-
The New England Journal of Medicine Feb 2024Retrospective data suggest that the incidence of parametrial infiltration is low in patients with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer, which raises questions regarding... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Retrospective data suggest that the incidence of parametrial infiltration is low in patients with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer, which raises questions regarding the need for radical hysterectomy in these patients. However, data from large, randomized trials comparing outcomes of radical and simple hysterectomy are lacking.
METHODS
We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing radical hysterectomy with simple hysterectomy including lymph-node assessment in patients with low-risk cervical cancer (lesions of ≤2 cm with limited stromal invasion). The primary outcome was cancer recurrence in the pelvic area (pelvic recurrence) at 3 years. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 4 percentage points.
RESULTS
Among 700 patients who underwent randomization (350 in each group), the majority had tumors that were stage IB according to the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria (91.7%), that had squamous-cell histologic features (61.7%), and that were grade 1 or 2 (59.3%). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the incidence of pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 2.17% in the radical hysterectomy group and 2.52% in the simple hysterectomy group (an absolute difference of 0.35 percentage points; 90% confidence interval, -1.62 to 2.32). Results were similar in a per-protocol analysis. The incidence of urinary incontinence was lower in the simple hysterectomy group than in the radical hysterectomy group within 4 weeks after surgery (2.4% vs. 5.5%; P = 0.048) and beyond 4 weeks (4.7% vs. 11.0%; P = 0.003). The incidence of urinary retention in the simple hysterectomy group was also lower than that in the radical hysterectomy group within 4 weeks after surgery (0.6% vs. 11.0%; P<0.001) and beyond 4 weeks (0.6% vs. 9.9%; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with low-risk cervical cancer, simple hysterectomy was not inferior to radical hysterectomy with respect to the 3-year incidence of pelvic recurrence and was associated with a lower risk of urinary incontinence or retention. (Funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01658930.).
Topics: Female; Humans; Canada; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Hysterectomy; Lymph Nodes; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Urinary Incontinence; Urinary Retention; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 38416430
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2308900 -
International Journal of Gynecological... Feb 2023The most common cancer in women worldwide is cervical cancer. For early-stage disease the standard treatment is radical hysterectomy. One of the main issues faced by... (Review)
Review
The most common cancer in women worldwide is cervical cancer. For early-stage disease the standard treatment is radical hysterectomy. One of the main issues faced by surgeons performing a radical hysterectomy is the wide variation in the terminology used to define the procedure and the nomenclature used to describe the anatomical spaces critical to the success of the surgery. The aim of this review was to synthesize currently used anatomical landmarks with relation to surgical avascular spaces for the performance of radical hysterectomy.A computer-based comprehensive review of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and SciSearch databases, as well as National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines, was performed. With all relevant data collected, and previous anatomical studies during surgeries and on cadavers performed by authors, a manuscript of the definition of avascular spaces, methods of dissection, and anatomical limits was prepared.Avascular pelvic spaces developed during radical hysterectomy, such as the paravesical, pararectal, ureter tunnel, and paravaginal, were considered and included in the manuscript. A clear definition of avascular spaces may aid a better understanding of the anatomical aspects of the radical hysterectomy. It could improve surgeon knowledge of the structures that need to be preserved and those that need to be resected during a radical hysterectomy. Additionally, the detailed exposure of anatomical boundaries will facilitate the appropriate tailored radicality depending on the risk factors of the disease. Moreover, knowledge of these spaces could make pelvic surgery safer and easier for other types of gynecological and non-gynecological procedures.
Topics: Female; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Hysterectomy; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Pelvis; Dissection
PubMed: 36581489
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004071 -
The Indian Journal of Medical Research Aug 2021Surgery plays an important role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using open... (Review)
Review
Surgery plays an important role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using open route is the standard surgical procedure. There is level I evidence against the use of laparoscopic/robotic approach for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Emerging data support the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in carefully selected patients with early-stage disease. In locally advanced cervical cancer patients, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery yields inferior disease-free survival compared to definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, definitive concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced disease. Fertility preserving surgery is feasible in highly selected young patients. Role of less-radical surgical procedures in patients' with low-stage disease with good prognostic factors is under evaluation.
