-
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Jul 2016Antidepressants are commonly prescribed medications in the United States, and there is increasing interest in individualizing treatment selection for more than 20 US... (Review)
Review
Antidepressants are commonly prescribed medications in the United States, and there is increasing interest in individualizing treatment selection for more than 20 US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for major depressive disorder. Providing greater precision to pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for individual patients beyond the large-scale clinical trials evidence base can potentially reduce adverse effect toxicity profiles and increase response rates and overall effectiveness. It is increasingly recognized that genetic variation may contribute to this differential risk to benefit ratio and thus provides a unique opportunity to develop pharmacogenetic guidelines for psychiatry. Key studies and concepts that review the rationale for cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) and cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genetic testing can be delineated by serum levels, adverse events, and clinical outcome measures (eg, antidepressant response). In this article, we report the evidence that contributed to the implementation of pharmacokinetic pharmacogenetic guidelines for antidepressants primarily metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP2C19.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Depressive Disorder, Major; Fluoxetine; Humans; Paroxetine; Pharmacogenetics; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Precision Medicine; Prescription Drugs; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 27289413
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.023 -
Human Psychopharmacology Jul 2015Venlafaxine is one of the most frequently prescribed antidepressants worldwide, despite its toxicity risk in overdose. Furthermore, the molecule has been recently... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Venlafaxine is one of the most frequently prescribed antidepressants worldwide, despite its toxicity risk in overdose. Furthermore, the molecule has been recently identified at the EU-wide level as one of the novel psychoactive substances. This paper aims at investigating the potential of misuse, taking into account both the existing literature and the analysis of the misusers' experiences as described in venlafaxine misuse web reports.
METHODS
A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Medline. Posts/threads relating to venlafaxine misuse issues were identified through Google® and Yahoo® English-language searches. Resulting websites' data were then qualitatively assessed, and information was collected on a range of issues, including dosage, drug intake modalities, untoward drug effects, and association with other recreational drugs.
RESULTS
A few literature case reports focusing on venlafaxine as a misusing drug were here identified. The molecule was here typically ingested or snorted at dosages up to 10-15 times higher than those clinically advised, obtaining MDMA/amphetamine-like stimulant and psychedelic effects. Polydrug misuse was commonly reported. Venlafaxine appeared to be widely available online for sale.
CONCLUSIONS
Physicians should carefully evaluate patients for history of drug dependence and observe them for signs of venlafaxine misuse.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Databases, Bibliographic; Drug Overdose; Humans; Internet; Prescription Drug Misuse; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 26216559
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2476 -
Journal of Affective Disorders May 2016Vortioxetine is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder and differs from other antidepressants in terms of its pharmacodynamic profile. Given the limited... (Review)
Review
Vortioxetine for major depressive disorder: An indirect comparison with duloxetine, escitalopram, levomilnacipran, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vilazodone, using number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.
BACKGROUND
Vortioxetine is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder and differs from other antidepressants in terms of its pharmacodynamic profile. Given the limited number of head-to-head studies comparing vortioxetine with other antidepressants, indirect comparisons using effect sizes observed in other trials can be helpful to discern potential differences in clinical outcomes.
METHODS
Data sources were the clinical trial reports for the pivotal short-term double-blind trials for vortioxetine and from publicly available sources for the pivotal short-term double-blind trials for two commonly used generic serotonin specific reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (sertraline, escitalopram), two commonly used generic serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (venlafaxine, duloxetine), and two recently introduced branded antidepressants (vilazodone, levomilnacipran). Response was the efficacy outcome of interest, defined as a≥50% reduction from baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. The tolerability outcome of interest was discontinuation because of an adverse event. Number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) for these outcomes vs. placebo were calculated, as well as likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH) to contrast efficacy vs. tolerability.
