-
Contact Dermatitis Jul 2020In Europe, contact photosensitivity to phenothiazines is well-known, particularly in southern countries. Topical phenothiazines are widely used and sold over-the-counter...
BACKGROUND
In Europe, contact photosensitivity to phenothiazines is well-known, particularly in southern countries. Topical phenothiazines are widely used and sold over-the-counter (OTC) for the treatment of mosquito bites and pruritus in France.
OBJECTIVE
To report a series of cases with photodermatitis following use of topical phenothiazines.
METHOD
A retrospective study of cases of contact dermatitis from phenothiazines seen in French photodermatology centers was performed.
RESULTS
In all, 14 patients with a diagnosis of contact dermatitis from phenothiazines were included. These patients developed eczema on the application sites, and in 13 the eruption spread to photodistributed sites. Topical products containing isothipendyl were the most common cause of photodermatitis. One patient had photoaggravated eczema due to promethazine cream. All patients stopped using topical phenothiazines and were treated successfully with topical corticosteroids. One patient relapsed and developed persistent light eruption. In all of the nine cases tested, photopatch testing to the topical phenothiazine used "as is" was positive. Isothipendyl, chlorproethazine, and the excipients were not tested. Photopatch tests to chlorpromazine and promethazine were positive in 8 of 12 and 7 of 13 tested, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Use of isothipendyl and promethazine as OTC (or even prescribed) drugs needs to be limited due to severe reactions and sensitization to other phenothiazines that consequently will have to be avoided.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chlorpromazine; Dermatitis, Photoallergic; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phenothiazines; Promethazine; Thiazines
PubMed: 32124458
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13509 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023The limitations of current cancer therapies, including the increasing prevalence of multidrug resistance, underscore the urgency for more effective treatments. One... (Review)
Review
The limitations of current cancer therapies, including the increasing prevalence of multidrug resistance, underscore the urgency for more effective treatments. One promising avenue lies in the repurposing of existing drugs. This review explores the impact of phenothiazines, primarily used as antipsychotic agents, on key mechanisms driving tumor growth and metastasis. The cationic and amphiphilic nature of phenothiazines allows interaction with the lipid bilayer of cellular membranes, resulting in alterations in lipid composition, modulation of calcium channels, fluidity, thinning, and integrity of the plasma membrane. This is especially significant in the setting of increased metabolic activity, a higher proliferative rate, and the invasiveness of cancer cells, which often rely on plasma membrane repair. Therefore, properties of phenothiazines such as compromising plasma membrane integrity and repair, disturbing calcium regulation, inducing cytosolic K-RAS accumulation, and sphingomyelin accumulation in the plasma membrane might counteract multidrug resistance by sensitizing cancer cells to membrane damage and chemotherapy. This review outlines a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms driving the anticancer activities of phenothiazines derivates such as trifluoperazine, prochlorperazine, chlorpromazine, promethazine, thioridazine, and fluphenazine. The repurposing potential of phenothiazines paves the way for novel approaches to improve future cancer treatment.
PubMed: 38074670
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1320621 -
Journal For Healthcare Quality :...Vaso-occlusive pain leads to high acute care utilization among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Data suggest that clinical pathways (CPWs) reduce variation in...
BACKGROUND
Vaso-occlusive pain leads to high acute care utilization among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Data suggest that clinical pathways (CPWs) reduce variation in the management of vaso-occlusive pain and improve clinical outcomes.
METHODS
We implemented and evaluated a CPW for vaso-occlusive pain at our institution using a before and after study design. The primary objective was to decrease acute care utilization among patients with SCD, which was assessed by the primary outcome measures of hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rate, and total hospitalizations annually per patient. Secondary outcome measures were packed red blood cell transfusions, and acute chest syndrome incidence. Patient-controlled analgesia use and promethazine use were assessed to estimate CPW use.
RESULTS
Three hundred fourty-four admissions in 112 patients were analyzed, of which 193 admissions occurred pre-CPW and 151 admissions occurred post-CPW implementation. Post-CPW implementation, we observed a significant decrease in hospital admissions annually per patient, an increase in patient-controlled analgesia use, and a decrease in intravenous promethazine use. We observed trends toward decreased 30-day readmission rate and increased acute chest syndrome incidence, which were not statistically significant. No effect was found on hospital LOS.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical pathway implementation at our institution reduced variation in management and decreased hospital admissions for vaso-occlusive pain.