Topics: Consensus; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Lymph Node Excision; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 34854431
DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4240_20 -
International Journal of Environmental... Sep 2022Radical hysterectomy and plus pelvic node dissection are the primary methods of treatment for patients with early stage cervical cancer. During the last decade, growing... (Review)
Review
Radical hysterectomy and plus pelvic node dissection are the primary methods of treatment for patients with early stage cervical cancer. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the adoption of a minimally invasive approach. Retrospective data suggested that minimally invasive surgery improves perioperative outcomes, without neglecting long-term oncologic outcomes. In 2018, the guidelines from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology stated that a "minimally invasive approach is favored" in comparison with open surgery. However, the phase III, randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial questioned the safety of the minimally invasive approach. The LACC trial highlighted that the execution of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy correlates with an increased risk of recurrence and death. After its publication, other retrospective studies investigated this issue, with differing results. Recent evidence suggested that robotic-assisted surgery is not associated with an increased risk of worse oncologic outcomes. The phase III randomized Robotic-assisted Approach to Cervical Cancer (RACC) and the Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy Surgery in Cervix Cancer (ROCC) trials will clarify the pros and cons of performing a robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (with tumor containment before colpotomy) in early stage cervical cancer.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Neoplasm Staging; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 36141917
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811641 -
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Apr 2017The complex pathogenesis and variable presentation of adenomyosis make it one of the most difficult of the FIGO PALM-COIEN abnormal uterine bleeding group to diagnose... (Review)
Review
The complex pathogenesis and variable presentation of adenomyosis make it one of the most difficult of the FIGO PALM-COIEN abnormal uterine bleeding group to diagnose and treat. Basic clinical parameters such as prevalence are difficult to accurately assess because histological confirmation is usually employed; however, because of the access to and accuracy and utilization of transvaginal ultrasound and other advanced imaging techniques such as MRI, noninvasive diagnosis is recognized to be highly accurate. The clinical symptoms of pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, and subfertility are the primary presentations of adenomyosis with increasing data supporting a substantial role of this disease in reducing fecundity and interfering with assisted reproductive interventions. Treatments have been aimed at managing symptoms and improving fertility options. Management by hysterectomy is not always desired by women, and with many women having children in their fourth and even fifth decades, it is often not reasonable to consider this radical option.
Topics: Adenomyosis; Adult; Female; Fertility; Humans; Hysterectomy; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Parity; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography; Uterine Hemorrhage
PubMed: 27810281
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.006 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Oct 2017One of the most important principles in modern cervical cancer surgery is the concept of tailoring surgical radicality. In practice, this means abandoning the...
BACKGROUND
One of the most important principles in modern cervical cancer surgery is the concept of tailoring surgical radicality. In practice, this means abandoning the "one-fits-all" concept in favor of tailored operations. The term "radical hysterectomy" is used to describe many different procedures, each with a different degree of radicality. Anatomic structures are subjected to artificial dissection artifacts, as well as different interpretations and nomenclatures. This study aimed to refine and standardize the principles and descriptions of the different classes of radical hysterectomy as defined in the Querleu-Morrow classification and to propose its universal applicability.
METHODS
All three authors independently examined the current literature and undertook a critical assessment of the original classification. Images and pathologic slides demonstrating different types of radical hysterectomy were examined to document a consensual vision of the anatomy. The Cibula 3-D concept also was included in this update.
RESULTS
The Querleu-Morrow classification is based on the lateral extent of resection. Four types of radical hysterectomy are described, including a limited number of subtypes when necessary. Two major objectives remain constant: excision of central tumor with clear margins and removal of any potential sites of nodal metastasis.
CONCLUSION
Studies evaluating radicality in the surgical management of cervical cancer should be based on precise, universally accepted descriptions. The authors' updated classification presents standardized, universally applicable descriptions of different types of hysterectomies performed worldwide, categorized according to degree of radicality, independently of theoretical considerations.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Lymph Node Excision; Prognosis; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 28785898
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6031-z -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2022hemostasis hysterectomy is the radical treatment for postpartum hemorrhage. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors, indications and complications of...
INTRODUCTION
hemostasis hysterectomy is the radical treatment for postpartum hemorrhage. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors, indications and complications of hemostasis hysterectomy and to determine factors influencing the types of approaches to hysterectomy.
METHODS
we conducted a monocentric descriptive and analytical retrospective study in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Regional Hospital of Ben Arous from 2003 to 2019. Patients were classified according to the type of surgical treatment they received: total or subtotal hysterectomy.
RESULTS
seventy patients were included in the study. The rate of hemostasis hysterectomy was 1.3%. The average age of patients was 34.5 years (±5.1). Indications for hemostasis hysterectomy were dominated by placenta accreta (39% of cases; n=27), uterine inertia (34% of cases; n=24) and uterine rupture (16% of cases; n=11). Perioperative morbidity rate was 34 % (n=24). The most frequent complications were hemorrhagic shock (17%; n=12), disseminated intravascular coagulation (6%; n=4) and bladder lesions (6%; n=4). We reported six cases of maternal death, reflecting a rate of 8% (n=6). Subtotal hysterectomy was performed in 79% of patients (n=55) and 21% of women (n=15) underwent total hysterectomy. Placenta accreta was significantly associated with total hysterectomy group (aOR: 6.93, 95% CI: 1.07-44,80, p=0.042) and the average operation time was significantly shorter in subtotal hysterectomy group (aOR: 1.023; 95% CI: 1.009-1.03, p= 0.01).