RESULTS
The analysis included 8 studies for duloxetine, 3 studies for escitalopram, 5 studies for levomilnacipran, 1 study for sertraline, 4 studies for venlafaxine, 2 studies for vilazodone, and 11 studies for vortioxetine. NNTs for response vs. placebo were 6 (95% CI 5-8), 7 (5-11), 10 (8-16), 6 (4-13), 6 (5-9), 8 (6-16), and 9 (7-11), respectively. NNHs for discontinuation because of an adverse event vs. placebo were 25 (17-51), 31 (19-92), 19 (14-27), 7 (5-12), 8 (7-11), 27 (15-104), and 43 (28-91), respectively. LHH values contrasting response vs. discontinuation because of an adverse event were 4.3, 4.6, 1.8, 1.2, 1.4, 3.3, and 5.1 respectively.
LIMITATIONS
Subjects were all participants in carefully designed and executed clinical trials and may not necessarily reflect patients in clinical settings who may have complex psychiatric and non-psychiatric comorbidities. The measured outcomes come from different studies and thus comparisons are indirect.
CONCLUSIONS
Vortioxetine demonstrates similar efficacy to that observed for duloxetine, escitalopram, levomilnacipran, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vilazodone, however overall tolerability as measured by discontinuation because of an adverse event differs. Vortioxetine is 5.1 times more likely to be associated with response than discontinuation because of an adverse event when compared to placebo.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline; Treatment Outcome; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Vilazodone Hydrochloride
PubMed: 26938965
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.042 -
Chemosphere Aug 2021Venlafaxine, a representative antidepressant, has been detected frequently in aquatic environments. The treatment of venlafaxine by free chlorine (NaOCl) and chlorine...
Venlafaxine, a representative antidepressant, has been detected frequently in aquatic environments. The treatment of venlafaxine by free chlorine (NaOCl) and chlorine dioxide (ClO) was investigated in this study. The effects of operational variables and the water matrix on venlafaxine degradation were evaluated. The transformation pathways of venlafaxine were also studied. The results indicated that venlafaxine was removed efficiently during disinfection processes, especially when reacted with ClO. A higher dosage of disinfectant and mildly alkaline conditions (pH 9) enhanced the degradation of venlafaxine. The reactions were impacted when the tests were conducted in real water matrices, especially in secondary effluent. The presence of chloride and low concentrations of fulvic acid enhanced venlafaxine decomposition. The presence of Br also accelerated the reaction between venlafaxine and NaOCl. However, NO inhibited venlafaxine removal in both disinfection processes. Six intermediates were identified during venlafaxine degradation by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and the main reactions included dehydration and demethylation.
Topics: Chlorides; Chlorine; Chlorine Compounds; Disinfection; Oxides; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Water Purification
PubMed: 33714880
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130147 -
Journal of Clinical PsychopharmacologySince insomnia and depression are interrelated, improved sleep early in antidepressant pharmacotherapy may predict a positive treatment outcome. We investigated whether... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Since insomnia and depression are interrelated, improved sleep early in antidepressant pharmacotherapy may predict a positive treatment outcome. We investigated whether early insomnia improvement (EII) predicted treatment outcome in psychotic depression (PD) and examined if there was an interaction effect between EII and treatment type to assess if findings were treatment-specific.
METHODS
This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing 7 weeks treatment with the antidepressants venlafaxine, imipramine and venlafaxine plus the antipsychotic quetiapine in PD ( n = 114). Early insomnia improvement, defined as ≥20% reduced insomnia after 2 weeks, was assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17). Associations between EII and treatment outcome were examined using logistic regressions. Subsequently, we added interaction terms between EII and treatment type to assess interaction effects. The predictive value of EII was compared with early response on overall depression (≥20% reduced HAM-D-17 score after 2 weeks).