Topics: Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Critical Pathways; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Pain
PubMed: 34965539
DOI: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000292 -
Cureus Nov 2019Acute agitation is a common presenting symptom in the emergency ward and is also dealt with on a routine basis in psychiatry. Usually a symptom of an underlying mental... (Review)
Review
Acute agitation is a common presenting symptom in the emergency ward and is also dealt with on a routine basis in psychiatry. Usually a symptom of an underlying mental illness, it is considered urgent and immediate treatment is indicated. The practice of treating agitation on an acute care basis is also referred to as rapid tranquilization. A variety of psychotropic drugs and combinations thereof can be used. The decision is usually made based on availability and the clinician's experience, with the typical antipsychotic haloperidol (alone or in combination with antihistaminergic and anticholinergic drugs such as promethazine), the benzodiazepines lorazepam, diazepam and midazolam as well as a variety of atypical antipsychotics being used for this purpose. Haloperidol is associated with extrapyramidal symptoms (which can be controlled by co-administration of promethazine) and may control agitation without inducing sedation, while benzodiazepines have a more pronounced sedating activity. The atypical antipsychotics aripiprazole and ziprasidone are better tolerated, while olanzapine is also a powerful sedative. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of different treatment options have been conducted but they are extremely heterogenous and most have numerous methodological flaws, leading to a poor overall quality of evidence upon which guidelines for the appropriate treatment could be based. The combination of haloperidol and promethazine, which combines the sedative properties of the antihistamine with the more selective calming action of haloperidol (with a reduced risk of extrapyramidal effects compared to haloperidol alone because of the anticholinergic properties of promethazine) may be the best choice based on empirical evidence.
PubMed: 31890361
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6152 -
Biofouling Jan 2017Efflux pumps are important defense mechanisms against antimicrobial drugs and maintenance of Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilms. This study evaluated the effect of the...
Efflux pumps are important defense mechanisms against antimicrobial drugs and maintenance of Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilms. This study evaluated the effect of the efflux pump inhibitor promethazine on the structure and antimicrobial susceptibility of B. pseudomallei biofilms. Susceptibility of planktonic cells and biofilms to promethazine alone and combined with antimicrobials was assessed by the broth microdilution test and biofilm metabolic activity was determined with resazurin. The effect of promethazine on 48 h-grown biofilms was also evaluated through confocal and electronic microscopy. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of promethazine was 780 mg l, while the minimum biofilm elimination concentration (MBEC) was 780-3,120 mg l. Promethazine reduced the MIC values for erythromycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin and reduced the MBEC values for all tested drugs (p<0.05). Microscopic analyses demonstrated that promethazine altered the biofilm structure of B. pseudomallei, even at subinhibitory concentrations, possibly facilitating antibiotic penetration. Promethazine improves antibiotics efficacy against B. pseudomallei biofilms, by disrupting biofilm structure.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biofilms; Burkholderia pseudomallei; Drug Synergism; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Plankton; Promethazine
PubMed: 27936915
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2016.1262846 -
Medical Mycology Oct 2020Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii are fungal pathogens that affect the central nervous system, mainly in immunocompromised individuals. Due to the limited...
Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii are fungal pathogens that affect the central nervous system, mainly in immunocompromised individuals. Due to the limited pharmacological arsenal available for the treatment of cryptococcosis associated with cases of antifungal resistance of Cryptococcus spp. reported in some studies, the search for new compounds with antifungal potential becomes relevant. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory effect of phenothiazines (promethazine and chlorpromazine) on C. neoformans/C. gattii planktonic cells and biofilms. In vitro planktonic susceptibility testing was performed using the broth microdilution assay. The effect of phenothiazines was evaluated against biofilm formation and mature Cryptococcus biofilms. Biofilm morphology and ultrastructure were also evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Promethazine and chlorpromazine showed antifungal activity against planktonic cells, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 8-32 μg/ml and 4-16 μg/ml, respectively. As for biofilm formation, phenothiazines reduced biomass by 60% and metabolic activity by 90% at 64 μg/ml; while in mature biofilms, reductions of 85% and 90% in biomass and metabolic activity, respectively, were observed at 1024 μg/ml. Promethazine and chlorpromazine were also able to disrupt and fragment biofilms. In conclusion, promethazine and chlorpromazine have antifungal activity against planktonic cells and biofilms of Cryptococcus spp. These data show the potential of promethazine and chlorpromazine as antibiofilm drugs.