CONCLUSION
hysterectomy is essential in certain patients with severe postpartum hemorrhage. Placenta accreta is the main indication for hysterectomy. Total hysterectomy is not associated with an increased risk of complications compared to subtotal hysterectomy.
Topics: Adult; Female; Gynecology; Hemostasis; Hospitals; Humans; Hysterectomy; Placenta Accreta; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Tunisia
PubMed: 36187026
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.172.34423 -
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Sep 2021Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) is the oldest fertility-sparing procedure for stage 1b cervical cancer. For that reason, there are more published data for RVT than... (Review)
Review
Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) is the oldest fertility-sparing procedure for stage 1b cervical cancer. For that reason, there are more published data for RVT than for all the other radical trachelectomy approaches. However, there are no randomised controlled studies between RVT and radical hysterectomy proving the comparability of survival and no randomised controlled studies comparing a vaginal approach with open, standard laparoscopy and robotic approaches. This article intends to describe the case selection, the procedure and outcomes for RVT.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Trachelectomy; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vagina
PubMed: 34099413
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.04.005 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Mar 2020Standard treatment of early cervical cancer involves a radical hysterectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The existing evidence on the incidence of adverse... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Standard treatment of early cervical cancer involves a radical hysterectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The existing evidence on the incidence of adverse events after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer is either nonrandomized or retrospective.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of adverse events after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer.
STUDY DESIGN
The Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the Cervix trial was a multinational, randomized noninferiority trial that was conducted between 2008 and 2017, in which surgeons from 33 tertiary gynecologic cancer centers in 24 countries randomly assigned 631 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion to IB1 cervical cancer to undergo minimally invasive (n = 319) or open radical hysterectomy (n = 312). The Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the Cervix trial was suspended for enrolment in September 2017 because of an increased risk of recurrence and death in the minimally invasive surgery group. Here we report on a secondary outcome measure: the incidence of intra- and postoperative adverse events within 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS
Of 631 randomly assigned patients, 536 (85%; mean age, 46.0 years) met inclusion criteria for this analysis; 279 (52%) underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy, and 257 (48%) underwent open radical hysterectomy. Of those, 300 (56%), 91 (16.9%), and 69 (12.8%) experienced at least 1 grade ≥2 or ≥3 or a serious adverse event, respectively. The incidence of intraoperative grade ≥2 adverse events was 12% (34/279 patients) in the minimally invasive group vs 10% (26/257) in the open group (difference, 2.1%; 95% confidence interval, -3.3 to 7.4%; P=.45). The overall incidence of postoperative grade ≥2 adverse events was 54% (152/279 patients) in the minimally invasive group vs 48% (124/257) in the open group (difference, 6.2%; 95% confidence interval, -2.2 to 14.7%; P=.14).
CONCLUSION
For early cervical cancer, the use of minimally invasive compared with open radical hysterectomy resulted in a similar overall incidence of intraoperative or postoperative adverse events.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Blood Loss, Surgical; Blood Transfusion; Body Mass Index; Carcinoma, Adenosquamous; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Conversion to Open Surgery; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Intraoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Lymph Node Excision; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 31586602
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.036 -
Current Urology Reports Jan 2017Hysterectomy is an important surgical procedure in the care of women with pelvic organ prolapse or lower urinary tract malignancy. Therefore, hysterectomy can be a... (Review)
Review
Hysterectomy is an important surgical procedure in the care of women with pelvic organ prolapse or lower urinary tract malignancy. Therefore, hysterectomy can be a commonly performed surgical procedure in the urologist's practice. Obtaining a thorough gynecologic history is necessary prior to performing a hysterectomy and prolapse repair. Specifically, reviewing prior cervical cancer screening, risk factors for uterine malignancy, and the role of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy are important steps of the reconstructive surgical planning process. In women with lower urinary tract malignancy, hysterectomy is included in the classic technique of radical cystectomy. However, preliminary research has begun to question whether or not the uterus can be spared in some cases. In the article, we review the literature on hysterectomy as it pertains to the field of urology.
Topics: Female; Fibrosis; Humans; Hysterectomy; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Risk Factors; Urologic Diseases; Uterine Diseases
PubMed: 28133712
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0654-2