperative PVT occurred in 20 patients (8.1%). Multivariate analyses in all patients revealed that postoperative left PV diameter/main PV diameter (L/M ratio) <0.56 (odds ratio [OR] 4.00, p = 0.009) and PVR (OR 3.31, p = 0.031) were significant risk factors for PVT. In 73 patients who underwent PVR, PVT occurred in 14 (19%) and WR (OR 11.5, p = 0.005) and L/M ratio <0.56 (OR 5.51, p = 0.016) were significant risk factors for PVT.
CONCLUSION
PVR was one of the significant risk factors for PVT after right hepatectomy. SR rather than WR may be recommended for preventing PVT.
Topics: Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Diseases; Portal Vein; Retrospective Studies; Splenectomy; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 34991960
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.004 -
Scientific Reports Feb 2020Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) mimics liver cirrhosis in many aspects, and no efficient imaging method to differentiate the two diseases has been reported to date....
Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) mimics liver cirrhosis in many aspects, and no efficient imaging method to differentiate the two diseases has been reported to date. In this study, the imaging and pathological characteristics were analysed for both IPH and cirrhosis. From January 2015 to March 2019, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and pathological results from 16 IPH and 16 liver cirrhosis patients, as well as imaging results of 16 normal patients as a control group, were retrospectively reviewed. The age of the patients was 39 ± 20 years. There was a significant difference in the mean lumen diameter, wall thickness and ratio of thickness to diameter between the IPH and liver cirrhosis patients in the main and sagittal portal veins (P < 0.05), as well as in the lumen diameter and ratio of thickness to diameter between the IPH and liver cirrhosis patients in the Segment 3 (S3) portal vein (P < 0.05). In IPH patients, the main imaging changes were portal vein wall thickening, stenosis or occlusion, a low enhancement area along the portal vein in the delay phase in contrast-enhanced imaging, and a non-homogeneous change in T1WI. The corresponding pathological changes included interlobular vein thickening, stenosis, occlusion, portal area fibrosis, and atrophy or apoptosis of hepatocytes. The main imaging characteristic of liver cirrhosis was a nodular change in T1WI, and the related pathological change was pseudolobule formation. The imaging characteristics of IPH include thickening of the portal vein vascular wall, stenosis of the portal vein lumen and the absence of diffuse cirrhosis-like nodules. These imaging features have a definite pathological basis and could help make differential diagnoses between IPH and cirrhosis.
Topics: Adult; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Liver Cirrhosis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Portal Vein; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 32051517
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59286-8