RESULTS
EII was associated with response (odds ratio [OR], 7.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-23.4; P = <0.001), remission of depression (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.6-22.3; P = 0.009), and remission of psychosis (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.6-10.9; P = 0.004). We found no interaction effects between EII and treatment type on depression outcome. Early insomnia improvement and early response on overall depression had a comparable predictive ability for treatment outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Early insomnia improvement was associated with a positive outcome in pharmacotherapy of PD, regardless of the medication type. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings and to examine the generalizability of EII as predictor in treatment of depression.
Topics: Humans; Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major; Psychotic Disorders; Sleep; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 37930199
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001756 -
Neuropharmacology Feb 2024The etiology of idiopathic pain conditions, such as Provoked vulvodynia (PV), is multifactorial. The efficiency of venlafaxine, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake...
The etiology of idiopathic pain conditions, such as Provoked vulvodynia (PV), is multifactorial. The efficiency of venlafaxine, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs) in modulating vulvar pain led to the hypothesis that PV might involve central mechanisms. Here, we investigate whether vulvar pain is associated with gene-expression changes in mood, stress and pain systems, including amygdala (Amg), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and periaqueductal gray matter (PAG). Additionally, we examined the analgesic and anxiolytic effects of venlafaxine. We found that the development of chronic vulvar pain in an animal model of PV is associated by overexpression of genes related to neuronal-activity and neuroinflammation in the Amg, mPFC, and PAG. Additionally, changes in the expression of GABA and serotonin synthesis, and reuptake were noted in the Amg and mPFC. Unsurprisingly, anxiety-like behavior and emotional-disorder were observed in rats with chronic vulvar pain. Nevertheless, treatment with venlafaxine (37.5 mg/kg) for one month significantly improves the vulvar hypersensitivity, as well as reduces the anxiety level. More critically, the long-term gene expression adaptation in serotonin receptor and synthesis, GABA synthesis, neuroplasticity, and neuroinflammation in the Amg, mPFC, and PAG, were modulated by venlafaxine in rats with vulvar pain. Our findings suggest that vulvar hypersensitivity induced by inflammation might associated with gene expression changes in brain areas that are involved in mood, stress and pain regulation. These changes probably play a role in central sensitization, and anxiety. Strikingly, enhancing the activity of serotonin and noradrenaline via venlafaxine treatment in rats with vulvar pain induces analgesic and anxiolytic effects.
Topics: Humans; Female; Rats; Animals; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Vulvodynia; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Serotonin; Neuroinflammatory Diseases; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Norepinephrine; Chronic Pain; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Analgesics
PubMed: 37984764
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109788 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2015Neuropathic pain, which is caused by nerve damage, is increasing in prevalence worldwide. This may reflect improved diagnosis, or it may be due to increased incidence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Neuropathic pain, which is caused by nerve damage, is increasing in prevalence worldwide. This may reflect improved diagnosis, or it may be due to increased incidence of diabetes-associated neuropathy, linked to increasing levels of obesity. Other types of neuropathic pain include post-herpetic neuralgia, trigeminal neuralgia, and neuralgia caused by chemotherapy. Antidepressant drugs are sometimes used to treat neuropathic pain; however, their analgesic efficacy is unclear. A previous Cochrane review that included all antidepressants for neuropathic pain is being replaced by new reviews of individual drugs examining chronic neuropathic pain in the first instance. Venlafaxine is a reasonably well-tolerated antidepressant and is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and weak noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. Although not licensed for the treatment of chronic or neuropathic pain in most countries, it is sometimes used for this indication.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the analgesic efficacy of, and the adverse effects associated with the clinical use of, venlafaxine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via The Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid up to 14 August 2014. We reviewed the bibliographies of any randomised trials identified and review articles, contacted authors of one excluded study and searched www.clinicaltrials.gov to identify additional published or unpublished data. We also searched the meta-Register of controlled trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com/mrct) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (apps.who.int/trialsearch/) for ongoing trials but did not find any relevant trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised, double-blind studies of at least two weeks' duration comparing venlafaxine with either placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain in adults. All participants were aged 18 years or over and all included studies had at least 10 participants per treatment arm. We only included studies with full journal publication.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently extracted data using a standard form and assessed study quality. We intend to analyse data in three tiers of evidence as described by Hearn 2014, but did not find any first-tier evidence (ie evidence meeting current best standards, with minimal risk of bias) or second-tier evidence, that was considered at some risk of bias but with adequate participant numbers (at least 200 in the comparison). Third-tier evidence is that arising from studies with small numbers of participants; studies of short duration, studies that are likely to be of limited clinical utility due to other limitations, including selection bias and attrition bias; or a combination of these.