Topics: Antifungal Agents; Biofilms; Chlorpromazine; Cryptococcosis; Cryptococcus gattii; Cryptococcus neoformans; Drug Resistance, Fungal; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Plankton; Promethazine
PubMed: 32016364
DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myz140 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2016Hyperemesis gravidarum is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy affecting 0.3% to 1.0% of pregnancies, and is one of the most common indications for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Hyperemesis gravidarum is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy affecting 0.3% to 1.0% of pregnancies, and is one of the most common indications for hospitalization during pregnancy. While a previous Cochrane review examined interventions for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, there has not yet been a review examining the interventions for the more severe condition of hyperemesis gravidarum.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety, of all interventions for hyperemesis gravidarum in pregnancy up to 20 weeks' gestation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register and the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field's Trials Register (20 December 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials of any intervention for hyperemesis gravidarum. Quasi-randomized trials and trials using a cross-over design were not eligible for inclusion.We excluded trials on nausea and vomiting of pregnancy that were not specifically studying the more severe condition of hyperemesis gravidarum.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently reviewed the eligibility of trials, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. Data were checked for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-five trials (involving 2052 women) met the inclusion criteria but the majority of 18 different comparisons described in the review include data from single studies with small numbers of participants. The comparisons covered a range of interventions including acupressure/acupuncture, outpatient care, intravenous fluids, and various pharmaceutical interventions. The methodological quality of included studies was mixed. For selected important comparisons and outcomes, we graded the quality of the evidence and created 'Summary of findings' tables. For most outcomes the evidence was graded as low or very low quality mainly due to the imprecision of effect estimates. Comparisons included in the 'Summary of findings' tables are described below, the remaining comparisons are described in detail in the main text.No primary outcome data were available when acupuncture was compared with placebo, There was no clear evidence of differences between groups for anxiodepressive symptoms (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.40; one study, 36 women, very low-quality evidence), spontaneous abortion (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.03; one study, 57 women, low-quality evidence), preterm birth (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.26; one study, 36 women, low-quality evidence), or perinatal death (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.30; one study, 36 women, low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to identify clear differences between acupuncture and metoclopramide in a study with 81 participants regarding reduction/cessation in nausea or vomiting (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.49 and RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.48, respectively; very low-quality evidence).In a study with 92 participants, women taking vitamin B6 had a slightly longer hospital stay compared with placebo (mean difference (MD) 0.80 days, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.52, moderate-quality evidence). There was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a difference in other outcomes including mean number of episodes of emesis (MD 0.50, 95% CI -0.40 to 1.40, low-quality evidence) or side effects.A comparison between metoclopramide and ondansetron identified no clear difference in the severity of nausea or vomiting (MD 1.70, 95% CI -0.15 to 3.55, and MD -0.10, 95% CI -1.63 to 1.43; one study, 83 women, respectively, very low-quality evidence). However, more women taking metoclopramide complained of drowsiness and dry mouth (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.69, and RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.11, respectively; moderate-quality evidence). There were no clear differences between groups for other side effects.In a single study with 146 participants comparing metoclopramide with promethazine, more women taking promethazine reported drowsiness, dizziness, and dystonia (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87, RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.69, and RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.90, respectively, moderate-quality evidence). There were no clear differences between groups for other important outcomes including quality of life and other side effects.In a single trial with 30 women, those receiving ondansetron had no difference in duration of hospital admission compared to those receiving promethazine (MD 0.00, 95% CI -1.39 to 1.39, very low-quality evidence), although there was increased sedation with promethazine (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.94, low-quality evidence) .Regarding corticosteroids, in a study with 110 participants there was no difference in days of hospital admission compared to placebo (MD -0.30, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.10; very low-quality evidence), but there was a decreased readmission rate (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.94; four studies, 269 women). For other important outcomes including pregnancy complications, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth and congenital abnormalities, there was insufficient evidence to identify differences between groups (very low-quality evidence for all outcomes). In other single studies there were no clear differences between groups for preterm birth or side effects (very low-quality evidence).For hydrocortisone compared with metoclopramide, no data were available for primary outcomes and there was no difference in the readmission rate (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.28;one study, 40 women).In a study with 80 women, compared to promethazine, those receiving prednisolone had increased nausea at 48 hours (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.72; low-quality evidence), but not at 17 days (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.15, very low-quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the number of episodes of emesis or subjective improvement in nausea/vomiting. There was insufficient evidence to identify differences between groups for stillbirth and neonatal death and preterm birth.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of this review, there is little high-quality and consistent evidence supporting any one intervention, which should be taken into account when making management decisions. There was also very limited reporting on the economic impact of hyperemesis gravidarum and the impact that interventions may have.The limitations in interpreting the results of the included studies highlights the importance of consistency in the definition of hyperemesis gravidarum, the use of validated outcome measures, and the need for larger placebo-controlled trials.
Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antiemetics; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Metoclopramide; Ondansetron; Placebo Effect; Prednisolone; Pregnancy; Promethazine; Pyridoxine
PubMed: 27168518
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010607.pub2 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Drug-induced QT prolongation and (or) Torsade de Pointes (TdP) is a well-known serious adverse reaction (ADR) for some drugs, but the widely recognized comprehensive...
Drug-induced QT prolongation and (or) Torsade de Pointes (TdP) is a well-known serious adverse reaction (ADR) for some drugs, but the widely recognized comprehensive landscape of culprit-drug of QT prolongation and TdP is currently lacking. To identify the top drugs reported in association with QT prolongation and TdP and provide information for clinical practice. We reviewed the reports related to QT prolongation and TdP in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2022, and summarized a potential causative drug list accordingly. Based on this drug list, the most frequently reported causative drugs and drug classes of QT prolongation and TdP were counted, and the disproportionality analysis for all the drugs was conducted to in detect ADR signal. Furthermore, according to the positive-negative distribution of ADR signal, we integrated the risk characteristic of QT prolongation and TdP in different drugs and drug class. A total of 42,713 reports in FAERS database were considered to be associated with QT prolongation and TdP from 2004 to 2022, in which 1,088 drugs were reported as potential culprit-drugs, and the largest number of drugs belonged to antineoplastics. On the whole, furosemide was the most frequently reported drugs followed by acetylsalicylic acid, quetiapine, citalopram, metoprolol. In terms of drug classes, psycholeptics was the most frequently reported drug classes followed by psychoanaleptics, analgesics, beta blocking agents, drugs for acid related disorders. In disproportionality analysis, 612 drugs showed at least one positive ADR signals, while citalopram, ondansetron, escitalopram, loperamide, and promethazine were the drug with the maximum number of positive ADR signals. However, the positive-negative distribution of ADR signals between different drug classes showed great differences, representing the overall risk difference of different drug classes. Our study provided a real-world overview of QT prolongation and TdP to drugs, and the presentation of the potential culprit-drug list, the proportion of reports, the detection results of ADR signals, and the distribution characteristics of ADR signals may help understand the safety profile of drugs and optimize clinical practice.
PubMed: 38186652
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1259611 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Jan 2021
Review
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Gastroparesis; Humans; Metoclopramide; Nasal Sprays
PubMed: 33646999
DOI: No ID Found -
ACS Chemical Neuroscience Aug 2020Of the free-living amoebae (FLA) , , and spp. are known to cause encephalitis. Coined with the term "brain-eating amoebae" (BEA), infection of the central nervous...
Of the free-living amoebae (FLA) , , and spp. are known to cause encephalitis. Coined with the term "brain-eating amoebae" (BEA), infection of the central nervous system with FLA has a high mortality rate. A combination of diagnostic delay, lack of new drug development, and incomplete understanding of the dependencies of FLA have resulted in the failure of introducing safer and effective drugs. We inferred that being a shape-changing entity the FLA should have a dependency on calcium (Ca) ions that could be targeted to cripple the pathogenicity of the FLA. We used genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic information available on FLA in online databases to evidence the presence of various Caion influx regulating channels, reviewing adapter proteins at first and then targeting human-like voltage-gated Ca channels with nifedipine and verapamil that are used clinically for noninfectious diseases to see their effect in trophozoites of spp. in particular.
Topics: Amebiasis; Brain; Calcium; Central Nervous System; Delayed Diagnosis; Humans; Ions; Naegleria fowleri; Proteomics
PubMed: 31840980
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00635