MAIN RESULTS
We found six randomised, double-blind trials of at least two weeks' duration eligible for inclusion. These trials included 460 participants with neuropathic pain, with most participants having painful diabetic neuropathy. Four studies were of cross-over design and two were parallel trials. Only one trial was both parallel design and placebo-controlled. Mean age of participants ranged from 48 to 59 years. In three studies (Forssell 2004, Jia 2006 and Tasmuth 2002), only mean data were reported. Comparators included placebo, imipramine, and carbamazepine and duration of treatment ranged from two to eight weeks. The risk of bias was considerable overall in the review, especially due to the small size of most studies and due to attrition bias. Four of the six studies reported some positive benefit for venlafaxine. In the largest study by Rowbotham, 2004, 56% of participants receiving venlafaxine 150 to 225 mg achieved at least a 50% reduction in pain intensity versus 34% of participants in the placebo group and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome was 4.5. However, this study was subject to significant selection bias. Known adverse effects of venlafaxine, including somnolence, dizziness, and mild gastrointestinal problems, were reported in all studies but were not particularly problematic and, overall, adverse effects were equally prominent in placebo or other active comparator groups.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found little compelling evidence to support the use of venlafaxine in neuropathic pain. While there was some third-tier evidence of benefit, this arose from studies that had methodological limitations and considerable risk of bias. Placebo effects were notably strong in several studies. Given that effective drug treatments for neuropathic pain are in current use, there is no evidence to revise prescribing guidelines to promote the use of venlafaxine in neuropathic pain. Although venlafaxine was generally reasonably well tolerated, there was some evidence that it can precipitate fatigue, somnolence, nausea, and dizziness in a minority of people.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Carbamazepine; Humans; Imipramine; Middle Aged; Neuralgia; Off-Label Use; Patient Dropouts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 26298465
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011091.pub2 -
The International Journal of... Apr 2022Venlafaxine is a dual serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The specific dose at which it begins to efficiently engage the norepinephrine transporter...
BACKGROUND
Venlafaxine is a dual serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The specific dose at which it begins to efficiently engage the norepinephrine transporter (NET) remained to be determined. Paroxetine is generally considered as a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor but exhibits some affinity for NET. Atomoxetine is a NET inhibitor but also has some affinity for the 5-HT reuptake transporter (SERT).
METHODS
This study examined the effects of forced titration of venlafaxine from 75 to 300 mg/d, paroxetine from 20 to 50 mg/d, or atomoxetine from 25 to 80 mg/d in 32 patients with major depressive disorder. Inhibition of SERT was estimated using the depletion of whole-blood 5-HT. Inhibition of NET was assessed using the attenuation of the systolic blood pressure produced by i.v. injections of tyramine.
RESULTS
All 3 medications significantly reduced 5-HT levels at the initiating regimens: venlafaxine and paroxetine by approximately 60% and atomoxetine by 16%. The 3 subsequent regimens of venlafaxine and paroxetine reduced 5-HT levels by over 90%, but the highest dose of atomoxetine only reached a 40% inhibition. Atomoxetine dose dependently inhibited the tyramine pressor response from the lowest dose, venlafaxine from 225 mg/d, and paroxetine left it unaltered throughout.
CONCLUSION
These results confirm that venlafaxine and paroxetine are potent SERT inhibitors over their usual therapeutic range but that venlafaxine starts inhibiting NET only at 225 mg/d, whereas paroxetine remains selective for SERT up to 50 mg/d. Atomoxetine dose dependently inhibits NET from a low dose but does not inhibit SERT to a clinically relevant degree.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder, Major; Humans; Norepinephrine; Norepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; Paroxetine; Serotonin; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Tyramine; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 34958348
DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab086 -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2020Widespread presence of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites in the environment of industrialized countries is an emerging global concern. Potential contamination of the...
Widespread presence of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites in the environment of industrialized countries is an emerging global concern. Potential contamination of the soil and water by such pharmacologically active substances poses serious ecotoxicological implications. Several studies assessing the long-term ecological risks of pharmaceutical contaminants mainly focus on the risk assessment of the parent drug, while the potential contributions of their metabolites is often neglected. Presence of selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine, an antidepressant drug, and its metabolites is a matter of serious concern for aquatic systems, since they are difficult to remove by traditional wastewater treatment processes. The concentration of VEN present in water is reportedly one of the highest among pharmaceuticals; however, the long-term effects of its metabolites have not yet been systematically studied. Given the consideration to complex and time-consuming effluent treatment, and realizing the importance of levels of venlafaxine and its metabolites, a simple and accurate analytical method for quick determination is needed. We designed a selective colorimetric method by using oxidative coupling of drug molecules with 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone hydrochloride (MBTH) reagent, to quantify the presence of venlafaxine and its metabolites in aquatic samples, with special emphasis on effluent. The method was validated for selectivity, specificity and robustness as per the ICH Q2 guidelines to assess its suitability in pharmaceutical samples, as well. Highly sensitive and green economical analytical method was successfully established for estimation of venlafaxine and its metabolites in aquatic samples. The method was quick, as it involved minimum processing steps. The method was accurate and linear in the range of 0.5 to 80 ppm and could successfully detect lowest concentration of 1.3 ppm, thus qualifying its applicability for the desired purpose to check the presence of trace levels of VEN or its metabolites in aquatic samples or in pharmaceutical formulations.
Topics: Environmental Monitoring; Humans; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Water Purification
PubMed: 33086601
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204793 -
Clinical Therapeutics Jun 2017The prevalence of neuropathic pain is high in the general population, and high priority is given to the management of this pain condition. The treatment of neuropathic... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The prevalence of neuropathic pain is high in the general population, and high priority is given to the management of this pain condition. The treatment of neuropathic pain remains challenging, despite the publication of national and international recommendations. The purpose of this narrative review of venlafaxine (VLX) is to provide a better knowledge of the pharmacology of this drug and a clearer view of its efficacy and tolerability in neuropathic pain.
METHODS
Two independent reviewers searched PubMed with the following search terms: serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors OR VLX hydrochloride AND pain. The reviewers included all clinical studies that investigated VLX in neuropathic pain conditions and excluded animal studies, studies on fibromyalgia, studies that focused on the prevention of neuropathic pain, case reports, and studies that did not clearly describe neuropathic pain in the included patients. We describe the 13 studies that we analyzed.
FINDINGS
Eleven were randomized clinical trials, and the comparator was placebo in 8 studies. Nine studies reported that VLX was effective against neuropathic pain. However, among the trials, only one against placebo included a large number of patients with >200 participants and one against prégabaline and carbamazepine had >200 patients. Most of the adverse events reported in the selected studies were consistent with known adverse events of VLX, and most were mild to moderate. However, most studies were of very short duration.
IMPLICATIONS
Most of the clinical studies found that VLX was effective and well tolerated. However, given the limited number of study and the limitations of all these studies, further large clinical trials are needed. Currently, considering the limited therapeutic options for treating neuropathic pain and the highly variable nature of responses to all drugs, VLX has a place as a treatment option for neuropathic pain.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Humans; Neuralgia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 28554532
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.347